Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.04
    0.043658122 = product of:
      0.109145306 = sum of:
        0.09496609 = weight(_text_:relation in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09496609 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.46247426 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.014179217 = product of:
          0.04253765 = sum of:
            0.04253765 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04253765 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Kokabi, M.: Is the future of MARC assured? (1996) 0.02
    0.01899322 = product of:
      0.09496609 = sum of:
        0.09496609 = weight(_text_:relation in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09496609 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.46247426 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    MARC is now more than 20 years old. It has been, and still is, criticized from different point of view. Reviews some of the positive and negative opinions on MARC, as expressed by different sectors of the profession, and studies the future of MARC in relation to technological innovations. Concludes that MARC remains a valuable means of communicating bibliographical information
  3. Kokabi, M.: Is the future of MARC assured? (1996) 0.02
    0.01899322 = product of:
      0.09496609 = sum of:
        0.09496609 = weight(_text_:relation in 6724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09496609 = score(doc=6724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.46247426 = fieldWeight in 6724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6724)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The MARC machine readable catalogue is now more than 20 years old. It has been, and still is, criticized from different points of view. Reviews some positive and negative opinions on MARC as expressed by different sectors of the profession, and considers its future in relation to technological innovations. MARC remains a valuable means of communicating bibliographical information
  4. Beaudiquez, M.: ¬L'¬avenir des formats de communication (1996) 0.01
    0.014244914 = product of:
      0.07122457 = sum of:
        0.07122457 = weight(_text_:relation in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07122457 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.3468557 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last decade, the gap between North and South in relation to formats has increasingly limited development of international programmes such as UBC and UAP. At present the need to review formats in the light of network developments such as the Internet is urgent. Presentations covered the Web, limitations of traditional formats eg. MARC, Internet formats eg. Z39.50 and SGML, and multimedia formats, with examples of prototypes for converting traditional systems to international standards. The Internet has defined a new field of action for librarians. It is essential that developing countries share the experience of industrialised countries, with support from governments and collaboration from international organisations, in ensuring harmonious progress to universal compatibility
  5. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.014243572 = product of:
      0.07121786 = sum of:
        0.07121786 = product of:
          0.10682678 = sum of:
            0.05365472 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05365472 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
            0.053172063 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053172063 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  6. Block, B.; Hengel, C.; Heuvelmann, R.; Katz, C.; Rusch, B.; Schmidgall, K.; Sigrist, B.: Maschinelles Austauschformat für Bibliotheken und die Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : Oder: Wieviel FRBR verträgt MAB? (2005) 0.01
    0.012336457 = product of:
      0.061682284 = sum of:
        0.061682284 = weight(_text_:relation in 467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061682284 = score(doc=467,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.30038583 = fieldWeight in 467, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=467)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Zehn Entitäten werden drei Gruppen zugeordnet. Die Entitäten der ersten Gruppe stehen unter der Überschrift Produkte intellektueller und/oder künstlerischer Arbeit, Gruppe zwei für die Produktverantwortlichen und die letzte Gruppe für die Produktinhalte. Wichtig für das Verständnis ist die Unterscheidung zwischen den vier Entitäten der ersten Gruppe: Work, Expression, Manifestation, Item. Die abstrakte Einheit Work drückt sich aus in einer Expression, die ihre konkrete, physische Erscheinung in einer oder mehreren Manifestationen findet, von der wiederum zahlreiche Items existieren (können). Frau Tillett nennt zur Illustration ein Beispiel: Von einem Roman (Work) existieren verschiedene Übersetzungen (Expression) als Papierausgabe oder Hörbuch (Manifestation), die in zahlreichen Exemplaren (Item) im Besitz einer Bibliothek sind. Diese Begriffe haben weder in der Terminologie der AACR noch in der der RAK genaue Entsprechungen. Entsprechend verhält es sich mit den Felddefinitionen auf der Formatebene in MAB und MARC 21. Zwei weitere Gruppen von Entitäten spielen im Kontext bibliographischer Veröffentlichungen eine Rolle: Zum einen sind dies Personen (Person) und Körperschaften (Corporate Body): Gruppe-2-Entitäten. Sie sind die Akteure, die ein künstlerisches Werk - bestehend aus Work, Expression, Manifestation, Item - gestalten: es schaffen, dazu beitragen oder daran beteiligt sind. Zum anderen sind dies Begriffe (Concept), Gegenstände (Object), Ereignisse (Event) und Orte (Place): die Gruppe-3-Entitäten. Damit sind alle Einheiten gemeint, die in Werken als deren Gegenstand behandelt werden. Da auch die Entitäten der Gruppen 1 und 2 Gegenstand einer Veröffentlichung sein können, sind sie gleichzeitig auch der Gruppe 3 zuzurechnen. Jede Einheit charakterisiert sich durch Eigenschaften, die mit Hilfe von Attributen beschrieben werden können. Im MAB-Format finden sich diese Attribute in Feldern wieder. Das Verhältnis zwischen den Entitäten ist in dem Modell durch Relationen beschrieben. Für die Entitäten der ersten Gruppe handelt es sich um immanente Relationen (z.B. Relation "is realized by" Beispiel: Work "is realized by" Expression) und um Relationen, die bibliographische Entitäten untereinander in Beziehung setzen (z.B. Teil-Ganzes-Beziehungen). Für Personen und Körperschaften wird mit der Relation ihre Rolle definiert (Verfasser, Übersetzer usw.). Das gilt auch für die Entitäten der dritten Gruppe, deren Rolle mit der Relation "is subject of" beschrieben ist.
  7. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.01
    0.011394857 = product of:
      0.056974284 = sum of:
        0.056974284 = product of:
          0.08546142 = sum of:
            0.042923775 = weight(_text_:29 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042923775 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
            0.04253765 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04253765 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:29:32
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  8. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01
    0.011394857 = product of:
      0.056974284 = sum of:
        0.056974284 = product of:
          0.08546142 = sum of:
            0.042923775 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042923775 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
            0.04253765 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04253765 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  9. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code. Report from the 1st Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt 2003 (2004) 0.01
    0.0109274015 = product of:
      0.027318504 = sum of:
        0.023741523 = weight(_text_:relation in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023741523 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.115618564 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
        0.0035769814 = product of:
          0.010730944 = sum of:
            0.010730944 = weight(_text_:29 in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010730944 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2004 14:20:29
    Footnote
    Ton Heijligers reflects an the relation of the IME ICC effort to AACR and calls for an examination of the principles and function of the concept of main entry in his brief paper "Main entry into the future?" Ingrid Parent's article "From ISBD (S) to ISBD(CR): a voyage of discovery and alignment" is reprinted from Serials Librarian as it tells of the successful project not only to revise an ISBD, but also to harmonize three Codes for serials cataloguing: ISBD (CR), ISSN and AACR. Gunilla Jonsson's paper "The bibliographic unit in the digital context" is a perceptive discussion of level of granularity issues which must be addressed in deciding what to catalogue. Practical issues and user expectation are important considerations, whether the material to be catalogued is digital or analog. Ann Huthwaite's paper "Class of materials concept and GMDs" as well as Tom Delsey's ensuing comments, originated as Joint Steering Committee restricted papers in 2002. It is a great service to have them made widely available in this form as they raise fundamental issues and motivate work that has since taken place, leading to the current major round of revision to AACR. The GMD issue is about more than a list of terms and their placement in the cataloguing record, it is intertwined with consideration of whether the concept of classes of materials is helpful in organizing cataloguing rules, if so, which classes are needed, and how to allow for eventual integration of new types of materials. Useful in the Code comparison exercise is an extract of the section an access points from the draft of revised RAK (German cataloguing rules). Four short papers compare aspects of the Russian Cataloguing Rules with RAK and AACR: Tatiana Maskhoulia covers corporate body headings; Elena Zagorskaya outlines current development an serials and other continuing resources; Natalia N. Kasparova covers multilevel structures; Ljubov Ermakova and Tamara Bakhturina describe the uniform title and GMD provisions. The website includes one more item by Kasparova "Bibliographic record language in multilingual electronic communication." The volume is rounded out by the appendix which includes the conference agenda, the full list of participants, and the reports from the five working groups. Not for the casual reader, this volume is a must read for anyone working an cataloguing code development at the national or international levels, as well as those teaching cataloguing. Any practising cataloguer will benefit from reading the draft statement of principles and the three presentation papers, and dipping into the background papers."
  10. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01
    0.0060157324 = product of:
      0.030078663 = sum of:
        0.030078663 = product of:
          0.090235986 = sum of:
            0.090235986 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090235986 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  11. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch (1995) 0.01
    0.0057231705 = product of:
      0.028615851 = sum of:
        0.028615851 = product of:
          0.08584755 = sum of:
            0.08584755 = weight(_text_:29 in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08584755 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S. 322-327
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01
    0.005671687 = product of:
      0.028358433 = sum of:
        0.028358433 = product of:
          0.0850753 = sum of:
            0.0850753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0850753 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. Devadason, F.J.: Common format for machine-readable bibliographic records for India : a proposal (1978) 0.01
    0.0050077736 = product of:
      0.025038868 = sum of:
        0.025038868 = product of:
          0.075116605 = sum of:
            0.075116605 = weight(_text_:29 in 5539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075116605 = score(doc=5539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5539)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Towards a common bibliographic exchange format? International Symposium on Bibliographic Exchange Formats, Taormina, Sicily, 27-29 April 1978
  14. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.01
    0.0050077736 = product of:
      0.025038868 = sum of:
        0.025038868 = product of:
          0.075116605 = sum of:
            0.075116605 = weight(_text_:29 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075116605 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.9, S.1428-1446
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.00
    0.004962726 = product of:
      0.02481363 = sum of:
        0.02481363 = product of:
          0.07444089 = sum of:
            0.07444089 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07444089 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  16. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.00
    0.004962726 = product of:
      0.02481363 = sum of:
        0.02481363 = product of:
          0.07444089 = sum of:
            0.07444089 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07444089 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  17. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.00
    0.004962726 = product of:
      0.02481363 = sum of:
        0.02481363 = product of:
          0.07444089 = sum of:
            0.07444089 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07444089 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  18. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.00
    0.004962726 = product of:
      0.02481363 = sum of:
        0.02481363 = product of:
          0.07444089 = sum of:
            0.07444089 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07444089 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  19. ZETA: Format und Konventionen für die Zeitschriften-Titelaufnahme in der Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) (1993) 0.00
    0.0042923777 = product of:
      0.021461887 = sum of:
        0.021461887 = product of:
          0.06438566 = sum of:
            0.06438566 = weight(_text_:29 in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06438566 = score(doc=4335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    28. 6.1996 14:29:37
  20. Deifel, R.: Offener Brief der Sektion 6 des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbandes (2002) 0.00
    0.0042923777 = product of:
      0.021461887 = sum of:
        0.021461887 = product of:
          0.06438566 = sum of:
            0.06438566 = weight(_text_:29 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06438566 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2002 18:43:44

Authors

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 19
  • f 9
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 76
  • s 9
  • m 6
  • b 2
  • l 1
  • More… Less…