Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Saracevic, T."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Saracevic, T.: Why is relevance still the basic notion in information science? (2015) 0.01
    0.0057412777 = product of:
      0.057412777 = sum of:
        0.048359692 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048359692 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
        0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006236001 = score(doc=2980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.26-34
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.66
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  2. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science (1975) 0.00
    0.0039585875 = product of:
      0.029689403 = sum of:
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=626,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
        0.003903466 = weight(_text_:s in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003903466 = score(doc=626,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1664486 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Footnote
    Vg. auch die Beiträge in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance) und S.2126 - 2144 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26(1975), S.321-343
  3. Saracevic, T.: Information science (1999) 0.00
    0.0034117852 = product of:
      0.051176775 = sum of:
        0.048359692 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048359692 = score(doc=4325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 4325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4325)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 4325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=4325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4325)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1051
  4. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.0023665128 = product of:
      0.023665126 = sum of:
        0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006236001 = score(doc=2417,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
        0.0146120405 = product of:
          0.029224081 = sum of:
            0.029224081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029224081 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
    Source
    Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
  5. Saracevic, T.: Information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0022398883 = product of:
      0.033598322 = sum of:
        0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029015815 = score(doc=3812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
        0.0045825066 = weight(_text_:in in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045825066 = score(doc=3812,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of information science as a field or discipline, including a historical perspective to illustrate the events and forces that shaped it. Information science is a field of professional practice and scientific inquiry dealing with effective communication of information and information objects, particularly knowledge records, among humans in the context of social, organizational, and individual need for and use of information. Information science emerged in the aftermath of the Second World War, as did a number of other fields, addressing the problem of information explosion and using technology as a solution. Presently, information science deals with the same problems in the Web and digital environments. This entry covers problems addressed by information science, the intellectual structure of the field, and the description of main areas-information retrieval, human information behavior, metric studies, and digital libraries. This entry also includes an account of education related to information science and conclusions about major characteristics.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  6. Saracevic, T.; Mokros, H.; Su, L.: Nature of interaction between users and intermediaries in online searching : a qualitative analysis (1990) 0.00
    0.0015135966 = product of:
      0.015135966 = sum of:
        0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005915991 = score(doc=4894,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports preliminary results from a study, conducted at Rutgers Univ., School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, to conduct observations and experiments under real-life conditions on the nature, effects and patterns in the discourse between users and intermediary searchers and in the related computer commands in the context of online searching and responses. The study involved videotaping interactions between users and intermediaries and recording the search logs for 40 questions. Users judged the relevance of output and completed a number of other measures. Data is analysed both quantitatively, using standard and innovative statistical techniques, and qualitatively, through a grounded theory approach using microanalytic and observational methods
    Pages
    S.47-54
    Source
    ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000, from research to applications. Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Toronto, Canada, 4.-8.11.1990. Ed. by Diana Henderson
  7. Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999) 0.00
    0.0012092832 = product of:
      0.0120928325 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=6711,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
        0.006274772 = product of:
          0.018824315 = sum of:
            0.018824315 = weight(_text_:l in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824315 = score(doc=6711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=6711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    In anticipation of the explosive growth of digital libraries, a complex study was undertaken seeking to evaluate 21 diverse services at 5 major academic research libraries. This work stands as a model for evaluation of digital libraries, through its focus on both the costs of operations and the impacts of the services that those operations provide. The data have been analyzed using both statistical methods and methods of Data Envelopment Analysis. The results of the study, which are presented in detail, serve to demonstrate that a cross-functional approach to library services is feasible. They also highlight a new measure of impact, which is a weighted logarithmic combination of the amount of time that users spend interacting with the service, combined with a Likert-scale indication of the value of that service in relation to the time expended. The measure derived, incorporating simple information obtainable from the user, together with information which is readily available in server/client logs, provides an excellent foundation for transferring these measurement principles to the Digital Library environment
    Pages
    S.407-418
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  8. Saracevic, T.: ¬The concept of 'relevance' in information science : a historical review (1970) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    S.111-151
  9. Saracevic, T.: Modelling interaction in information retrieval (IR) : a review and proposal (1996) 0.00
    7.3834363E-4 = product of:
      0.011075154 = sum of:
        0.007887987 = weight(_text_:in in 7443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007887987 = score(doc=7443,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 7443, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7443)
        0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 7443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031871665 = score(doc=7443,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 7443, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7443)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Examines traditional and interactive models in information retrieval, and proposes an interactive information retrieval model based on different levels in the interactive process. Proposes a stratified interactive information retrieval model which has potential to account for a variety of aspects in the processes involved. In this model information retrieval interaction is decomposed into several levels that subtly affect each other. Makes general remarks on the state of information retrieval interaction research
    Pages
    S.3-9
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  10. Saracevic, T.: Information retrieval (1985) 0.00
    6.7448284E-4 = product of:
      0.010117242 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=3302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=3302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    Chpt.4, S.1-29
    Source
    Indexing and searching in perspective. Ed.: E.H. Brenner u. T. Saracevic
  11. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III : behavior and effects of relevance (2007) 0.00
    6.0307025E-4 = product of:
      0.0090460535 = sum of:
        0.0076375115 = weight(_text_:in in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076375115 = score(doc=798,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years or so and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized in two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevancies. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporated data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.2126-2144
  12. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Dynamics of search term selection during mediated online searching (1993) 0.00
    5.914012E-4 = product of:
      0.008871017 = sum of:
        0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 7968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064806426 = score(doc=7968,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 7968, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7968)
        0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 7968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002390375 = score(doc=7968,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 7968, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7968)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    One in a series of studies on the selection of search terms during an online search involving users and intermediaries in real online interactive situations. Considers: during what stage of the search process were search terms from different sources selected?; how were the search terms selected at different stages of the search process connected with retrieval of relevant answers as judges by users?; and in what sequences were the search terms selected, in respect to their sources. Sequences of selected search terms were analyzed to describe the types and frequencies of changes that occur in such sequences. Results indicate that search term selection follows regular patterns in the dynamics of the search process. Discusses implications of findings
    Pages
    S.63-72
    Source
    Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
  13. Mokros, H.B.; Mullins, L.S.; Saracevic, T.: Practice and personhood in professional interaction : social identities and information needs (1995) 0.00
    5.79343E-4 = product of:
      0.008690145 = sum of:
        0.0069998945 = weight(_text_:in in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069998945 = score(doc=4080,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=4080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Information seeking and provision does not occur in a vacuum, but is shaped and affected by the way that individuals convey regard for themselves and for each other. Reports 2 studies that explore the intersection between professional and personal or relational dimensions of intermediary practice during the research phase of a set of online computer search interactions that aim to address user information queries. The 1st study examines and compares, through an interpretative microanalytic approach, explicit and implicit situation defining assumptions contained in the initial talk, or opening moves, of 4 intermediaries in interaction with 2 users each. The 2nd study seeks to verify, quantitatively, interpretative claims developed in the 1st study through an analysis of intermediaries' use of pronouns in the course of their interactions with users. The specific patterns of results gained through this quantitiative study were consistent with those achieved interpretatively in the 1st study. The results of these studies are discussed within a proposed theoretic framework developed from the perspective of a constitutive theory of communication
    Source
    Library and information science research. 17(1995) no.3, S.237-257
  14. Belkin, N.J.; Chang, S.J.; Downs, T.; Saracevic, T.; Zhao, S.: Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs (1990) 0.00
    5.595652E-4 = product of:
      0.008393478 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=5261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
        0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003983958 = score(doc=5261,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    S.69-79
    Source
    ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000: from research to application. Proc. 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science
  15. Saracevic, T.: Individual differences in organizing, searching and retrieving information (1991) 0.00
    5.575784E-4 = product of:
      0.008363675 = sum of:
        0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006110009 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Synthesises the major findings of several decades of research into the magnitude of individual deffirences in information retrieval related tasks and suggests implications for practice and design. The study is related to a series of studies of human aspects and cognitive decision making in information seeking, searching and retrieving
    Pages
    S.82-86
  16. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.; Chamis, A.Y.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.1: Background and methodology (1988) 0.00
    5.537577E-4 = product of:
      0.008306365 = sum of:
        0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005915991 = score(doc=1963,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002390375 = score(doc=1963,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The objectives of the study were to conduct a series of observations and experiments under as real-life a situation as possible related to: (i) user context of questions in information retrieval; (ii) the structure and classification of questions; (iii) cognitive traits and decision making of searchers; and (iv) different searches of the same question. The study is presented in three parts: part 1 presents the background of the study and describes the models, measures, methods, procedures and statistical analyses used. Pt.2 is devoted to results related to users, questions, and effectiveness measures, and pt.3 to results related to searchers, searches, and overlap studies. A concluding summary of all results is presented in pt.3
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. Sam Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.175-190.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.161-176
  17. Saracevic, T.: Indexing, searching, and relevance (1989) 0.00
    5.450645E-4 = product of:
      0.008175967 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=3615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
        0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031871665 = score(doc=3615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    "As noted by many critics, the present design of online subject access, be it through library catalogs or online retrieval systems, does not accomodate human variability in searching (or indexing). This calls for radically different design principles and inplementations ir order to accomodate the observed patterns, interactions,and differences in human information behavior, of which the overlap findings are one of the important manifestations" (S.107)
    Pages
    S.102-109
  18. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part I: Establishing a theoretical framework (1997) 0.00
    5.447262E-4 = product of:
      0.0081708925 = sum of:
        0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064806426 = score(doc=352,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses underlying concepts related to value that must be clarified in order to proceed with any pragmatic study of value, and establishes a theory of use-oriented value of information and information services. Examines the notion of value in philosophy and economics and in relation to library and information services as well as the connection between value and relevance. Develops 2 models: one related to use of information and the other to use of library and information services. They are a theoretical framework for pragmatic study of value and a guide for the development of a Derived Taxonomy of Value in Using Library and Information Services
    Footnote
    1st part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.6, S.527-542
  19. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Human-computer interaction in information retrieval : nature and manifestations of feedback (1998) 0.00
    5.43019E-4 = product of:
      0.008145284 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=3763,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Develops a theoretical framework for expressing the nature of feedback as a critical process in interactive information retrieval. Feedback concepts from cybernetics and social sciences perspectives are used to develop a concept of information feedback applicable to information retrieval. Adapts models from human-computer interaction and interactive information retrieval as a framework for studying the manifestations of feedback in information retrieval. Presents results from an empirical study of real-life interactions between users, professional mediators and an information retrieval system computer. Presents data involving 885 feedback loops classified in 5 categories. Presents a connection between the theoretical framework and empirical observations and provides a number of pragmatic and research suggestions
    Source
    Interacting with computers. 10(1998) no.3, S.249-267
  20. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II : nature and manifestations of relevance (2007) 0.00
    5.150931E-4 = product of:
      0.0077263964 = sum of:
        0.006599563 = weight(_text_:in in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006599563 = score(doc=612,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22493094 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
        0.0011268335 = weight(_text_:s in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011268335 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized into two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevances. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporate data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
    Content
    Relevant: Having significant and demonstrable bearing on the matter at hand.[Note *][A version of this article has been published in 2006 as a chapter in E.G. Abels & D.A. Nitecki (Eds.), Advances in Librarianship (Vol. 30, pp. 3-71). San Diego: Academic Press. (Saracevic, 2006).] Relevance: The ability as of an information retrieval system to retrieve material that satisfies the needs of the user. - Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2005
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933