Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Mandl, T.; Schulz, J.M.; Marholz, N.; Werner, K.: Benutzerforschung anhand von Log-Dateien : Chancen Grenzen und aktuelle Trends (2011) 0.01
    0.013500039 = product of:
      0.1035003 = sum of:
        0.022881467 = weight(_text_:und in 4304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022881467 = score(doc=4304,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 4304, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4304)
        0.04227155 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04227155 = score(doc=4304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 4304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4304)
        0.03834728 = sum of:
          0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 4304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012570425 = score(doc=4304,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 4304, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4304)
          0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 4304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025776858 = score(doc=4304,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4304, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4304)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    Die Analyse des Verhaltens von Benutzern von Informationssystemen stellt einen Kern der Informationswissenschaft dar. Die Sammlung von umfangreichen Verhaltensdaten fällt mit den heutigen technischen Möglichkeiten leicht. Der Artikel fasst Möglichkeiten und Chancen der Analyse von Log-Dateien zusammen. Der Track LogCLEF wird vorgestellt, der Forschern erstmals die Möglichkeit eröffnet, mit den denselben Log-Dateien und somit vergleichend arbeiten zu können. Die Datengrundlage und einige Ergebnisse von LogCLEF werden vorgestellt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.1, S.29-35
  2. Huvila, I.: Mining qualitative data on human information behaviour from the Web (2010) 0.01
    0.005649647 = product of:
      0.06497094 = sum of:
        0.012662571 = weight(_text_:und in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012662571 = score(doc=4676,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
        0.052308373 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052308373 = score(doc=4676,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.58
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  3. Stallmann, A.: Silver Surfer im Internet (2012) 0.00
    0.0037508563 = product of:
      0.043134846 = sum of:
        0.01790758 = weight(_text_:und in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01790758 = score(doc=408,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
        0.025227265 = weight(_text_:im in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025227265 = score(doc=408,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.37866634 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Deutschland unterliegt einem demographischen Wandel, der Anteil der über 50-Jährigen nimmt deutlich zu. Internetnutzer mit einem Alter von 50 Jahren oder älter werden als Silver Surfer bezeichnet. Im Zuge der fortschreitenden Digitalisierung gilt der kompetente Umgang mit dem Internet als Schlüsselqualifikation zur Erleichterung und Bereicherung des Lebens. Es werden Ergebnisse einer Befragung vorgestellt, die zu beantworten versucht, ob und in welchem Umfang Silver Surfer über Kompetenz im Umgang mit dem Internet verfügen. Bei der Befragung findet der Persona-Ansatz aus dem Bereich der Softwareentwicklung Anwendung. Ergebnis der Studie ist, dass die Generation 50+ unterschiedliche Interneterfahrungen aufweist und nicht als homogene Gruppe betrachtet werden kann.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.4, S.217-226
  4. Knautz, K.; Dröge, E.; Finkelmeyer, S.; Guschauski, D.; Juchem, K.; Krzmyk, C.; Miskovic, D.; Schiefer, J.; Sen, E.; Verbina, J.; Werner, N.; Stock, W.G.: Indexieren von Emotionen bei Videos (2010) 0.00
    0.002577857 = product of:
      0.029645357 = sum of:
        0.0171611 = weight(_text_:und in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0171611 = score(doc=3637,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.328536 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
        0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012484257 = score(doc=3637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenstand der empirischen Forschungsarbeit sind dargestellte wie empfundene Gefühle bei Videos. Sind Nutzer in der Lage, solche Gefühle derart konsistent zu erschließen, dass man deren Angaben für ein emotionales Videoretrieval gebrauchen kann? Wir arbeiten mit einem kontrollierten Vokabular für neun tionen (Liebe, Freude, Spaß, Überraschung, Sehnsucht, Trauer, Ärger, Ekel und Angst), einem Schieberegler zur Einstellung der jeweiligen Intensität des Gefühls und mit dem Ansatz der broad Folksonomy, lassen also unterschiedliche Nutzer die Videos taggen. Versuchspersonen bekamen insgesamt 20 Videos (bearbeitete Filme aus YouTube) vorgelegt, deren Emotionen sie indexieren sollten. Wir erhielten Angaben von 776 Probanden und entsprechend 279.360 Schiebereglereinstellungen. Die Konsistenz der Nutzervoten ist sehr hoch; die Tags führen zu stabilen Verteilungen der Emotionen für die einzelnen Videos. Die endgültige Form der Verteilungen wird schon bei relativ wenigen Nutzern (unter 100) erreicht. Es ist möglich, im Sinne der Power Tags die jeweils für ein Dokument zentralen Gefühle (soweit überhaupt vorhanden) zu separieren und für das emotionale Information Retrieval (EmIR) aufzubereiten.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.4, S.221-236
  5. Werner, K.: das Confirmation/Disconfirmation-Paradigma der Kundenzufriedenheit im Kontext des Information Retrieval : Größere Zufriedenheit durch bessere Suchmaschinen? (2010) 0.00
    0.0023372679 = product of:
      0.02687858 = sum of:
        0.010232903 = weight(_text_:und in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010232903 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
        0.016645677 = weight(_text_:im in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016645677 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.6/7, S.385-396
  6. Bank, C.: ¬Die Usability von Online-Wörterbüchern und elektronischen Sprachportalen (2012) 0.00
    0.0011122721 = product of:
      0.025582258 = sum of:
        0.025582258 = weight(_text_:und in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025582258 = score(doc=566,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit untersucht die Usability von Online-Wörterbüchern und elektronischen Sprachportalen und soll eine Brücke zwischen der Usability von Websites hinsichtlich softwareergonomischer Normen und Konventionen und Wörterbüchern in elektronischer Form schlagen. Die einzige Usability-Methode, mit der es möglich ist, konkrete und empirisch belegte Aussagen darüber zu treffen, wie potentielle Nutzer ein Online-Wörterbuch verwenden und welche Probleme dabei festgestellt werden, ist ein Usability- Test mit realen Benutzern. Als Untersuchungsgegenstand dient das Online-Wortschatz-Informationssystem Deutsch (Owid), die Base lexicale du français (BLF) und das elektronische Lernerwörterbuch Deutsch-Italienisch (Eldit). Die Arbeit setzt sich aus vier verschiedenen empirischen Studien zusammen. Da ein Usability-Test immer nur einen Ausschnitt an Funktionalitäten aus einem gesamten System widerspiegeln kann, wurden mithilfe einer empirischen Fragebogen-Studie zunächst die für den Benutzer wichtigsten und am meisten verwendeten Funktionen eines Online-Wörterbuchs identifiziert und als Grundlage für den Test gewählt. Eine anschließende heuristische Evaluation trug potentielle Usability-Probleme der drei Online- Wörterbücher zusammen und stellte die Grundlage für die Thesenstellung des Usability-Tests dar. Der Test setzte sich aus zwei empirischen Teilen zusammen: Einem Aufgabenteil, den die Testperson für jedes der drei Online-Wörterbüchern einzeln bearbeiten und dabei die Testmethode des lauten Denkens anwenden musste und einem Post-Test- Fragebogen, der direkt nach dem Bearbeiten des jeweiligen Aufgabenkatalogs ausgefüllt wurde. Der gesamte Test wurde mit Morae, einer Software u. a. für Software- und Website- Usability-Tests, durchgeführt und ausgewertet.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.6, S.345-360
  7. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.00
    0.0010357446 = product of:
      0.0119110625 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  8. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.00
    0.0010357446 = product of:
      0.0119110625 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.13-24
  9. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.00
    8.2859566E-4 = product of:
      0.00952885 = sum of:
        0.0031426062 = product of:
          0.0062852125 = sum of:
            0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062852125 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006386244 = product of:
          0.012772488 = sum of:
            0.012772488 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012772488 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.2-26
  10. Heller, L.: Ergebnisse der Benutzerumfrage "Literaturverwaltung - Was ich benutze und was ich brauche", TIB/UB Hannover 2011 (2011) 0.00
    6.2919606E-4 = product of:
      0.0144715095 = sum of:
        0.0144715095 = weight(_text_:und in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144715095 = score(doc=4884,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: http://www.tib.uni-hannover.de/de/aktuelles/aktuell/newsdetail/article/citavi-endnote-zotero-und-co/62.html.
  11. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.00
    5.345087E-4 = product of:
      0.0122937 = sum of:
        0.0122937 = product of:
          0.0245874 = sum of:
            0.0245874 = weight(_text_:international in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0245874 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31273875 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
  12. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.00
    4.1649418E-4 = product of:
      0.009579366 = sum of:
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  13. Clewley, N.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, X.: Cognitive styles and search engine preferences : field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism (2010) 0.00
    3.5022903E-4 = product of:
      0.008055268 = sum of:
        0.008055268 = product of:
          0.016110536 = sum of:
            0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016110536 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:47
  14. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: Analysis of change in users' assessment of search results over time (2017) 0.00
    3.5022903E-4 = product of:
      0.008055268 = sum of:
        0.008055268 = product of:
          0.016110536 = sum of:
            0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016110536 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:33:29
  15. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.00
    3.470785E-4 = product of:
      0.007982805 = sum of:
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  16. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.00
    3.470785E-4 = product of:
      0.007982805 = sum of:
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  17. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.00
    3.470785E-4 = product of:
      0.007982805 = sum of:
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  18. Foss, E.; Druin, A.; Yip, J.; Ford, W.; Golub, E.; Hutchinson, H.: Adolescent search roles (2013) 0.00
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
      0.0047139092 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.173-189
  19. O'Brien, H.L.; Toms, E.G.: ¬The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement (2010) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.50-69
  20. Huurnink, B.; Hollink, L.; Heuvel, W. van den; Rijke, M. de: Search behavior of media professionals at an audiovisual archive : a transaction log analysis (2010) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=3468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 10:10:55