Search (93 results, page 2 of 5)

0.0035882134 = product of:
  0.041264452 = sum of:
    0.017723909 = weight(_text_:und in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017723909 = score(doc=3328,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
    0.023540542 = weight(_text_:im in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023540542 = score(doc=3328,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.35334828 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: RUNGE, S.: Wege und Möglichkeiten gemeinschaftlicher Sachkatalogisierung; FRAUENDORFER, S. von: Wo liegen die Grenzen für die Aufstellung und Verwendung bibliographischer Einheitssysteme?; RUNGE, S.: Die Deweysche Dezimalklassifikation [DDC] im Vergleich zur Brüsseler Dezimalklassifikation [UDC]; KLEMM, F.: Die Cuttersche Expansive Classification; MOGK, H.: Das System der Kongreßbibliothek in Washington [LCC]; FAASS, B.: Die neuen Fachkataloge des sächsischen Landesbibliothek; NISSEN, C.: Der Mainzer Sachkatalog in Theorie und Praxis; SCHMITZ, W.: Der Katalog "Technik" der Preußischen Staatsbibliothek; RUNGE, S.: Die Bezeichnung im systematischen Katalog

0.0033823033 = product of:
  0.038896486 = sum of:
    0.018089388 = weight(_text_:und in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018089388 = score(doc=5582,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
    0.020807097 = weight(_text_:im in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020807097 = score(doc=5582,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Footnote

Bis heute der 'Standardtext' zur Methode Eppelsheimer mit ausführlicher Dokumentation der verschiedenen Modifikationen und Anpassungen im Anhang

0.0033771032 = product of:
  0.025891125 = sum of:
    0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012484257 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
    0.0047139092 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094278185 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008692958 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385917 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)

Abstract

This article discusses the relation between epistemology, social organization and knowledge organization. Three examples are used to show how this relation has proven to be historically stable: 1) the organization of knowledge in 18th century encyclopedias; 2) the problem of bias in the international introduction of DDC in early 20th century libraries in Scandinavia; and 3) the practice of social tagging and folksonomies in contemporary late capitalist society. By using the concept of 'materiality' and the theoretical contribution on the documentality of social objects by Maurizio Ferraris, an understanding of the character of the connection between epistemology and social order in knowledge organization systems is achieved.

Content

Beitrag im Rahmen eines Special Issue: 'Paradigms of Knowledge and its Organization: The Tree, the Net and Beyond,' edited by Fulvio Mazzocchi and Gian Carlo Fedeli. - Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_40_2013_6_d.pdf.

0.003015826 = product of:
  0.034682 = sum of:
    0.015349354 = weight(_text_:und in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015349354 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
    0.019332644 = product of:
      0.038665287 = sum of:
        0.038665287 = weight(_text_:29 in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038665287 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract

Kurzer Beitrag zur Entwicklung, der Publikationsgeschichte und zum gegenwärtigen Stad der DDC

Source

OCLC newsletter. 2001, no.2, Nov./Dec., S.27-29

0.0028726207 = product of:
  0.033035137 = sum of:
    0.016751006 = weight(_text_:und in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016751006 = score(doc=684,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.3206851 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
    0.016284129 = weight(_text_:im in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016284129 = score(doc=684,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.24442805 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract

In dem Maße, in dem sich die Wissenschaften partikularisieren und atomisieren, wird es immer schwieriger, Überblick zu gewinnen auch schon über nah verwandte Wissenschaften. Daher wächst die Bedeutung der Klassifizierung hinsichtlich ihrer pragmatischen Funktionen stark an. Zudem sind es heute besonders die Querschnittswissenschaften, die im Zentrum des Forschungsinteresses stehen. Dort werden derzeit die größten Fortschritte gemacht. Man denke dabei nur an die Krebsforschung, die sich im molekularen Bereich in einen Forschungsraum zwischen Chemie und Biologie bewegt. Gerade die Medizin bietet viele Beispiele dieser die Wissenschaftsgrenzen überschreitenden Forschungen: der ganze Bereich der Gentechnik, die Nanotechnik, aber auch die medizinische Informatik und Robotik. Aus diesem Grund sind es nicht nur pragmatische Funktionen, die von einer heutigen Wissenschaftsklassifikation bedient werden müssen, sondern auch epistemologische. Wissenschaftsklassifikationen bieten die Möglichkeit, Zusammenhänge zwischen den Wissenschaften erkennbar machen und eröffnen damit unter Umständen neue Wege der Forschung. Dennoch geriet die Wissenschaftsklassifikation gerade in den letzten Jahren in eine Krise. Die Absage an die Systemhaftigkeit des Ganzen der Wissenschaft, die sich im Zuge der postmodernen Theorie durchgesetzt hat, stellte die Wissenschaftsklassifikation vor Probleme, die sie mit den üblichen Ansätzen nicht lösen konnte. Neue Wege der Klassifikation vor dem Hintergrund der Erkenntnisse dieser neuen Theorieansätze galt es nun zu finden. Jede Zeit findet sich ihre Problemlösungswege, und so hat sich auch für die Wissenschaftsklassifikation der Gegenwart neue Möglichkeiten eröffnet, die sich mit Hilfe der neuen Medien verwirklichen lassen.
Durch die rasche Vermehrung und erhöhte Verschränkung der Wissenschaften stoßen die klassischen zweidimensionalen und hierarchischen Klassifikationen heute an eine Grenze. Die eindeutige Hierarchisierung kann hier nur auf Kosten der potentiell auszubildenden Beziehungen zwischen den zu klassifizierenden Wissenschaften gehen, denn, um die Logik der Hierarchie zu bewahren, muss häufig auf die Logik der inhaltlichen Zusammenhänge verzichten werden. Eine Lösung in Form von mehrdimensionalen Verbindungen und In-Bezug-Setzungen bieten die Darstellungsmöglichkeiten der neuen Medien. Einen Schritt in diese Richtung unternahm ARTUR P. SCHMIDT mit seinem 1999 auch als CD-Rom erschienen 'Wissensnavigator'. Unter Bezugnahme auf Deleuzes und Guattaris 'Rhizom' fordert er eine ungehinderte Vernetzung des Wissens in alle Richtungen. Er sieht sich damit im Einklang mit den Entwicklungen seiner Zeit. Interaktive Benutzung soll diese totale Vernetzung des Wissens generieren, indem der Benutzer der Enzyklopädie durch seine Anfragen bei ihrer Evolution mitwirkt. Die Darstellbarkeit dieser Vernetzung soll mit Hilfe eines sich in einem 4-dimensionalen Raum befindlichen "Hyperkubus" ermöglicht werden, der "in einer Matrix ein neuronales Netzwerk" enthalten soll. Neben diesem wohl noch als utopisch zu bezeichnenden Projekt gibt es derzeit eine Anzahl konservativerer Ansätze der Klassifizierung im Internet, die größte Differenzierungen erlauben, aber auf ungeregelte 'Hyperverlinkung' verzichten. Sollten jedoch Projekte wie die ARTUR P. SCHMIDTS realisiert werden können, so ist damit vielleicht auch Nietzsches Forderung zu erfüllen, die er noch in weiter Ferne vermutete.
Mit Hilfe mehrdimensionaler In-Bezug-Setzungen könnte auch einem wechselseitigen Prozess entgegnet werden, der sich seit gut einem Jahrhundert mehr und mehr dynamisierte: Gleichzeitig mit dem Differenzierungsprozess der Wissenschaften, der besonders in den letzten Jahrzehnten immer rascher fortschreitet und hybride Wissenschaftsbezeichnungen wie 'Physikochemie', 'Biophysik' oder 'Soziobiologie' entstehen ließ, geht ein Integrationsprozess einher, der diese Wissenschaften sich wieder annähern lässt. Diese Gleichzeitigkeit der entgegengesetzten Prozesse von Differenzierung und Integration könnte eine neue Form der Einheit der Wissenschaften schaffen, die eine Entwicklung der Wissenschaften zu einem einheitlichen Ganzes in Gang setzt. Damit könnten die großen Potentiale, die in diesem dialektischen Prozess von Differenzierung und Integration hinsichtlich neuer Forschungsergebnisse verwirklicht werden.

0.002714016 = product of:
  0.031211182 = sum of:
    0.02396705 = sum of:
      0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007856515 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.023567878 = queryNorm
          0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
      0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016110536 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.023567878 = queryNorm
          0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
    0.0072441325 = product of:
      0.014488265 = sum of:
        0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014488265 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract

Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.

Content

Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.

Date

29. 9.2017 18:58:02

0.0025460895 = product of:
  0.02928003 = sum of:
    0.012888429 = product of:
      0.025776858 = sum of:
        0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025776858 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0163916 = product of:
      0.0327832 = sum of:
        0.0327832 = weight(_text_:international in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0327832 = score(doc=689,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.416985 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract

Revisits the heritage of faceted classification (FC) beginning with an examination of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in its early manifestations and the groundwork established by international documentalist groups. Early document retrieval experimentation with FC during the intensive period of system design, testing and evaluation in the 1950s and 1960s is discussed, as well as the rise of an international discourse community that sought to augment and extend the reach of FC through system implementations. A list of acronyms employed in the article is given in an appendix.

Date

28.12.2007 19:29:10

0.0025232534 = product of:
  0.029017413 = sum of:
    0.019438047 = product of:
      0.038876094 = sum of:
        0.038876094 = weight(_text_:international in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038876094 = score(doc=1429,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009579366 = product of:
      0.019158732 = sum of:
        0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019158732 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract

I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.0024985038 = product of:
  0.019155195 = sum of:
    0.0039282576 = product of:
      0.007856515 = sum of:
        0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007856515 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0072441325 = product of:
      0.014488265 = sum of:
        0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014488265 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.007982805 = product of:
      0.01596561 = sum of:
        0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01596561 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)

Abstract

The origin of the abridged edition of the Dewey system goes back to 1894 when an outline of 192 pages based on the full 5th Edition (1894) was issued for small public and school libraries of North America. New editions have appeared regularly following closely the publication of new full editions. An abridged version, which is always in one volume, comprises an introduction, schedules, four tables (namely 1, 2, 3 and 4) only, and the relative index and other minor features of the full edition, and has shorter numbers. Abridged 15 is a logical abridgement of the DDC23 (2011) and is a product of a new approach to development of an abridged edition of the DDC. Its content has been derived from the DDC database applying a set of rules to extract the edition using the new (2010) version of the editorial support system. The revision process has been informed by interaction with an always widening and diversified Dewey community at home and abroad. It aims to improve the currency of the schedules continuing to serve as shelving tool while recognizing its 'other' uses as a spinoff of its simplicity and inexpensiveness.

Date

3. 3.2016 18:59:22

Theme

International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen

0.0022420113 = product of:
  0.025783129 = sum of:
    0.005499561 = product of:
      0.010999122 = sum of:
        0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010999122 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.020283569 = product of:
      0.040567137 = sum of:
        0.040567137 = weight(_text_:international in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040567137 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5159926 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Abstract

The ideas and practices embraced by the term documentation introduced by Paul Otlet and his colleagues to describe the work of the International Institute of Bibliography (later FID) that they set up in Brussels in 1895, constituted a new discursive formation. The key concepts for information science were implicit in and operationalized by what was created within the International Institute of Bibliography in 1895 and the decades that followed. Important aspects of the origins of information science were contained within or became an extension of the discursive format labelled documentation

Footnote

Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science

0.0022328494 = product of:
  0.051355537 = sum of:
    0.051355537 = product of:
      0.102711074 = sum of:
        0.102711074 = weight(_text_:kataloge in 4518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102711074 = score(doc=4518,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1351219 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.7601364 = fieldWeight in 4518, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4518)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)

Theme

Geschichte der Kataloge

0.0021545368 = product of:
  0.024777172 = sum of:
    0.015349354 = weight(_text_:und in 8921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015349354 = score(doc=8921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 8921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8921)
    0.0094278185 = product of:
      0.018855637 = sum of:
        0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 8921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018855637 = score(doc=8921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 8921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Content

1. Die Herausbildung des Klassifikationsbegriffs in der Geschichte der Philosophie - 2. Logische und methodologische Probleme der Klassifikation der Wissenschaften - 3. Zur Klassifikation innerhalb größerer Wissenschaftsbereiche

0.0020840913 = product of:
  0.0479341 = sum of:
    0.0479341 = sum of:
      0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01571303 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.023567878 = queryNorm
          0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
      0.03222107 = weight(_text_:29 in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03222107 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.023567878 = queryNorm
          0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)

Date

29. 7.2006 20:06:08

Footnote

Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4

0.0019430243 = product of:
  0.02234478 = sum of:
    0.007856515 = product of:
      0.01571303 = sum of:
        0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 2359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571303 = score(doc=2359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 2359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014488265 = product of:
      0.02897653 = sum of:
        0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 2359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02897653 = score(doc=2359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 2359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Source

International classification. 19(1992) no.1, S.7-9

0.0019430243 = product of:
  0.02234478 = sum of:
    0.007856515 = product of:
      0.01571303 = sum of:
        0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571303 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014488265 = product of:
      0.02897653 = sum of:
        0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02897653 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Source

International classification. 19(1992) no.1, S.3-6

0.0018158929 = product of:
  0.013921846 = sum of:
    0.0062421286 = weight(_text_:im in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062421286 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.09369561 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
    0.0033332373 = product of:
      0.0066664745 = sum of:
        0.0066664745 = weight(_text_:1 in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066664745 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.11514856 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004346479 = product of:
      0.008692958 = sum of:
        0.008692958 = weight(_text_:international in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008692958 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.11056984 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)

Abstract

This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.

Footnote

Rez. in: International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.228-229 (B.C. Vickery); Journal of classification 11(1994) no.2, S.255-256 (W. Gödert)

Isbn

0-444-89343-1

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.0017954474 = product of:
  0.020647645 = sum of:
    0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012791129 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
    0.007856515 = product of:
      0.01571303 = sum of:
        0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571303 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Content

1. Wortgeschichte, Terminologie - 2. Überblick über die zitierte Literatur - 3. Klassifikatorische Elementarprinzipien - 3.1 Die Psychologie betreffend - 3.2 Die Logik betreffend - 3.3 Die Philosophie betreffend (h.a. bibl. KS) - 3.4 Die Sprachwissenschaft betreffend - 3.5 Die Ähnlichkeit - 3.6 Die Relation - 4. Angewandte Klassifikation - 5. Automatische Klassifikation - 6. Darstellung

Series

Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Kommunikationsforschung und Phonetik der Universität Bonn; Bd.36

0.0017954474 = product of:
  0.020647645 = sum of:
    0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012791129 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
    0.007856515 = product of:
      0.01571303 = sum of:
        0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571303 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Footnote

Original in: Library Association Record 13(1911) Oct.14, S.354-358; Nov.15, S.389-394; Dec.15, S.444-449 und 14(1912) Jan.15, S.39-46; Mar.15, S.174-181

Series

AAL reprints; no.1

0.0017254096 = product of:
  0.019842211 = sum of:
    0.005499561 = product of:
      0.010999122 = sum of:
        0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010999122 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01434265 = product of:
      0.0286853 = sum of:
        0.0286853 = weight(_text_:international in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0286853 = score(doc=825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Date

1. 6.2013 19:59:02

Source

Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan

Theme

International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen

0.0015964593 = product of:
  0.018359281 = sum of:
    0.009666322 = product of:
      0.019332644 = sum of:
        0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019332644 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008692958 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385917 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)

Date

29. 8.2004 9:43:23

Source

Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al