-
Read, S.: ¬The new guide to working from home (1995)
0.00
5.005185E-4 = product of:
0.0120124435 = sum of:
0.0120124435 = product of:
0.024024887 = sum of:
0.024024887 = weight(_text_:29 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024024887 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 14:29:45
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.00
4.96016E-4 = product of:
0.011904384 = sum of:
0.011904384 = product of:
0.023808768 = sum of:
0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023808768 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.00
4.96016E-4 = product of:
0.011904384 = sum of:
0.011904384 = product of:
0.023808768 = sum of:
0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023808768 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.00
4.3401401E-4 = product of:
0.010416336 = sum of:
0.010416336 = product of:
0.020832673 = sum of:
0.020832673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020832673 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
-
Fugmann, R.: Book indexing : the classificatory approach (1994)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 21(1994) no.1, S.29-31
-
Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Fisher, J.: ¬An index to historical fiction for children and young people (1994)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:32:09
-
Bradley, P.: Indexes to works of fiction : the views of producers and users on the need for them (1989)
0.00
3.4860696E-4 = product of:
0.008366567 = sum of:
0.008366567 = product of:
0.0250997 = sum of:
0.0250997 = weight(_text_:p in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0250997 = score(doc=5816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.00
3.1001001E-4 = product of:
0.00744024 = sum of:
0.00744024 = product of:
0.01488048 = sum of:
0.01488048 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01488048 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Luhn, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature (1985)
0.00
2.714289E-4 = product of:
0.0065142936 = sum of:
0.0065142936 = weight(_text_:des in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065142936 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Mulvany, N.C.: Indexing books (2005)
0.00
2.5025924E-4 = product of:
0.0060062218 = sum of:
0.0060062218 = product of:
0.0120124435 = sum of:
0.0120124435 = weight(_text_:29 in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0120124435 = score(doc=72,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 24.11.2006 12:58:29
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.00
2.4359654E-4 = product of:
0.005846317 = sum of:
0.005846317 = product of:
0.01753895 = sum of:
0.01753895 = weight(_text_:p in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01753895 = score(doc=2294,freq=10.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2220705 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
-
Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000)
0.00
2.1787935E-4 = product of:
0.0052291043 = sum of:
0.0052291043 = product of:
0.015687313 = sum of:
0.015687313 = weight(_text_:p in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015687313 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
