Search (147 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Information society : new media, ethics and postmodernism (1996) 0.01 
    0.012508537 = product of:
  0.09381402 = sum of:
    0.0049006958 = product of:
      0.0098013915 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0098013915 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06544907 = weight(_text_:post in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06544907 = score(doc=2451,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.6287354 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
    0.0147098815 = weight(_text_:u in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0147098815 = score(doc=2451,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.25064746 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
    0.008754379 = product of:
      0.013131568 = sum of:
        0.0033301765 = weight(_text_:a in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033301765 = score(doc=2451,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
        0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0098013915 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    This volume examines 3 critical debates of the post-industrial society: culture and technology, information society, and postmodernism. It aims to provide theoretical and methodological underpinnings for the analysis and design of information, communication and multimedia technologies. It is a thoroughly interdisciplinara volume, which will be of interest to students, researchers and practitioners in a wide area of disciplines including information and communication systems, education and social sciences
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: COOLEY, M.: Visions and problems of the post-industrial society; GILL, K.S.: Knowledge and the post-industrial society; LYTJE, I.: Media and the cultural condition: language and education; WHISTON, T.: Knowledge and sustainable development: towards the furtherance of a global communication system; SHIPLEY, P.: The keyboard blues: modern technology and the rights and risks of people at work; LEAL, F.: Ethics is fragile, goodness is not; HIROSE, L.M.: Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics; THORPE, J.: Information system design: human centres approaches; BESSELAAR, P. van den u. T. MOM: Technological change, social innovation and employment; JONES, M.: Empowerment and enslavement: business process reeingineering and the transformation of work; LEVY, P.: The role of creativity in post-industrial society: exploring the implications of non-conventional technologies for work and management organisation; JANSEN, A.: The global information society and rural economics; DAY, P.: Information communication technology and society: a community-based approach; CYSNE, F.P.: Technology transfer and development; COOPER, J.: Information, knowledge and empowerment: the role of information in rural development; CLAY, J.: Participative citizenry in the information ages: the role of science and technology towards democratic education in a multicultural society; TAYLOR, J.: New media and cultural representation; BLACK, M.T.: Consensus and authenticity in representations: simulation as participative theatre; GORAYSKA, B. u. J.L. MEY: Cognitive technology; BOYNE, C.W.: Electronic mail, IT productivity and workplace culture; Squires, P.: Deadly technology in the post-industrial society: a case study of firearms and firearms control; COLE, M. u. D. HILL: Resitance postmodernism: emancipatory politics for a new era or academic chic for a defeatist intelligentsia?; McFEE, G.: Postmodernism, dance and post-industrial society; MULLER, R.C.: Creativity constellation for innovation and cooperation
    Date
    1. 1.1999 18:59:29
  2. Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008) 0.01 
    0.007428072 = product of:
  0.07428072 = sum of:
    0.013148096 = weight(_text_:neue in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013148096 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.18005691 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
    0.052639864 = weight(_text_:medien in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052639864 = score(doc=213,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.62401694 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
    0.008492753 = weight(_text_:u in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008492753 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    Die Etablierung einer neuen Medientechnologie erzeugte zu jeder Zeit als Reaktion auf das bis dahin Unbekannte und Neue positive wie negative Zukunftsvisionen. So wurde und wird etwa an das Internet die Erwartung geknüpft, dass die Menschen sich zu neuen Communities zusammenschließen. Derzeit werden im Kontext der Informationstechnologien auch Utopien diskutiert, die von einem veränderten Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik bzw. Umwelt ausgehen. Welche Mythen und Utopien sind in der Geschichte der Informations- und Kommunikationsmedien entstanden und auch heute noch virulent? Was sagen sie über die Welt aus, in der wir leben? Und welche ethischen Perspektiven sind für eine zukünftige Gestaltung der Informations- und Wissensgesellschaften zu berücksichtigen? Der vorliegende Band mit den Beiträgen des sechsten Symposiums zur Medienethik der Stuttgarter Hochschule der Medien wirft einen kritischen Blick auf bestehende Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien und regt dazu an, diese (immer wieder) auf ihre positiven wie negativen Potentiale zu hinterfragen.
    Classification
    AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Content
    Inhalt: Rafael Capurro: Einleitung Klaus Wiegerling: Ubiquitous Computing als konkrete Utopie Michael Nagenborg: Wenn Roboter alles wissen und Kühlschränke nicht lügen Tassilo Pellegrini: Semantic Web als konkrete Utopie - Eine praktische Annäherung Falko Blask: TV kontra Web: Mythos Medien - Medienmythen Hans Kräh: Filme als Zeitreisen: Medienszenarien in Zukunftsszenarien Uwe Jochum: Zur Zeit wird hier der Raum - Die digitale Inversion des Karfreitagszaubers Thomas Nisslmüller: Der cybergnostische Imperativ: Sich lesen in Zeiten virtueller Versuchsspiele Manfred Lang: Good Night, and Good Luck! Zur Geschichte informationspolitischer Utopien
    Editor
    Grimm, P. u. R. Capurro
    Footnote
    Beiträge des sechsten Symposiums zur Medienethik der Stuttgarter Hochschule der Medien. Rez. in: ZfBB 57(2010) H.1, S.65-66 (W. Gödert)
    RSWK
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Ethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Informationsethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
    RVK
    AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Subject
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Ethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
    Informationstechnik / Utopie / Medien / Informationsethik / Kongress / Stuttgart <2006>
  3. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01 
    0.005812961 = product of:
  0.05812961 = sum of:
    0.030706586 = weight(_text_:medien in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030706586 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
    0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014862318 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
    0.012560702 = product of:
      0.018841052 = sum of:
        0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001842915 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
        0.016998138 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016998138 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  4. Schuchart, F.: Neue Buckower Thesen : Im Mittelpunkt der Mensch? Die Technik? Oder der Konzern? (2001) 0.01 
    0.005473781 = product of:
  0.054737806 = sum of:
    0.027891325 = weight(_text_:neue in 6376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027891325 = score(doc=6376,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.38195843 = fieldWeight in 6376, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6376)
    0.026319932 = weight(_text_:medien in 6376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026319932 = score(doc=6376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 6376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6376)
    5.265472E-4 = product of:
      0.0015796415 = sum of:
        0.0015796415 = weight(_text_:a in 6376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015796415 = score(doc=6376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Source
    Neue Medien - neues Lernen?: 4. Buckower Mediengespräche. Hrsg.: K.-D. Felsmann
    Type
    a
  5. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.01 
    0.005259384 = product of:
  0.05259384 = sum of:
    0.030706586 = weight(_text_:medien in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030706586 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
    0.021018492 = weight(_text_:u in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021018492 = score(doc=1698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.35814235 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
    8.6875854E-4 = product of:
      0.0026062755 = sum of:
        0.0026062755 = weight(_text_:a in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026062755 = score(doc=1698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  6. McGarry, K.: ¬The ethics of information : its relevance in the curriculum (Abstract) (1992) 0.00 
    0.0037890498 = product of:
  0.056835745 = sum of:
    0.05578265 = weight(_text_:neue in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05578265 = score(doc=1908,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.76391685 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
    0.0010530944 = product of:
      0.003159283 = sum of:
        0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003159283 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Source
    Neue Techniken im Informationswesen - neue Trends in der Ausbildung: Beiträge zur Jubiläumsveranstaltung "10 Jahre Fachhochschule für Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen in Köln"
    Type
    a
  7. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0033309222 = product of:
  0.03330922 = sum of:
    0.021933276 = weight(_text_:medien in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021933276 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.26000705 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
    7.6000544E-4 = product of:
      0.0022800162 = sum of:
        0.0022800162 = weight(_text_:a in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022800162 = score(doc=1696,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  8. Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0033309222 = product of:
  0.03330922 = sum of:
    0.021933276 = weight(_text_:medien in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021933276 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.26000705 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
    7.6000544E-4 = product of:
      0.0022800162 = sum of:
        0.0022800162 = weight(_text_:a in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022800162 = score(doc=1699,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    In the past, many professions and scientific disciplines decided to create a code of ethics which shall guide the professional activities of their members. The rules in these codes of ethics, sometimes called ethical guidelines, shall provide guidance in situations of moral conflict. Obviously, as other professionals or scholars, persons who are involved in knowledge organization face moral conflicts, too. Therefore, ISKO decided to discuss whether it would be necessary to create ethical guidelines for ISKO. In the paper two options to formulate a code of ethics are discussed: First, it is possible to identify moral values without formulating the way they can be achieved - this option is realised in the ethical guidelines of the German Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Second, it is feasible to clearly define morally acceptable professional actions without formulation basic moral values - this option is realised in the ACM and IEEE-CS Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. It is argued that if ISKO should decide to implement an own code of ethics it will be inevitable to choose the second option while it also will be necessary to address the specific needs of knowledge organization and its moral problems, for instance, the conflict of copyright and open access. Additionally, the second option has to be completed by basic moral values that shall underlie the professional actions of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  9. Huber, W.: Menschen, Götter und Maschinen : eine Ethik der Digitalisierung (2022) 0.00 
    0.0028491705 = product of:
  0.042737555 = sum of:
    0.025190933 = product of:
      0.050381865 = sum of:
        0.050381865 = weight(_text_:industrie in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050381865 = score(doc=752,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12019911 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7064548 = idf(docFreq=146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.41915342 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7064548 = idf(docFreq=146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017546622 = weight(_text_:medien in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017546622 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Die Digitalisierung hat unsere Privatsphäre ausgehöhlt, die Öffentlichkeit in antagonistische Teilöffentlichkeiten zerlegt, Hemmschwellen gesenkt und die Grenze zwischen Wahrheit und Lüge aufgeweicht. Wolfgang Huber beschreibt klar und pointiert diese technische und soziale Entwicklung. Er zeigt, wie sich konsensfähige ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz finden lassen und umgesetzt werden können - von der Gesetzgebung, von digitalen Anbietern und von allen Nutzern. Die Haltungen zur Digitalisierung schwanken zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse: Die einen erwarten die Schaffung eines neuen Menschen, der sich selbst zum Gott macht. Andere befürchten den Verlust von Freiheit und Menschenwürde. Wolfgang Huber wirft demgegenüber einen realistischen Blick auf den technischen Umbruch. Das beginnt bei der Sprache: Sind die "sozialen Medien" wirklich sozial? Fährt ein mit digitaler Intelligenz ausgestattetes Auto "autonom" oder nicht eher automatisiert? Sind Algorithmen, die durch Mustererkennung lernen, deshalb "intelligent"? Eine überbordende Sprache lässt uns allzu oft vergessen, dass noch so leistungsstarke Rechner nur Maschinen sind, die von Menschen entwickelt und bedient werden. Notfalls muss man ihnen den Stecker ziehen. Das wunderbar anschaulich geschriebene Buch macht auf der Höhe der aktuellen ethischen Diskussionen bewusst, dass wir uns der Digitalisierung nicht ausliefern dürfen, sondern sie selbstbestimmt und verantwortlich gestalten können. 80. Geburtstag von Wolfgang Huber am 12.8.2022 Ein Heilmittel gegen allzu euphorische und apokalyptische Erwartungen an die Digitalisierung Wie wir unsere Haltung zur Digitalisierung ändern können, um uns nicht der Technik auszuliefern.
    Classification
    MS 4850: Industrie (allgemeines) und Technik (Automatisierung), Technologie (Allgemeines)
    RVK
    MS 4850: Industrie (allgemeines) und Technik (Automatisierung), Technologie (Allgemeines)
  10. Capurro, R.: Ethos des Cyberspace (1999) 0.00 
    0.0028319713 = product of:
  0.042479567 = sum of:
    0.017152434 = product of:
      0.03430487 = sum of:
        0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430487 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.025327131 = product of:
      0.037990697 = sum of:
        0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00368583 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
        0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430487 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Date
    29. 1.1997 18:49:05
    Type
    a
  11. Wiegerling, K.: Was ist Medienethik? (1999) 0.00 
    0.0020228368 = product of:
  0.030342551 = sum of:
    0.01225174 = product of:
      0.02450348 = sum of:
        0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02450348 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01809081 = product of:
      0.027136216 = sum of:
        0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026327355 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02450348 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Date
    29. 1.1997 18:49:05
    Type
    a
  12. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.0019581942 = product of:
  0.02937291 = sum of:
    0.023989752 = product of:
      0.047979504 = sum of:
        0.047979504 = weight(_text_:dienstleistungen in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047979504 = score(doc=462,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10771505 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.44542992 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.005383158 = product of:
      0.008074737 = sum of:
        7.8982074E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          7.8982074E-4 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.007284916 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007284916 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    1. Ethische Grundsätze im Umgang mit Kundinnen und Kunden - Wir begegnen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden im Rahmen unseres Auftrags und unserer rechtlichen Grundlagen ohne Unterschied. Wir stellen für alle Kundinnen und Kunden Dienstleistungen in hoher Qualität bereit. - Wir ermöglichen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden den Zugang zu unseren Beständen und zu den öffentlich verfügbaren Informationsquellen. - Wir informieren und beraten unsere Kundinnen und Kunden sachlich, unparteiisch und höflich und unterstützen sie dabei, ihren Informationsbedarf zu decken. - Wir behandeln unsere Kundinnen und Kunden gleich, unabhängig von ihrer Herkunft, ihrer Hautfarbe, ihrem Alter, ihrer sozialen Stellung, ihrer Religion, ihrem Geschlecht oder ihrer sexuellen Orientierung. - Wir beachten die Prinzipien der Barrierefreiheit. - Wir setzen uns auf der Grundlage des Jugendschutzgesetzes und weiterer gesetzlicher Regelungen für den Schutz von Kindern und Jugendlichen vor Inhalten ein, die nicht für sie geeignet sind. - Wir respektieren die Privatsphäre unserer Kundinnen und Kunden. Wir speichern personenbezogene Daten nur zur Erbringung unserer Dienstleistung und nur im gesetzlichen Rahmen. Anderen Behörden stellen wir Benutzerdaten nur im engen Rahmen der gesetzlichen Vorschriften zur Verfügung. - Wir erfüllen unsere beruflichen Aufgaben nach professionellen Gesichtspunkten unabhängig von unserer persönlichen Meinung und Einstellung.
    2. Ethische Grundsätze im weiteren Aufgabenspektrum - Wir setzen uns für die freie Meinungsbildung und für den freien Fluss von Informationen ein sowie für die Existenz von Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen als Garanten des ungehinderten Zugangs zu Informationsressourcen aller Art in unserer demokratischen Gesellschaft. Eine Zensur von Inhalten lehnen wir ab. - Wir bewahren das kulturelle Erbe im Rahmen des Sammelauftrages der Bibliotheken. - Wir unterstützen Wissenschaft und Forschung durch die Bereitstellung von Informationen, Quellen und damit im Zusammenhang stehenden Dienstleistungen. Weiterhin setzen wir uns für die Freiheit von Wissenschaft und Forschung ein. - Wir bekennen uns zum Prinzip des Lebenslangen Lernens - sowohl zur Verbesserung unserer eigenen Kompetenzen als auch zur Unterstützung der Kompetenzerweiterung der Bürgerinnen und Bürger. In diesem Zusammenhang sehen wir uns in einem kontinuierlichen Verbesserungsprozess, um unsere Dienstleistungen für Kundinnen und Kunden laufend optimieren zu können. - Wir bieten Veranstaltungsformen an, die das Lesen und die aktive Nutzung von Informationen fördern, auch in Kooperation mit Partnern. - Unser Verhältnis zu Lieferanten und anderen Geschäftspartnern zeichnet sich durch einen hohen ethischen Standard aus.
    - Wir wählen die Informationsquellen nach rein fachlichen Kriterien, nach ihrer Qualität und ihrer Eignung für die Erfüllung der Bedarfe unserer Kundinnen und Kunden aus - unabhängig von persönlichen Vorlieben und von Einflüssen Dritter. Durch unsere Erschließungsleistungen und unsere Fachkompetenz bieten wir aktive Dienstleistungen zum Auffinden der benötigten Informationen an. - Wir machen unsere Dienstleistungen und Einrichtungen aktiv bekannt, damit die Bürgerinnen und Bürger alle Möglichkeiten kennen, um öffentlich zugängliche Informationen zu nutzen. - Wir stellen im Rahmen der gesetzlichen Regelungen Informationen als Daten und Volltexte im Internet bereit, um sie noch besser zugänglich zu machen. - Wir akzeptieren die Rechte der Kreativen und Urheber für gesetzlich geschützte Bibliotheks- und Informationsmaterialien. - Wir nutzen unsere professionellen Kompetenzen, um die historischen Bestände zu bewahren, damit sie auch künftigen Generationen zur Verfügung stehen. - Wir begegnen unseren Kolleginnen und Kollegen fair und mit Respekt und fördern eine Kultur der Kooperation, des selbst verantworteten Handelns und des gegenseitigen Vertrauens. - Fachliche Unabhängigkeit, Respekt, Fairness, Kooperationsbereitschaft und kritische Loyalität kennzeichnen unser Verhalten gegenüber unseren Führungskräften und vorgesetzten Dienststellen."
    Type
    a
  13. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.0018639866 = product of:
  0.027959798 = sum of:
    0.021679446 = product of:
      0.043358892 = sum of:
        0.043358892 = weight(_text_:dienstleistungen in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043358892 = score(doc=459,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10771505 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.4025333 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.006280351 = product of:
      0.009420526 = sum of:
        9.214575E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          9.214575E-4 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.008499069 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008499069 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    1. Ethische Grundsätze im Umgang mit Kundinnen und Kunden - Wir begegnen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden im Rahmen unseres Auftrags und unserer rechtlichen Grundlagen ohne Unterschied. Wir stellen für alle Kundinnen und Kunden Dienstleistungen in hoher Qualität bereit. - Wir ermöglichen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden den Zugang zu unseren Beständen und zu den öffentlich verfügbaren Informationsquellen. - Wir informieren und beraten unsere Kundinnen und Kunden sachlich, unparteiisch und höflich und unterstützen sie dabei, ihren Informationsbedarf zu decken. - Wir behandeln unsere Kundinnen und Kunden gleich, unabhängig von ihrer Herkunft, ihrer Hautfarbe, ihrem Alter, ihrer sozialen Stellung, ihrer Religion, ihrem Geschlecht oder ihrer sexuellen Orientierung. - Wir beachten die Prinzipien der Barrierefreiheit. - Wir setzen uns auf der Grundlage des Jugendschutzgesetzes und weiterer gesetzlicher Regelungen für den Schutz von Kindern und Jugendlichen vor Inhalten ein, die nicht für sie geeignet sind. - Wir respektieren die Privatsphäre unserer Kundinnen und Kunden. Wir speichern personenbezogene Daten nur zur Erbringung unserer Dienstleistung und nur im gesetzlichen Rahmen. Anderen Behörden stellen wir Benutzerdaten nur im engen Rahmen der gesetzlichen Vorschriften zur Verfügung. - Wir erfüllen unsere beruflichen Aufgaben nach professionellen Gesichtspunkten unabhängig von unserer persönlichen Meinung und Einstellung.
    2. Ethische Grundsätze im weiteren Aufgabenspektrum - Wir setzen uns für die freie Meinungsbildung und für den freien Fluss von Informationen ein sowie für die Existenz von Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen als Garanten des ungehinderten Zugangs zu Informationsressourcen aller Art in unserer demokratischen Gesellschaft. Eine Zensur von Inhalten lehnen wir ab. - Wir bewahren das kulturelle Erbe im Rahmen des Sammelauftrages der Bibliotheken. - Wir unterstützen Wissenschaft und Forschung durch die Bereitstellung von Informationen, Quellen und damit im Zusammenhang stehenden Dienstleistungen. Weiterhin setzen wir uns für die Freiheit von Wissenschaft und Forschung ein. - Wir bekennen uns zum Prinzip des Lebenslangen Lernens - sowohl zur Verbesserung unserer eigenen Kompetenzen als auch zur Unterstützung der Kompetenzerweiterung der Bürgerinnen und Bürger. In diesem Zusammenhang sehen wir uns in einem kontinuierlichen Verbesserungsprozess, um unsere Dienstleistungen für Kundinnen und Kunden laufend optimieren zu können. - Wir bieten Veranstaltungsformen an, die das Lesen und die aktive Nutzung von Informationen fördern, auch in Kooperation mit Partnern. - Unser Verhältnis zu Lieferanten und anderen Geschäftspartnern zeichnet sich durch einen hohen ethischen Standard aus."
    Type
    a
  14. Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik - Die Entwicklung von Normen für den Umgang mit Wissen und Information in elektronischen Räumen (2005) 0.00 
    0.0017118778 = product of:
  0.025678165 = sum of:
    0.0098013915 = product of:
      0.019602783 = sum of:
        0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019602783 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.015876774 = product of:
      0.02381516 = sum of:
        0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004212377 = score(doc=3687,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019602783 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Date
    27. 7.2005 12:29:44
    Source
    Bibliothekswissenschaft - quo vadis? Eine Disziplin zwischen Traditionen und Visionen: Programme - Modelle - Forschungsaufgaben / Library Science - quo vadis? A Discipline between Challenges and Opportunities: Programs - Models - Research Assignments. Mit einem Geleitwort von / With a Preface by Guy St. Clair Consulting Specialist for Knowledge Management and Learning, New York, NY und einem Vorwort von / and a Foreword by Georg Ruppelt Sprecher von / Speaker of BID - Bibliothek & Information Deutschland Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksund Informationsverbände e.V. Hrsg. von P. Hauke
    Type
    a
  15. Marco, G.A.: Ethics for librarians : a narrow view (1996) 0.00 
    0.0016867955 = product of:
  0.025301931 = sum of:
    0.0098013915 = product of:
      0.019602783 = sum of:
        0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019602783 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01550054 = product of:
      0.023250809 = sum of:
        0.0036480257 = weight(_text_:a in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036480257 = score(doc=3706,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
        0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019602783 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Offers a definition of ethics for librarians by recent concerns in the uSA about the Code of Ethics (1981) of the ALA and by examination of other codes of ethics, such as that produced by the Library Association, UK, and the writings of librarians and ethicists. Concludes with notes on the revision of the 1981 Code of Ethics, adopted by the ALA on 28 June 95, comparing the 2 codes and noting the differences where applicable
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:33:41
    Type
    a
  16. Informationsethik (1995) 0.00 
    0.0015317886 = product of:
  0.022976829 = sum of:
    0.022064822 = weight(_text_:u in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022064822 = score(doc=2455,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3759712 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
    9.120064E-4 = product of:
      0.0027360192 = sum of:
        0.0027360192 = weight(_text_:a in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027360192 = score(doc=2455,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge u. Kapitel: HENRICHS, N.: Menschsein im Informationszeitalter; WIEGERLING, K.: Medium und Verhalten; BOUGNOUX, D.: Qui a peur de l'information?; CAPURRO, R.: Moral issues in information science; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethical considerations in technology transfer; DOCTOR, R.D.: Information technologies and social equity: confronting the revolution; BARBES, R.F.: Ethical and legal issues raised by information technology: the professional producer-product mix; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethics, ideologies, and practices of information technology and systems; Du MONT, R.R.: Ethics in librarianship: a management model; HAUPTMANN, R.: Ethical concerns in librarianship: an overview; SWAN, J.: Ethics inside and out: the case of Guidoriccio; SMITH, M.M.: Infoethics for leaders: models of moral agency in the information environment; KOSTREWSKI, B.J. u. C. OPPENHEIM: Ethics in information science; FROHMANN, B.: Knowledge and power in information science: a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint 'Ein- u. weiterführende Bibliographie'; 'Ethik-Kodizes'
  17. Day, R.E.: Tropes, history, and ethics in professional discourse and information science (2000) 0.00 
    0.0014499128 = product of:
  0.02174869 = sum of:
    0.008576217 = product of:
      0.017152434 = sum of:
        0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017152434 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013172473 = product of:
      0.019758709 = sum of:
        0.0026062755 = weight(_text_:a in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026062755 = score(doc=4589,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
        0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017152434 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    This article argues that professional discourses tend to align themselves with dominant ideological and social forces by means of language. Tn twentieth century modernity, the use of the trope of 'science' and related terms in professional theory is a common linguistic device through which professions attempt social self-advancement. This article examines how professional discourses, in particular those which are foundational for library and information science theory and practice, establish themselves in culture and project history - past and future - by means of appropriating certain dominant tropes in culture's language. This article suggests that ethical and political choices arise out of the rhetoric and practice of professional discourse, and that these choices cannot be confined to the realm of professional polemics
    Date
    8. 7.2000 10:29:54
    Type
    a
  18. Shoemaker, E.: No one can whistle a symphony : seeking a catalogers' code of ethics (2015) 0.00 
    0.0013541146 = product of:
  0.020311719 = sum of:
    0.0073510436 = product of:
      0.014702087 = sum of:
        0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 2370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014702087 = score(doc=2370,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2370, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2370)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012960675 = product of:
      0.019441012 = sum of:
        0.004738924 = weight(_text_:a in 2370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004738924 = score(doc=2370,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2370, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2370)
        0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 2370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014702087 = score(doc=2370,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2370, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2370)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    This paper examines the limited literature about ethics of cataloging in order to elucidate the kind of situations catalogers face with minimal ethical guidance, and the questions those situations raise for the profession. Existing codes of ethics for library staff offer only peripheral guidelines for catalogers, leaving them adrift when ethical issues arise. Ultimately the lack of a clear code of ethics for information organization reinforces existing mystification around the role of catalogers within the library and causes difficulty in justifying decisions to supervisors and administrators. While ALA has a professionally accepted code of ethics, and ALCTS has a supplement to it, these codes are inadequate to clarify and guide cataloging work. Two vastly different approaches to a code of ethics for catalogers are considered for both their strengths and weaknesses. The author will make recommendations about what a code of ethics for catalogers should include, and who should be responsible for creating a new code for the profession.
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
    Type
    a
  19. Rockembach, M.; Malheiro da Silva, A.: Epistemology and ethics of big data (2018) 0.00 
    0.0011985583 = product of:
  0.017978372 = sum of:
    0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016985506 = score(doc=4848,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
    9.928669E-4 = product of:
      0.0029786006 = sum of:
        0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029786006 = score(doc=4848,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  20. Chaves Guimarães, J.A. et al: ¬Los valores éticos en organización y representación del conocimiento (ORC) (2007) 0.00 
    0.0011791713 = product of:
  0.017687568 = sum of:
    0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016985506 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
    7.0206285E-4 = product of:
      0.0021061886 = sum of:
        0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0021061886 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 104
  • d 41
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 131
  • m 11
  • s 9
  • el 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications