Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Library and information science and the philosophy of science (2005) 0.01
    0.0144322105 = product of:
      0.08298521 = sum of:
        0.015522547 = product of:
          0.031045094 = sum of:
            0.031045094 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031045094 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031703662 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
        0.031045094 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031045094 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
    
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.5-10
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Comments on the articles and proposals for further work (2005) 0.01
    0.0144322105 = product of:
      0.08298521 = sum of:
        0.015522547 = product of:
          0.031045094 = sum of:
            0.031045094 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031045094 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031703662 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
        0.031045094 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031045094 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Bibliothekswesen
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.156-163
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.013451911 = product of:
      0.077348486 = sum of:
        0.01790758 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01790758 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.036987606 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036987606 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.011277375 = product of:
          0.02255475 = sum of:
            0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02255475 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science (2005) 0.01
    0.012026843 = product of:
      0.069154344 = sum of:
        0.012935456 = product of:
          0.025870912 = sum of:
            0.025870912 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025870912 = score(doc=4415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026419718 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026419718 = score(doc=4415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4415)
        0.025870912 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025870912 = score(doc=4415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4415)
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 4415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=4415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Bibliothekswesen
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.130-155
  5. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.01
    0.0059996 = product of:
      0.045996934 = sum of:
        0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031703662 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.72-77
  6. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The nature of information science and its core concepts (2014) 0.00
    0.0027568403 = product of:
      0.063407324 = sum of:
        0.063407324 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063407324 = score(doc=1318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5972451 = fieldWeight in 1318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1318)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  7. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The foundation of information science : one world or three? A discussion of Gnoli (2018) (2019) 0.00
    0.0026389544 = product of:
      0.030347975 = sum of:
        0.026419718 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026419718 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.1, S.164-171
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.00
    0.0024985038 = product of:
      0.019155195 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    This paper considers classical bibliographic databases based on the Boolean retrieval model (for example MEDLINE and PsycInfo). This model is challenged by modern search engines and information retrieval (IR) researchers, who often consider Boolean retrieval as a less efficient approach. This speech examines this claim and argues for the continued value of Boolean systems, which implies two further issues: (1) the important role of human expertise in searching (expert searchers and "information literacy") and (2) the role of knowledge organization (KO) in the design and use of classical databases, including controlled vocabularies and human indexing. An underlying issue is the kind of retrieval system for which one should aim. It is suggested that Julian Warner's (2010) differentiation between the computer science traditions, aiming at automatically transforming queries into (ranked) sets of relevant documents, and an older library-orientated tradition aiming at increasing the "selection power" of users seems important. The Boolean retrieval model is important in order to provide users with the power to make informed searches and have full control over what is found and what is not found. These issues may also have important implications for the maintenance of information science and KO as research fields as well as for the information profession as a profession in its own right.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Hjoerland, B.: Theory of information science : Reply to Professor Gernot Wersig (1998) 0.00
    0.0021545368 = product of:
      0.024777172 = sum of:
        0.015349354 = weight(_text_:und in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015349354 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Erwiderung auf die Rezension des gleichbetitelten Buches des Autors durch G. Wersig in nfd 49(1998) H.1
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.2, S.122-126
  10. Hjoerland, B.: Domain analysis (2017) 0.00
    0.002128612 = product of:
      0.024479039 = sum of:
        0.012888429 = product of:
          0.025776858 = sum of:
            0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 3852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025776858 = score(doc=3852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011590611 = product of:
          0.023181222 = sum of:
            0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 3852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023181222 = score(doc=3852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 19:09:20
  11. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.0017911282 = product of:
      0.041195948 = sum of:
        0.041195948 = weight(_text_:im in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041195948 = score(doc=3826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.6183595 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : browsing as an example (2011) 0.00
    0.0011486834 = product of:
      0.026419718 = sum of:
        0.026419718 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026419718 = score(doc=4774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  13. Hjoerland, B.; Scerri, E.; Dupré, J.: Forum: The Philosophy of Classification : The Periodic Table and the Philosophy of Classification - What is the Nature of the Periodic Table as a Classification System? - A Note on the Debate Between Hjørland and Scerri on the Significance of the Periodic Table (2011) 0.00
    0.0010772684 = product of:
      0.012388586 = sum of:
        0.007674677 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007674677 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Thanks to Professor Eric Scerri for engaging in debate in this journal (Scerri 2011) by replying to my review (Hjørland 2008a) of his book (Scerri 2007). One of my points has been that we in our community (Knowledge Organization, KO / Library and Information Science, LIS) have been too isolated from broader academic fields related to classification and the organization of knowledge. The present debate is a step towards reversing this situation. Bezug zu: Scerri, E.R.: The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. xxii, 346 S. und die Rezension dazu in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland).
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.1, S.9-24
  14. Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.00
    0.0010357446 = product of:
      0.0119110625 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:49:13
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.11-27
  15. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.00
    0.0010357446 = product of:
      0.0119110625 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-2/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-2?page=1.
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  16. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2013) 0.00
    9.7151217E-4 = product of:
      0.01117239 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    Adapted from the Keynote Presentation, March 19, 2013, at the 13th Meeting of the German ISKO (International Society for Knowledge Organization), Potsdam. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_40_2013_3_c.pdf.
    Date
    1. 6.2013 17:54:48
  17. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The methodology of constructing classification schemes : a discussion of the state-of-the-art (2003) 0.00
    7.7720976E-4 = product of:
      0.008937912 = sum of:
        0.0031426062 = product of:
          0.0062852125 = sum of:
            0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062852125 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0057953056 = product of:
          0.011590611 = sum of:
            0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011590611 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Special classifications have been somewhat neglected in KO compared to general classifications. The methodology of constructing special classifications is important, however, also for the methodology of constructing general classification schemes. The methodology of constructing special classifications can be regarded as one among about a dozen approaches to domain analysis. The methodology of (special) classification in LIS has been dominated by the rationalistic facet-analytic tradition, which, however, neglects the question of the empirical basis of classification. The empirical basis is much better grasped by, for example, bibliometric methods. Even the combination of rational and empirical methods is insufficient. This presentation will provide evidence for the necessity of historical and pragmatic methods for the methodology of classification and will point to the necessity of analyzing "paradigms". The presentation covers the methods of constructing classifications from Ranganathan to the design of ontologies in computer science and further to the recent "paradigm shift" in classification research. 1. Introduction Classification of a subject field is one among about eleven approaches to analyzing a domain that are specific for information science and in my opinion define the special competencies of information specialists (Hjoerland, 2002a). Classification and knowledge organization are commonly regarded as core qualifications of librarians and information specialists. Seen from this perspective one expects a firm methodological basis for the field. This paper tries to explore the state-of-the-art conceming the methodology of classification. 2. Classification: Science or non-science? As it is part of the curriculum at universities and subject in scientific journals and conferences like ISKO, orte expects classification/knowledge organization to be a scientific or scholarly activity and a scientific field. However, very often when information specialists classify or index documents and when they revise classification system, the methods seem to be rather ad hoc. Research libraries or scientific databases may employ people with adequate subject knowledge. When information scientists construct or evaluate systems, they very often elicit the knowledge from "experts" (Hjorland, 2002b, p. 260). Mostly no specific arguments are provided for the specific decisions in these processes.
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  18. Hjoerland, B.: Theory of knowledge organization and the feasibility of universal solutions (2004) 0.00
    7.559094E-4 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = product of:
          0.034771834 = sum of:
            0.034771834 = weight(_text_:international in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034771834 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.44227937 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Content
    Vortrag, anläßlich der Tagung Eighth International ISKO Conference London, Friday July 16th 2004, Session 9B 2.15-3.45.
  19. Hjoerland, B.: Fundamentals of knowledge organization (2003) 0.00
    6.299246E-4 = product of:
      0.014488265 = sum of:
        0.014488265 = product of:
          0.02897653 = sum of:
            0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02897653 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  20. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00
    5.178723E-4 = product of:
      0.0059555313 = sum of:
        0.0019641288 = product of:
          0.0039282576 = sum of:
            0.0039282576 = weight(_text_:1 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039282576 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.06785194 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0039914027 = product of:
          0.007982805 = sum of:
            0.007982805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007982805 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    "This letter considers some main arguments in Professor Bates' article (2008), which is part of our former debate (Bates, 2005,2006; Hjoerland, 2007). Bates (2008) does not write much to restate or enlarge on her theoretical position but is mostly arguing about what she claims Hjorland (2007) ignored or misinterpreted in her two articles. Bates (2008, p. 842) wrote that my arguments did not reflect "a standard of coherence, consistency, and logic that is expected of an argument presented in a scientific journal." My argumentation below will refute this statement. This controversy is whether information should be understood as a subjective phenomenon (alone), as an objective phenomenon (alone), or as a combined objective and a subjective phenomenon ("having it both ways"). Bates (2006) defined "information" (sometimes, e.g., termed "information 1," p. 1042) as an objective phenomenon and "information 2" as a subjective phenomenon. However, sometimes the term "information" is also used as a synonym for "information 2," e.g., "the term information is understood to refer to one or both senses" (p. 1042). Thus, Professor Bates is not consistent in using the terminology that she herself introduces, and confusion in this controversy may be caused by Professor Bates' ambiguity in her use of the term "information." Bates (2006, p. 1033) defined information as an objective phenomenon by joining a definition by Edwin Parker: "Information is the pattern of organization of matter and energy." The argument in Hjoerland (2007) is, by contrast, that information should be understood as a subjective phenomenon all the way down: That neither the objective definition of information nor "having it both ways" is fruitful. This is expressed, for example, by joining Karpatschof's (2000) definition of information as a physical signal relative to a certain release mechanism, which implies that information is not something objective that can be understood independently of an observer or independently of other kinds of mechanism that are programmed to be sensitive to specific attributes of a signal: There are many differences in the world, and each of them is potentially informative in given situations. Regarding Parker's definition, "patterns of organization of matter and energy" are no more than that until they inform somebody about something. When they inform somebody about something, they may be considered information. The following quote is part of the argumentation in Bates (2008): "He contrasts my definition of information as 'observer-independent' with his position that information is 'situational' and adds a list of respected names on the situational side (Hjoerland, 2007, p. 1448). What this sentence, and much of the remainder of his argument, ignores is the fact that my approach accounts for both an observer-independent and a contextual, situational sense of information." Yes, it is correct that I mostly concentrated on refuting Bates' objective definition of information. It is as if Bates expects an overall appraisal of her work rather than providing a specific analysis of the points on which there are disagreements. I see Bates' "having it both ways": a symptom of inconsistence in argumentation.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27