-
Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990)
0.00
0.0023583425 = product of:
0.035375137 = sum of:
0.03397101 = weight(_text_:u in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03397101 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.0014041257 = product of:
0.004212377 = sum of:
0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004212377 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Theme
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Information search tactics (1979)
0.00
0.0016570432 = product of:
0.024855647 = sum of:
0.0098013915 = product of:
0.019602783 = sum of:
0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019602783 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015054256 = product of:
0.022581384 = sum of:
0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029786006 = score(doc=2407,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019602783 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.00
0.0016372361 = product of:
0.02455854 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.01181941 = product of:
0.017729115 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=54,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014569832 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989)
0.00
0.0014692845 = product of:
0.022039266 = sum of:
0.020635141 = product of:
0.041270282 = sum of:
0.041270282 = weight(_text_:online in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041270282 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0014041257 = product of:
0.004212377 = sum of:
0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004212377 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use information search tactics online (1987)
0.00
0.0014692845 = product of:
0.022039266 = sum of:
0.020635141 = product of:
0.041270282 = sum of:
0.041270282 = weight(_text_:online in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041270282 = score(doc=3364,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0014041257 = product of:
0.004212377 = sum of:
0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004212377 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Online. 11(1987), S.47-54
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019)
0.00
0.0014499128 = product of:
0.02174869 = sum of:
0.008576217 = product of:
0.017152434 = sum of:
0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017152434 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013172473 = product of:
0.019758709 = sum of:
0.0026062755 = weight(_text_:a in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026062755 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017152434 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
- Date
- 25. 6.2019 11:13:29
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986)
0.00
0.001319551 = product of:
0.019793265 = sum of:
0.018055748 = product of:
0.036111496 = sum of:
0.036111496 = weight(_text_:online in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036111496 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0017375171 = product of:
0.005212551 = sum of:
0.005212551 = weight(_text_:a in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005212551 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of browsing and berrypicking : techniques for the online search interface (1989)
0.00
0.001285624 = product of:
0.019284358 = sum of:
0.018055748 = product of:
0.036111496 = sum of:
0.036111496 = weight(_text_:online in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036111496 = score(doc=2228,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.00122861 = product of:
0.00368583 = sum of:
0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00368583 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Online review. 13(1989) no.5, S.407-424
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The fallacy of the perfect thirty-item online search (1984)
0.00
0.0011537586 = product of:
0.017306378 = sum of:
0.016313512 = product of:
0.032627024 = sum of:
0.032627024 = weight(_text_:online in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032627024 = score(doc=857,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.5998251 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
9.928669E-4 = product of:
0.0029786006 = sum of:
0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029786006 = score(doc=857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Problems in determining output size are sometimes associated with the performance of online bibliographic searches for clients in academic and other libraries. These problems are examined through discussion of a fallacy in thinking that arises when searchers try to produce the "perfect thirty-item" online search. Origins of the fallacy are explored by considering sources of misunderstandings between client and searcher and by identifying differences between manual and online searching. Several types of online searches are distinguished, and search techniques that avoid the fallacy are recommended for each search type
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars : the Getty Online Searching Project report no.4 (1994)
0.00
0.0011537586 = product of:
0.017306378 = sum of:
0.016313512 = product of:
0.032627024 = sum of:
0.032627024 = weight(_text_:online in 6989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032627024 = score(doc=6989,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.5998251 = fieldWeight in 6989, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6989)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
9.928669E-4 = product of:
0.0029786006 = sum of:
0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 6989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029786006 = score(doc=6989,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6989, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6989)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The forth report in a series of studies, based on the 2 year Getty Art History Information Project; where humanities scholars were trained in DIALOG online searching and then allowed 24 hour unlimited access to DIALOG. Complete transaction logs were taken and form the data upon which the Getty Online Searching Project is based. Data obtained from the study is used to draw conclusions about the design of humanities information resources, particularly databases and other online resources
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 18(1994) no.6, S.331-340
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
9.4273133E-4 = product of:
0.014140969 = sum of:
0.012767341 = product of:
0.025534682 = sum of:
0.025534682 = weight(_text_:online in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025534682 = score(doc=2883,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0013736277 = product of:
0.004120883 = sum of:
0.004120883 = weight(_text_:a in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004120883 = score(doc=2883,freq=10.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Source
- Online '88. Proceedings of the Online Inc., Conference, New York, 11-12 October 1988
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the humanities, report no.6 : overview and conclusions (1996)
0.00
9.2349335E-4 = product of:
0.0138524 = sum of:
0.012636391 = product of:
0.025272783 = sum of:
0.025272783 = weight(_text_:online in 7261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025272783 = score(doc=7261,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 7261, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0012160086 = product of:
0.0036480257 = sum of:
0.0036480257 = weight(_text_:a in 7261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036480257 = score(doc=7261,freq=6.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7261, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7261)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Over a 2 year period, the Getty Information Institute (formerly the Getty Art History Information Program) sponsored and carried out a major study of end user online searching by humanities scholars. Complete logs of the searches and output were captured, and the 27 scholars involved were interviewed in depth. Reviews the study and its results, with particular emphasis on matters of interest to academic librarians. Implications are drawn for academic library reference service and collection development, as well as for cataloguing in the online and digital environment
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
8.2869804E-4 = product of:
0.01243047 = sum of:
0.011056842 = product of:
0.022113685 = sum of:
0.022113685 = weight(_text_:online in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022113685 = score(doc=207,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0013736277 = product of:
0.004120883 = sum of:
0.004120883 = weight(_text_:a in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004120883 = score(doc=207,freq=10.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Source
- Online. 11(1988), S.45-56
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬An explanatory paradigm for online information retrieval (1986)
0.00
7.997687E-4 = product of:
0.01199653 = sum of:
0.010943435 = product of:
0.02188687 = sum of:
0.02188687 = weight(_text_:online in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02188687 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0010530944 = product of:
0.003159283 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Document familiarity, relevance, and Bradford's law : the Getty Online Searching Project report; no.5 (1996)
0.00
7.9249544E-4 = product of:
0.011887431 = sum of:
0.0103175705 = product of:
0.020635141 = sum of:
0.020635141 = weight(_text_:online in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020635141 = score(doc=6978,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0015698604 = product of:
0.004709581 = sum of:
0.004709581 = weight(_text_:a in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004709581 = score(doc=6978,freq=10.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Getty Online Searching Project studied the end user searching behaviour of 27 humanities scholars over a 2 year period. A number of scholars anticipated that they were already familiar with a percentage of records their searches retrieved. High document familiarity can be a significant factor in searching: Draws implications regarding the impact of high document familiarity on relevance and information retrieval theory. Makes speculations regarding high document familiarity and Bradford's law
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.; Wilde, D.N.; Siegfried, S.: ¬An analysis of search terminology used by humanities scholars : the Getty online searching project report number 1 (1993)
0.00
6.664739E-4 = product of:
0.009997108 = sum of:
0.009119529 = product of:
0.018239059 = sum of:
0.018239059 = weight(_text_:online in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018239059 = score(doc=2707,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
8.775785E-4 = product of:
0.0026327355 = sum of:
0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026327355 = score(doc=2707,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Getty art history information program carried out a two-year project to study how humanities scholars operate as end users of online databases. Visiting scholars at the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities in Santa Monica, California, were offered the opportunity to so unlimited subsidized searching of DIALOG databases. This first report from the project analyzes the vocabulary terms twenty-two scholars used in their natural language descriptions of their information needs and in their online searches. The data were extracted from 165 natural language statements and 1.068 search terms. Vocabulary categories used by humanities scholars were found to differ markedly from those used in the sciences, a fact that imposes distinctive demands on thesaurus development and the design of online information systems. Humanities scholars searched for far more named individuals, geographical terms, chronological terms, and discipline terms than was the case in a comparative science sample. The analysis provides substantial support for the growing perception that information needs of humanities scholars are distinct from those of scholars in other fields, and that the design of information-providing systems for these scholars must take their unique qualitites into account
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.00
5.9211726E-4 = product of:
0.017763516 = sum of:
0.017763516 = product of:
0.026645273 = sum of:
0.0026062755 = weight(_text_:a in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026062755 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.024038998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024038998 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Content
- Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
- Type
- a
-
Siegfried, S.; Bates, M.J.; Wilde, D.N.: ¬A profile of end-user searching behavior by humanities scholars : the Getty online searching project report no.2 (1993)
0.00
5.0729397E-4 = product of:
0.0076094093 = sum of:
0.0064484817 = product of:
0.012896963 = sum of:
0.012896963 = weight(_text_:online in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012896963 = score(doc=4348,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0011609273 = product of:
0.003482782 = sum of:
0.003482782 = weight(_text_:a in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003482782 = score(doc=4348,freq=14.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Getty Art History Information Program carried out a two-year project to study how advanced humanities scholars operate as end users of online databases. Visiting scholars at the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities in Santa Monica, CA, were offered the oppotunity to do unlimited subsidized searching of DIALOG databases. This second report from the project analyzes how much searching the scholars did, the kinds of search techniques and DIALOG features they used., and their learning curves. Search features studied included commands, Boolean logic, types of vocabulary, and proximity operators. Error rates were calculated, as well as how often the scholars used elementary search formulations and introduced new search features and capabiblities into their searches. The amount of searching done ranged from none at all to dozens of hours. A typical search tended to be simple, using one-word search terms and little or no Boolean logic. Starting with a full day of DIALOG training, the scholars began their search experience at a reasonably high level of competence; in general, they maintained a stable level of competence throughout the early hours of their search experience
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Designing online catalog subject acces to meet user needs (1989)
0.00
4.8637492E-4 = product of:
0.014591247 = sum of:
0.014591247 = product of:
0.029182494 = sum of:
0.029182494 = weight(_text_:online in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029182494 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
-
Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996)
0.00
4.7850295E-4 = product of:
0.014355088 = sum of:
0.014355088 = product of:
0.02153263 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.019426443 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019426443 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Date
- 14. 4.1997 20:22:55
- Type
- a
