-
Hahn, A.: Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung und elektronische Datenverarbeitung (1966)
0.01
0.00836782 = product of:
0.11714947 = sum of:
0.11714947 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 5963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11714947 = score(doc=5963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.83597314 = fieldWeight in 5963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5963)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966)
0.01
0.008014596 = product of:
0.03740145 = sum of:
0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070627616 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020970564 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.009368123 = product of:
0.028104367 = sum of:
0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028104367 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
-
International Symposium on Relational Factors in Classification, Univ. of Maryland, 8.-11.6.1966. Proceedings (1967)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=1309,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=1309,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: PERREAULT, J.M. On the articulation of surrogates: an attempt at an epistemological foundation; RICHMOND, P.A.: Critique; CECCATO, S.: Concepts for a new systematics; BREGZIS, R., D.E. WALKER: Critique; SOERGEL, D.: Some remarks on information languages, their analysis and comparison; ATHERTON, P., FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Critique; FARRADANE, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval; ATHERTON, P., H. BORKO: Critique; LÉVY, F.: On the relative nature of relational factors in classifications; RICHMOND, P.A., H. BORKO: Critique; NEWMAN, S.M.: An operative information retrieval system based on relational factors; LANCASTER, F.W., D.E. WALKER: Critique; PAGèS, R.: Relational aspects of conceptualization in message analysis; WILLIAMS, T.M., R. BREGZIS: Critique; DALE, A.G.: Indexing and classification for interactive retrieval systems; WILLIAMS, T.M., F.W. LANCASTER: Critique; GROLIER, E. de: Synoptic critique; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Hidden roots of classification
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967), no.4
-
Körner, H.G.: Short and flexible generic codes for mechanized information retrieval (1965)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Classification for information retrieval : papers presented at an intensive course held in Sept. 1967 at the School of Librarianship, Liverpool College of Commerce (1968)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Stevens, N.D.: ¬A comparative study of three systems of information retrieval (1961)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 6241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=6241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6241)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=6241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6241)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Balay, R.; Gardner, J.: ¬An inexpensive information retrieval system using coordination of terms with edgenotched cards (1966)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 6251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=6251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6251)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=6251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6251)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Goffman, W.: ¬A searching procedure for information retrieval (1964)
0.01
0.007927371 = product of:
0.055491596 = sum of:
0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013980643 = score(doc=5281,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041510954 = score(doc=5281,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- A search procedure for an information retrieval system is developed whereby the answer to a question is obtained by maximizing an evaluation function of the system's output in terms of the probility of relevance. Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for a set to be an answer to a query. A partition of the file is made in such way that all documents belonging to the answer are members of the same class. Hence the answer can be generated by one relevant document. In this manner a search of the total file is avoided
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 2(1964), S.73-78
-
Goffman, W.: On relevance as a measure (1964)
0.01
0.007581752 = product of:
0.05307226 = sum of:
0.01712272 = weight(_text_:information in 5514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01712272 = score(doc=5514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5514)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=5514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5514)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Relevance is defined as a measure of information conveyed by a document relative to a query.It is shown that the relationship between the document and the query, though necessary, is not sufficient to determine relevance
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 2(1964), S.201-203
-
Paisley, W.J.; Parker, E.B.: Information retrieval as a receiver-controlled communication system (1965)
0.01
0.007581752 = product of:
0.05307226 = sum of:
0.01712272 = weight(_text_:information in 3321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01712272 = score(doc=3321,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 3321, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3321)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=3321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3321)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Proceedings of the Symposium on Eudcation for Information Science, Warrenton, VA, Sept. 7-10, 1965. Ed.: L.B. Heilprin et al
-
Dehnhard, H.: Probleme einer simultanen Bearbeitung alphabetischer und systematischer Sachkataloge mit Hilfe der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung (1968)
0.01
0.0073218425 = product of:
0.10250579 = sum of:
0.10250579 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10250579 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.7314765 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Elektronische Datenverarbeitung in der Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. Hrsg.: G. Pflug
-
Goffman, W.: ¬An indirect method of information retrieval (1968)
0.01
0.0072068013 = product of:
0.050447606 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=72,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036322083 = score(doc=72,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The information retrieval process, treated strictly as a matching procedure, has the defects that the whole file must be probed for each query, and that it overlooks the facts that the relevance of the information from one document depends upon what is already known about the subject, and in turn affects the relevance of other documents subsequently examined. A mathematical model of a search technique in which the defects of the direct method are taken into account is demonstrated by an experiment in which a given paper is treated as an enquiry and the references cited in the paper are treated as relevant answers. The results in two tests show much better results than those achieved by the direct method. No spurious material was retrieved by either method
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 4(1968), S.361-373
-
Salton, G.; Lesk, M.E.: Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing (1968)
0.01
0.006865305 = product of:
0.04805713 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.60-84.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.: ¬The testing of index language devices (1963)
0.01
0.006865305 = product of:
0.04805713 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.98-110.
-
Doyle, L.B.: Indexing and abstracting by association : Part 1 (1962)
0.01
0.006865305 = product of:
0.04805713 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.25-38
-
Lancaster, F.W.: MEDLARS : report on the evaluation of its operating effiency (1961)
0.01
0.006865305 = product of:
0.04805713 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 1931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=1931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1931)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=1931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1931)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.223-246.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ¬The Cranfield tests on index language devices (1967)
0.01
0.006865305 = product of:
0.04805713 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.47-58.
-
Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969)
0.01
0.0066157626 = product of:
0.046310335 = sum of:
0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009988253 = score(doc=4151,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036322083 = score(doc=4151,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Two widerly used criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems are, respectively, the recall and the precision. Since the determiniation of these measures is dependent on a distinction between documents which are relevant to a given query and documents which are not relevant to that query, it has sometimes been claimed that an accurate, generally valid evaluation cannot be based on recall and precision measure. A study was made to determine the effect of variations in relevance assesments do not produce significant variations in average recall and precision. It thus appears that properly computed recall and precision data may represent effectiveness indicators which are gemerally valid for many distinct user classes.
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 4(1969), S.343-359
-
Mölgaard-Hansen, R.: UDC, DC und LC im Wettberwerb auf dem Gebiet der Universitäts-Bibliothek (1968)
0.01
0.006306904 = product of:
0.08829665 = sum of:
0.08829665 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08829665 = score(doc=1807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.72576207 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Gunzenhäuser, M.: Übersicht des Systematischen Katalogs (1969)
0.01
0.006306904 = product of:
0.08829665 = sum of:
0.08829665 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08829665 = score(doc=3495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.72576207 = fieldWeight in 3495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3495)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Jahresbibliographie. Bibliothek für Zeitgeschichte. Stuttgart. 41(1969), S.IX-LXXX
