Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Arsenault, C."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Arsenault, C.; Leide, J.E.: Format integration and the design of cataloging and classification curricula (2002) 0.00 
    3.7538886E-4 = product of:
  0.009009332 = sum of:
    0.009009332 = product of:
      0.018018665 = sum of:
        0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018018665 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    29. 7.2006 17:54:43
  2. Arsenault, C.: Word division in the transcription of Chinese script in the title fields of bibliographic Records (2001) 0.00 
    3.0503108E-4 = product of:
  0.007320746 = sum of:
    0.007320746 = product of:
      0.021962237 = sum of:
        0.021962237 = weight(_text_:p in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021962237 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Abstract
    Recently, the Library of Congress adopted the pinyin Romanization system for transcribing Chinese data in its bibliographic records. In its canonical form, pinyin aggregates Chinese "words" into single linguistic units, but pinyin entries could be constructed following either a monosyllabic or a polysyllabic pattern. Although the former is easier and less costly to implement, the latter method is potentially more beneficial for end-users, as it reduces ambiguity, and generates a much larger variety of indexable terms. The current study investigates if following the polysyllabic method improves retrieval efficiency and effectiveness in item-specific searching within online bibliographic databases. Analysis of the results revealed that aggregation of monosyllables does improve efficiency significantly (p < .05), especially during keyword searches, while effectiveness remains mainly unaffected.
  3. Arsenault, C.; Paradis, D.; Riva, P.: Translating RDA into French (2014) 0.00 
    3.0503108E-4 = product of:
  0.007320746 = sum of:
    0.007320746 = product of:
      0.021962237 = sum of:
        0.021962237 = weight(_text_:p in 1990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021962237 = score(doc=1990,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1990, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1990)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)

Authors

Years