Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.: Electronic publishing : research issues for academic librarians and users (2003) 0.01
    0.011196761 = product of:
      0.06718057 = sum of:
        0.0045825066 = weight(_text_:in in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045825066 = score(doc=35,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Increased reliance on electronic resources requires examination of the roles of librarians in several key ways. This paper addresses the need for further research into three important areas of electronic publishing. How is the change to digital information sources affecting the scholarly work of college and university students? Previous research shows that students rely on Web and online resources and ask for less help from librarians. We do not know, however, how these changes will affect the learning and scholarly work of college and university students. Research is also needed to determine how the differences between separate article and full journal databases affect the way research is done. What are the implications for scholarship of decisions being made about what publishers publish and what librarians purchase? Finally, are librarians--as intermediaries to the search process--still necessary in a digital age? Online systems are designed to be used independently but that may not always yield the best results.
    Area
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Research questions for the twenty-first century
    Source
    Library trends. 51(2003) no.4, S.614-635
  2. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.00
    0.0039449367 = product of:
      0.029587023 = sum of:
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.008784681 = product of:
          0.026354041 = sum of:
            0.026354041 = weight(_text_:l in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026354041 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.014465182 = product of:
          0.028930364 = sum of:
            0.028930364 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028930364 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a survey of all academic members of the Association of Research Libraries in the 4th quarter of 1997 which examined how academic libraries incorporate electronic information sources into their reference activities and the effects on libraries services. There was a response rate of 68 per cent, Compares results surveys carried out in 1991 and 1994. The survey covered: numbers of computers access options (intermediary, end user online, CD-ROM locally loaded databases or those accessible through the library catalogue and the Internet. There is a trend away from print resources, particularly indexing and abstracting materials, and away from CD-ROM LANs and local loading of databases towards remote online resources
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  3. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.00
    0.0018932101 = product of:
      0.0189321 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=2612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the variety of search services supporting library reference functions offered by the RLG in the USA. The best known of these is RLIN, the massive bibliographic database and related services originally developed for shared cataloguing. In the last few years RLG has added CitaDel, an online search system that provides access to indexing/abstracting databases; and Zephyr, a Z39.50 server that amkes the RLIN and CitaDel databases searchable through a library's online catalogue. RLG also offers document delivery connections, including Ariel and Internet based document delivery software, for a full complement of online reference support for academic and public libraries
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
    Source
    Library journal. 120(1995) no.8, S.28,30
  4. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.00
    0.0018932101 = product of:
      0.0189321 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=2616,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a survey of ARL (Ass. of Research Libraries) members in the USA in 1994, which sought to find out the electronic reference services that are offered by these libraries and how the services affect reference staff, the expectations of users, and user instruction. The services covered include CD-ROM, intermediary online searching, end user online (e.g. FirstSearch), tape loaded databases and user access to the Internet, including electronic mail facilities. Highlights the additional workload the provision of these services involves, and the sometimes unrealistic expectations of users especially with regard to Internet resources
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
    Source
    Library journal. 120(1995) no.6, S.39-40
  5. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.00
    0.0016935511 = product of:
      0.01693551 = sum of:
        0.0076375115 = weight(_text_:in in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076375115 = score(doc=2735,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
        0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001991979 = score(doc=2735,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
        0.0073060202 = product of:
          0.0146120405 = sum of:
            0.0146120405 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0146120405 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This exploratory study examines how design engineers and technical professionals (hereafter referred to as engineers) in innovative high-tech firms in the United States and India use information in their daily work activities including research, development, and management. The researchers used naturalistic observation to conduct a series of daylong workplace observations with 103 engineers engaged in product design and testing in four U.S.- and two India-based firms. A key finding is that engineers spend about one fourth of their day engaged in some type of information event, which was somewhat lower than the percentage identified in previous research. The explanation may be rooted in the significant change in the information environment and corporate expectations in the last 15 years, which is the time of the original study. Searching technology has improved, making searching less time consuming, and engineers are choosing the Internet as a primary source even though information may not be as focused, as timely, or as authoritative. The study extends our understanding of the engineering workplace, and the information environment in the workplace, and provides information useful for improving methods for accessing and using information, which could ultimately lead to better job performance, facilitate innovation, and encourage economic growth.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.443-454
  6. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0016565587 = product of:
      0.016565587 = sum of:
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=2343,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a survey 96 (out of 119) US and Canadian member libraries of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) to determine their use of on-line and CD-ROM data bases, including OPACs. 4 catalogues were identified: on-line mediated searching (97%); CD-ROMs (96%); end-user on-line searching (45%); and locally mounted magnetic tapes (37,5%). The latter option is expected to be the most widely used option in the new future. Although CD-ROM caused some migration from on-line, most migration was from printed sources to CD-ROM. Tables show: on-line hosts most used for intermediary on-line searching; on-line data bases most after searched by intermediaries; end user on-line systems offered by most libraries; the 20 most popular CD-ROM data bases; and the 8 magnetic tape data bases accessible on OPACs
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  7. Tenopir, C.; Green, D.: Patterns of use and usage factors for online databases in academic and public libraries (1999) 0.00
    0.0015700618 = product of:
      0.015700618 = sum of:
        0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 6700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064806426 = score(doc=6700,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 6700, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6700)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 6700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=6700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 6700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6700)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 6700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=6700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 6700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6700)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Database usage data from a random sample of academic and public libraries in the U.S. and Canada reveals patterns of use in selected types of libraries. Library users in both public and academic libraries tend to use commercial online databases most frequently early in the week, mid-day, and at times that correspond to the academic calendar (November in this six-month sample.) The mean number of simultaneous users is correlated with the size of the population served and the number of workstations available, but relatively low numbers of users are simultaneously logged on to research databases at all sizes of libraries. A questionnaire sent to these same libraries identified many other factors that might influence database use, including levels of instruction, availability of remote login, placement of a database on the library's homepage, although none of these factors was found to be statistically significant
    Pages
    S.616-626
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  8. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.00
    0.0015211523 = product of:
      0.015211523 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=3113,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002390375 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.10, S.2344-2361
  9. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Edwards, S.; Wu, L.: Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns : the paradox of control (2009) 0.00
    0.0013196743 = product of:
      0.013196743 = sum of:
        0.004929992 = weight(_text_:in in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004929992 = score(doc=2960,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
        0.006274772 = product of:
          0.018824315 = sum of:
            0.018824315 = weight(_text_:l in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824315 = score(doc=2960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001991979 = score(doc=2960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - By tracking the information-seeking and reading patterns of science, technology, medical and social science faculty members from 1977 to the present, this paper seeks to examine how faculty members locate, obtain, read, and use scholarly articles and how this has changed with the widespread availability of electronic journals and journal alternatives. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered using questionnaire surveys of university faculty and other researchers periodically since 1977. Many questions used the critical incident of the last article reading to allow analysis of the characteristics of readings in addition to characteristics of readers. Findings - The paper finds that the average number of readings per year per science faculty member continues to increase, while the average time spent per reading is decreasing. Electronic articles now account for the majority of readings, though most readings are still printed on paper for final reading. Scientists report reading a higher proportion of older articles from a wider range of journal titles and more articles from library e-collections. Articles are read for many purposes and readings are valuable to those purposes. Originality/value - The paper draws on data collected in a consistent way over 30 years. It provides a unique look at how electronic journals and other developments have influenced changes in reading behavior over three decades. The use of critical incidence provides evidence of the value of reading in addition to reading patterns.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 61(2009) no.1, S.5-32
  10. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Boyce, P.; Grayson, M.; Paulson, K.-L.: Relying an electronic journals : reading patterns of astronomers (2005) 0.00
    0.0012961577 = product of:
      0.012961577 = sum of:
        0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003741601 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys of the members of the American Astronomical Society identify how astronomers use journals and what features and formats they prefer. While every work field is distinct, the patterns of use by astronomers may provide a glimpse of what to expect of journal patterns and use by other scientists. Astronomers, like other scientists, continue to invest a large amount of their time in reading articles and place a high level of importance an journal articles. They use a wide variety of formats and means to get access to materials that are essential to their work in teaching, service, and research. They select access means that are convenient-whether those means be print, electronic, or both. The availability of a mature electronic journals system from their primary professional society has surely influenced their early adoption of e-journals.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.786-802
  11. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.00
    8.4495463E-4 = product of:
      0.012674319 = sum of:
        0.008730402 = weight(_text_:in in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008730402 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
    Series
    New directions in information management; 21
  12. Tenopir, C.: Online databases : a second look at FirstSearch (1994) 0.00
    7.2630163E-4 = product of:
      0.010894524 = sum of:
        0.008640857 = weight(_text_:in in 1966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008640857 = score(doc=1966,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29450375 = fieldWeight in 1966, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1966)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1966)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the online end user search service, FirstSearch, provided by OCLC, noting the ways it has developed since its launch in 1991, and the extent of its use in libraries worldwide. Focuses on an important new aspect of the service, the availability of the full text in ASCII format of many of the articles cited in the database, for ordering, viewing and downloading. Also discusses the value of FirstSearch to interloans departments, the costs of the service, enhancements in the searchability of the databases and in the interfaces provided for searching, and the variety of uses to which libraries are putting the service
    Source
    Library journal. 119(1994) no.18, S.30,32
  13. Tenopir, C.; Cahn, P.: TARGET & FREESTYLE : DIALOG and Mead join the relevance ranks (1994) 0.00
    6.813307E-4 = product of:
      0.01021996 = sum of:
        0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006236001 = score(doc=2777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
        0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003983958 = score(doc=2777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.446-456.
    Source
    Online. 18(1994) no.3, S.31-47
  14. Tenopir, C.; Read, E.: Patterns of database use in academic libraries (2000) 0.00
    6.7448284E-4 = product of:
      0.010117242 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=6869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=6869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 61(2000) no.3, S.234-246
  15. Tenopir, C.: Will online vendors survive? (1998) 0.00
    6.2059314E-4 = product of:
      0.009308897 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 1815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=1815,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1815, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1815)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1815,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1815, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1815)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Looks to the future of traditional online services, in light of the rising use of the WWW, which brings authors or publishers and readers directly together, without the intermediary role played by online vendors. Gives examples of changes in ownership of online services in the last half of 1997, and notes that the changes all suggest that online vendors must nkow their best markets and stick to them. Concludes that many online vendors will survive but in ne configurations and often with new owners
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.2, S.35-36
  16. Tenopir, C.: Plagued by our own successes (1998) 0.00
    6.2059314E-4 = product of:
      0.009308897 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=2191,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=2191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a survey of electronic reference sources and their impact on the work of reference librarians. Reference librarians in university libraries in the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) in the USA were asked to comment on how the library's use of such sources has changed over the past 2 to 3 years and how the work of reference staff has changed. The themes highlighted by the survey include changes in user instructions; the impact of technology; the rising expectations of users; and 'technostress'
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.4, S.39-40
  17. Tenopir, C.; Lundeen, G.: Managing your information : how to design and create a textual database on your microcomputer (1988) 0.00
    5.781282E-4 = product of:
      0.008671923 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 3208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=3208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3208)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 3208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=3208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3208)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    XII,226 S
    Series
    Applications in information management and technology series
  18. Tenopir, C.: ASCII full texts (1995) 0.00
    5.575784E-4 = product of:
      0.008363675 = sum of:
        0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 3188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006110009 = score(doc=3188,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3188, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3188)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 3188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=3188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3188)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the rapid increase in the availability of the full text of journals, newspapers, documents and books, online and in CD-ROM, in the recent past, noting that full text now makes up 49% of word oriented databases. Explains the differences between image files, ASCII fullt text which is searchable, and ASCII full text which is displayable and downloadable but not searchable, and gives examples of these. Highlights the full text databases which are being introduced by the H.W. Wilson Company
    Source
    Library journal. 120(1995) no.10, S.34-36
  19. Tenopir, C.: Trends in user searching (1996) 0.00
    5.575784E-4 = product of:
      0.008363675 = sum of:
        0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 7471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006110009 = score(doc=7471,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 7471, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7471)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 7471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=7471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7471)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses a number of trends in the provision of commerical research online systems to end users, as opposed to professional intermediaries. The trends highlighted include: Web versions of, for example, FirstSearch and EBSCOhost; end user access via the library, which cushions the user from direct paymant for use; the integration of information sources in specific subject areas; the rethinking of proprietary software solutions; and the provision of specialized products with a very specific customer focus
    Source
    Library journal. 121(1996) no.20, S.35-36
  20. Tenopir, C.: Moving to the information village (1996) 0.00
    5.43019E-4 = product of:
      0.008145284 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=4944,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=4944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the familiar problem of users are now confronted with the needs to impose order on myriad sources of information and to present them in an integrated way to users. Describes an attempt to provide such integration in the engineering field, Engineering Information Village, or Ei Village, produced by Engineering Information Inc. It resembles a WWW site, and integrates a traditional online abstracting and indexing service with access to WWW sites in the engineering field, contacts to engineering consultants, and access to other sources of interest to engineers. Explains how the metaphor of the village is carried though in the service and stresses the vetting process which seeks to guarantee that sources provided are authoritative. Also details the pricing of the service
    Source
    Library journal. 121(1996) no.4, S.29-30