Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Hertramph, H.: Ihr Internet-Archiv : askSam Online (1996) 0.03
    0.033490356 = product of:
      0.13396142 = sum of:
        0.13396142 = sum of:
          0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 6001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034898523 = score(doc=6001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 6001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6001)
          0.0990629 = weight(_text_:seiten in 6001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0990629 = score(doc=6001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.4859952 = fieldWeight in 6001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6001)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet explodiert - und mit ihm die Informationsflut auf der Festplatte des eigenen PCs: E-Mails aus verschiedenen Online-Diensten, gespeicherte Web-Seiten, Texte und Zahlen aus Archiven ... Wer die Informationen des Internet systematisch auswerten möchte, verzweifelt angesichts dieses Chaos. Hilfe verspricht ein Programm, das gerade auf den Markt gkommen ist: das 'askSam Internet-Online-Paket'
  2. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.021467421 = product of:
      0.042934842 = sum of:
        0.034898523 = product of:
          0.06979705 = sum of:
            0.06979705 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06979705 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008036317 = product of:
          0.040181585 = sum of:
            0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040181585 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  3. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.02
    0.018878007 = product of:
      0.037756015 = sum of:
        0.013086946 = product of:
          0.026173891 = sum of:
            0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026173891 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02466907 = product of:
          0.061672673 = sum of:
            0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031536486 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
            0.030136187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030136187 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  4. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.01
    0.01431207 = product of:
      0.02862414 = sum of:
        0.021592362 = product of:
          0.043184724 = sum of:
            0.043184724 = weight(_text_:web in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043184724 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007031777 = product of:
          0.035158884 = sum of:
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  5. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.01
    0.011978836 = product of:
      0.023957672 = sum of:
        0.01888938 = product of:
          0.03777876 = sum of:
            0.03777876 = weight(_text_:web in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03777876 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005068291 = product of:
          0.025341455 = sum of:
            0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025341455 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:51:04
  6. SilverPlatter unveils new Internet database gateway (1996) 0.01
    0.01131331 = product of:
      0.02262662 = sum of:
        0.015268105 = product of:
          0.03053621 = sum of:
            0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03053621 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007358514 = product of:
          0.03679257 = sum of:
            0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679257 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Announces WebSPIRS v3.0, an enhanced version of the Web gateway form SilverPlatter Information, Inc. The update is an http gateway that provides access to the WWW via SilverPlatter's Internet Subscription Service on the librar's ERL network, using any forms-capable browser. This eliminates the need to install individual search software at workstations. Features in the updated version include: a new, simplified interface; search history capabilities; record selection and marking capabilities; enhancements to the thesaurus; point and click record display options; 'message of the day' option; and enhanced online help. WebSPIRS is a good introduction to database searching for novices and is IP filtered and password protected
    Date
    28. 2.1997 10:46:02
  7. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.010090989 = product of:
      0.040363956 = sum of:
        0.040363956 = product of:
          0.10090989 = sum of:
            0.05068291 = weight(_text_:29 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05068291 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
            0.050226983 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050226983 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.2
  8. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.010090989 = product of:
      0.040363956 = sum of:
        0.040363956 = product of:
          0.10090989 = sum of:
            0.05068291 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05068291 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
            0.050226983 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050226983 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.3
  9. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.009964736 = product of:
      0.039858945 = sum of:
        0.039858945 = product of:
          0.09964736 = sum of:
            0.05946577 = weight(_text_:28 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05946577 = score(doc=340,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.4477829 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
            0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040181585 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22.11.1996 19:28:14
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  10. Schoonbaert, D.; Rosenberg, V.: Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) (2009) 0.01
    0.009697122 = product of:
      0.019394243 = sum of:
        0.013086946 = product of:
          0.026173891 = sum of:
            0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026173891 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0063072974 = product of:
          0.031536486 = sum of:
            0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031536486 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. The software allows for references to a number of different document types such as journal articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports, unpublished papers, electronic documents, etc. Unlike general-purpose database management packages, PBS are made for bibliographic information, featuring a variety of import profiles for records downloaded from the major international databases, and the automatic generation of dozens of different output styles, including those used by the world's leading scientific journals. Modern PBS are thoroughly integrated with word processors. The software provides for the import, storage, retrieval, and output of World Wide Web-based information. This survey focuses on the various options and characteristics of PBS. Special attention is paid to structural flexibility, retrieval options, input, display, and output formats.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:28:15
  11. dwi: Quellenarchiv (2002) 0.01
    0.00798704 = product of:
      0.01597408 = sum of:
        0.010905789 = product of:
          0.021811578 = sum of:
            0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021811578 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005068291 = product of:
          0.025341455 = sum of:
            0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025341455 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    "Für bibliografische Angaben wie Autor, Titel und Erscheinungsjahr ist der obere Teil der Eingabemaske vorgesehen. Der Mittelteil hilft bei Beschaffung und Archi-vierung der Materialien: Ein Häkchen zeigt, ob eine Veröffentlichung noch fehlt oder schon abgelegt wurde. Angaben dazu, unter welcher Signatur und in welcher Bibliothek das Werk verfügbar ist, finden hier ebenso Platz wie Verweise auf das heimische Ablagesystem. Die Stichwort-Zuordnung erleichtert später das Suchen nach Material zu einem bestimmten Teilgebiet. In das Feld für die Zusammenfassung passen bis zu 4000 Zeichen; sinnvoll sind hier eine Inhaltsangabe oder einige kurze Zitate. Mit dem Literaturmanager kann man zwar beliebig viele Datenbanken aufbauen, allerdings immer nur eine zur selben Zeit öffnen. Der Export der Daten ist nur in eine Textdatei möglich, dabei kann man das Format mit einem kleinen Editor festlegen. Zum Import geeignet sind Datensätze aus Standard-Datenbanken, außerdem versteht Liman Excel- und Txt-Dateien. Hersteller infoball hofft vor allem auf Anwender, die das Web-Portal infoball.de zur Literaturrecherche benutzen. Der Import dieses Recherche-Ergebnisses in die Liman-Datenbank ist dabei für Inhaber eines kostenpflichtigen Accounts besonders einfach, möglich ist er aber bereits nach einer kostenlosen Registrierung. Insgesamt ist Liman 2.7 ein unkompliziertes Einsteigerprogramm, das auch für Studenten erschwinglich ist (? 50)."
    Date
    29. 1.2002 9:53:06
  12. Eversberg, B.: allegro und RDBMS : vergleichende Gegenüberstellung (2000) 0.01
    0.0077392887 = product of:
      0.030957155 = sum of:
        0.030957155 = product of:
          0.06191431 = sum of:
            0.06191431 = weight(_text_:seiten in 974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06191431 = score(doc=974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.303747 = fieldWeight in 974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Regelmäßig werden Fragen gestellt wie "Was für ein Standard-Datenbanksystem steckt in allegro?" oder "Kann man eine allegro-Datenbank mit SQL abfragen?" Es zeigt sich in solchen Unterhaltungen immer wieder, dass der eine sehr viel von relationalen Datenbanken versteht, von allegro aber ganz wenig, bzw. umgekehrt. Dann wird es mühsam und Fehleinschätzungen sind auf beiden Seiten vorprogrammiert. Um diesem Missstand abzuhelfen und das gegenseitige Verstehen zu fördern, wird hier der Versuch gemacht, vergleichende Aussagen zu den Konzepten und Eigenschaften der beiden Datenbankwelten zu machen, und zwar mit möglichst wenig Fachjargon und mit Blick mehr auf die Praxis als auf die Theorie. Diese "Welten" sind von höchst unterschiedlicher Größe und Bedeutung, das ist klar, doch darum geht es hier nicht, schon gar nicht um die immer nur für konkrete Anwendungen, aber nicht allgemein entscheidbare Frage "Was ist besser?". Wer aber wegen eines konkreten Projekts vor eben dieser Frage steht, soll hier Hilfen zur Einschätzung erhalten. Fakt ist auch, dass immer wieder relationale Daten nach allegro überführt werden bzw. Datenaustausch in umgekehrter Richtung stattfinden soll, und auch dabei können ein paar übergreifende Kenntnisse nützen. Gewiss kann man noch viel mehr sagen, vermutlich müssen einige der Aussagen weiter präzisiert oder modifiziert werden. Jeder Leser ist eingeladen, konstruktive Kritik zu üben, damit wir diese Übersicht verbessern und in der nächsten "news"-Ausgabe veröffentlichen können.
  13. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.01
    0.0055909283 = product of:
      0.0111818565 = sum of:
        0.0076340525 = product of:
          0.015268105 = sum of:
            0.015268105 = weight(_text_:web in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015268105 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0035478037 = product of:
          0.017739018 = sum of:
            0.017739018 = weight(_text_:29 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017739018 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.
    Date
    4.11.2005 13:29:37
  14. Endnote X2 für Mac OS X : bibliographies made easy ; search online bibliographic database, organize references, images, and PDFs easily, cite while you write (patent pending) in 3,000+styles, collaborate with others using EndNote Web (2008) 0.01
    0.0054528946 = product of:
      0.021811578 = sum of:
        0.021811578 = product of:
          0.043623157 = sum of:
            0.043623157 = weight(_text_:web in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043623157 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.01
    0.0053980905 = product of:
      0.021592362 = sum of:
        0.021592362 = product of:
          0.043184724 = sum of:
            0.043184724 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043184724 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  16. Beiser, K.: Publishing text databases on the Web with Inmagic's DB/Text WebServer (1996) 0.00
    0.0043623154 = product of:
      0.017449262 = sum of:
        0.017449262 = product of:
          0.034898523 = sum of:
            0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 7663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034898523 = score(doc=7663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 7663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Böhner, D.; Stöber, T.; Teichert, A.; Lemke, D.; Tietze, K.; Helfer, M.; Frauenrath, P.; Podschull, S.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme im Vergleich (2016) 0.00
    0.0043623154 = product of:
      0.017449262 = sum of:
        0.017449262 = product of:
          0.034898523 = sum of:
            0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034898523 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Object
    EndNote Web
  18. Ashoor, M.S.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Bi-lingual bibliographic software for processing library materials in the Arabic language (1994) 0.00
    0.004204865 = product of:
      0.01681946 = sum of:
        0.01681946 = product of:
          0.084097296 = sum of:
            0.084097296 = weight(_text_:28 in 7137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084097296 = score(doc=7137,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 7137, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7137)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Program. 28(1994) no.2, S.167-175
  19. Redlhammer, S.: Einführung von ALLEGRO-C in einer Spezialbibliothek (1992) 0.00
    0.004204865 = product of:
      0.01681946 = sum of:
        0.01681946 = product of:
          0.084097296 = sum of:
            0.084097296 = weight(_text_:28 in 8592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084097296 = score(doc=8592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 8592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8592)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaus. 1992, H.48, S.25-28
  20. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.00
    0.0040181587 = product of:
      0.016072635 = sum of:
        0.016072635 = product of:
          0.08036317 = sum of:
            0.08036317 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08036317 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 12
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 39
  • m 7
  • el 3
  • s 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…