Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.02 
    0.023531847 = product of:
  0.047063693 = sum of:
    0.047063693 = product of:
      0.09412739 = sum of:
        0.09412739 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09412739 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  2. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.02 
    0.023531847 = product of:
  0.047063693 = sum of:
    0.047063693 = product of:
      0.09412739 = sum of:
        0.09412739 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09412739 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  3. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.02 
    0.023531847 = product of:
  0.047063693 = sum of:
    0.047063693 = product of:
      0.09412739 = sum of:
        0.09412739 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09412739 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  4. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.02 
    0.023531847 = product of:
  0.047063693 = sum of:
    0.047063693 = product of:
      0.09412739 = sum of:
        0.09412739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09412739 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  5. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  6. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  7. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  8. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  9. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  10. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  11. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  13. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02 
    0.020590365 = product of:
  0.04118073 = sum of:
    0.04118073 = product of:
      0.08236146 = sum of:
        0.08236146 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08236146 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  14. Fugmann, R.: ¬Das Buchregister : Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (2006) 0.02 
    0.018079055 = product of:
  0.03615811 = sum of:
    0.03615811 = product of:
      0.07231622 = sum of:
        0.07231622 = weight(_text_:ludwig in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07231622 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3371676 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.21448153 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    6. In diesem Buch wird in den Kapiteln 2 bis 5 ein Grundkursus zur Theorie der Inhaltserschließung angeboten, wobei die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von natursprachiger und indexsprachiger Ausdrucksweise geklärt werden, sowie auch der Unterschied zwischen Ausdruck und Begriff, zwischen den Recherchetypen von Erinnerung und Entdeckung, zwischen den Indexierungstypen von Zuteilung und Extraktion und auch der Unterschied zwischen Register und Konkordanz. Auf einer solchen Grundlage kann der Indexer besser den Nutzen der einzelnen Indexierungswerkzeuge abschätzen, sowie auch die nachteiligen Folgen, welche durch den Verzicht auf das eine oder das andere dieser Werkzeuge zwangsläufig eintreten. In der Literatur ist zwar der Standpunkt anzutreffen, dass "allzu viel Theorie" zu vermeiden sei, weil sie doch so "grau" sei. Aber wir schließen uns lieber dem Standpunkt des Physikers Ludwig Boltzmann an: "Nichts ist praktischer als Theorie", wenn eine solche Theorie das Beobachtbare erklären und das Zukünftige voraussagen kann. 7. Im Kapitel 7 werden die Bestandteile des Schlagwort-Registers in Gestalt von Schlagwort und Fundstelle, Untereintrag und Verweisung abgehandelt und das Zusammenfügen dieser Komponenten zum Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art. Dieser Registertyp ist gekennzeichnet durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich der Inanspruchnahme von Platz für den Druck und durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich des Aufwandes an Zeit und Geld zu seiner Erstellung. Es werden die hiermit zwangläufig verbundenen Mängel dargelegt. 8. Im Kapitel 8 wird die Überwindung dieser Mängel durch die Einführung von reichlichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen gezeigt. Das Register nimmt hierdurch einen ausgesprochen informativen Charakter an. Zugleich werden auf diesem Weg auch Wesen und Nutzen eines systematischen Registers dargelegt, welches zusätzlich zum herkömmlichen alphabetischen Register vorgelegt wird. 9. Die Möglichkeit zu alledem eröffnet sich dadurch, dass eine hochentwickelte Software eingesetzt wird und dass ein außergewöhnlicher Arbeitsaufwand aufseiten des Indexers nicht gescheut wird, verbunden mit entsprechend hohen Kosten. Dieser Aufwand ist erforderlich für die Formulierung von zahlreichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen, zum Aufbau eines systematischen, thesaurusgestützten Schlagwort-Vokabulars und für eine besonders sorgfältige Indexierung. 10. Dieses Modell eines kompletten informativen Registers ist als eine Art Werkzeugkasten zu verstehen, aus welchem man diejenigen gedanklichen und technischen Werkzeuge auswählen und miteinander kombinieren kann, welche der jeweils herrschenden Bedarfslage am besten angemessen sind. Man wird von diesen Werkzeugen besonders dann ausgiebig Gebrauch machen, wenn hohe Anforderungen an die Treffsicherheit und Leichtigkeit der Recherche gestellt werden, Anforderungen, welche mit einem Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art nicht erfüllbar sind. Der hohe Aufwand für ein gutes Register ist natürlich nur dann gerechtfertigt, wenn aufseiten der Leser auch wirklich Bedarf zum Nachschlagen besteht. Man wird kein Register für ein Buch anlegen, welches nur zur Unterhaltung und Erbauung gelesen und dann für alle Zeiten beiseite gelegt wird.
  15. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.02 
    0.017648883 = product of:
  0.035297766 = sum of:
    0.035297766 = product of:
      0.07059553 = sum of:
        0.07059553 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07059553 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  16. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.02 
    0.017648883 = product of:
  0.035297766 = sum of:
    0.035297766 = product of:
      0.07059553 = sum of:
        0.07059553 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07059553 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02 
    0.016639529 = product of:
  0.033279058 = sum of:
    0.033279058 = product of:
      0.066558115 = sum of:
        0.066558115 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066558115 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  18. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02 
    0.016639529 = product of:
  0.033279058 = sum of:
    0.033279058 = product of:
      0.066558115 = sum of:
        0.066558115 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066558115 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  19. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01 
    0.014707404 = product of:
  0.029414808 = sum of:
    0.029414808 = product of:
      0.058829617 = sum of:
        0.058829617 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058829617 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  20. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01 
    0.011765923 = product of:
  0.023531847 = sum of:
    0.023531847 = product of:
      0.047063693 = sum of:
        0.047063693 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047063693 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15205334 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043421112 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 26
  • d 2

Types

  • a 24
  • m 4

Themes