Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Rada, R."
  1. McMath, C.F.; Tamaru, R.S.; Rada, R.: ¬A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1989) 0.00
    0.0036722657 = product of:
      0.036722656 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Source
    International journal of man-machine studies. 31(1989), S.121-147
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Rada, R.: Connecting and evaluating thesauri : issues and cases (1987) 0.00
    0.0034562773 = product of:
      0.025922079 = sum of:
        0.008194685 = weight(_text_:und in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008194685 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.00756075 = weight(_text_:in in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756075 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.008194685 = weight(_text_:und in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008194685 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Connecting and evaluating thesauri is an important task for the systematic development of better information retrieval systems. Connecting thesauri includes not only determining when terms in different thesauri are the same but also determining what kinds of relationships can be transferred from one thesaurus to another. This paper first presents issues in connecting and evaluating thesauri. Various experiments in connecting a particular thesaurus, the Medical Subject Headings, with other medical thesauri are described. In these experiments, similar terms in two thesauri are recognized and then differences in two thesauri are exploited to create more powerful thesauri. Part of the evaluation requires the thesaurus to support automatic indexing and retrieving of documents
    Source
    International classification. 14(1987), S.63-69
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Rada, R.: Hypertext and paper : a special synergy (1991) 0.00
    0.0017470915 = product of:
      0.017470915 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Some people argure that hypertext is easy to write, is hard to create by converting existing text into hypertext, and has a massive market. This paper argures the contrary. First, Hypertext is hard to write. Second, automatically converting a text into hypertext is, to a first approximation, easy. Third, successful marketing of hypertext depends on having a large volume of material that is also available in paper form
    Source
    International journal of information management. 11(1991) no.1, S.14-22
  4. Rada, R.; Wang, W.; Birchall, A.: Retrieval hierarchies in hypertext (1993) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 4714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=4714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4714)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 4714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=4714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4714)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.3, S.359-372
  5. Rada, R.: Knowledge-sparse and knowledge-rich learning in information retrieval (1987) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 5146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=5146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5146)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 5146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=5146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5146)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 23(1987) no.3, S.195-210
  6. Rada, R.: Hypertext: from text to expertext (1991) 0.00
    6.6957914E-4 = product of:
      0.010043686 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 6273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=6273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6273)
        0.005634167 = weight(_text_:s in 6273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005634167 = score(doc=6273,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 6273, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6273)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 48(1992) S.98-99 (P. Brown); Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.2, S.106-107 (dt.), no.3, S.172-173 (engl.) (R. Kuhlen)
    Pages
    237 S
  7. Rada, R.; You, G.-N.: Balanced outlines and hypertext (1992) 0.00
    6.355139E-4 = product of:
      0.009532709 = sum of:
        0.00756075 = weight(_text_:in in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756075 = score(doc=2363,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=2363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Navigation problems in a hypertext migth be reduced, if mutiple, coherent views of the hypertext were available. Document outlines help readers appreciate the structure and meaning of the document. Proposes measures of syntactic and lexical balance in an outline and show in a sample of documents the degree to which these balances occur. Based on balance in an outline, a method for semi-automatically generating an alternative outline is applied to one textbook. The textbook with both its original and its alternative outline is availbale in hypertext, and subjects who were asked to evaluate this hypertext noted that the alternative outline would help readers compare concepts in the textbook
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 48(1992) no.1, S.20-44
  8. You, G.-N:; Rada, R.: ¬A systematic approach to outline manipulation (1994) 0.00
    5.781282E-4 = product of:
      0.008671923 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines (Tables of contents) reflect a conceptual model and can serve as a cognitive aid in reading and writing hypertext
    Source
    Human-computer studies. 41(1994) no.3, S.283-308
  9. Birchall, A.; Deakin, A.; Rada, R.: Knowledge automation and the need for intermediaries (1994) 0.00
    5.0708273E-4 = product of:
      0.007606241 = sum of:
        0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005915991 = score(doc=706,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Draws together research from a variety of disciplines to consider why and how information technology is qualitatively different from older technologies of information, and why this promotes changes at both the individual and the social level. Concludes from this analysis that there are 2 diverging directions for organizational and societal development: towards technocracy or towards the learning organization and the learning society. In both there will be roles that could be filled by librarians, but the learning organization's network structure would offer many more opportunities for active intermediary roles, and it is in accord with the social ethic of the library profession. In a technocracy, the librarian might assume the high status role of 'knowledge manager' but be out of touch with the ultimate users of information. Considers the pursuit of professional status by librarians as not being the best way to ensure the continuation of the 'social ethic' according to which librarians are educated. A new model of professionalism is needed along the lines suggested by D.A. Schon for the 'reflective practioner', in which knowledge and expertise are collaboratively developed in the interchange between the professional and the client
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 26(1994) no.4, S.181-192
  10. Chen, C.; Rada, R.: ¬A conceptual model for supporting collaborative authoring and use (1994) 0.00
    4.8788113E-4 = product of:
      0.0073182164 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 7554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=7554,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 7554, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7554)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 7554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=7554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 7554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7554)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses some problems encountered in hypermedia-based collaboration and reuse, and presents a conceptual framework to resolve these problems. Three suggestions are made based on the discussion: (1) extra organizational structures are necessary in shared hypermedia to support collaborative interactions; (2) an abstract schema is a key to capture the dynamic nature of the shared hypermedia; (3) an integration of the schema evolution approach and the workflow approach is recommended for an open system hypermedia teamwork support. The whole authoring environment is divided into several component spaces with particular respect to the Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. Not only can this separation reduce the overall complexitiy of working within such an environment, but it also conforms more closely with human cognitive needs in collaborative authoring and reuse activities
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 21(1994) no.2, S.88-93
  11. Chen, C.; Rada, R.; Zeb, A.: ¬An extended fisheye view browser for collaborative writing (1994) 0.00
    4.8788113E-4 = product of:
      0.0073182164 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=604,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates information-seeking tasks and associated cognitve issues in the context of interacting with an evolving collaborative hypertext. Fishexe view browsers were used to facilitate exploring in a large information space. The fishexe view browser was extended to incorporate word frequencies. The effects of the fisheye view browser and the changing document were tested with 2x2 factorial experiment. Multivariate tests founs a significant interaction between the 2 factors and a significant main effect of the fisheye view browser. The users who had access to the word frequency information performed their tasks more effectively than the users without access to word frequencies. This work implies that several aspects of an evolving hypertext might als be useful incorporated in an associated fishexe view browser
    Source
    International journal of human-computer studies. 40(1994) no.5, S.859-878
  12. Rada, R.: Hypertext writing and document reuse : the role of a semantic net (1990.) 0.00
    4.8283124E-4 = product of:
      0.007242468 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=5911,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    When document components are classified and then recombined during document re-use, a semantic net may serve as the classification language. A theory of analogical inheritance, applied to this semantic net, guides the reorganisation of document components. Authors index paragraphs from various sources with node-link-node triples from a semantic net and then use programs to transverse the semantic net and generate various outlines. The program examines node and link names in deciding which path to take. Describes how these techniques helped in the re-use: parts of an existing book to write a new one
    Source
    Electronic publishing review. 3(1990) no.3, S.125-140
  13. Rada, R.; Mili, H.: Document reuse : organizing, finding, and reorganizing content (1992) 0.00
    4.8283124E-4 = product of:
      0.007242468 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 7082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=7082,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 7082, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7082)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 7082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=7082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7082)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Existing structures should be exploited as best as possible in the course of document reuse. Reuse may take multiple forms: rearranging a single document so as to provide different views of the same information, copying a portion of a single document to as to provide a portion of a new document, and combining portions of existing documents to constitute a new document. Algortihms are presented to do such reuse, examples are provided. For significant reuse the information in existing documents need to be abstracted so as to highlight the conceptual pattern
    Source
    International journal of information management. 12(1992) no.4, S.310-319
  14. Rada, R.: Medical knowledge and hypermedia (1992) 0.00
    4.8177355E-4 = product of:
      0.0072266026 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=4280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=4280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the history of the Univ. of Liverpool Research Group and its vision. The vision is to merge medical knowledge and hypermedia to produce more powerful information generation and improve access tools for those in health care. Like GALEN, the plan is to improve the construction of knowledge bases and provide user interfaces to medical information
    Source
    International classification. 19(1992) no.4, S.192
  15. Rada, R.; Barlow, J.; Potharst, J.; Zanstra, P.; Bijstra, D.: Document ranking using an enriched thesaurus (1991) 0.00
    4.6544487E-4 = product of:
      0.0069816727 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 6626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=6626,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6626, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6626)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 6626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=6626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 6626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6626)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus may be viewed as a graph, and document retrieval algorithms can exploit this graph when both the documents and the query are represented by thesaurus terms. These retrieval algorithms measure the distance between the query and documents by using the path lengths in the graph. Previous work witj such strategies has shown that the hierarchical relations in the thesaurus are useful but the non-hierarchical are not. This paper shows that when the query explicitly mentions a particular non-hierarchical relation, the retrieval algorithm benefits from the presence of such relations in the thesaurus. Our algorithms were applied to the Excerpta Medica bibliographic citation database whose citations are indexed with terms from the EMTREE thesaurus. We also created an enriched EMTREE by systematically adding non-hierarchical relations from a medical knowledge base. Our algorithms used at one time EMTREE and, at another time, the enriched EMTREE in the course of ranking documents from Excerpta Medica against queries. When, and only when, the query specifically mentioned a particular non-hierarchical relation type, did EMTREE enriched with that relation type lead to a ranking that better corresponded to an expert's ranking
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 47(1991) no.3, S.240-253
  16. Rada, R.; Mili, H.; Letourneau, G.; Johnston, D.: Creating and evaluating entry terms (1988) 0.00
    3.854188E-4 = product of:
      0.0057812817 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    An indexing language is made more accessible to searchers and indexers by the presence of entry terms or near-synonyms. This paper first presents an evaluation of existing entry terms and then presents and tests a strategy for creating entry terms. The key tools in the evaluation of the entry terms are documents already indexed into the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and an automatic indexer ...
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 44(1988), S.19-41
  17. Rada, R.; Murphy, C.: Searching verses browsing in hypertext (1992) 0.00
    3.854188E-4 = product of:
      0.0057812817 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Hypermedia. 4(1992) no.1, S.1-30
  18. Rada, R.: Focus on links : a holistic view of hypertext (1991) 0.00
    3.854188E-4 = product of:
      0.0057812817 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 5227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=5227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 5227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5227)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=5227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5227)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The disciplines of human-computer interaction, computer-supported collaborative work, information storage and retrieval, and artificial intelligence should complement one another in the new discipline of hypertext. This holistic view of hypertext focuses on links: links within a document (microtext), links among documents (macrotext), links among people (grouptext), and dynamic links (expertext). The principles and systems which are relevant to creating and accessing hypertext can be usefully presented under the heading of text, microtext, macrotext, grouptext and expertext. From text to expertext, people consistently use hierarchical structures, particularly hierarchical semantic nets, to organize information
    Source
    International classification. 18(1991) no.1, S.13-18
  19. Rada, R.: Maintaining thesauri and metathesauri (1990) 0.00
    3.3724142E-4 = product of:
      0.005058621 = sum of:
        0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030866629 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Maintaining a thesaurus is a time-consuming task which should go hand-in-hand with the indexing of information and should be supported by software. To connect different document databases their respective thesauri should be related. The most straightforward way to support to support this by computer is to map the terms of one thesaurus to those of another. Such a mapping creates one kind of metathesaurus. As citation systems are extended to include full-text online, a new thesaurus may be used to index individual paragraphs. To illustrate these principles several computer systems are described which help people maintain thesauri and metathesauri. Particular success has been had by the National Library of Medicine with its Medical Subject Headings and its Unified Medical Language System
    Source
    International classification. 17(1990) no.3/4, S.158-164
  20. Rada, R.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, M.: Connecting educational information spaces (1997) 0.00
    3.3724142E-4 = product of:
      0.005058621 = sum of:
        0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030866629 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Online textbooks can be connected to other sources of information to improve their educational value. We describe 2 case studies. One used in a medical textbook and connected to medical journal abstracts via a thesaurus. The textbook, journal abstracts, and thesaurus were stored on a CD-ROM. The other case study shows a textbook on the WWW that is connected to various other sources of information. About half the book references are to web sites, and the textbook is part of an online course that is connected to an online catalog and other courses. Such linkages among information spaces should help students navigate the information relevant to their studies
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 24(1997) no.3, S.154-162