-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.34
0.34479102 = product of:
0.9851172 = sum of:
0.091462016 = product of:
0.27438605 = sum of:
0.27438605 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27438605 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27438605 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27438605 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.27438605 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27438605 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.032992136 = weight(_text_:der in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032992136 = score(doc=973,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5129615 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.27438605 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27438605 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
- Footnote
- Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde Vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
-
Siever, C.M.: Multimodale Kommunikation im Social Web : Forschungsansätze und Analysen zu Text-Bild-Relationen (2015)
0.25
0.24765567 = product of:
0.49531135 = sum of:
0.19451343 = weight(_text_:15860 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19451343 = score(doc=4056,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26774642 = queryWeight, product of:
9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.72648376 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.06103005 = weight(_text_:medien in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06103005 = score(doc=4056,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.45034546 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.013533398 = weight(_text_:und in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013533398 = score(doc=4056,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.022467308 = product of:
0.044934615 = sum of:
0.044934615 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044934615 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0194408 = weight(_text_:der in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0194408 = score(doc=4056,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30226544 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.118864596 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118864596 = score(doc=4056,freq=16.0), product of:
0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8031421 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.013533398 = weight(_text_:und in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013533398 = score(doc=4056,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.017251236 = weight(_text_:des in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017251236 = score(doc=4056,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.004162154 = weight(_text_:in in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004162154 = score(doc=4056,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.030515024 = product of:
0.06103005 = sum of:
0.06103005 = weight(_text_:medien in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06103005 = score(doc=4056,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.45034546 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(10/20)
- Abstract
- Multimodalität ist ein typisches Merkmal der Kommunikation im Social Web. Der Fokus dieses Bandes liegt auf der Kommunikation in Foto-Communitys, insbesondere auf den beiden kommunikativen Praktiken des Social Taggings und des Verfassens von Notizen innerhalb von Bildern. Bei den Tags stehen semantische Text-Bild-Relationen im Vordergrund: Tags dienen der Wissensrepräsentation, eine adäquate Versprachlichung der Bilder ist folglich unabdingbar. Notizen-Bild-Relationen sind aus pragmatischer Perspektive von Interesse: Die Informationen eines Kommunikats werden komplementär auf Text und Bild verteilt, was sich in verschiedenen sprachlichen Phänomenen niederschlägt. Ein diachroner Vergleich mit der Postkartenkommunikation sowie ein Exkurs zur Kommunikation mit Emojis runden das Buch ab.
- BK
- 05.38 Neue elektronische Medien Kommunikationswissenschaft
- Classification
- AP 15860
05.38 Neue elektronische Medien Kommunikationswissenschaft
- Field
- Kommunikationswissenschaften
- RSWK
- Social Media / Multimodalität / Kommunikation / Social Tagging (DNB)
Text / Bild / Computerunterstützte Kommunikation / Soziale Software (SBB)
- RVK
- AP 15860
- Series
- Sprache - Medien - Innovationen ; 8
- Subject
- Social Media / Multimodalität / Kommunikation / Social Tagging (DNB)
Text / Bild / Computerunterstützte Kommunikation / Soziale Software (SBB)
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.21
0.20826851 = product of:
0.46281892 = sum of:
0.038109176 = product of:
0.11432753 = sum of:
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.013533398 = weight(_text_:und in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013533398 = score(doc=4388,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.026322968 = weight(_text_:der in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026322968 = score(doc=4388,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.40926933 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.013533398 = weight(_text_:und in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013533398 = score(doc=4388,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.021128364 = weight(_text_:des in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021128364 = score(doc=4388,freq=6.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2649762 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.0072090626 = weight(_text_:in in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072090626 = score(doc=4388,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.45 = coord(9/20)
- Abstract
- Werden Maschinen mit Begriffen beschrieben, die ursprünglich der Beschreibung des Menschen dienen, so liegt zunächst der Verdacht nahe, dass jene Maschinen spezifischmenschliche Fähigkeiten oder Eigenschaften besitzen. Für körperliche Fähigkeiten, die mechanisch nachgeahmt werden, hat sich in der Alltagssprache eine anthropomorphisierende Sprechweise bereits etabliert. So wird kaum in Frage gestellt, dass bestimmte Maschinen weben, backen, sich bewegen oder arbeiten können. Bei nichtkörperlichen Eigenschaften, etwa kognitiver, sozialer oder moralischer Art sieht dies jedoch anders aus. Dass mittlerweile intelligente und rechnende Maschinen im alltäglichen Sprachgebrauch Eingang gefunden haben, wäre jedoch undenkbar ohne den langjährigen Diskurs über Künstliche Intelligenz, welcher insbesondere die zweite Hälfte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts geprägt hat. In jüngster Zeit ist es der Autonomiebegriff, welcher zunehmend Verwendung zur Beschreibung neuer Technologien findet, wie etwa "autonome mobile Roboter" oder "autonome Systeme". Dem Begriff nach rekurriert die "Autonomie" jener Technologien auf eine bestimmte Art technologischen Fortschritts, die von der Fähigkeit zur Selbstgesetzgebung herrührt. Dies wirft aus philosophischer Sicht jedoch die Frage auf, wie die Selbstgesetzgebung in diesem Fall definiert ist, zumal sich der Autonomiebegriff in der Philosophie auf die politische oder moralische Selbstgesetzgebung von Menschen oder Menschengruppen beziehungsweise ihre Handlungen bezieht. Im Handbuch Robotik hingegen führt der Autor geradezu beiläufig die Bezeichnung "autonom" ein, indem er prognostiziert, dass "[.] autonome Roboter in Zukunft sogar einen Großteil der Altenbetreuung übernehmen werden."
- Content
- Redigierte Version der Magisterarbeit, Karlsruhe, KIT, Inst. für Philosophie, 2012.
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.21
0.20567942 = product of:
0.45706537 = sum of:
0.038109176 = product of:
0.11432753 = sum of:
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.013533398 = weight(_text_:und in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013533398 = score(doc=1000,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.027493443 = weight(_text_:der in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027493443 = score(doc=1000,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.013533398 = weight(_text_:und in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013533398 = score(doc=1000,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.017251236 = weight(_text_:des in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017251236 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.004162154 = weight(_text_:in in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004162154 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.45 = coord(9/20)
- Abstract
- Vorgestellt wird die Konstruktion eines thematisch geordneten Thesaurus auf Basis der Sachschlagwörter der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) unter Nutzung der darin enthaltenen DDC-Notationen. Oberste Ordnungsebene dieses Thesaurus werden die DDC-Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Die Konstruktion des Thesaurus erfolgt regelbasiert unter der Nutzung von Linked Data Prinzipien in einem SPARQL Prozessor. Der Thesaurus dient der automatisierten Gewinnung von Metadaten aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen mittels eines computerlinguistischen Extraktors. Hierzu werden digitale Volltexte verarbeitet. Dieser ermittelt die gefundenen Schlagwörter über Vergleich der Zeichenfolgen Benennungen im Thesaurus, ordnet die Treffer nach Relevanz im Text und gibt die zugeordne-ten Sachgruppen rangordnend zurück. Die grundlegende Annahme dabei ist, dass die gesuchte Sachgruppe unter den oberen Rängen zurückgegeben wird. In einem dreistufigen Verfahren wird die Leistungsfähigkeit des Verfahrens validiert. Hierzu wird zunächst anhand von Metadaten und Erkenntnissen einer Kurzautopsie ein Goldstandard aus Dokumenten erstellt, die im Online-Katalog der DNB abrufbar sind. Die Dokumente vertei-len sich über 14 der Sachgruppen mit einer Losgröße von jeweils 50 Dokumenten. Sämtliche Dokumente werden mit dem Extraktor erschlossen und die Ergebnisse der Kategorisierung do-kumentiert. Schließlich wird die sich daraus ergebende Retrievalleistung sowohl für eine harte (binäre) Kategorisierung als auch eine rangordnende Rückgabe der Sachgruppen beurteilt.
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Nimz, B.: ¬Die Erschließung im Archiv- und Bibliothekswesen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung elektronischer Informationsträger : ein Vergleich im Interesse der Professionalisierung und Harmonisierung (2001)
0.15
0.1491202 = product of:
0.33137822 = sum of:
0.08284352 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08284352 = score(doc=2442,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.069047615 = weight(_text_:medien in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069047615 = score(doc=2442,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5095077 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.029977825 = weight(_text_:und in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029977825 = score(doc=2442,freq=46.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46975413 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.031746693 = weight(_text_:der in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031746693 = score(doc=2442,freq=50.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4935974 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
50.0 = termFreq=50.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.029977825 = weight(_text_:und in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029977825 = score(doc=2442,freq=46.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46975413 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.009758773 = weight(_text_:des in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009758773 = score(doc=2442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=2442,freq=18.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.036438745 = weight(_text_:elektronischen in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036438745 = score(doc=2442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15407887 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2364941 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.034523807 = product of:
0.069047615 = sum of:
0.069047615 = weight(_text_:medien in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069047615 = score(doc=2442,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5095077 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.45 = coord(9/20)
- Abstract
- Diese Arbeit dient der Professionalisierung und Harmonisierung der Erschließungsmethodik im Archiv- und Bibliothekswesen. Die Erschließung ist das Kernstück der archivarischen und bibliothekarischen Arbeit und Grundlage für die Benutzung durch die interessierte Öffentlichkeit. Hier wird, bildlich gesprochen, das gesät, was in der Benutzung geerntet wird und je gewissenhafter die Aussaat desto ertragreicher die Ernte. Der Bereich der Dokumentation wird, wo es für die Betrachtung der integrativen Momente in den Informationswissenschaften erforderlich erscheint, einbezogen. Das Hauptaugenmerk gilt jedoch der Archivwissenschaft und den Beziehungen zwischen der Archiv- und Bibliothekswissenschaft. Vornehmlich wird die Arbeit nationale Strukturen des Archivund Bibliothekswesens sowie ausgewählte Projekte und Tendenzen abhandeln. Auf eine erschöpfende Untersuchung aller Ausbildungsgänge auf dem Informationssektor wird verzichtet, da das Ziel dieser Arbeit nur die Betrachtung der integrativen Konzepte in der Ausbildung ist. Ziel der Publikation ist es, Angebote sowohl für die Grundlagenforschung als auch für die angewandte Forschung im Themenbereich Harmonisierung und Professionalisierung in der Erschließung der Informationswissenschaften zu machen. Sie kann als Diskussionsgrundlage für den interdisziplinären fachlichen Austausch dienen, der weitere Arbeiten folgen müssen. Es wird versucht, Wissen aus den Bereichen Archivwesen und Bibliothekswesen zu kumulieren und zu kommentieren. Vollständigkeit wird nicht beansprucht, sondern Wert auf Beispielhaftigkeit gelegt, zumal der rasante Technologiewandel zwangsläufig eine rasche Veralterung technischer Angaben zu den elektronischen Informationsträgern zur Folge hat. Bestand haben jedoch die theoretischen Überlegungen und abstrakten Betrachtungen sowie die getroffenen Aussagen zur Addition, Integration und Separation der Informationswissenschaften. In der Arbeit werden in dem Kapitel "Die Informationsgesellschaft" vorrangig die Auswirkungen der Informationsgesellschaft auf die Archive und Bibliotheken untersucht, wobei zunächst von der Klärung der Begriffe "Information" und "Informationsgesellschaft" und der Informationspolitik in der EU und in der Bundesrepublik ausgegangen wird.
- Classification
- AN 74000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Kataloge, Katalogisierung / Allgemeines
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 28(2004) H.1, S.132-135 (H. Flachmann)
- RSWK
- Archiv / Bestandserschließung / Elektronische Medien (BVB)
Bibliothek / Bestandserschließung / Elektronische Medien (BVB)
Deutschland / Archivbestand / Bibliotheksbestand / Bestandserschließung / Harmonisierung / Elektronische Medien (BVB)
- RVK
- AN 74000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Kataloge, Katalogisierung / Allgemeines
- Series
- Texte und Untersuchungen zur Archivpflege; Bd.14
- Subject
- Archiv / Bestandserschließung / Elektronische Medien (BVB)
Bibliothek / Bestandserschließung / Elektronische Medien (BVB)
Deutschland / Archivbestand / Bibliotheksbestand / Bestandserschließung / Harmonisierung / Elektronische Medien (BVB)
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.12
0.11764917 = product of:
0.33614048 = sum of:
0.030487342 = product of:
0.09146202 = sum of:
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.012698677 = weight(_text_:der in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012698677 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.009758773 = weight(_text_:des in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009758773 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.0088096205 = weight(_text_:in in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088096205 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.22493094 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
- Footnote
- Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) von der Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe genehmigte Dissertation.
- Imprint
- Karlsruhe : Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.11
0.10779485 = product of:
0.4311794 = sum of:
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007897133 = score(doc=563,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.011703186 = product of:
0.023406371 = sum of:
0.023406371 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023406371 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Sommer, M.: Automatische Generierung von DDC-Notationen für Hochschulveröffentlichungen (2012)
0.11
0.10736195 = product of:
0.26840487 = sum of:
0.059796993 = weight(_text_:medien in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059796993 = score(doc=587,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.44124663 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.026519936 = weight(_text_:und in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026519936 = score(doc=587,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.03011756 = weight(_text_:der in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03011756 = score(doc=587,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.07131875 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07131875 = score(doc=587,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.48188522 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.026519936 = weight(_text_:und in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026519936 = score(doc=587,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.020701483 = weight(_text_:des in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020701483 = score(doc=587,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003531705 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.029898496 = product of:
0.059796993 = sum of:
0.059796993 = weight(_text_:medien in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059796993 = score(doc=587,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.44124663 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(8/20)
- Abstract
- Das Thema dieser Bachelorarbeit ist die automatische Generierung von Notationen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation für Metadaten. Die Metadaten sind im Dublin-Core-Format und stammen vom Server für wissenschaftliche Schriften der Hochschule Hannover. Zu Beginn erfolgt eine allgemeine Einführung über die Methoden und Hauptanwendungsbereiche des automatischen Klassifizierens. Danach werden die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation und der Prozess der Metadatengewinnung beschrieben. Der theoretische Teil endet mit der Beschreibung von zwei Projekten. In dem ersten Projekt wurde ebenfalls versucht Metadaten mit Notationen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation anzureichern. Das Ergebnis des zweiten Projekts ist eine Konkordanz zwischen der Schlagwortnormdatei und der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation. Diese Konkordanz wurde im praktischen Teil dieser Arbeit dazu benutzt um automatisch Notationen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation zu vergeben.
- Content
- Vgl. unter: http://opus.bsz-bw.de/fhhv/volltexte/2012/397/pdf/Bachelorarbeit_final_Korrektur01.pdf. Bachelorarbeit, Hochschule Hannover, Fakultät III - Medien, Information und Design, Abteilung Information und Kommunikation, Studiengang Informationsmanagement
- Imprint
- Hannover : Hochschule Hannover, Fakultät III - Medien, Information und Design, Abteilung Information und Kommunikation
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.11
0.106397815 = product of:
0.42559126 = sum of:
0.030487342 = product of:
0.09146202 = sum of:
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12934683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12934683 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.12934683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12934683 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.12934683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12934683 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=5820,freq=18.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.10
0.09735401 = product of:
0.38941604 = sum of:
0.038109176 = product of:
0.11432753 = sum of:
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008324308 = score(doc=4997,freq=16.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.10
0.09631348 = product of:
0.3852539 = sum of:
0.038109176 = product of:
0.11432753 = sum of:
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11432753 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.004162154 = weight(_text_:in in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004162154 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Holze, J.: Digitales Wissen : bildungsrelevante Relationen zwischen Strukturen digitaler Medien und Konzepten von Wissen (2017)
0.09
0.090752214 = product of:
0.25929204 = sum of:
0.097648084 = weight(_text_:medien in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097648084 = score(doc=3984,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.72055274 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.017679956 = weight(_text_:und in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017679956 = score(doc=3984,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.03594769 = product of:
0.07189538 = sum of:
0.07189538 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07189538 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.021994755 = weight(_text_:der in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021994755 = score(doc=3984,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.017679956 = weight(_text_:und in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017679956 = score(doc=3984,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517547 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.048824042 = product of:
0.097648084 = sum of:
0.097648084 = weight(_text_:medien in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097648084 = score(doc=3984,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.72055274 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Wie verändern sich Begriffe von Wissen und Wissensgenerierung im Zeitalter digitaler Medien? Welche Implikationen können daraus für den Begriff der (Strukturalen Medien-)Bildung innerhalb einer Disziplin der Medienpädagogik abgeleitet werden? Inwieweit findet eine Transformation hin zu einem qualitativ anderen Wissen, gar einem digitalen Wissen statt?
- Field
- Kommunikationswissenschaften
- Footnote
- Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. phil., genehmigt durch die Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg.
-
Müller, M.: ¬Das Fremde und die Medien : interkulturelle Vergleiche der Darstellung von Ethnizität im öffentlich-rechtlichen Fernsehen und deren Rezeption in den Metropolen Hamburg und Sydney (2004)
0.09
0.08810626 = product of:
0.25173217 = sum of:
0.079729326 = weight(_text_:medien in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079729326 = score(doc=3717,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.58832884 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.039533585 = weight(_text_:und in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039533585 = score(doc=3717,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.6194934 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.025397355 = weight(_text_:der in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025397355 = score(doc=3717,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.039533585 = weight(_text_:und in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039533585 = score(doc=3717,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.6194934 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517547 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0081561245 = score(doc=3717,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.039864663 = product of:
0.079729326 = sum of:
0.079729326 = weight(_text_:medien in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079729326 = score(doc=3717,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.58832884 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Nach historischem Abriß des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks in Deutschland und Australien werden Programmstrukturen und -richtlinien behandelt, die sich auf die ethnische Vielfalt der Länder beziehen, ferner die multikulturelle Gesellschaft beider Länder und die Rolle der Medien bei der Integration. Ausgewählte Formate und ihre Programme werden auf ihren Anteil an Multikulturalität hin ausgewertet und Ergebnisse einer in Sydney und Hamburg durchgeführten Rezeptionsstudie miteinander verglichen.
- Imprint
- Hamburg : Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, FB Bibliothek und Information
-
Walther, T.: Erschließung historischer Bestände mit RDA (2015)
0.09
0.08541897 = product of:
0.21354742 = sum of:
0.049830828 = weight(_text_:medien in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049830828 = score(doc=2437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36770552 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.027066795 = weight(_text_:und in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027066795 = score(doc=2437,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.022448301 = weight(_text_:der in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022448301 = score(doc=2437,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.042024978 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042024978 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.28395358 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.027066795 = weight(_text_:und in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027066795 = score(doc=2437,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.017251236 = weight(_text_:des in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017251236 = score(doc=2437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.0029430876 = weight(_text_:in in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029430876 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.024915414 = product of:
0.049830828 = sum of:
0.049830828 = weight(_text_:medien in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049830828 = score(doc=2437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36770552 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(8/20)
- Abstract
- Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit der Erschließung historischer Bestände nach RDA. Inhaltlich begrenzt sie sich auf ausgewählte spezifische Merkmale alter Drucke und ihrer Formalerschließung mit RDA. Die Umstellung auf das neue Regelwerk, welches Anwen-dungsrichtlinien für alle Materialien vereinen soll, und einige in den Bibliotheksgremien diskutierte Aspekte wie z. B. "cataloger's judgement" haben die zentrale Frage dieser Arbeit veranlasst: Ist RDA für die Erschließung alter Drucke geeignet? Die Arbeit untersucht spezifische Merkmale alter Drucke. Sie betrachtet die bestehende Erschließungspraxis alter Drucke und geht auf die Grundlagen und wesentliche Inhalte von RDA ein. Zu wissenschaftlichen Methoden der Arbeit gehören der Regelwerkevergleich und das Experteninterview. Die Gegenüberstellung von RDA und den RAK-WB lässt erkennen, dass RDA sich prinzipiell für die Erschließung alter Drucke eignet und Elemente der bibliographischen Beschreibung ähnlich wie die RAK-WB abbildet. Wegen des allgemeinen Charakters sind einige Richtlinien von RDA noch zu konkretisieren. Mehrwert gegenüber den RAK-WB versprechen die normierten Sucheinstiege, die Erfassung von Werken und Beziehungen. Das Interview mit Christoph Boveland, dem Experten auf dem Gebiet Katalogisierung Alter Drucke, bringt neue Erkenntnisse über geplante Empfehlungen zur Erschließung alter Drucke mit RDA, Erweiterung des Standardelemente-Set usw. Basierend auf den Ergebnissen der Gegenüberstellung und der Meinung von Christoph Boveland wird eine Aussage zur Entwicklung der Lehrveranstaltung "Formalerschließung historischer Bestände" an der Hochschule Hannover getroffen.
- Content
- Bachelorarbeit, Hannover: Hochschule Hannover; Fakultät III: Medien, Information und Design, im Studiengang Informationsmanagement, 2015. Vgl.: http://serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/673.
- Imprint
- Hannover : Hochschule Hannover; Fakultät III: Medien, Information und Design, Abteilung Information und Kommunikation
-
Fellermaier, B.: Virtuelle Bibliothek : Konzepte und Forschungsprojekte (1997)
0.08
0.08450681 = product of:
0.28168935 = sum of:
0.027066795 = weight(_text_:und in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027066795 = score(doc=471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.16552597 = weight(_text_:formen in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16552597 = score(doc=471,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.9477618 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.031746693 = weight(_text_:der in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031746693 = score(doc=471,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4935974 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.027066795 = weight(_text_:und in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027066795 = score(doc=471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.024396934 = weight(_text_:des in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024396934 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005886175 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Virtuelle Bibliotheken sind nicht länger ein Schlagwort, sondern nehmen in Folge des Potentials von Internet und WWW allmählich konkrete Formen an. Der Begriff virtuelle Bibliothek wird zu anderen Formen von netzwerkbasierten Informationsangeboten abgegrenzt. Vor dem Hintergrund der Schwächen traditioneller Bibliotheken und der Krise der Informationsversorgung werden die Vorteile von virtuellen Bibliotheken aufgezeigt
-
Mertens, N.: Formale und sachliche Erschließung von AV-Medien in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Untersuchung von Universalklassifikationen und Regelwerken (1987)
0.08
0.08239995 = product of:
0.2746665 = sum of:
0.112754285 = weight(_text_:medien in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112754285 = score(doc=6806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8320226 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.03535991 = weight(_text_:und in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03535991 = score(doc=6806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.025397355 = weight(_text_:der in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025397355 = score(doc=6806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.03535991 = weight(_text_:und in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03535991 = score(doc=6806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00941788 = score(doc=6806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.056377143 = product of:
0.112754285 = sum of:
0.112754285 = weight(_text_:medien in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112754285 = score(doc=6806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8320226 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
-
Wölfle, C.: Formale und sachliche Erschließung von AV-Medien in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Untersuchung von Universalklassifikationen und Regelwerken (1987)
0.08
0.08239995 = product of:
0.2746665 = sum of:
0.112754285 = weight(_text_:medien in 6828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112754285 = score(doc=6828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8320226 = fieldWeight in 6828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6828)
0.03535991 = weight(_text_:und in 6828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03535991 = score(doc=6828,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 6828, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6828)
0.025397355 = weight(_text_:der in 6828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025397355 = score(doc=6828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 6828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6828)
0.03535991 = weight(_text_:und in 6828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03535991 = score(doc=6828,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 6828, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6828)
0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 6828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00941788 = score(doc=6828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 6828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6828)
0.056377143 = product of:
0.112754285 = sum of:
0.112754285 = weight(_text_:medien in 6828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112754285 = score(doc=6828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8320226 = fieldWeight in 6828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
-
Closhen, J.: Entwurf und Implementierung eines Informationssystems für audiovisuellen Medien aus dem Bereich der U-Musik unter Verwendung des relationalen Datanbankmanagementsystems INGRES (1991)
0.08
0.07987447 = product of:
0.26624823 = sum of:
0.09866 = weight(_text_:medien in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09866 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.7280198 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.030939924 = weight(_text_:und in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030939924 = score(doc=2755,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.022222685 = weight(_text_:der in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022222685 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.030939924 = weight(_text_:und in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030939924 = score(doc=2755,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.034155704 = weight(_text_:des in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034155704 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.04933 = product of:
0.09866 = sum of:
0.09866 = weight(_text_:medien in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09866 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.7280198 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Imprint
- Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Information und Dokumentation
-
Buß, M.: Unternehmenssprache in internationalen Unternehmen : Probleme des Informationstransfers in der internen Kommunikation (2005)
0.08
0.07904929 = product of:
0.22585511 = sum of:
0.02344053 = weight(_text_:und in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02344053 = score(doc=1482,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.029696314 = weight(_text_:der in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029696314 = score(doc=1482,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46171808 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.111187644 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111187644 = score(doc=1482,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.7512706 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.02344053 = weight(_text_:und in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02344053 = score(doc=1482,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.021128364 = weight(_text_:des in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021128364 = score(doc=1482,freq=6.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2649762 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.0072090626 = weight(_text_:in in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072090626 = score(doc=1482,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.009752655 = product of:
0.01950531 = sum of:
0.01950531 = weight(_text_:22 in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01950531 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden die Auswirkungen einer Unternehmenssprache auf den Informationstransfer in der internen Kommunikation internationaler Unternehmen untersucht. Eine Unternehmenssprache ist die von der Unternehmensleitung festgelegte, offizielle Sprache in der internen Kommunikation. Die Arbeit beginnt mit einer Analyse der Aufgaben und Ziele von Sprache, wonach im zweiten Teil das Unternehmen und die interne Kommunikation betrachtet werden. Auf dieser Grundlage werden die Auswirkungen der Unternehmenssprache auf die internen Netzwerke eines Unternehmens untersucht. Netzwerke bilden die Basis zum erfolgreichen Informationstransfer und entstehen durch Kommunikation. Im Unternehmen existieren formelle und informelle Netzwerke, die auf der Kommunikation zwischen Menschen direkt oder über Hilfsmittel sowie auf der Kommunikation zwischen Mensch und Maschine beruhen. Es stellt sich heraus, dass eine Unternehmenssprache positiv auf die Innenbindung der technischen Netzwerkstruktur wirkt. Dadurch ergeben sich Kosten- und Zeitvorteile. Innerhalb der zwischenmenschlichen Netzwerke bildet eine Unternehmenssprache die Basis für das Gelingen einer unternehmensweiten Zusammenarbeit. Synergieeffekte sind zu erwarten, welche die Leistung des Unternehmens steigern. In Bezug auf die Mitarbeiter, deren Muttersprache jedoch nicht die Unternehmenssprache ist, muss mit erheblichen Schwierigkeiten gerechnet werden. Es wird ein Bezug zwischen der Relevanz der beschriebenen Vor- und Nachteile und der Organisationsstruktur hergestellt und Empfehlungen für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung des Konzepts 'Unternehmenssprache' gegeben.
- Date
- 22. 5.2005 18:25:26
-
Heel, F.: Abbildungen zwischen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC), der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) für die Recherche in heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen : Möglichkeiten und Problembereiche (2007)
0.08
0.078734785 = product of:
0.22495653 = sum of:
0.049830828 = weight(_text_:medien in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049830828 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36770552 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.02923548 = weight(_text_:und in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02923548 = score(doc=4434,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.45812157 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.025097964 = weight(_text_:der in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025097964 = score(doc=4434,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.390223 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.059432298 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059432298 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.40157104 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.02923548 = weight(_text_:und in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02923548 = score(doc=4434,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.45812157 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.0072090626 = weight(_text_:in in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072090626 = score(doc=4434,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.024915414 = product of:
0.049830828 = sum of:
0.049830828 = weight(_text_:medien in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049830828 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36770552 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Eine einheitliche Sacherschließung in Deutschland wird durch die Vielzahl an vorhandenen und verwendeten Erschließungssystemen, Universal-, Fachklassifikationen und Fachthesauri erschwert. Den Benutzern von Bibliothekskatalogen oder Datenbanken fällt es daher schwer, themenspezifische Recherchen in heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen durchzuführen. In diesem Fall müssen die Nutzer derzeit nämlich den Umgang mit mehreren Erschließungsinstrumenten erlernen und verschiedene Suchanfragen anwenden, um das gewünschte Rechercheergebnis datenbankübergreifend zu erreichen. Um dem Benutzer einen einheitlichen Zugang zu heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen zu gewährleisten und gleichzeitig auch den Arbeitsaufwand für die Bibliothekare zu reduzieren, ist die Erstellung eines so genannten "Integrierten Retrievals" sinnvoll. Durch die Verknüpfung der unterschiedlichen Sacherschließungssysteme mit Hilfe von Konkordanzen wird es dem Nutzer ermöglicht, mit einem ihm vertrauten Vokabular eine sachliche Recherche in unterschiedlich erschlossenen Datenbeständen durchzuführen, ohne die spezifischen Besonderheiten der verschiedenen Erschließungsinstrumente kennen zu müssen. In dieser Arbeit sind exemplarisch drei Abbildungen für den Fachbereich der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften zwischen den für Deutschland wichtigsten Sacherschließungssystemen Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC), Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) und Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) erstellt worden. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sollen einen ersten Überblick über spezifische Problemfelder und Möglichkeiten der hier erstellten Konkordanzen DDC - RVK, SWD - DDC und SWD - RVK liefern, um damit die Erstellung eines zukünftigen Recherchetools (und gegebenenfalls einer Klassifizierungshilfe) voranzutreiben. Die erstellten Konkordanzen liegen der Arbeit als Anhang bei.
- Content
- Bachelorarbeit im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement, Fakultät Information und Kommunikation, Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart
- Imprint
- Stuttgart : Hochschule der Medien / Fakultät Information und Kommunikation
