Search (94 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.09
    0.08557457 = product of:
      0.17114913 = sum of:
        0.042787284 = product of:
          0.12836185 = sum of:
            0.12836185 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12836185 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3425918 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12836185 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12836185 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3425918 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  2. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.01
    0.013583808 = product of:
      0.027167616 = sum of:
        0.014392796 = product of:
          0.028785592 = sum of:
            0.028785592 = weight(_text_:online in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028785592 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01277482 = product of:
          0.03832446 = sum of:
            0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03832446 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Medium Internet ist im Wandel, und mit ihm ändern sich seine Publikations- und Rezeptionsbedingungen. Welche Chancen bieten die momentan parallel diskutierten Zukunftsentwürfe von Social Web und Semantic Web? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage beschäftigt sich der Beitrag mit den Grundlagen beider Modelle unter den Aspekten Anwendungsbezug und Technologie, beleuchtet darüber hinaus jedoch auch deren Unzulänglichkeiten sowie den Mehrwert einer mediengerechten Kombination. Am Beispiel des grammatischen Online-Informationssystems grammis wird eine Strategie zur integrativen Nutzung der jeweiligen Stärken skizziert.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
  3. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.01
    0.012832801 = product of:
      0.051331203 = sum of:
        0.051331203 = product of:
          0.0769968 = sum of:
            0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038672343 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
            0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03832446 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:39
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.01
    0.011643264 = product of:
      0.023286529 = sum of:
        0.0123366825 = product of:
          0.024673365 = sum of:
            0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673365 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010949845 = product of:
          0.032849535 = sum of:
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Source
    Online information review. 27(2003) no.2, S.94-101
  5. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.01
    0.011643264 = product of:
      0.023286529 = sum of:
        0.0123366825 = product of:
          0.024673365 = sum of:
            0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673365 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010949845 = product of:
          0.032849535 = sum of:
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Mit Verweis auf das Buch: Firnkes, M.: Das gekaufte Web: wie wir online manipuliert werden. Hannover : Heise Zeitschriften Verlag 2015. 220 S.
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
  6. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.010999544 = product of:
      0.043998174 = sum of:
        0.043998174 = product of:
          0.06599726 = sum of:
            0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033147726 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  7. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013) 0.01
    0.010999544 = product of:
      0.043998174 = sum of:
        0.043998174 = product of:
          0.06599726 = sum of:
            0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033147726 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:29:20
  8. McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003) 0.01
    0.009744135 = product of:
      0.01948827 = sum of:
        0.010280568 = product of:
          0.020561136 = sum of:
            0.020561136 = weight(_text_:online in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020561136 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009207701 = product of:
          0.027623104 = sum of:
            0.027623104 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027623104 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies have moved beyond the domains of library science, philosophy, and knowledge representation. They are now the concerns of marketing departments, CEOs, and mainstream business. Research analyst companies such as Forrester Research report on the critical roles of ontologies in support of browsing and search for e-commerce and in support of interoperability for facilitation of knowledge management and configuration. One now sees ontologies used as central controlled vocabularies that are integrated into catalogues, databases, web publications, knowledge management applications, etc. Large ontologies are essential components in many online applications including search (such as Yahoo and Lycos), e-commerce (such as Amazon and eBay), configuration (such as Dell and PC-Order), etc. One also sees ontologies that have long life spans, sometimes in multiple projects (such as UMLS, SIC codes, etc.). Such diverse usage generates many implications for ontology environments. In this paper, we will discuss ontologies and requirements in their current instantiations on the web today. We will describe some desirable properties of ontologies. We will also discuss how both simple and complex ontologies are being and may be used to support varied applications. We will conclude with a discussion of emerging trends in ontologies and their environments and briefly mention our evolving ontology evolution environment.
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  9. Borst, T.: Repositorien auf ihrem Weg in das Semantic Web : semantisch hergeleitete Interoperabilität als Zielstellung für künftige Repository-Entwicklungen (2014) 0.01
    0.00815221 = product of:
      0.03260884 = sum of:
        0.03260884 = product of:
          0.06521768 = sum of:
            0.06521768 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06521768 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.32709154 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Repositorien zählen mittlerweile zu den Standardanwendungen und -infrastrukturkomponenten im Bereich digitaler Bibliotheken und zielen mit ihrer durchgängigen Unterstützung des OAI-Protokolls seit jeher auf Interoperabilität, Austausch und Wiederverwendung ihrer Daten. In dem vorliegenden Artikel wird erläutert, warum das Protokoll in seiner bisherigen Form hierfür allerdings keine ausreichende Grundlage bietet. Demgegenüber bietet der Einsatz von Prinzipien und Techniken des Semantic Web die Aussicht, die Daten von Repositorien auf der Einzelebene nicht nur selbst besser wiederverwendbar und interoperabel mit anderen Repositorien zu publizieren, sondern durch die konsequente Verwendung von - teilweise bereits als Linked Open Data (LOD) vorliegenden - externen Daten in eine LOD-basierte Dateninfrastruktur zu integrieren. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird beschrieben, wie im Rahmen einer experimentellen Entwicklung die Metadaten eines großen Repositoriums für wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Literatur in ein Linked Dataset konvertiert wurden, und welche Folgearbeiten sich hieraus ergeben.
  10. Feigenbaum, L.; Herman, I.; Hongsermeier, T.; Neumann, E.; Stephens, S.: ¬The Semantic Web in action (2007) 0.01
    0.007795308 = product of:
      0.015590616 = sum of:
        0.008224455 = product of:
          0.01644891 = sum of:
            0.01644891 = weight(_text_:online in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01644891 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0073661613 = product of:
          0.022098484 = sum of:
            0.022098484 = weight(_text_:29 in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022098484 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Six years ago in this magazine, Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila unveiled a nascent vision of the Semantic Web: a highly interconnected network of data that could be easily accessed and understood by any desktop or handheld machine. They painted a future of intelligent software agents that would head out on the World Wide Web and automatically book flights and hotels for our trips, update our medical records and give us a single, customized answer to a particular question without our having to search for information or pore through results. They also presented the young technologies that would make this vision come true: a common language for representing data that could be understood by all kinds of software agents; ontologies--sets of statements--that translate information from disparate databases into common terms; and rules that allow software agents to reason about the information described in those terms. The data format, ontologies and reasoning software would operate like one big application on the World Wide Web, analyzing all the raw data stored in online databases as well as all the data about the text, images, video and communications the Web contained. Like the Web itself, the Semantic Web would grow in a grassroots fashion, only this time aided by working groups within the World Wide Web Consortium, which helps to advance the global medium. Since then skeptics have said the Semantic Web would be too difficult for people to understand or exploit. Not so. The enabling technologies have come of age. A vibrant community of early adopters has agreed on standards that have steadily made the Semantic Web practical to use. Large companies have major projects under way that will greatly improve the efficiencies of in-house operations and of scientific research. Other firms are using the Semantic Web to enhance business-to-business interactions and to build the hidden data-processing structures, or back ends, behind new consumer services. And like an iceberg, the tip of this large body of work is emerging in direct consumer applications, too.
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
  11. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.01
    0.0077392766 = product of:
      0.030957107 = sum of:
        0.030957107 = product of:
          0.046435658 = sum of:
            0.019336171 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019336171 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
            0.027099486 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027099486 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  12. Woitas, K.: Bibliografische Daten, Normdaten und Metadaten im Semantic Web : Konzepte der bibliografischen Kontrolle im Wandel (2010) 0.01
    0.006793508 = product of:
      0.027174031 = sum of:
        0.027174031 = product of:
          0.054348063 = sum of:
            0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054348063 = score(doc=115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliografische Daten, Normdaten und Metadaten im Semantic Web - Konzepte der Bibliografischen Kontrolle im Wandel. Der Titel dieser Arbeit zielt in ein essentielles Feld der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, die Bibliografische Kontrolle. Als zweites zentrales Konzept wird der in der Weiterentwicklung des World Wide Webs (WWW) bedeutsame Begriff des Semantic Webs genannt. Auf den ersten Blick handelt es sich hier um einen ungleichen Wettstreit. Auf der einen Seite die Bibliografische Kontrolle, welche die Methoden und Mittel zur Erschließung von bibliothekarischen Objekten umfasst und traditionell in Form von formal-inhaltlichen Surrogaten in Katalogen daherkommt. Auf der anderen Seite das Buzzword Semantic Web mit seinen hochtrabenden Konnotationen eines durch Selbstreferenzialität "bedeutungstragenden", wenn nicht sogar "intelligenten" Webs. Wie kamen also eine wissenschaftliche Bibliothekarin und ein Mitglied des World Wide Web Consortiums 2007 dazu, gemeinsam einen Aufsatz zu publizieren und darin zu behaupten, das semantische Netz würde ein "bibliothekarischeres" Netz sein? Um sich dieser Frage zu nähern, soll zunächst kurz die historische Entwicklung der beiden Informationssphären Bibliothek und WWW gemeinsam betrachtet werden. Denn so oft - und völlig zurecht - die informationelle Revolution durch das Internet beschworen wird, so taucht auch immer wieder das Analogon einer weltweiten, virtuellen Bibliothek auf. Genauer gesagt, nahmen die theoretischen Überlegungen, die später zur Entwicklung des Internets führen sollten, ihren Ausgangspunkt (neben Kybernetik und entstehender Computertechnik) beim Konzept des Informationsspeichers Bibliothek.
  13. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.01
    0.00638741 = product of:
      0.02554964 = sum of:
        0.02554964 = product of:
          0.07664892 = sum of:
            0.07664892 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664892 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  14. Trkulja, V.: Suche ist überall, Semantic Web setzt sich durch, Renaissance der Taxonomien (2005) 0.01
    0.0061683413 = product of:
      0.024673365 = sum of:
        0.024673365 = product of:
          0.04934673 = sum of:
            0.04934673 = weight(_text_:online in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04934673 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ein Schwerpunkt der Online Information 2004 bildete das Thema "Search": Wie wird die Suche in 2005 aussehen? Welche Bedeutung haben Taxonomien? Wie verändern sich Suchfunktionen?
  15. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01
    0.0054749227 = product of:
      0.02189969 = sum of:
        0.02189969 = product of:
          0.06569907 = sum of:
            0.06569907 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06569907 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  16. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.01
    0.0054749227 = product of:
      0.02189969 = sum of:
        0.02189969 = product of:
          0.06569907 = sum of:
            0.06569907 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06569907 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  17. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: ¬The Semantic Web : a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001) 0.00
    0.0046038507 = product of:
      0.018415403 = sum of:
        0.018415403 = product of:
          0.055246208 = sum of:
            0.055246208 = weight(_text_:29 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055246208 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
  18. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.00
    0.0045624357 = product of:
      0.018249743 = sum of:
        0.018249743 = product of:
          0.054749228 = sum of:
            0.054749228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054749228 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  19. Narock, T.; Zhou, L.; Yoon, V.: Semantic similarity of ontology instances using polarity mining (2013) 0.00
    0.004361676 = product of:
      0.017446704 = sum of:
        0.017446704 = product of:
          0.03489341 = sum of:
            0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03489341 = score(doc=620,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic similarity is vital to many areas, such as information retrieval. Various methods have been proposed with a focus on comparing unstructured text documents. Several of these have been enhanced with ontology; however, they have not been applied to ontology instances. With the growth in ontology instance data published online through, for example, Linked Open Data, there is an increasing need to apply semantic similarity to ontology instances. Drawing on ontology-supported polarity mining (OSPM), we propose an algorithm that enhances the computation of semantic similarity with polarity mining techniques. The algorithm is evaluated with online customer review data. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the baseline algorithm in multiple settings.
  20. Firnkes, M.: ¬Das gekaufte Web : wie wir online manipuliert werden (2015) 0.00
    0.004361676 = product of:
      0.017446704 = sum of:
        0.017446704 = product of:
          0.03489341 = sum of:
            0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03489341 = score(doc=2117,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Was wir online lesen und sehen, auf Webseiten, in Blogs und sozialen Netzwerken, das ist immer öfter verfremdet und manipuliert. Gefälschte Inhalte werden genutzt, um versteckte Werbung zu platzieren und Einnahmen zu generieren, aber auch um die öffentliche Meinung zu Gunsten von Interessensverbänden und der Politik zu steuern. Neue Technologien der digitalen Welt befeuern den Trend zu rein künstlich generiertem Content. Wir sind an einem Punkt angelangt, an dem wir uns entscheiden müssen: Zwischen einem "freien" oder einem von kommerziellen Interessen beherrschten World Wide Web. Das Buch deckt auf verständliche Weise die unterschiedlichen Methoden der Manipulation auf. Es zeigt, wie fremdgesteuerte Inhalte alle Internetnutzer betreffen, geht aber gleichzeitig auf mögliche Auswege und Lösungsmöglichkeiten ein. Als Plädoyer für ein nachhaltig unabhängiges Internet.

Authors

Languages

  • e 68
  • d 26

Types

  • a 56
  • m 20
  • el 18
  • s 13
  • x 4
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications