Search (77 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Gödert, W."
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.31
    0.3089534 = product of:
      0.72089124 = sum of:
        0.05490988 = product of:
          0.16472964 = sum of:
            0.16472964 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16472964 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16472964 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16472964 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16472964 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16472964 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16472964 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16472964 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16472964 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16472964 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  2. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.07
    0.06658985 = product of:
      0.18645157 = sum of:
        0.054539118 = weight(_text_:wide in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054539118 = score(doc=987,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.055354897 = weight(_text_:web in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055354897 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.020970963 = weight(_text_:information in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020970963 = score(doc=987,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.04755677 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04755677 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.008029819 = product of:
          0.024089456 = sum of:
            0.024089456 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024089456 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.
    Content
    Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    Information retrieval
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Information organization
    World Wide Web / Subject access
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    Information retrieval
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Information organization
    World Wide Web / Subject access
    Semantic Web
    Information Retrieval
  3. Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991) 0.03
    0.029588463 = product of:
      0.10355961 = sum of:
        0.032137483 = weight(_text_:wide in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032137483 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
        0.02465703 = weight(_text_:web in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02465703 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
        0.03963064 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963064 = score(doc=5825,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.442117 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings
    "Online retrieval" conjures up a very different mental image now than in 1991, the year this article was written, and the year Tim Berners-Lee first revealed the new hypertext system he called the World Wide Web. Gödert shows that truncation and Boolean logic, combined with notation from a faceted classification system, will be a powerful way of searching for information. It undoubtedly is, but no system built now would require a user searching for material on "nervous systems of bone fish" to enter "Fdd$ and Leaa$". This is worth reading for someone interested in seeing how searching and facets can go together, but the web has made this article quite out of date.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Gödert, W.: Multimedia-Enzyklopädien auf CD-ROM : eine vergleichende Analyse von Allgemeinenzyklopädien (1994) 0.02
    0.023913419 = product of:
      0.08369696 = sum of:
        0.041418593 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041418593 = score(doc=5976,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.29556113 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
        0.03121758 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03121758 = score(doc=5976,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25659564 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
        0.005707573 = weight(_text_:information in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005707573 = score(doc=5976,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
        0.0053532133 = product of:
          0.016059639 = sum of:
            0.016059639 = weight(_text_:22 in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016059639 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    BK
    05.38 Neue elektronische Medien <Kommunikationswissenschaft>
    Classification
    AN 97000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Fachliche Information und Dokumentation / Allgemeines, Wissenschaft, Hochschulwesen
    05.38 Neue elektronische Medien <Kommunikationswissenschaft>
    Date
    22. 3.2008 16:17:15
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / Enzyklopädie / CD-ROM
    RVK
    AN 97000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Fachliche Information und Dokumentation / Allgemeines, Wissenschaft, Hochschulwesen
    Subject
    Bibliothek / Enzyklopädie / CD-ROM
  5. Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.; Rösch, H.; Sleegers, P.: Evit@: Evaluation elektronischer Informationsmittel (2000) 0.02
    0.021268029 = product of:
      0.0992508 = sum of:
        0.051252894 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051252894 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.36573824 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.038629785 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038629785 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.009368123 = product of:
          0.028104367 = sum of:
            0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028104367 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Evit@ stellt ein Bewertungsinstrument bereit, mit dessen Hilfe qualitative Aussagen über elektronische Informationsmittel möglich werden. Eine Stärke des Verfahrens liegt auf der vergleichenden Produktanalyse und auf einem weitgehend entindividualisierten Ansatz. Das entwickelte Kriteriensystem geht in seiner Differenziertheit über alle bisherigen Ansätze hinaus. Das Verfahren der produkttypenbezogenen Gewichtung eignet sich besonders bei der quantifizierenden Beschreibung aller wesentlichen Eigenschaften und Leistungsmerkmale elektronischer Informationsmittel. Über eine eigens entwikkelte Softwarekomponente kann das Bewertungsergebnis sowohl auf jede einzelne Kategorie bezogen als auch in Form eines kondensierten Endergebnisses dargestellt werden. Diese Ergebnisse bieten im Sinne eines Qualitätsurteils Hilfestellung für Auswahl und Kaufentscheidungen. Für Produzenten elektronischer Informationsmittel kann Evit@ darüber hinaus als Checkliste zur Qualitätssicherung eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:00:32
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 24(2000) H.1, S.63-87
  6. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.02
    0.018905811 = product of:
      0.066170335 = sum of:
        0.032137483 = weight(_text_:wide in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032137483 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.017435152 = weight(_text_:web in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017435152 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.009463232 = product of:
          0.028389696 = sum of:
            0.028389696 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028389696 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  7. Gödert, W.: Zwischen Individuum und Wissen : Computergestützte Schnittstellen für ein Lernen der Zukunft (2002) 0.02
    0.018790895 = product of:
      0.06576813 = sum of:
        0.025709987 = weight(_text_:wide in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025709987 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
        0.013948122 = weight(_text_:web in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013948122 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
        0.022074163 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022074163 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.18144052 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
        0.0040358636 = weight(_text_:information in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0040358636 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Es ist nicht neu, Institutionen als Mittler zwischen Wissen und Nutzer zu betrachten. Bibliotheken und andere Einrichtungen des Bildungssystems wurde schon immer diese Rolle zugeschrieben. Neu ist es allerdings, die Schnittstelle selbst als ein Bildungsobjekt zu betrachten, das nicht allein vermittelnd zwischen Wissen und Nutzer steht, sondern dessen Eigenschaften selbst wissensrelevant sind. Des weiteren kann diese Schnittstelle nicht mehr individuell für jede Institution gesehen werden, sondern sie besteht aus mehreren Stufen. Deren erste - das World Wide Web - ist eine mediale Ebene mit eigenen Eigenschaften, erst darunter kommt die institutionenbezogene Schnittstelle. Mit dem WWW ist ein Zwischenmedium entstanden ist, das Zugriff auf eine Vielzahl von Anbietern gestattet, die miteinander konkurrieren, die sich mit ihren Leistungsmöglichkeiten werbend präsentieren müssen, die auch probehalber oder mehr oder weniger zufällig aufgesucht werden. In jedem Fall muss sich nun jede Institution, die Präsenz unter dieser Schnittstelle zeigen will, mit den Spielregeln, den Möglich-keiten und Problemen dieser medialen Schnittstelle auseinander setzen. In dieser neuen Situation weichen ehemals scharfe Grenzen zwischen Anbietern auf, entweder weil die Anbieter selbst es so wollen oder weil über die Nutzer explizit oder gemäß einer impliziten Erwartung so agiert wird. Dabei gilt es zu fragen, ob und ggf. wie die Schnittstelle die bisherige Auffassung von der eigenen Rolle im Prozess der Wissensvermittlung verändert, welche Aufgaben fortgeführt werden können, welche verändert, welche mit Partnern verfolgt, welche vielleicht auch aufgegeben werden sollten. Es ist die Frage zu beachten, welches Verhältnis die anbietende Institution zur Schnittstelle haben soll. Soll die Schnittstelle eine Zugangsfunktion für die Institution mit ihren Angeboten bieten? Werden über die Schnittstelle Inhalte der Institution bereitgestellt oder ist sie nur ein Portal als Zugang für Angebote anderer? Ist die Schnittstelle der Selbstbestimmung der Insti-tution nachgeordnet oder soll sie die Identifikationsfunktion für die Institution übernehmen? Vorstehende Fragen spielen für Bibliotheken eine Rolle, da man sie als Anbieter von Materialien ansieht, die als Träger von Information zum Zwecke der Wissensaneignung dienen. Darüber hinaus treten Bibliotheken des öfteren auch in der Rolle von Mediatoren im Prozess der Wissensaneignung auf. Damit stellt sich die Frage nach der Rolle der Bibliotheken für Konzepte des Lebenslangen Lernens und der selbstbestimmten Aneignung von Wissen. Besonders mit dem Konzept der Virtuellen oder Digitalen Bibliothek sind vielfältige Erwartungen geweckt worden, welche Rolle Bibliotheken im Rahmen der Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft spielen können.
  8. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Retrieval in Datenbanken und Informationsnetzen (1995) 0.02
    0.017028673 = product of:
      0.1192007 = sum of:
        0.07725957 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07725957 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.63504183 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
        0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194113 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Ausarbeitung eines Vortrages anläßlich des SWD-Kolloquiums in der Deutschen Bibliothek in Frankfurt am 23.11.1994; Text beim Verfasser erhältlich
  9. Gödert, W.: Facettenklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.016146302 = product of:
      0.075349405 = sum of:
        0.038629785 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038629785 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
        0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029656855 = score(doc=4574,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 16(1992) H.3, S.382-395
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Gödert, W.: Inhaltsdarstellung und Informationsgewinnung aus multimedialen Datenbanken (1995) 0.02
    0.015825069 = product of:
      0.11077547 = sum of:
        0.09365275 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09365275 = score(doc=2477,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.76978695 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
        0.01712272 = weight(_text_:information in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01712272 = score(doc=2477,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Biblionota: 50 Jahre bibliothekarische Ausbildung in Hamburg - 25 Jahre Fachbereich Bibliothek und Information. Hrsg.: Fachbereich Bibliothek und Information der Fachhochschule Hamburg
  11. Gödert, W.: Facets and typed relations as tools for reasoning processes in information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.014206957 = product of:
      0.06629913 = sum of:
        0.024409214 = weight(_text_:web in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024409214 = score(doc=1565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
        0.012233062 = weight(_text_:information in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012233062 = score(doc=1565,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
        0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029656855 = score(doc=1565,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted arrangement of entities and typed relations for representing different associations between the entities are established tools in knowledge representation. In this paper, a proposal is being discussed combining both tools to draw inferences along relational paths. This approach may yield new benefit for information retrieval processes, especially when modeled for heterogeneous environments in the Semantic Web. Faceted arrangement can be used as a selection tool for the semantic knowledge modeled within the knowledge representation. Typed relations between the entities of different facets can be used as restrictions for selecting them across the facets.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
  12. Gödert, W.: Facets and typed relations as tools for reasoning processes in information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.013725927 = product of:
      0.064054325 = sum of:
        0.024409214 = weight(_text_:web in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024409214 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
        0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009988253 = score(doc=3816,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
        0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029656855 = score(doc=3816,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted arrangement of entities and typed relations for representing different associations between the entities are established tools in knowledge representation. In this paper, a proposal is being discussed combining both tools to draw inferences along relational paths. This approach may yield new benefit for information retrieval processes, especially when modeled for heterogeneous environments in the Semantic Web. Faceted arrangement can be used as a selection tool for the semantic knowledge modeled within the knowledge representation. Typed relations between the entities of different facets can be used as restrictions for selecting them across the facets.
  13. Gödert, W.: Vorstellungen im Kopf haben nicht immer eine Widerspiegelung in der beobachtbaren Welt (1995) 0.01
    0.013055014 = product of:
      0.0913851 = sum of:
        0.07725957 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07725957 = score(doc=1613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.63504183 = fieldWeight in 1613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1613)
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 1613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=1613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1613)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Reisser, M.: Schöne neue Bibliothek in: BuB 47(1995) H.5
    Theme
    Information
  14. Gödert, W.: ¬Ein informationstheoretisches Paradigma für bibliothekarisches Handeln (2001) 0.01
    0.013055014 = product of:
      0.0913851 = sum of:
        0.07725957 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07725957 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.63504183 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek in der Wissensgesellschaft: Festschrift für Peter Vodosek. Hrsg. von Askan Blum unter Mitarb. von Wolfram Henning u.a
    Theme
    Information
  15. Gödert, W.: Fortschritt und Automatisierung in Bibliotheken : verändern sich Ethos und Verantwortung? (1993) 0.01
    0.011190011 = product of:
      0.07833008 = sum of:
        0.06622249 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06622249 = score(doc=3214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.54432154 = fieldWeight in 3214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3214)
        0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 3214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012107591 = score(doc=3214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3214)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek - Kultur - Information: Beiträge eines internationalen Kongresses anläßlich des 50jährigen Bestehens der Fachhochschule für Bibliothekswesen Stuttgart vom 20.-22.10.1992. Hrsg. P. Vodosek u.a
  16. Gödert, W.: ¬Die Dezimalklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1990) 0.01
    0.01062486 = product of:
      0.07437402 = sum of:
        0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012107591 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.06226643 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06226643 = score(doc=5067,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  17. Gödert, W.: ¬An ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval (2013) 0.01
    0.008808877 = product of:
      0.061662138 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
        0.05359041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05359041 = score(doc=1510,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Starting from an unsolved problem of information retrieval this paper presents an ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval. The model combines the methods and experiences of cognitive-to-interpret indexing languages with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of hit quantities in the context of retrieval processes. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.
  18. Gödert, W.; Jochum, U.: Mit Information zum Wissen - Durch Wissen zur Information (2002) 0.01
    0.008372327 = product of:
      0.05860629 = sum of:
        0.038629785 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038629785 = score(doc=5831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
        0.019976506 = weight(_text_:information in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019976506 = score(doc=5831,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Einleitung zu einem Themenheft, das Ergebnis einer Tagung "Mit Information zum Wissen - Durch Wissen zur Information" am 25./26.9.2000 in Wolfenbüttel ist
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: JOCHUM, U.: Information oder Wissen und Gedächtnis; ERNST, W.: Datum und Information: Begriffsverwirrungen; JAENECKE, P.: Wissensbausteine; GÖDERT, W.: Der konstruktivistische Ansatz für Kommunikation und Informationsverarbeitung; KÜBLER, H.-D.: Nachrichtenrezeption, Informationsnutzung, Wissenserwerb: Diskrepanzen wissenschaftlicher Zugänge; BONFADELLI, H.: Online-Kommunikation: Die Relevanz der Wissenskluft-Perspektive; GEORGY, U.: Der Wert von Information: Thesen zum Thema.
    Footnote
    Vgl. den Bericht in: Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis. 25(2001) H.1, S.94-95 (Werner Arnold) [Unter: https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/bfup/25/1/article-p94.xml?language=de].
    Theme
    Information
  19. Gödert, W.: Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval im Wandel : Konzepte für die Ausbildung in Deutschland (2001) 0.01
    0.008223673 = product of:
      0.05756571 = sum of:
        0.013536699 = weight(_text_:information in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013536699 = score(doc=4833,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
        0.044029012 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044029012 = score(doc=4833,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Es wird ein Überblick gegeben, wie sich die Veränderungen sich im Bereich der Informationsverarbeitung und -technik auf die Gestaltung von Studienkonzepten im Bereich Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval in deutschen bibliothekarischen Ausbildungseinrichtungen ausgewirkt haben. Dabei wird unterschieden in Bereiche der Veränderungen und in Bereiche der Stabilität. Die Bereiche der Veränderungen lassen sich den Verfahren und Anwendungen in der Praxis zuordnen. Sie sind zum einen geprägt durch eine integrative Sicht auf Indexierung und Information Retrieval und lassen sich zum anderen durch folgende Trends charakterisieren: - Von Katalogen zu OPACs und WebOPACs - Von der Katalogisierung zum intelligenten Information Retrieval und Suchmaschinen mit benutzerfreundlichen Interaktionsschnittstellen - Vom lokalen Katalog zum kooperativen Erschließen und Retrieval in heterogenen Netzen - Von intellektueller zu automatischer Indexierung - Von Regelwerken zu strukturierten Beschreibungsebenen (z.B. Metadaten) - Von Beschreibung und Bewertung zu Entwicklungen und Produktdesign Die Bereiche der Stabilität lassen sich der Theorie und den Methoden zuordnen und sind durch folgende Themen beschreibbar: - Grundlagen der Wissensorganisation und Informationserschließung (z.B. in Philosophie, Linguistik, Informatik, Kognitionspsychologie) - Grundlagen der Gestaltung von Dokumentationssprachen - Grundlagen des Information Retrieval
  20. Boteram, F.; Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.: Semantic interoperability and retrieval paradigms (2010) 0.01
    0.007560872 = product of:
      0.0529261 = sum of:
        0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011415146 = score(doc=3362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
        0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041510954 = score(doc=3362,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a new approach to understanding how indexing strategies, models for interoperability and retrieval paradigms interact in information systems and how this can be used to support the design and implementation of components of a semantic navigation for information retrieval systems.

Years

Languages

  • d 62
  • e 15

Types

  • a 63
  • el 9
  • m 5
  • r 3
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications