Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

0.039924767 = product of:
  0.14971787 = sum of:
    0.07369448 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07369448 = score(doc=3803,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.44573617 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
    0.022492902 = product of:
      0.044985805 = sum of:
        0.044985805 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044985805 = score(doc=3803,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.34825563 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.044985805 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044985805 = score(doc=3803,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.34825563 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
    0.008544678 = product of:
      0.017089356 = sum of:
        0.017089356 = weight(_text_:information in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017089356 = score(doc=3803,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)

Abstract

The 4th edition of this popular and well-cited text is now co-authored, and includes significant changes from earlier texts. Presenting a comprehensive review of over a century of research on information behavior (IB), this book is intended for students in information studies and disciplines interested in research on information activities. The initial two chapters introduce IB as a multi-disciplinary topic, the 3rd provides a brief history of research on information seeking. Chapter four discusses what is meant by the terms "information" and "knowledge. "Chapter five discusses "information needs," and how they are addressed. The 6th chapter identifies many related concepts. Twelve models of information behavior (expanded from earlier editions) are illustrated in chapter seven. Chapter eight reviews various paradigms and theories informing IB research. Chapter nine examines research methods invoked in IB studies and a discussion of qualitative and mixed approaches. The 10th chapter gives examples of IB studies by context. The final chapter looks at strengths and weaknesses, recent trends, and future development.

BK

06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)

Classification

06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)

RSWK

Information Retrieval

Series

Studies in information

Subject

Information Retrieval

0.002937599 = product of:
  0.044063985 = sum of:
    0.044063985 = sum of:
      0.020507226 = weight(_text_:information in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020507226 = score(doc=3450,freq=24.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
            4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
              24.0 = termFreq=24.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023556758 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Most information systems share a common assumption: information seeking is discrete. Such an assumption neither reflects real-life information seeking processes nor conforms to the perspective of phenomenology, "life is a journey constituted by continuous acquisition of knowledge." Thus, this study develops and validates a theoretical model that explains successive search experience for essentially the same information problem. The proposed model is called Multiple Information Seeking Episodes (MISE), which consists of four dimensions: problematic situation, information problem, information seeking process, episodes. Eight modes of multiple information seeking episodes are identified and specified with properties of the four dimensions of MISE. The results partially validate MISE by finding that the original MISE model is highly accurate, but less sufficient in characterizing successive searches; all factors in the MISE model are empirically confirmed, but new factors are identified as weIl. The revised MISE model is shifted from the user-centered to the interaction-centered perspective, taking into account factors of searcher, system, search activity, search context, information attainment, and information use activities.

Date

10. 4.2005 14:52:22

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.393-415

0.0026867227 = product of:
  0.04030084 = sum of:
    0.04030084 = sum of:
      0.016744079 = weight(_text_:information in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016744079 = score(doc=3612,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023556758 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

Source

Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase

0.0023994963 = product of:
  0.035992444 = sum of:
    0.035992444 = sum of:
      0.01636181 = weight(_text_:information in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01636181 = score(doc=3340,freq=22.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
            4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
              22.0 = termFreq=22.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019630633 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Keeping up to date with research developments is a central activity of academic researchers, but researchers face difficulties in managing the rapid growth of available scientific information. This study examined how researchers stay up to date, using the information journey model as a framework for analysis and investigating which dimensions influence information behaviors. We designed a 2-round study involving semistructured interviews and prototype testing with 61 researchers with 3 levels of seniority (PhD student to professor). Data were analyzed following a semistructured qualitative approach. Five key dimensions that influence information behaviors were identified: level of seniority, information sources, state of the project, level of familiarity, and how well defined the relevant community is. These dimensions are interrelated and their values determine the flow of the information journey. Across all levels of professional expertise, researchers used similar hard (formal) sources to access content, while soft (interpersonal) sources were used to filter information. An important "pain point" that future information tools should address is helping researchers filter information at the point of need.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35

0.0023724737 = product of:
  0.035587102 = sum of:
    0.035587102 = weight(_text_:und in 7619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035587102 = score(doc=7619,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 7619, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7619)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

6.961179E-4 = product of:
  0.010441768 = sum of:
    0.010441768 = product of:
      0.020883536 = sum of:
        0.020883536 = weight(_text_:information in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020883536 = score(doc=3760,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

"Information behavior" is the currently preferred term used to describe the many ways in which human beings interact with information, in particular, the ways in which people seek and utilize information. The broad history of research on information-seeking behavior over the last 50-60 years is reviewed, major landmarks are identified, and current directions in research are discussed.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

Theme

Information

6.5776956E-4 = product of:
  0.009866543 = sum of:
    0.009866543 = product of:
      0.019733086 = sum of:
        0.019733086 = weight(_text_:information in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019733086 = score(doc=4577,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

To better understand how individuals and groups derive satisfaction from information, it is important to identify the information source preferences they apply in information seeking and decision making. Four informal propositions drove the structure and underlying logic of this study, forming a preliminary outline of a theory of information source preference profiles and their influence an information satisfaction. This study employed Social Judgment Analysis (SJA) to identify the information judgment preferences held by professional groups for six selected information sources: word of mouth, expert oral advice, Internet, print news, nonfiction books, and radio/television news. The research was designed as an hypotheses-generating exploratory study employing a purposive sample (n = 90) and generated four empirically supported, testable hypotheses about user satisfaction with information sources. The SJA judgment functions revealed the influences of volume and polarity (i.e., positive versus negative information) an information satisfaction. By advancing the understanding of how information source preferences can be identified empirically and their influence an information satisfaction, this research reflects a first, small step toward understanding "satisficing." Satisficing behaviors result in early termination of information search processes when individuals, facing incomplete information, are sufficiently satisfied to assume risks and execute decisions.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.9, S.879-904

6.5447245E-4 = product of:
  0.009817086 = sum of:
    0.009817086 = product of:
      0.019634172 = sum of:
        0.019634172 = weight(_text_:information in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019634172 = score(doc=1320,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.14, S.2269-2279

6.5447245E-4 = product of:
  0.009817086 = sum of:
    0.009817086 = product of:
      0.019634172 = sum of:
        0.019634172 = weight(_text_:information in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019634172 = score(doc=4138,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Previous studies have found that both (a) the characteristics (e.g., quality and accessibility) and (b) the types of sources (e.g., relational and nonrelational sources) influence information source selection. Different from earlier studies that have prioritized one source attribute over the other, this research uses information need as a contingency factor to examine information seekers' simultaneous consideration of different attributes. An empirical test from 149 employees' evaluations of eight information sources revealed that (a) low-and high-information-need individuals favored information source quality over accessibility while medium-information-need individuals favored accessibility over quality; and (b) individuals are more likely to choose relational over nonrelational sources as information need increases.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.133-145

6.152871E-4 = product of:
  0.009229306 = sum of:
    0.009229306 = product of:
      0.018458612 = sum of:
        0.018458612 = weight(_text_:information in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018458612 = score(doc=2034,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

The study focuses on the ways in which people define their source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information for non-work purposes. The conceptual framework draws on two major concepts, that is, information source horizon and information pathways. The former denotes the ways information sources are mapped in preference order in an imaginary field, while information pathways refers to the sequences in which sources placed on the information source horizon are actually used. The empirical part of the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 18 individuals active in environmental issues. Human sources and the Internet were preferred most strongly in seeking for problem-based information. The major source preferences were content of information, and availability and accessibility. Usability of information sources and user characteristics were mentioned less frequently as preference criteria. Typically, information pathways consisted of the use of 3-4 sources. On average, human and networked sources were favored in the early phases of information seeking. Printed media such as magazines and organizational sources were often used to complement information received from human sources and the Internet. However, the source preferences varied considerably, depending on the requirements of the problem at hand.

Source

Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.274-293

6.091031E-4 = product of:
  0.009136546 = sum of:
    0.009136546 = product of:
      0.018273093 = sum of:
        0.018273093 = weight(_text_:information in 6004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018273093 = score(doc=6004,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 6004, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6004)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

This article investigates whether information seeking patterns can be related to discipline differences, study approaches, and personality traits. A quantitative study of 305 master's thesis students' information behavior found that their information seeking tended to be either exploratory or precise. Statistical analyses showed that inner traits seemed more influential than discipline characteristics an information behavior. Exploration or specificity was manifested in terms of both the level and scope of information students wished to retrieve and the way they searched for it.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.11, S.1440-1450

5.58136E-4 = product of:
  0.0083720395 = sum of:
    0.0083720395 = product of:
      0.016744079 = sum of:
        0.016744079 = weight(_text_:information in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016744079 = score(doc=3819,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

The information search process (ISP) is a six-stage model of the users' holistic experience in the process of information seeking. The ISP model, based on two decades of empirical research, identifies three realms of experience: the affective (feelings), the cognitive (thoughts), and the physical (actions) common to each stage. These studies were among the first to investigate the affective aspects or the feelings of a person in the process of information seeking along with the cognitive and physical aspects. Central to the ISP is the notion that uncertainty, both affective and cognitive, increases and decreases in the process of information seeking. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking is proposed that states that information commonly increases uncertainty in the early stages of the search process. Increased uncertainty indicates a zone of intervention for intermediaries and system designers.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

5.58136E-4 = product of:
  0.0083720395 = sum of:
    0.0083720395 = product of:
      0.016744079 = sum of:
        0.016744079 = weight(_text_:information in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016744079 = score(doc=3821,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Key terms related to information searching and search models are defined. A historic context is provided to illustrate the evolution of the four main digital environments that users interact with in their search process to offer readers background information regarding the transition from manual information systems to computer-based information retrieval (IR) systems, as well as the transition from intermediary searching to end-user searching. Emphasis is placed on the review of different levels of information searching from search tactics/moves, search strategies, and usage patterns, to search models and associated factors in relation to task, user knowledge structure, IR system design, and social-organization context. Search models are further classified into two types, with one type illustrating information search process (ISP) and the other type emphasizing the factors that influence the process. In addition, unsolved problems and future research are discussed and suggested.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

5.2621565E-4 = product of:
  0.0078932345 = sum of:
    0.0078932345 = product of:
      0.015786469 = sum of:
        0.015786469 = weight(_text_:information in 6918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015786469 = score(doc=6918,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6918, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Proposes a reference interview strategy that will allow the reference librarian to: efficiently assess the information need of undergraduates undertaking a social science assignment, label the information need, and assign the most appropriate online search strategy to satisfy this need

Source

Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.709-717

5.2621565E-4 = product of:
  0.0078932345 = sum of:
    0.0078932345 = product of:
      0.015786469 = sum of:
        0.015786469 = weight(_text_:information in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015786469 = score(doc=766,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Provides guidelines for information professionals running end user search programmes. Covers: the reference interview, evaluation of information sources (purpose, authprity, scope and proposed audience), user aids giving information on access, electronic database procedures, standards, electronic search strategies (logical connectors, proximity connections, limiting searches), and the role of the information centre in supporting end users

5.2208843E-4 = product of:
  0.007831326 = sum of:
    0.007831326 = product of:
      0.015662652 = sum of:
        0.015662652 = weight(_text_:information in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015662652 = score(doc=580,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

This article presents the research findings of a study on task complexity and information-seeking activities in real-life work tasks. The focus was on perceived task complexity, which was determined according to the task performers' prior knowledge about the task ahead. This view on task complexity is closely related to research considering task uncertainty and analyzability. Information-seeking activities considered were a need to acquire different types of information and the subsequent use of different types of sources. The research data were mainly collected by (1) self-recorded journals that were filled out by municipal administrators in the course of performing their ordinary work duties (altogether 78 task diaries), and (2) subsequent interviews. The results indicated that there is a relatively strong relationship between types of information and types of sources. The effects of task complexity made experts more attractive as a source than other people and all types of documentary sources.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.7, S.581-591

4.8335994E-4 = product of:
  0.007250399 = sum of:
    0.007250399 = product of:
      0.014500798 = sum of:
        0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 3330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014500798 = score(doc=3330,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 3330, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Successive information searches are fairly common. To enhance the understanding of the behavior, this study attempted to improve both the descriptive and explanatory power of the Multiple Information Seeking Episodes (MISE) model, a conceptual model characterizing factors affecting successive searches. It empirically observed how the key factors in the information seeking process in the MISE model evolve over multiple search sessions and explained how those factors are affected by other factors associated with searchers, search activity, search context, systems, information attainment, and information-use activities. The validated and enriched MISE model can be extended to serve the basis for future studies in other complex searches process such as multi-tasking and collaborative searches, and can also help identify problems that users face and thus derive requirements for system support.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.416-436

4.6511332E-4 = product of:
  0.0069766995 = sum of:
    0.0069766995 = product of:
      0.013953399 = sum of:
        0.013953399 = weight(_text_:information in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013953399 = score(doc=3802,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

4.604387E-4 = product of:
  0.00690658 = sum of:
    0.00690658 = product of:
      0.01381316 = sum of:
        0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01381316 = score(doc=3866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

4.5571616E-4 = product of:
  0.006835742 = sum of:
    0.006835742 = product of:
      0.013671484 = sum of:
        0.013671484 = weight(_text_:information in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013671484 = score(doc=1883,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Research methodologies in several of the social sciences require the use of tests. When assisting social science researchers who seek information on tests, reference librarians do not, themselves, always have direct access to the instruments. Librarians should not only have the knowledge that various print and electronic database resources are available to gain needed information, but they should also have a strategy by which these sources can be searched in an expedient and thorough manner. This paper offers such a search strategy which can be used with the materials commonly found in a large research or specialized test library