Search (989 results, page 1 of 50)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.09 
    0.08682389 = product of:
  0.27783644 = sum of:
    0.05911953 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05911953 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.09335702 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09335702 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.09026646 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09026646 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5040722 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.018076118 = product of:
      0.036152236 = sum of:
        0.036152236 = weight(_text_:online in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036152236 = score(doc=2905,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017017314 = product of:
      0.03403463 = sum of:
        0.03403463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03403463 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  2. Kneifel, F.: Mit Web 2.0 zum Online-Katalog der nächsten Generation (2009) 0.07 
    0.072353385 = product of:
  0.28941354 = sum of:
    0.04815952 = weight(_text_:wide in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04815952 = score(doc=2919,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
    0.052254777 = weight(_text_:web in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052254777 = score(doc=2919,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
    0.16503346 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16503346 = score(doc=2919,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
    0.02396577 = product of:
      0.04793154 = sum of:
        0.04793154 = weight(_text_:online in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04793154 = score(doc=2919,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.50296855 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Das Web 2.0 hat auch bei Bibliotheksnutzern zu veränderten Erwartungshaltungen an bibliothekarische Online-Angebote wie die Kataloge geführt. Diese waren lange Zeit statische Nachweisinstrumente, die heutzutage über das Angebot reiner Bestandsverzeichnisse hinausgehend verschiedene Web 2.0-Funktionalitäten sowie Zusatzinformationen mittels Kataloganreicherung integrierten sollten, um den Erwartungen der Nutzer zu genügen. Die Ergebnisse einer Online-Umfrage unter Nutzern einer Großstadtbibliothek unterstreichen dies: die Nutzer wünschen sich vielfältige Browsingmöglichkeiten, Google-ähnliche Suchmöglichkeiten, zusätzliche Inhalte und ein personalisier-bares Angebot. Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten? Am Beispiel der Stadtbücherei Frankfurt wird dargestellt wie Prinzipien des Web 2.0 - u.a. Nutzerfreundlichkeit und Kollaboration - auf das Online-Angebot übertragbar sind, ohne dabei den Personalaufwand, die rechtliche Absicherung der Bibliothek und Fragen der technischen Implementierung zu vergessen.
    Classification
    AN 74190 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Kataloge, Katalogisierung / Kataloge nach der technischen Einrichtung / Elektronische Kataloge, Online-Kataloge
    Content
    Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Masterarbeit, 2008 u.d.T.: Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten?
    RSWK
    Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
    RVK
    AN 74190 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Kataloge, Katalogisierung / Kataloge nach der technischen Einrichtung / Elektronische Kataloge, Online-Kataloge
    Series
    B.I.T. online. Innovativ; 23
    Subject
    Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
  3. Greifeneder, E.: Hilfe auf allen Ebenen : ein Beitrag zur Forschung über Online-Hilfen in OPACs (2008) 0.06 
    0.059775583 = product of:
  0.3188031 = sum of:
    0.07817305 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07817305 = score(doc=1936,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43653932 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
    0.023912456 = product of:
      0.04782491 = sum of:
        0.04782491 = weight(_text_:online in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04782491 = score(doc=1936,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.50184965 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.2167176 = sum of:
      0.19970028 = weight(_text_:hilfesystem in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19970028 = score(doc=1936,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3167505 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031400457 = queryNorm
          0.63046557 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.017017314 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017017314 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031400457 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Viele Benutzer haben Probleme im Umgang mit OPACs - das dokumentieren zahlreiche Usability-Studien in ausreichendem Maße. Benutzer benötigen also Hilfe, genauer: sie benötigen ein Online-Hilfesystem, das ihnen beim "Discovery", "Locate" und "Request"' von Dokumenten im OPAC unabhängig von den Öffnungszeiten der Bibliothek situationsgerechte Online-Hilfen anbietet. Mit dem Ausdruck "Online-Hilfe" assoziieren viele nur einen Fragezeichen-Button oder Module wie die sprechende Büroklammer der Microsoft-Office-Applikationen. Doch Online-Hilfe umfasst viel mehr, von der Rechtschreibkorrektur in Suchfeldern bis hin zu Recommender-Systemen. Definieren lässt sich Online-Hilfe als ein computergestütztes Werkzeug im virtuellen Raum, das an kritischen Stellen den Nutzer bei der erfolgreichen Durchführung einer Aktion unterstützt und/oder kontextbezogene Informationen gibt. "Kritisch" für die erfolgreiche Nutzung eines Angebotes sind solche Stellen, "an denen bei den Nutzern ein jeweils spezifisches oder differenziertes Wissen vorausgesetzt wird"2. Eine einzelne Hilfe, etwa ein erklärender Text, kann dem Benutzer nicht auf allen Ebenen der Interaktion mit dem System helfen. Deshalb ist es notwendig, mehrere Online-Hilfen zu kombinieren; man spricht dann von einem Online-Hilfesystem. Online-Hilfe ist ein wichtiges Forschungsthema, doch ist es vor allem im Bibliotheksbereich nur mangelnd theoretisch fundiert. Eine präzise Unterscheidung und Klassifikation der verschiedenen Arten von Online-Hilfen ist dabei eine notwendige Grundlage für weiterführende Analysen. Der vorliegende Beitrag erläutert die einzelnen Arten von Online-Hilfen in OPACs anhand der von der Autorin entwickelten Klassifikation nach Funktionalitäten3. Es werden vier Arten von Online-Hilfen unterschieden: erklärende Hilfen, aufbereitende/visuelle Hilfen, sucheinschränkende Hilfen und sucherweiternde Hilfen. Während die ersten beiden am Suchergebnis nichts ändern, beeinflussen sowohl die einschränkenden als auch die erweiternden Hilfen das Suchergebnis. Abbildung 1 zeigt die Klassifikation mit ihrer weiteren Untergliederung. Die technische Komplexität der angeführten Online-Hilfen nimmt dabei - in grober Näherung - von oben nach unten zu.
    Date
    22. 6.2008 13:29:15
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Greifeneder, E.: Online-Hilfen in OPACs: Analyse deutscher Universitäts-Onlinekataloge. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller 2007.
  4. BOND: Assoziativ-OPAC SpiderSearch (2003) 0.05 
    0.04700126 = product of:
  0.18800505 = sum of:
    0.031999387 = weight(_text_:web in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031999387 = score(doc=1795,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.112833075 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112833075 = score(doc=1795,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.63009024 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015872208 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.027300376 = weight(_text_:software in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027300376 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Der Hersteller von Bibliothekssoftware BOND erweitert sein Produktangebot um eine innovative Neuheit, den Assoziativ-OPAC SpiderSearch. Dieser graphische Web-OPAC sucht zu einem Stichwort Assoziative, d.h. sinn- oder sprachwissenschaftlich verwandte Begriffe. Diese baut er spinnennetzartig um den zentralen Suchbegriff herum auf. Anhand der ihm angebotenen Assoziative kann sich der Leser sehr einfach und anschaulich durch den Medienbestand der Bibliothek klicken. So findet er schnell und komfortabel relevante Medien, die mit herkömmlichen Suchverfahren nur schwer recherchierbar wären. Mühsame Überlegungen über verwandte Suchbegriffe und angrenzende Themengebiete bleiben dem Benutzer erspart. Dies übernimmt SpiderSearch und navigiert den Benutzer ähnlich wie beim Surfen durch Webseiten durch sämtliche Themen, die mit dem Suchbegriff in Zusammenhang stehen. Auch aufwändiges Durchblättern einer riesigen Suchergebnisliste ist nicht nötig. Durch die im semantischen Netz vorgeschlagenen Begriffe, kann der Benutzer sein Thema genau eingrenzen und erhält in seiner Trefferliste nur passende Medien. Diese ordnet SpiderSearch nach ihrer Relevanz, so dass der Leser die benötigte Literatur einfach und komfortabel findet. Wie auch im normalen Web-OPAC enthält die Trefferliste Angaben zu Titel, Standort und Verfügbarkeit des Mediums. Zur einfachen Zuordnung der Medienart ist jedem Medium ein entsprechendes Symbol zugewiesen. Per Mausklick erhält der Benutzer Detailangaben zum Medium und optional eine Ansicht des Buchcovers. SpiderSearch ist ein Zusatzmodul zur Software BIBLIOTHECA2000 von BOND und setzt auf den Web-OPAL auf. Vor allem bei Öffentlichen Bibliotheken stößt SpiderSearch auf großes Interesse. Erste Anwender bieten Ihren Lesern bereits dieses neue Sucherlebnis.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. AssoziativOPAC : SpiderSearch von BOND (2003) 0.05 
    0.04700126 = product of:
  0.18800505 = sum of:
    0.031999387 = weight(_text_:web in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031999387 = score(doc=2029,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
    0.112833075 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112833075 = score(doc=2029,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.63009024 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
    0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015872208 = score(doc=2029,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
    0.027300376 = weight(_text_:software in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027300376 = score(doc=2029,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Content
    "Der Hersteller von Bibliothekssoftware BOND erweitert sein Produktangebot um den Assoziativ-OPAC SpiderSearch. Dieser graphische Web-OPAC sucht zu einem Stichwort Assoziative, d.h. sinnoder sprachwissenschaftlich verwandte Begriffe. Diese baut er spinnennetzartig um den zentralen Suchbegriff herum auf. Anhand der ihm angebotenen Assoziative kann sich der Leser sehr einfach und anschaulich durch den Medienbestand der Bibliothek klicken. So findet er schnell und komfortabel relevante Medien, die mit herkömmlichen Suchverfahren nur schwer recherchierbar wären. Überlegungen über verwandte Suchbegriffe und angrenzende Themengebiete bleiben dem Benutzer erspart: SpiderSearch navigiert den Benutzer ähnlich wie beim Surfen durch Webseiten durch sämtliche Themen, die mit dem Suchbegriff in Zusammenhang stehen. Auch aufwändiges Durchblättern einer riesigen Suchergebnisliste ist nicht nötig. Durch die im semantischen Netz vorgeschlagenen Begriffe kann der Benutzer sein Thema genau eingrenzen und erhält in seiner Trefferliste nur passende Medien. Diese ordnet SpiderSearch nach ihrer Relevanz, so dass der Leser die benötigte Literatur einfach und komfortabel findet. Wie auch im normalen Web-OPAC enthält die Trefferliste Angaben zu Titel, Standort und Verfügbarkeit des Mediums. Zur einfachen Zuordnung der Medienart ist jedem Medium ein entsprechendes Symbol zugewiesen. Per Mausklick erhält der Benutzer Detailangaben zum Medium und optional eine Ansicht des Buchcovers. SpiderSearch ist ein Zusatzmodul zur Software BIBLIOTHECA2000 von BOND und setzt auf den Web-OPAC auf."
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Steiner, E.S.: OPAC 2.0 : Mit Web 2.0-Technologie zum Bibliothekskatalog der Zukunft? (2007) 0.04 
    0.040396634 = product of:
  0.32317308 = sum of:
    0.05911953 = weight(_text_:web in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05911953 = score(doc=678,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
    0.26405355 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26405355 = score(doc=678,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        1.4499333 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit besteht im Wesentlichen aus zwei Teilen: Der erste Teil beinhaltet eine Einführung in den Begriff Web 2.0 und in die allgemeinen Rahmenbedingungen der zugehörigen technischen Entwicklungen. Des Weiteren werden exemplarische Techniken vorgestellt, die Web 2.0 zugeschrieben werden können sowie einige beispielhafte Anwendungen. Im zweiten Teil wird die Diskussion um Bibliothek 2.0 aufgegriffen, um anschließend näher auf Web 2.0 Techniken in Bibliothekskatalogen bzw. den OPAC 2.0 einzugehen. Verschiedene Techniken, die im OPAC 2.0 Anwendung finden können, werden diskutiert und zuletzt werden einige beispielhafte OPACs vorgestellt.
  7. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.04 
    0.0388371 = product of:
  0.1553484 = sum of:
    0.04901933 = weight(_text_:web in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04901933 = score(doc=1339,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
    0.08084956 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08084956 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.4439496 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
    0.012781745 = product of:
      0.02556349 = sum of:
        0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02556349 = score(doc=1339,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012697767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012697767 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    Content
    Foreword - Marshall Breeding Introduction - Sally Chambers 1. Next generation catalogues: what do users think? - Anne Christensen 2. Making search work for the library user - Till Kinstler 3. Next-generation discovery: an overview of the European Scene - Marshall Breeding 4. The mobile library catalogue - Lukas Koster and Driek Heesakkers 5. FRBRizing your catalogue - Rosemie Callewaert 6. Enabling your catalogue for the semantic web - Emmanuelle Bermes 7. Supporting digital scholarship: bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories - Karen Calhoun 8. Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention - Lorcan Dempsey.
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
  8. Janka, D.: Online-Bibliothekskataloge in Gopher und World Wide Web (1995) 0.04 
    0.038194787 = product of:
  0.15277915 = sum of:
    0.06810784 = weight(_text_:wide in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06810784 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
    0.03694971 = weight(_text_:web in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03694971 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
    0.01597718 = product of:
      0.03195436 = sum of:
        0.03195436 = weight(_text_:online in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03195436 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.031744417 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031744417 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Source
    Wissen in elektronischen Netzwerken: Strukturierung, Erschließung und Retrieval von Informationsressourcen im Internet. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der 19. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Basel 1995. Hrsg.: H.-C. Hobohm u. H.-J. Wätjen
  9. Butterfield, K.: Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs) (2009) 0.03 
    0.034311224 = product of:
  0.10979591 = sum of:
    0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040864702 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
    0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022169823 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
    0.016603975 = product of:
      0.03320795 = sum of:
        0.03320795 = weight(_text_:online in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03320795 = score(doc=4694,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.34846687 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011110757 = weight(_text_:information in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011110757 = score(doc=4694,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
    0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01904665 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
  0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    Abstract
    In one form or another, from a mental list in the mind of the librarian, to book catalogs, card indexes, and online information retrieval systems, some type of meta access has existed to guide library users through library collections. Over the last 40 years, these constructs of paper and wood evolved into Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). When the catalog shifted out of drawers and off of three by five cards to become a networked, universally accessible entity, its role in the library shifted as well. The OPAC competes with the World Wide Web, metadata registries, search engines, and more sophisticated database structures for attention. Amongst this assortment of access mechanisms, the purpose of the OPAC has become muddled. The OPAC has now become one information source among many and one of a number of portals for accessing library collections and beyond.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  10. Külper, U.; Will, G.: ¬Das Projekt Bücherschatz : interdisziplinäre und partizipative Entwicklung eines kindgerechten Bibliotheks-Online-Kataloges (1996) 0.03 
    0.03396791 = product of:
  0.13587163 = sum of:
    0.07898315 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07898315 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.44106317 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
    0.0111840265 = product of:
      0.022368053 = sum of:
        0.022368053 = weight(_text_:online in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022368053 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074839313 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
    0.038220525 = weight(_text_:software in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038220525 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1995 entstand in interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit der Prototyp Bücherschatz, ein Bibliotheks-Online_katalog für Kinder. Beteiligt waren Studierende und eine Professorin der FH Hamburg, Fb Bibliothek und Information, ein Designer und 2 Informatikerinnen der Universität Hamburg. In diesem Bericht werden sowohl das Produkt Bücherschatz als auch der Prozeß seiner Entwicklung beschrieben. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt in der Auseinandersetzung mit theoretischen Modellen der Softwaretechnik - hier STEPS und Prototyping - und ihrer Anpassung an konkrete Projekterfordernisse. Weiterhin werden Fragen nach der Gestaltung kindgerechter Software, der Organisation eines großen Projektteams und nach der Art der Partizipation der Benutzer thematisiert. Das Gesamtprojekt wird in einen wissenschaftlichen Kontext der Informatik eingeordnet, und zentrale Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse hinsichtlich interdisziplinärer und partizipativer Softwareentwicklung werden zusammengefaßt
  11. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.03 
    0.032845885 = product of:
  0.13138354 = sum of:
    0.05448627 = weight(_text_:wide in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05448627 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
    0.041803822 = weight(_text_:web in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041803822 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
    0.018076118 = product of:
      0.036152236 = sum of:
        0.036152236 = weight(_text_:online in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036152236 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017017314 = product of:
      0.03403463 = sum of:
        0.03403463 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03403463 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  12. Poo, D.C.C.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Online Catalog Subject Searching (2009) 0.03 
    0.03272192 = product of:
  0.104710154 = sum of:
    0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040864702 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
    0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022169823 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
    0.013557088 = product of:
      0.027114175 = sum of:
        0.027114175 = weight(_text_:online in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027114175 = score(doc=3851,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.284522 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009071894 = weight(_text_:information in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009071894 = score(doc=3851,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
    0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01904665 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
  0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    Abstract
    The Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) is an information retrieval system characterized by short bibliographic records, mainly of books, journals, and audiovisual materials available in a particular library. This, coupled with a Boolean search interface and a heterogeneous user population with diverse needs, presents special problems for subject searching by end users. To perform effective subject searching in the OPAC system requires a wide range of knowledge and skills. Various approaches to improving the OPAC design for subject searching have been proposed and are reviewed in this entry. The trend toward Web-based OPAC interfaces and the developments in Internet and digital library technologies present fresh opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of the OPAC system for subject searching.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  13. Lahary, D.: ¬Le jeu de puzzle de l'acces aux catalogues : World Wide Web et/ou Z39.50 (1997) 0.03 
    0.032475922 = product of:
  0.17320491 = sum of:
    0.06742332 = weight(_text_:wide in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06742332 = score(doc=925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.4846142 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
    0.051729593 = weight(_text_:web in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051729593 = score(doc=925,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
    0.05405199 = weight(_text_:software in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05405199 = score(doc=925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    To access a remote catalogue the searcher can use the Z39.50 standard as interface, which requires appropriate software; or for databases accessible on the WWW use a common gateway interface. The multibase access advantage of Z39.50 can also be obtained through a Web navigator by inserting a Web server/Z39.50 client software connector: this can be located either on the search site, in an intermediary position or on the database site, so determining the range of databases which can be searched. Z39.50 also offers interesting possibilities for joint and local cataloguing: multibase searching can equally be realised on intranets
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The puzzling game of catalogue access: World Wide Web and/or Z39.50
  14. Willson, R.; Given, L.M.: ¬The effect of spelling and retrieval system familiarity on search behavior in online public access catalogs : a mixed methods study (2010) 0.03 
    0.03224517 = product of:
  0.10318454 = sum of:
    0.03405392 = weight(_text_:wide in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03405392 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
    0.026127389 = weight(_text_:web in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026127389 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
    0.011297573 = product of:
      0.022595147 = sum of:
        0.022595147 = weight(_text_:online in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022595147 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009258964 = weight(_text_:information in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009258964 = score(doc=4042,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
    0.022446692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022446692 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
  0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    Abstract
    Although technology can often correct spelling errors, the complex tasks of information searching and retrieval in an online public access catalog (OPAC) are made more difficult by these errors in users' input and bibliographic records. This study examines the search behaviors of 38 university students, divided into groups with either easy-to-spell or difficult-to-spell search terms, who were asked to find items in the OPAC with these search terms. Search behaviors and strategy use in the OPAC and on the World Wide Web (WWW) were examined. In general, students used familiar Web resources to check their spelling or discover more about the assigned topic. Students with difficult-to-spell search terms checked spelling more often, changed search strategies to look for the general topic and had fewer successful searches. Students unable to find the correct spelling of a search term were unable to complete their search. Students tended to search the OPAC as they would search a search engine, with few search terms or complex search strategies. The results of this study have implications for spell checking, user-focused OPAC design, and cataloging. Students' search behaviors are discussed by expanding Thatcher's (2006) Information-Seeking Process and Tactics for the WWW model to include OPACs.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2461-2476
  15. Honeit, W.: ¬Der Online-Benutzerkatalog im lokalen Bibliothekssystem der Deutschen Bücherei Leipzig (1995) 0.03 
    0.030904107 = product of:
  0.16482191 = sum of:
    0.09026646 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 41) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09026646 = score(doc=41,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5040722 = fieldWeight in 41, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=41)
    0.012781745 = product of:
      0.02556349 = sum of:
        0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 41) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02556349 = score(doc=41,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 41, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=41)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.061773706 = weight(_text_:software in 41) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061773706 = score(doc=41,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 41, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=41)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Seit dem 1.8.94 betreibt die Deutsche Bücherei Leipzig einen OPAC. Dieser ist Teil des Integrierten Literatur-, Tonträger- und Musikalieninformationssystems (ILTIS), das auf der Basis der PICA-Software in Der Deutschen Bibliothek eingesetzt wird. Damit haben erstmals auch Benutzer innerhalb der Bibliothek Zugriff auf das PICA/ILTIS-System. In diesem Artikel wird eine Zwischenbilanz gezogen und das bisher Erreichte dargestellt: die technische Basis, die Struktur der Datenbestände und die Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der PICA-Software
  16. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.03 
    0.03029403 = product of:
  0.16156816 = sum of:
    0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029559765 = score(doc=2672,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.12349974 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12349974 = score(doc=2672,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.18211427 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.008508657 = product of:
      0.017017314 = sum of:
        0.017017314 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017017314 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Die verschiedenen unter dem Schlagwort "Bibliothek 2.0" zusammengefassten neuen Dienste und Komponenten wie etwa Wikis, Tagging-Systeme und Blogs sind seit einiger Zeit in aller Munde und dringen über Fortbildungsveranstaltungen, Konferenzen und Publikationsorgane immer mehr in das deutschsprachige Bibliothekswesen ein. Darüber hinaus gibt es öffentlich geförderte Projekte zu bibliothekarischen 2.0-Themen und sogar ein Projekt, welches sich explizit einen 2.0-Katalog zum Ziel gesetzt hat. In diesem Beitrag soll es nun nicht um die Vorstellung eines weiteren Projekts im Dienste des Themas "Bibliothek 2.0" gehen, ebenso hat dieser Beitrag nicht den Anspruch, die Diskussion über die möglichen Vor- oder Nachteile dieser Thematik auf theoretischer Ebene voranzubringen. Vielmehr wird hier ganz praktisch aus Sicht einer kleinen Universitätsbibliothek, der Bibliothek der Helmut-SchmidtUniversität (HSU) - Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, aufgezeigt, wie das Thema "Web/Bibliothek 2.0" durchaus neben und in Unterstützung von weiteren nutzerorientierten Servicedienstleistungen auch in kleinen Schritten positive Auswirkungen für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer haben kann. Der Focus wird dabei auf dem zentralen Arbeits- und Rechercheinstrument der Bibliotheksnutzer liegen, dem Bibliothekskatalog. Speziell wird es darum gehen, wie auf relativ einfache Art und Weise durch Anwendung verschiedener Elemente anderer Dienste und Anbieter sowie das Aufgreifen von Schnittstellen und wenig aufwendigen Verbesserungen, Mehrwert für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer zu erzielen ist. Ein zentraler Begriff bei fast allen Überlegungen, die im Zusammenhang mit der Verbesserung und Anreicherung des Kataloges stehen, war und ist das Thema "Mash-up". Unter Mashups - ein Begriff, der gerade im Zusammenhang mit dem Thema "Web 2.0" im deutschsprachigen Raum eingeführt und adaptiert wurde - wird das Verfahren bezeichnet, Web-Inhalte neu zu kombinieren. Dabei nutzt man bei und für Mashups offene "APIs" (Application Programming Interfaces, also offene Programmierschnittstellen), die von anderen Web-Anwendungen zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  17. Hildreth, C.R.: Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors? : an experimental study (2000) 0.03 
    0.02978646 = product of:
  0.11914584 = sum of:
    0.03405392 = weight(_text_:wide in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03405392 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.052254777 = weight(_text_:web in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052254777 = score(doc=113,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005345665 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.027491473 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027491473 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web (simplified here to "Web") is well-known for its "point and click" graphical user interface (GUI) and hyperlink search and navigate capabilities. When OPACs are placed in this operational context, users can easily hyperlink from a bibliographic display to related search terms, class marks, or bibliographic records. This hyperlinking capability is not available in most conventional text-based OPACs. As more and more users undertake their searches on Web-based information retrieval systems such as OPACs, it is natural to ask, "Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors?" This paper presents the findings of an experimental study which compared users' search performance, assessments of ease of use, and satisfaction with search results after use of a Web OPAC or its conventional counterpart. The primary questions addressed by this research center on the influence of two experimental factors, OPAC search interface style and search task level of difficulty, on the dependent variables: actual search performance, perceptions of ease of use, and user assessments of satisfaction with search results. It was hypothesized that Web OPACs would be assessed as easier to use and that they would outperform conventional OPACs when measured by actual search results and users' levels of satisfaction with search results. Web OPAC searchers outperformed Text OPAC searchers, but search task level of difficulty is a major determinant of search success. The study also found little association between searchers' level of satisfaction with results and actual search performance
  18. Voß, J.; Hellmich, J.: »Am Kerngeschäft der Bibliothekare kann sich plötzlich jeder beteiligen« (2007) 0.03 
    0.029012963 = product of:
  0.1547358 = sum of:
    0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025864797 = score(doc=397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
    0.09065048 = weight(_text_:soziale in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09065048 = score(doc=397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19184545 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.47251827 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
    0.038220525 = weight(_text_:software in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038220525 = score(doc=397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Der Wikipedia-Experte Jakob Voß plädiert dafür, Opacs mit Inhalten aus Wikis, Weblogs und Bookmarking-Diensten anzureichern Auf dem Leipziger Bibliothekskongress hat Jakob Voß einen Vortrag zum Thema »Soziale Software - Hype oder Verheißung?« gehalten - und damit eine der bestbesuchten Veranstaltungen eingeleitet. Der 28-Jährige hat Informatik, Bibliothekswissenschaft und Philosophie in Chemnitz und Berlin studiert und arbeitet als Entwickler beim Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund GBV in Göttingen. Seit 2002 gehörter zum Vorstand von Wikimedia Deutschland, einem »Verein zur Förderung des freien Wissens«, dessen prominentestes Förderprojekt die Web-Enzyklopädie Wikipedia ist. BuB-Redakteurin Julia Hellmich hat Jakob Voß in Leipzig interviewt.
  19. Wimmer, W.: Mit dem 'Surfbrett' in die Bibliothek : der World-Wide-Web Katalog der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1996) 0.03 
    0.028424067 = product of:
  0.15159503 = sum of:
    0.081729405 = weight(_text_:wide in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.081729405 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.044339646 = weight(_text_:web in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044339646 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.02552597 = product of:
      0.05105194 = sum of:
        0.05105194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05105194 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  20. BOND: Assoziativ-Opac SpiderSearch (2005) 0.03 
    0.027552947 = product of:
  0.14694905 = sum of:
    0.026127389 = weight(_text_:web in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026127389 = score(doc=3429,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
    0.112833075 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112833075 = score(doc=3429,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17907447 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031400457 = queryNorm
        0.63009024 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
    0.00798859 = product of:
      0.01597718 = sum of:
        0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01597718 = score(doc=3429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    Abstract
    Der Hersteller von Bibliothekssoftware BOND bietet zusätzlich zum bewährten WebOpac den Assoziativ-Web-Opac SpiderSearch. Dieser graphische Web-Opac sucht zu einem Stichwort Assoziative, das heißt sinn- oder sprachwissenschaftlich verwandte Begriffe. Diese baut er spinnennetzartig um den zentralen Suchbegriffherum auf. Anhand der ihm angebotenen Assoziative kann sich der Leser sehr einfach und anschaulich im Internet durch den Medienbestand der Bibliothek klicken. So findet er schnell und komfortabel relevante Medien, die mit herkömmlichen Suchverfahren nur schwer recherchierbar wären. Mühsame Überlegungen über verwandte Suchbegriffe und angrenzende Themengebiete bleiben dem Benutzer erspart. Dies übernimmt SpiderSearch und navigiert den Benutzer ähnlich wie beim Surfen durch Webseiten durch sämtliche Themen, die mit dem Suchbegriff in Zusammenhang stehen. Auch aufwändiges Durchblättern einer riesigen Suchergebnisliste ist nicht nötig. Durch die im semantischen Netz vorgeschlagenen Begriffe kann der Benutzer sein Thema genau eingrenzen und erhält in seiner Trefferliste nur passende Medien. Diese ordnet SpiderSearch nach ihrer Relevanz, sodass der Leser die benötigte Literatur einfach und komfortabel findet. Wie auch im normalen WebOpac, enthält die Trefferliste Angaben zu Titel, Standort und Verfügbarkeit des Mediums. Zur einfachen Zuordnung der Medienart ist jedem Medium ein entsprechendes Symbol zugewiesen. Per Mausklick erhält der Benutzer Detailangaben zum Medium und optional eine Ansicht des Buchcovers. SpiderSearch ist ein Zusatzmodul zur Bibliothekssoftware von BOND. Vor allem bei Öffentlichen Bibliotheken stößt SpiderSearch auf großes Interesse. Dieses komfortable Sucherlebnis bieten unter anderem die Stadtbibliotheken in Reutlingen und Herren ihren Lesern.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: www. bond-online. de

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 868
  • m 37
  • s 25
  • el 24
  • r 24
  • x 22
  • b 4
  • p 4
  • d 2
  • i 2
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications