Search (163 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.27 
    0.26589185 = product of:
  0.6204143 = sum of:
    0.047065612 = product of:
      0.14119683 = sum of:
        0.14119683 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14119683 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14119683 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14119683 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14119683 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14119683 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00856136 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14119683 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14119683 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.14119683 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14119683 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25123185 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.02 
    0.01969863 = product of:
  0.09192693 = sum of:
    0.06427497 = weight(_text_:wide in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06427497 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.014268933 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014268933 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  3. Levasseur, D.: ¬Les solutions reseau pour optimiser la gestion des documents et leur diffusion dans les organisations (Groupware, Workflow, Intranet) (1998) 0.01 
    0.0145818265 = product of:
  0.06804852 = sum of:
    0.03856498 = weight(_text_:wide in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03856498 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
    0.020922182 = weight(_text_:web in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020922182 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
    0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00856136 = score(doc=5111,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Part 3 of a 3-part series on the electronic management of documents parts 1 and 2 of which appeared in Argus 26(3) 1997 and 27(1) 1998 respectively. Looks at 3 concepts relating to the management and communication of electronic documents within the corporate network: groupware, or the automation of work in groups; workflow, or the management of the flow of information to be treated; and intranet, which indicates the private network of an organization supplying internally the technologies responsible for the success of Internet and the World Wide Web. Considers the advantages of the electronic document operated on computer networks over paper handled through traditional channels focusing on intranet because of the importance it is given as an infrastructure for integration of document management activities and because it represents a major challenge for the information professionals of today
  4. Bantin, P.: Electronic records management : a review of the work of a decade and a reflection on future directions (2002) 0.01 
    0.014281386 = product of:
  0.09996969 = sum of:
    0.087862104 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087862104 = score(doc=4255,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.6269798 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=4255,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.71, [=Suppl.34]
  5. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.01 
    0.01361621 = product of:
  0.063542314 = sum of:
    0.012233062 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012233062 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.009368123 = product of:
      0.028104367 = sum of:
        0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028104367 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  6. Engelhardt, K.: ¬Der Blaue Engel im Archiv : Rettung von Dokumenten durch Digitalisierung an der Hochschule für Film und Fernsehen in Potsdam-Babelsberg (1998) 0.01 
    0.012840384 = product of:
  0.08988268 = sum of:
    0.051252894 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051252894 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.36573824 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
    0.038629785 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038629785 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Internationale Film- und Fernsehgeschichte ist vielerorts dokumentiert, nicht nur in der Bibliothek der Hochschule für Film und Fernsehen Babalsberg (HFF). Aber eine wirklich umfassende Dokumentation der DDR-Film- und Mediengeschichte gibt es nur an der HFF. Einen besonderen Schwerpunkt zur DEFA bietet das dortige Zeitungsausschnittarchiv. Um hier einmalige Originale vor Zerstörung durch zu intensiven Recherchebetrieb zu schützen, wurde eine elektronische Archivlösung realisiert, die in der Vorbereitung der Zeitungsdokumente für den Scanvorgang die größten Probleme aufwarf. Nun kann bei der HFF auch in diesen Altbeständen elektronisch recherchiert werden
  7. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.010983866 = product of:
  0.05125804 = sum of:
    0.012233062 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012233062 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.009368123 = product of:
      0.028104367 = sum of:
        0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028104367 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  8. Casey, C.: ¬The cyberarchive : a look at the storage and preservation of Web sites (1998) 0.01 
    0.010871779 = product of:
  0.07610245 = sum of:
    0.06903969 = weight(_text_:web in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06903969 = score(doc=2987,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Although librarians recognize the Internet as a resource for knowledge and information, they have yet to make a formal effort to collect and preserve the Web sites found there. Addresses the need to set up a cyberarchive and some of the issues involved. With Web sites appearing and disappearing constantly from the Internet, there is an immediate need to recognize that they are precious part of cultural and intellectual history and to preserve them for future study. Issues discussed include: Web site authorship vs. Web space ownership; physical media used to hold Web sites (hard drive, mainframe, CD-ROMs); collection development; acquiring Web sites; and adding Web sites to a collection
  9. Bittleston, R.: Managing documents in the wider ares : intelligent document management (1995) 0.01 
    0.010623518 = product of:
  0.074364625 = sum of:
    0.06427497 = weight(_text_:wide in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06427497 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
    0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010089659 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Looks at a range of techniques which offer intelligent mechanisms for managing documents in a wide area network. Describes differing techniques for increasing bandwidth, reducing data traffic, synchronizing documentation, achieving partial synchronization, audit trails, navigation, distribution control and security
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.5, S.208-213
  10. Tappenbeck, I.: Infrastrukturen für die Archivierung digitaler Dokumente : Ein Tagungsbericht (2001) 0.01 
    0.009779122 = product of:
  0.06845385 = sum of:
    0.063409016 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063409016 = score(doc=5651,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.45248374 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Mit der Entstehung digitaler Medien haben sich auch neue Formen der Produktion, Publikation und Distribution wissenschaftlicher Information entwickelt: Elektronische Sekundärveröffentlichungen, aber auch genuin elektronische Publikationen, Publishing-on-Demand sowie die Möglichkeit des Zugriffs auf Dokumente im Pay-per-View-Verfahren sind nur einige Beispiele für diese Veränderungen. Mit der steigenden Anzahl und Relevanz digitaler Ressourcen nimmt aber auch die Frage nach den Möglichkeiten und Bedingungen ihrer zuverlässigen Archivierung an Dringlichkeit zu. Dies betrifft sowohl die Sicherung der Datenspeicherung als auch den zukünftigen Zugriff auf die in ihnen enthaltenen Informationen. Die Faktoren, die einer einfachen Lösung dieser Aufgabe entgegenstehen, sind vielfältig: Der rasante Technologiewechsel im IT-Bereich erschwert den Zugriff auf ältere Datenformate und erfordert eine Emulation der ursprünglichen technischen Umgebung eines Dokuments bzw. die Migration der Daten selbst. Vor allem aber fehlen Standards für die Archivierung digitaler Ressourcen, die vorgeben, welche Informationen für die Langzeitarchivierung erforderlich sind, und die einen Rahmen für die Erstellung und Pflege dieser Informationen bereitstellen. Um sich einer Lösung dieser Probleme zu nähern, trafen sich Vertreter internationaler Institutionen aus dem Archiv-, Bibliotheks- und IT-Bereich vom 6. bis zum 8. Dezember 2000 in York anlässlich der von Cedars ausgerichteten Konferenz "Preservation 2000" und des dieser Konferenz vorausgehenden eintägigen Workshops jnformation Infrastructures for Digital Preservation". Im folgenden soll ein Überblick über die Inhalte der im Rahmen beider Veranstaltungen gehaltenen Vorträge gegeben werden
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  11. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.01 
    0.009539582 = product of:
  0.06677707 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
    0.05870535 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05870535 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  12. Langosch, G.: ¬Das Konzept entscheidet über den Erfolg : Elektronische Archivierungssysteme bei Banken und Versicherungen (1995) 0.01 
    0.009520924 = product of:
  0.066646464 = sum of:
    0.058574736 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058574736 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.41798657 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  13. Kampffmeyer, U.; Wasniewski, A.: MoReq2010 - Der europäische Records-Management-Standard (2011) 0.01 
    0.009520924 = product of:
  0.066646464 = sum of:
    0.058574736 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058574736 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.41798657 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Am 8. Juni 2011 veröffentlichte das DLM Forum die Core Services und Plug-in-Module für die Modular Requirements for Record Systems (MoReq2010®)-Spezifikation für elektronische Records-Management- Systeme (ERMS). Kaum veröffentlicht, spalten sich die Meinungen hinsichtlich Funktionalität und Nützlichkeit des neuen Standards. Ist eine Neu-Vermessung der ERM-Systeme notwendig oder wird mit MoReq2010 lediglich ein weiterer Records Management-Standard übers Knie gebrochen?
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.6/7, S.289-294
  14. ¬Das papierlose Archiv : Abspecken mit digitaler Speicherverwaltung (1995) 0.01 
    0.008660145 = product of:
  0.060621016 = sum of:
    0.051252894 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051252894 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.36573824 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
    0.009368123 = product of:
      0.028104367 = sum of:
        0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028104367 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Zuerst erkannt haben es Versicherungen, Landesbausparkassen, Verlage wie Gruner&Jahr sowie das europäische Patentamt. Bevor das eigene Unternehmen unter der Flut von Informationen zu ersticken droht, müssen die riesigen Papierberge abgetragen und die Verwaltung entschlackt werden. Die Zauberformel dafür: Dokumenten-Management-Systeme (DMS). Neue elektronische Speicher- und Archivierungssysteme bieten dem Unternehmer viele Vorteile: Sie sparen Kosten, denken den Verwaltungsaufwand und steigern dadurch die Leistung der Firma. Inzwischen ist DMS nicht nur für die Großen ein Thema: Freiberufler, Rechtsanwälte, Wirtschaftsprüfer, Steuerberater und Arztpraxen suchen ebenfalls einen Ausweg aus dem Papierchaos. Denn bereits in 2 Jahren, so die düstere Aussage amerikanischer Forscher, werden Unternehmen mit papiergebundenen Verwaltungen ums geschäftliche Überleben kämpfen. In Westeuropa steht DMS dagaben noch in den Anfängen: bis 1998 - so die Experten - werden aber die Nachfrage nach DMS-Lösungen auf rund 8 Milliarden steigen
    Source
    Facts: Testmagazin für die Büro- & Kommunikationswelt. 1995, H.5, S.22-34
  15. Hofmeister, H.-W.: Gezielte Informationsrecherche durch Konzept-Retrieval (1995) 0.01 
    0.008009522 = product of:
  0.05606665 = sum of:
    0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014125523 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  16. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.01 
    0.008000636 = product of:
  0.056004446 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
  17. Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995) 0.01 
    0.008000636 = product of:
  0.056004446 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
    Source
    ACM transactions on information systems. 13(1995) no.3, S.237-268
  18. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01 
    0.0079421 = product of:
  0.055594698 = sum of:
    0.039451245 = weight(_text_:web in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039451245 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=1502,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  19. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.01 
    0.0077077677 = product of:
  0.05395437 = sum of:
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
    0.046891607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046891607 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  20. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.01 
    0.007560872 = product of:
  0.0529261 = sum of:
    0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011415146 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
    0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041510954 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 107
  • d 48
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Themes