-
Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015)
0.00
0.003005047 = product of:
0.030050471 = sum of:
0.019722143 = weight(_text_:neue in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019722143 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.27008536 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.0054717176 = product of:
0.010943435 = sum of:
0.010943435 = weight(_text_:online in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943435 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0048566107 = product of:
0.014569832 = sum of:
0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014569832 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Content
- Mit Verweis auf das Buch: Firnkes, M.: Das gekaufte Web: wie wir online manipuliert werden. Hannover : Heise Zeitschriften Verlag 2015. 220 S.
- Date
- 5. 7.2015 22:02:31
-
Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (2008)
0.00
0.0029156015 = product of:
0.029156014 = sum of:
0.008576217 = product of:
0.017152434 = sum of:
0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017152434 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014862318 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.005717478 = product of:
0.017152434 = sum of:
0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017152434 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 14:29:06
- Editor
- Berrueta, D. u. J. Phipps
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.00
0.002590461 = product of:
0.038856912 = sum of:
0.0073510436 = product of:
0.014702087 = sum of:
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.031505868 = sum of:
0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0022339502 = score(doc=4649,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014569832 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Aslam, S.; Sonkar, S.K.: Semantic Web : an overview (2019)
0.00
0.0016182694 = product of:
0.02427404 = sum of:
0.0098013915 = product of:
0.019602783 = sum of:
0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019602783 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014472648 = product of:
0.02170897 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019602783 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Date
- 10.12.2020 9:29:12
- Type
- a
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.00
0.0015640659 = product of:
0.023460988 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.006475481 = product of:
0.019426443 = sum of:
0.019426443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019426443 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
- Editor
- Carroll, J.J. u. J. de Roo
-
RDF Semantics (2004)
0.00
0.0014981978 = product of:
0.022472966 = sum of:
0.021231882 = weight(_text_:u in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021231882 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
0.0012410836 = product of:
0.0037232507 = sum of:
0.0037232507 = weight(_text_:a in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037232507 = score(doc=3065,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This is a specification of a precise semantics, and corresponding complete systems of inference rules, for the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and RDF Schema (RDFS).
- Editor
- Hayes, P. u. B. McBride
-
Panzer, M.: Relationships, spaces, and the two faces of Dewey (2008)
0.00
0.001416405 = product of:
0.021246074 = sum of:
0.020039603 = weight(_text_:post in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020039603 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19251013 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
0.001206471 = product of:
0.003619413 = sum of:
0.003619413 = weight(_text_:a in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003619413 = score(doc=2127,freq=42.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.17513901 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Content
- "When dealing with a large-scale and widely-used knowledge organization system like the Dewey Decimal Classification, we often tend to focus solely on the organization aspect, which is closely intertwined with editorial work. This is perfectly understandable, since developing and updating the DDC, keeping up with current scientific developments, spotting new trends in both scholarly communication and popular publishing, and figuring out how to fit those patterns into the structure of the scheme are as intriguing as they are challenging. From the organization perspective, the intended user of the scheme is mainly the classifier. Dewey acts very much as a number-building engine, providing richly documented concepts to help with classification decisions. Since the Middle Ages, quasi-religious battles have been fought over the "valid" arrangement of places according to specific views of the world, as parodied by Jorge Luis Borges and others. Organizing knowledge has always been primarily an ontological activity; it is about putting the world into the classification. However, there is another side to this coin--the discovery side. While the hierarchical organization of the DDC establishes a default set of places and neighborhoods that is also visible in the physical manifestation of library shelves, this is just one set of relationships in the DDC. A KOS (Knowledge Organization System) becomes powerful by expressing those other relationships in a manner that not only collocates items in a physical place but in a knowledge space, and exposes those other relationships in ways beneficial and congenial to the unique perspective of an information seeker.
What are those "other" relationships that Dewey possesses and that seem so important to surface? Firstly, there is the relationship of concepts to resources. Dewey has been used for a long time, and over 200,000 numbers are assigned to information resources each year and added to WorldCat by the Library of Congress and the German National Library alone. Secondly, we have relationships between concepts in the scheme itself. Dewey provides a rich set of non-hierarchical relations, indicating other relevant and related subjects across disciplinary boundaries. Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, there is the relationship between the same concepts across different languages. Dewey has been translated extensively, and current versions are available in French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Briefer representations of the top-three levels (the DDC Summaries) are available in several languages in the DeweyBrowser. This multilingual nature of the scheme allows searchers to access a broader range of resources or to switch the language of--and thus localize--subject metadata seamlessly. MelvilClass, a Dewey front-end developed by the German National Library for the German translation, could be used as a common interface to the DDC in any language, as it is built upon the standard DDC data format. It is not hard to give an example of the basic terminology of a class pulled together in a multilingual way: <class/794.8> a skos:Concept ; skos:notation "794.8"^^ddc:notation ; skos:prefLabel "Computer games"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Computerspiele"@de ; skos:prefLabel "Jeux sur ordinateur"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Juegos por computador"@es .
Expressed in such manner, the Dewey number provides a language-independent representation of a Dewey concept, accompanied by language-dependent assertions about the concept. This information, identified by a URI, can be easily consumed by semantic web agents and used in various metadata scenarios. Fourthly, as we have seen, it is important to play well with others, i.e., establishing and maintaining relationships to other KOS and making the scheme available in different formats. As noted in the Dewey blog post "Tags and Dewey," since no single scheme is ever going to be the be-all, end-all solution for knowledge discovery, DDC concepts have been extensively mapped to other vocabularies and taxonomies, sometimes bridging them and acting as a backbone, sometimes using them as additional access vocabulary to be able to do more work "behind the scenes." To enable other applications and schemes to make use of those relationships, the full Dewey database is available in XML format; RDF-based formats and a web service are forthcoming. Pulling those relationships together under a common surface will be the next challenge going forward. In the semantic web community the concept of Linked Data (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_Data) currently receives some attention, with its emphasis on exposing and connecting data using technologies like URIs, HTTP and RDF to improve information discovery on the web. With its focus on relationships and discovery, it seems that Dewey will be well prepared to become part of this big linked data set. Now it is about putting the classification back into the world!"
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
0.0012839084 = product of:
0.019258624 = sum of:
0.0073510436 = product of:
0.014702087 = sum of:
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01190758 = product of:
0.01786137 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=4640,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
- Type
- a
-
Mehler, A.; Waltinger, U.: Automatic enrichment of metadata (2009)
0.00
0.0012259755 = product of:
0.018389631 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=4840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.0014041257 = product of:
0.004212377 = sum of:
0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004212377 = score(doc=4840,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- In this talk we present a retrieval model based on social ontologies. More specifically, we utilize the Wikipedia category system in order to perform semantic searches. That is, textual input is used to build queries by means of which documents are retrieved which do not necessarily contain any query term but are semantically related to the input text by virtue of their content. We present a desktop which utilizes this search facility in a web-based environment - the so called eHumanities Desktop.
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.; Sigel, A.: Introducing terminology-based ontologies : Papers and Materials presented by the authors at the workshop "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" (Poli/Schmitz-Esser/Sigel) at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), Vienna, Austria, July 6th, 2006 (2006)
0.00
0.0012137021 = product of:
0.018205531 = sum of:
0.0073510436 = product of:
0.014702087 = sum of:
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010854486 = product of:
0.01628173 = sum of:
0.0015796415 = weight(_text_:a in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0015796415 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Date
- 17. 7.2006 12:29:55
-
RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0 : RDF Schema (2004)
0.00
0.0011985583 = product of:
0.017978372 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
9.928669E-4 = product of:
0.0029786006 = sum of:
0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029786006 = score(doc=3057,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a general-purpose language for representing information in the Web. This specification describes how to use RDF to describe RDF vocabularies. This specification defines a vocabulary for this purpose and defines other built-in RDF vocabulary initially specified in the RDF Model and Syntax Specification.
- Editor
- Brickley, D. u. R.V. Guha
-
RDF Primer : W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004 (2004)
0.00
0.0011791713 = product of:
0.017687568 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
7.0206285E-4 = product of:
0.0021061886 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a language for representing information about resources in the World Wide Web. This Primer is designed to provide the reader with the basic knowledge required to effectively use RDF. It introduces the basic concepts of RDF and describes its XML syntax. It describes how to define RDF vocabularies using the RDF Vocabulary Description Language, and gives an overview of some deployed RDF applications. It also describes the content and purpose of other RDF specification documents.
- Editor
- Manola, F. u. E. Miller
-
Resource Description Framework (RDF) : Concepts and Abstract Syntax (2004)
0.00
0.0011791713 = product of:
0.017687568 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
7.0206285E-4 = product of:
0.0021061886 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a framework for representing information in the Web. RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax defines an abstract syntax on which RDF is based, and which serves to link its concrete syntax to its formal semantics. It also includes discussion of design goals, key concepts, datatyping, character normalization and handling of URI references.
- Editor
- Klyne, G. u. J.C. Carroll
-
Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004)
0.00
0.0010727285 = product of:
0.016090928 = sum of:
0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014862318 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
0.00122861 = product of:
0.00368583 = sum of:
0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00368583 = score(doc=4684,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
- Editor
- Dean, M. u. G. Schreiber
-
Shah, U.; Finin, T.; Joshi, A.; Cost, R.S.; Mayfield, J.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web (2002)
0.00
0.0010727285 = product of:
0.016090928 = sum of:
0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014862318 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
0.00122861 = product of:
0.00368583 = sum of:
0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00368583 = score(doc=696,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- We describe an apporach to retrieval of documents that consist of both free text and semantically enriched markup. In particular, we present the design and implementation prototype of a framework in which both documents and queries can be marked up with statements in the DAML+OIL semantic web language. These statement provide both structured and semi-structured information about the documents and their content. We claim that indexing text and semantic markup will significantly improve retrieval performance. Outr approach allows inferencing to be done over this information at several points: when a document is indexed,when a query is processed and when query results are evaluated.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004)
0.00
9.3526015E-4 = product of:
0.014028901 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=4683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
0.0012897718 = product of:
0.0038693151 = sum of:
0.0038693151 = weight(_text_:a in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038693151 = score(doc=4683,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This description of OWL, the Web Ontology Language being designed by the W3C Web Ontology Working Group, contains a high-level abstract syntax for both OWL DL and OWL Lite, sublanguages of OWL. A model-theoretic semantics is given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies written in this abstract syntax. A model-theoretic semantics in the form of an extension to the RDF semantics is also given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies as RDF graphs (OWL Full). A mapping from the abstract syntax to RDF graphs is given and the two model theories are shown to have the same consequences on OWL ontologies that can be written in the abstract syntax.
- Editor
- Patel-Schneider, P.F., P. Hayes u . I. Horrocks
-
SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference : W3C Recommendation 18 August 2009 (2009)
0.00
9.3526015E-4 = product of:
0.014028901 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.0012897718 = product of:
0.0038693151 = sum of:
0.0038693151 = weight(_text_:a in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038693151 = score(doc=4688,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This document defines the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), a common data model for sharing and linking knowledge organization systems via the Web. Many knowledge organization systems, such as thesauri, taxonomies, classification schemes and subject heading systems, share a similar structure, and are used in similar applications. SKOS captures much of this similarity and makes it explicit, to enable data and technology sharing across diverse applications. The SKOS data model provides a standard, low-cost migration path for porting existing knowledge organization systems to the Semantic Web. SKOS also provides a lightweight, intuitive language for developing and sharing new knowledge organization systems. It may be used on its own, or in combination with formal knowledge representation languages such as the Web Ontology language (OWL). This document is the normative specification of the Simple Knowledge Organization System. It is intended for readers who are involved in the design and implementation of information systems, and who already have a good understanding of Semantic Web technology, especially RDF and OWL. For an informative guide to using SKOS, see the [SKOS-PRIMER].
- Editor
- Miles, A. u. S. Bechhofer
-
Davies, J.; Weeks, R.; Krohn, U.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
9.1007573E-4 = product of:
0.013651135 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=4316,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
9.120064E-4 = product of:
0.0027360192 = sum of:
0.0027360192 = weight(_text_:a in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027360192 = score(doc=4316,freq=6.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- An information-seeking system is described which combines traditional keyword querying of WWW resources with the ability to browse and query against RDF annotations of those resources. RDF(S) and RDF are used to specify and populate an ontology and the resultant RDF annotations are then indexed along with the full text of the annotated resources. The resultant index allows both keyword querying against the full text of the document and the literal values occurring in the RDF annotations, along with the ability to browse and query the ontology. We motivate our approach as a key enabler for fully exploiting the Semantic Web in the area of knowledge management and argue that the ability to combine searching and browsing behaviours more fully supports a typical information-seeking task. The approach is characterised as "low threshold, high ceiling" in the sense that where RDF annotations exist they are exploited for an improved information-seeking experience but where they do not yet exist, a search capability is still available.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004)
0.00
8.9891866E-4 = product of:
0.0134837795 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=4682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
7.446501E-4 = product of:
0.0022339502 = sum of:
0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0022339502 = score(doc=4682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The OWL Web Ontology Language is designed for use by applications that need to process the content of information instead of just presenting information to humans. OWL facilitates greater machine interpretability of Web content than that supported by XML, RDF, and RDF Schema (RDF-S) by providing additional vocabulary along with a formal semantics. OWL has three increasingly-expressive sublanguages: OWL Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full. This document is written for readers who want a first impression of the capabilities of OWL. It provides an introduction to OWL by informally describing the features of each of the sublanguages of OWL. Some knowledge of RDF Schema is useful for understanding this document, but not essential. After this document, interested readers may turn to the OWL Guide for more detailed descriptions and extensive examples on the features of OWL. The normative formal definition of OWL can be found in the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
- Editor
- McGuinness, D.L. u. F. van Harmelen
-
SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer (2009)
0.00
8.9891866E-4 = product of:
0.0134837795 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=4795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
7.446501E-4 = product of:
0.0022339502 = sum of:
0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0022339502 = score(doc=4795,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, folksonomies, and other types of controlled vocabulary. As an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF) SKOS allows concepts to be documented, linked and merged with other data, while still being composed, integrated and published on the World Wide Web. This document is an implementors guide for those who would like to represent their concept scheme using SKOS. In basic SKOS, conceptual resources (concepts) can be identified using URIs, labelled with strings in one or more natural languages, documented with various types of notes, semantically related to each other in informal hierarchies and association networks, and aggregated into distinct concept schemes. In advanced SKOS, conceptual resources can be mapped to conceptual resources in other schemes and grouped into labelled or ordered collections. Concept labels can also be related to each other. Finally, the SKOS vocabulary itself can be extended to suit the needs of particular communities of practice.
- Editor
- Isaac, A. u. E. Summers
