Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Nicholas, D.; Nicholas, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Watkinson, A.: ¬The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals (2006) 0.03
    0.02585395 = product of:
      0.12926975 = sum of:
        0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016833913 = score(doc=990,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
        0.11243584 = weight(_text_:log in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11243584 = score(doc=990,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.61319727 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The article employs deep log analysis (DLA) techniques, a more sophisticated form of transaction log analysis, to demonstrate what usage data can disclose about information seeking behaviour of virtual scholars - academics, and researchers. DLA works with the raw server log data, not the processed, pre-defined and selective data provided by journal publishers. It can generate types of analysis that are not generally available via proprietary web logging software because the software filters out relevant data and makes unhelpful assumptions about the meaning of the data. DLA also enables usage data to be associated with search/navigational and/or user demographic data, hence the name 'deep'. In this connection the usage of two digital journal libraries, those of EmeraldInsight, and Blackwell Synergy are investigated. The information seeking behaviour of nearly three million users is analyzed in respect to the extent to which they penetrate the site, the number of visits made, as well as the type of items and content they view. The users are broken down by occupation, place of work, type of subscriber ("Big Deal", non-subscriber, etc.), geographical location, type of university (old and new), referrer link used, and number of items viewed in a session.
  2. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Watkinson, A.: Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour : a pilot study (2003) 0.02
    0.022889657 = product of:
      0.11444829 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
        0.09088081 = weight(_text_:log in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09088081 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.49564147 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates, through deep log analysis, the impact of "Big Deal" agreements on the online searching behaviour of users of the Emerald digital library Web site, which provides access to more than 150 journals in the fields of business and information science. The purpose of the evaluation was to map the online information seeking behaviour of the digital library user and to see whether those signed-up to a Big Deal arrangement behaved any differently from the others. In general they did. The real surprise proved to be the strong consumer traits of the library's users. Research reported here refers to the first stage of a three-stage research project.
  3. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008) 0.02
    0.021727478 = product of:
      0.10863739 = sum of:
        0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016833913 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
        0.091803476 = weight(_text_:log in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091803476 = score(doc=1911,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5006735 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
  4. Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998) 0.01
    0.011397746 = product of:
      0.05698873 = sum of:
        0.04665151 = weight(_text_:web in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04665151 = score(doc=3620,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
        0.010337221 = product of:
          0.031011663 = sum of:
            0.031011663 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031011663 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach for developing adaptive textbooks and presents InterBook - an authoring tool based on this approach which simplifies the development of adaptive electronic textbooks on the Web
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  5. Nguyen, T.-L.; Wu, X.; Sajeev, S.: Object-oriented modeling of multimedia documents (1998) 0.01
    0.008474903 = product of:
      0.042374514 = sum of:
        0.033329446 = weight(_text_:web in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033329446 = score(doc=3598,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
        0.009045068 = product of:
          0.027135205 = sum of:
            0.027135205 = weight(_text_:22 in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027135205 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an object-oriented model for paper-based multimedia documents such as textbook with embedded graphics. This model is the 1st step towards building a manageable authoring system for the Web, in which documents can be easily built, extended, truncated, reordered, assembled and disassembled on a computer basis, and the document components, can be reused. The model will also make accessible properties, which might be significant or important to the user, especially in searching or classifying documents, such as the document title and author. Explains the model design and presents the class hierarchy for the model
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  6. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.01
    0.008307311 = product of:
      0.08307311 = sum of:
        0.08307311 = product of:
          0.12460966 = sum of:
            0.06258633 = weight(_text_:29 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06258633 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
            0.062023327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062023327 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2000 12:41:29
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  7. Weibel, S.: ¬An architecture for scholarly publishing on the World Wide Web (1995) 0.01
    0.007454296 = product of:
      0.03727148 = sum of:
        0.026934259 = weight(_text_:web in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026934259 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
        0.010337221 = product of:
          0.031011663 = sum of:
            0.031011663 = weight(_text_:22 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031011663 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Date
    23. 7.1996 10:22:20
  8. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Huntington, P.: What do faculty and students really think about e-books? (2007) 0.01
    0.006491486 = product of:
      0.06491486 = sum of:
        0.06491486 = weight(_text_:log in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06491486 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.3540296 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to report on a large-scale survey that was carried out to assess academic users' awareness, perceptions and existing levels of use of e-books. The survey also seeks to find out about the purposes to which electronic books were put, and to obtain an understanding of the most effective library marketing and communication channels. Design/methodology/approach - An e-mail invitation to participate in the survey was distributed to all UCL staff and students (approximately 27,000) in November 2006, and 1,818 completions were received, an effective response rate of at least 6.7 per cent. Statistical analyses were carried out on the data using Software Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Findings - The survey findings point to various ways in which user uptake and acceptance of e-books may be encouraged. Book discovery behaviour, a key issue for publishers and librarians in both print and electronic environments, emerges as a critical focus for service delivery and enhancement. Originality/value - The survey is part of an action research project, CIBER's SuperBook, that will further investigate the issues raised in this initial benchmarking survey using deep log analysis and qualitative methods. The paper partly fills the gap in the literature on e-books which has mainly focused on usage and not the users.
  9. Bates, C.: Web programming : building Internet applications (2000) 0.01
    0.006022684 = product of:
      0.06022684 = sum of:
        0.06022684 = weight(_text_:web in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06022684 = score(doc=5,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This book introduces the most important Web technologies and shows how they can be used on today's Websites. From client development using HTML and Javascript, through to full server-side applications written in ASP and Perl, the complete web system is shown. Concentrating on immediately useful code, rather than theory, this is a how-to book Im programmers who need quick answers
    LCSH
    Web site development
    Subject
    Web site development
  10. Mizzaro, S.: Quality control in scholarly publishing : a new proposal (2003) 0.01
    0.005604797 = product of:
      0.028023984 = sum of:
        0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020200694 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
        0.007823291 = product of:
          0.023469873 = sum of:
            0.023469873 = weight(_text_:29 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023469873 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet has fostered a faster, more interactive and effective model of scholarly publishing. However, as the quantity of information available is constantly increasing, its quality is threatened, since the traditional quality control mechanism of peer review is often not used (e.g., in online repositories of preprints, and by people publishing whatever they want an their Web pages). This paper describes a new kind of electronic scholarly journal, in which the standard submission-reviewpublication process is replaced by a more sophisticated approach, based an judgments expressed by the readers: in this way, each reader is, potentially, a peer reviewer. New ingredients, not found in similar approaches, are that each reader's judgment is weighted an the basis of the reader's skills as a reviewer, and that readers are encouraged to express correct judgments by a feedback mechanism that estimates their own quality. The new electronic scholarly journal is described in both intuitive and formal ways. Its effectiveness is tested by several laboratory experiments that simulate what might happen if the system were deployed and used.
    Date
    28. 9.2003 11:29:47
  11. Zhang, Y.: ¬The effect of open access on citation impact : a comparison study based on Web citation analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.0053233504 = product of:
      0.053233504 = sum of:
        0.053233504 = weight(_text_:web in 5071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053233504 = score(doc=5071,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 5071, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5071)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    The academic impact advantage of Open Access (OA) is a prominent topic of debate in the library and publishing communities. Web citations have been proposed as comparable to, even replacements for, bibliographic citations in assessing the academic impact of journals. In our study, we compare Web citations to articles in an OA journal, the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC), and a traditional access journal, New Media & Society (NMS), in the communication discipline. Web citation counts for JCMC are significantly higher than those for NMS. Furthermore, JCMC receives significantly higher Web citations from the formal scholarly publications posted on the Web than NMS does. The types of Web citations for journal articles were also examined. In the Web context, the impact of a journal can be assessed using more than one type of source: citations from scholarly articles, teaching materials and non-authoritative documents. The OA journal has higher percentages of citations from the third type, which suggests that, in addition to the research community, the impact advantage of open access is also detectable among ordinary users participating in Web-based academic communication. Moreover, our study also proves that the OA journal has impact advantage in developing countries. Compared with NMS, JCMC has more Web citations from developing countries.
  12. Interactice magazine combines Web, print and CD-ROM (1996) 0.00
    0.0047613494 = product of:
      0.047613494 = sum of:
        0.047613494 = weight(_text_:web in 4991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047613494 = score(doc=4991,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 4991, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4991)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Yahoo! Corporation and the Ziff-Davies Publishing Company have announced a strategic relationship that establishes a Web-driven publishing model delivering content through the integrated media of print, online and CD-ROM. The 2 products involved are Yahoo! Internet Life and ZD/Yahoo!
  13. Paul, N.: ¬'The times they are a-changin' : newspapers on the Web (1996) 0.00
    0.0047613494 = product of:
      0.047613494 = sum of:
        0.047613494 = weight(_text_:web in 6636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047613494 = score(doc=6636,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 6636, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6636)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Issue
    Part two - The Los Angeles Times on the Web
  14. Peek, R.; Pomerantz, J.; Paling, S.: ¬The traditional scholarly journal publishers legitimize the Web (1998) 0.00
    0.0047134957 = product of:
      0.047134954 = sum of:
        0.047134954 = weight(_text_:web in 2019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047134954 = score(doc=2019,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2019, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2019)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the entry of the major academic publishing houses into the WWW publishing. The study identified that during 1997, traditional academic publishers made significant commitments to putting tables of content, abstracts, and the full-text of their print journals on the Web. At the same time, new services and organizations emerged that could ultimately compete with, or eliminate, the need for certain segments of the industry. The authors suggest that these early experiments in Web publishing began unevenly with areas that needed improvement. The article concludes with a discussion about the implications of the traditional academic publisher's presence on the Web
  15. Björk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P.: Anatomy of green open access (2014) 0.00
    0.0046706647 = product of:
      0.023353323 = sum of:
        0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016833913 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
        0.00651941 = product of:
          0.019558229 = sum of:
            0.019558229 = weight(_text_:29 in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019558229 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Open access (OA) is free, unrestricted access to electronic versions of scholarly publications. For peer-reviewed journal articles, there are two main routes to OA: publishing in OA journals (gold OA) or archiving of article copies or manuscripts at other web locations (green OA). This study focuses on summarizing and extending current knowledge about green OA. A synthesis of previous studies indicates that green OA coverage of all published journal articles is approximately 12%, with substantial disciplinary variation. Typically, green OA copies become available after considerable time delays, partly caused by publisher-imposed embargo periods, and partly by author tendencies to archive manuscripts only periodically. Although green OA copies should ideally be archived in proper repositories, a large share is stored on home pages and similar locations, with no assurance of long-term preservation. Often such locations contain exact copies of published articles, which may infringe on the publisher's exclusive rights. The technical foundation for green OA uploading is becoming increasingly solid largely due to the rapid increase in the number of institutional repositories. The number of articles within the scope of OA mandates, which strongly influence the self-archival rate of articles, is nevertheless still low.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:10:46
  16. Vincent-Lamarre, P.; Boivin, J.; Gargouri, Y.; Larivière, V.; Harnad, S.: Estimating open access mandate effectiveness : the MELIBEA score (2016) 0.00
    0.0046706647 = product of:
      0.023353323 = sum of:
        0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016833913 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
        0.00651941 = product of:
          0.019558229 = sum of:
            0.019558229 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019558229 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    MELIBEA is a directory of institutional open-access policies for research output that uses a composite formula with eight weighted conditions to estimate the "strength" of open access (OA) mandates (registered in ROARMAP). We analyzed total Web of Science-(WoS)-indexed publication output in years 2011-2013 for 67 institutions in which OA was mandated to estimate the mandates' effectiveness: How well did the MELIBEA score and its individual conditions predict what percentage of the WoS-indexed articles is actually deposited in each institution's OA repository, and when? We found a small but significant positive correlation (0.18) between the MELIBEA "strength" score and deposit percentage. For three of the eight MELIBEA conditions (deposit timing, internal use, and opt-outs), one value of each was strongly associated with deposit percentage or latency ([a] immediate deposit required; [b] deposit required for performance evaluation; [c] unconditional opt-out allowed for the OA requirement but no opt-out for deposit requirement). When we updated the initial values and weights of the MELIBEA formula to reflect the empirical association we had found, the score's predictive power for mandate effectiveness doubled (0.36). There are not yet enough OA mandates to test further mandate conditions that might contribute to mandate effectiveness, but the present findings already suggest that it would be productive for existing and future mandates to adopt the three identified conditions so as to maximize their effectiveness, and thereby the growth of OA.
    Date
    18.10.2016 14:29:07
  17. Schöning-Walter, C.: Persistant Identifier für Netzpublikationen (2007) 0.00
    0.004175992 = product of:
      0.04175992 = sum of:
        0.04175992 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04175992 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.28395358 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenwärtig werden große Mengen ursprünglich analog vorliegender Publikationen digitalisiert, um den Benutzerzugriff über Datennetze zu vereinfachen. Gleichzeitig wachsen Menge und Heterogenität der originär in digitaler Form erscheinenden Veröffentlichungen weiter an. Mehr und mehr Zeitschriften, Hochschulschriften, Lehr- und Lernmaterialien, aber auch Bücher, werden online publiziert. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten stehen teilweise überhaupt nicht mehr in gedruckter Form, sondern nur noch elektronisch zur Verfügung. Viele Autoren und wissenschaftliche Institutionen übernehmen mittlerweile selbst die Veröffentlichung und Verbreitung ihrer Publikationen. Und auch die Erscheinungsformen von Publikationen verändern sich und lösen sich teilweise sogar auf. Für alle am Publikationsprozess beteiligten Institutionen ergeben sich durch diese Veränderungen von Publikationsstrukturen und -formen neue Herausforderungen. So gewinnt für die Bibliotheken die Sammlung, Erschließung und Bereitstellung von Netzpublikationen sowie deren Langzeitarchivierung eine zunehmend stärkere Bedeutung. Als Netzpublikationen gelten alle Darstellungen in Schrift, Bild und Ton, die in öffentlichen Netzen zugänglich gemacht werden. Elektronische Zeitschriften, E-Books, Hochschulprüfungsarbeiten, Forschungsberichte, Kongressschriften und Lehrmaterialien gehören genauso dazu wie Digitalisate alter Drucke, Musikdateien oder Webseiten. Für die Information und Kommunikation in Wissenschaft und Forschung haben Netzpublikationen längst eine herausragende Bedeutung. Damit digitale Objekte zitierfähig sind, müssen sie jedoch auf Dauer - inhaltlich unverändert! - als Referenzen zur Verfügung stehen und trotz aller voraussichtlichen technischen und organisatorischen Veränderungen auch in der Zukunft noch zuverlässig auffindbar sein.
  18. Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005) 0.00
    0.004082007 = product of:
      0.04082007 = sum of:
        0.04082007 = weight(_text_:web in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04082007 = score(doc=1065,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article reveals different patterns of scholarly communication in the XML research field on the Web and in print journals in terms of author visibility, and challenges the common practice of exclusively using the ISI's databases to obtain citation counts as scientific performance indicators. Results from this study demonstrate both the importance and the feasibility of the use of multiple citation data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication, and provide evidence for a developing "two tier" scholarly communication system.
  19. Stankus, T.: Electronic expectations : science journals on the Web (1999) 0.00
    0.004040139 = product of:
      0.040401388 = sum of:
        0.040401388 = weight(_text_:web in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040401388 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  20. Weibel, S.L.: Scholarly Publishing on the World Wide Web (2001) 0.00
    0.004040139 = product of:
      0.040401388 = sum of:
        0.040401388 = weight(_text_:web in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040401388 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    

Years

Types

  • a 82
  • m 6
  • el 3
  • s 3
  • More… Less…