-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001)
0.04
0.042193852 = product of:
0.15822694 = sum of:
0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047684375 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047684375 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047684375 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.0151738 = product of:
0.0455214 = sum of:
0.0455214 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0455214 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 11. 2.1997 20:11:23
5. 5.2003 14:17:22
-
Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009)
0.03
0.033932965 = product of:
0.10179889 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.022685425 = weight(_text_:der in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022685425 = score(doc=3051,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.0075869 = product of:
0.0227607 = sum of:
0.0227607 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0227607 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Klassifikation von bibliografischen Einheiten ist für einen systematischen Zugang zu den Beständen einer Bibliothek und deren Aufstellung unumgänglich. Bislang wurde diese Aufgabe von Fachexperten manuell erledigt, sei es individuell nach einer selbst entwickelten Systematik oder kooperativ nach einer gemeinsamen Systematik. In dieser Arbeit wird ein Verfahren zur Automatisierung des Klassifikationsvorgangs vorgestellt. Dabei kommt das Verfahren des fallbasierten Schließens zum Einsatz, das im Kontext der Forschung zur künstlichen Intelligenz entwickelt wurde. Das Verfahren liefert für jedes Werk, für das bibliografische Daten vorliegen, eine oder mehrere mögliche Klassifikationen. In Experimenten werden die Ergebnisse der automatischen Klassifikation mit der durch Fachexperten verglichen. Diese Experimente belegen die hohe Qualität der automatischen Klassifikation und dass das Verfahren geeignet ist, Fachexperten bei der Klassifikationsarbeit signifikant zu entlasten. Auch die nahezu vollständige Resystematisierung eines Bibliothekskataloges ist - mit gewissen Abstrichen - möglich.
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 19:51:28
23. 8.2009 9:46:44
- Source
- Wissen bewegen - Bibliotheken in der Informationsgesellschaft / 97. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Mannheim, 2008. Hrsg. von Ulrich Hohoff und Per Knudsen. Bearb. von Stefan Siebert
-
Illing, S.: Automatisiertes klinisches Codieren (2021)
0.03
0.028724572 = product of:
0.10771714 = sum of:
0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031789586 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031789586 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031789586 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.012348382 = weight(_text_:der in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012348382 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Die in diesem Artikel vorgestellte Bachelorarbeit behandelt die Ergebnisse einer Shared Task im Bereich eHealth. Es wird untersucht, ob die Klassifikationsgenauigkeit ausgewählter klinischer Codiersysteme durch den Einsatz von Ensemble-Methoden verbessert werden kann. Entscheidend dafür sind die Werte der Evaluationsmaße Mean Average Precision und F1-Maß.
- Date
- 10.11.2021 19:11:23
-
Shafer, K.E.: Automatic Subject Assignment via the Scorpion System (2001)
0.03
0.028610626 = product of:
0.14305313 = sum of:
0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047684375 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047684375 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047684375 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 11. 2.1997 20:11:23
-
Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006)
0.03
0.025133999 = product of:
0.09425249 = sum of:
0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027815886 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027815886 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027815886 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.010804834 = weight(_text_:der in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010804834 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit den praktischen Aspekten des Automatischen Klassifizierens bibliographischer Referenzdaten. Im Vordergrund steht die konkrete Vorgehensweise anhand des eigens zu diesem Zweck entwickelten Open Source-Programms COBRA "Classification Of Bibliographic Records, Automatic". Es werden die Rahmenbedingungen und Parameter f¨ur einen Einsatz im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geklärt. Schließlich erfolgt eine Auswertung von Klassifizierungsergebnissen am Beispiel sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten aus der Datenbank SOLIS.
- Date
- 10. 9.2006 19:23:31
-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (1998)
0.02
0.02384219 = product of:
0.11921094 = sum of:
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 11. 2.1997 20:11:23
-
Shafer, K.E.: Evaluating Scorpion results (1998)
0.02
0.02384219 = product of:
0.11921094 = sum of:
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 11. 2.1997 20:11:23
-
Shafer, K.E.: Evaluating Scorpion Results (2001)
0.02
0.02384219 = product of:
0.11921094 = sum of:
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736982 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 11. 2.1997 20:11:23
-
Reiner, U.: VZG-Projekt Colibri : Bewertung von automatisch DDC-klassifizierten Titeldatensätzen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) (2009)
0.02
0.023315249 = product of:
0.087432176 = sum of:
0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019868491 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019868491 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019868491 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
0.027826702 = weight(_text_:der in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027826702 = score(doc=2675,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.4449227 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Das VZG-Projekt Colibri/DDC beschäftigt sich seit 2003 mit automatischen Verfahren zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (Dewey Decimal Classification, kurz DDC). Ziel des Projektes ist eine einheitliche DDC-Erschließung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen und eine Unterstützung der DDC-Expert(inn)en und DDC-Laien, z. B. bei der Analyse und Synthese von DDC-Notationen und deren Qualitätskontrolle und der DDC-basierten Suche. Der vorliegende Bericht konzentriert sich auf die erste größere automatische DDC-Klassifizierung und erste automatische und intellektuelle Bewertung mit der Klassifizierungskomponente vc_dcl1. Grundlage hierfür waren die von der Deutschen Nationabibliothek (DNB) im November 2007 zur Verfügung gestellten 25.653 Titeldatensätze (12 Wochen-/Monatslieferungen) der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie der Reihen A, B und H. Nach Erläuterung der automatischen DDC-Klassifizierung und automatischen Bewertung in Kapitel 2 wird in Kapitel 3 auf den DNB-Bericht "Colibri_Auswertung_DDC_Endbericht_Sommer_2008" eingegangen. Es werden Sachverhalte geklärt und Fragen gestellt, deren Antworten die Weichen für den Verlauf der weiteren Klassifizierungstests stellen werden. Über das Kapitel 3 hinaus führende weitergehende Betrachtungen und Gedanken zur Fortführung der automatischen DDC-Klassifizierung werden in Kapitel 4 angestellt. Der Bericht dient dem vertieften Verständnis für die automatischen Verfahren.
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 16:52:13
-
Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013)
0.02
0.021096926 = product of:
0.07911347 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.0075869 = product of:
0.0227607 = sum of:
0.0227607 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0227607 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 23. 3.2013 13:22:36
-
Montesi, M.; Navarrete, T.: Classifying web genres in context : A case study documenting the web genres used by a software engineer (2008)
0.02
0.020230768 = product of:
0.101153836 = sum of:
0.033717945 = weight(_text_:23 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033717945 = score(doc=2100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
0.033717945 = weight(_text_:23 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033717945 = score(doc=2100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
0.033717945 = weight(_text_:23 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033717945 = score(doc=2100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Abstract
- This case study analyzes the Internet-based resources that a software engineer uses in his daily work. Methodologically, we studied the web browser history of the participant, classifying all the web pages he had seen over a period of 12 days into web genres. We interviewed him before and after the analysis of the web browser history. In the first interview, he spoke about his general information behavior; in the second, he commented on each web genre, explaining why and how he used them. As a result, three approaches allow us to describe the set of 23 web genres obtained: (a) the purposes they serve for the participant; (b) the role they play in the various work and search phases; (c) and the way they are used in combination with each other. Further observations concern the way the participant assesses quality of web-based resources, and his information behavior as a software engineer.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:17:23
-
Schek, M.: Automatische Klassifizierung und Visualisierung im Archiv der Süddeutschen Zeitung (2005)
0.02
0.01874953 = product of:
0.070310734 = sum of:
0.013907943 = weight(_text_:23 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013907943 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.13859524 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.013907943 = weight(_text_:23 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013907943 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.13859524 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.013907943 = weight(_text_:23 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013907943 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.13859524 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.028586904 = weight(_text_:der in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028586904 = score(doc=4884,freq=56.0), product of:
0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
56.0 = termFreq=56.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Die Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) verfügt seit ihrer Gründung 1945 über ein Pressearchiv, das die Texte der eigenen Redakteure und zahlreicher nationaler und internationaler Publikationen dokumentiert und auf Anfrage für Recherchezwecke bereitstellt. Die Einführung der EDV begann Anfang der 90er Jahre mit der digitalen Speicherung zunächst der SZ-Daten. Die technische Weiterentwicklung ab Mitte der 90er Jahre diente zwei Zielen: (1) dem vollständigen Wechsel von der Papierablage zur digitalen Speicherung und (2) dem Wandel von einer verlagsinternen Dokumentations- und Auskunftsstelle zu einem auch auf dem Markt vertretenen Informationsdienstleister. Um die dabei entstehenden Aufwände zu verteilen und gleichzeitig Synergieeffekte zwischen inhaltlich verwandten Archiven zu erschließen, gründeten der Süddeutsche Verlag und der Bayerische Rundfunk im Jahr 1998 die Dokumentations- und Informationszentrum (DIZ) München GmbH, in der die Pressearchive der beiden Gesellschafter und das Bildarchiv des Süddeutschen Verlags zusammengeführt wurden. Die gemeinsam entwickelte Pressedatenbank ermöglichte das standortübergreifende Lektorat, die browserbasierte Recherche für Redakteure und externe Kunden im Intraund Internet und die kundenspezifischen Content Feeds für Verlage, Rundfunkanstalten und Portale. Die DIZPressedatenbank enthält zur Zeit 6,9 Millionen Artikel, die jeweils als HTML oder PDF abrufbar sind. Täglich kommen ca. 3.500 Artikel hinzu, von denen ca. 1.000 lektoriert werden. Das Lektorat erfolgt im DIZ nicht durch die Vergabe von Schlagwörtern am Dokument, sondern durch die Verlinkung der Artikel mit "virtuellen Mappen", den Dossiers. Diese stellen die elektronische Repräsentation einer Papiermappe dar und sind das zentrale Erschließungsobjekt. Im Gegensatz zu statischen Klassifikationssystemen ist die Dossierstruktur dynamisch und aufkommensabhängig, d.h. neue Dossiers werden hauptsächlich anhand der aktuellen Berichterstattung erstellt. Insgesamt enthält die DIZ-Pressedatenbank ca. 90.000 Dossiers, davon sind 68.000 Sachthemen (Topics), Personen und Institutionen. Die Dossiers sind untereinander zum "DIZ-Wissensnetz" verlinkt.
DIZ definiert das Wissensnetz als Alleinstellungsmerkmal und wendet beträchtliche personelle Ressourcen für die Aktualisierung und Oualitätssicherung der Dossiers auf. Nach der Umstellung auf den komplett digitalisierten Workflow im April 2001 identifizierte DIZ vier Ansatzpunkte, wie die Aufwände auf der Inputseite (Lektorat) zu optimieren sind und gleichzeitig auf der Outputseite (Recherche) das Wissensnetz besser zu vermarkten ist: 1. (Teil-)Automatische Klassifizierung von Pressetexten (Vorschlagwesen) 2. Visualisierung des Wissensnetzes (Topic Mapping) 3. (Voll-)Automatische Klassifizierung und Optimierung des Wissensnetzes 4. Neue Retrievalmöglichkeiten (Clustering, Konzeptsuche) Die Projekte 1 und 2 "Automatische Klassifizierung und Visualisierung" starteten zuerst und wurden beschleunigt durch zwei Entwicklungen: - Der Bayerische Rundfunk (BR), ursprünglich Mitbegründer und 50%-Gesellschafter der DIZ München GmbH, entschloss sich aus strategischen Gründen, zum Ende 2003 aus der Kooperation auszusteigen. - Die Medienkrise, hervorgerufen durch den massiven Rückgang der Anzeigenerlöse, erforderte auch im Süddeutschen Verlag massive Einsparungen und die Suche nach neuen Erlösquellen. Beides führte dazu, dass die Kapazitäten im Bereich Pressedokumentation von ursprünglich rund 20 (nur SZ, ohne BR-Anteil) auf rund 13 zum 1. Januar 2004 sanken und gleichzeitig die Aufwände für die Pflege des Wissensnetzes unter verstärkten Rechtfertigungsdruck gerieten. Für die Projekte 1 und 2 ergaben sich daraus drei quantitative und qualitative Ziele: - Produktivitätssteigerung im Lektorat - Konsistenzverbesserung im Lektorat - Bessere Vermarktung und intensivere Nutzung der Dossiers in der Recherche Alle drei genannten Ziele konnten erreicht werden, wobei insbesondere die Produktivität im Lektorat gestiegen ist. Die Projekte 1 und 2 "Automatische Klassifizierung und Visualisierung" sind seit Anfang 2004 erfolgreich abgeschlossen. Die Folgeprojekte 3 und 4 laufen seit Mitte 2004 und sollen bis Mitte 2005 abgeschlossen sein. Im folgenden wird in Abschnitt 2 die Produktauswahl und Arbeitsweise der Automatischen Klassifizierung beschrieben. Abschnitt 3 schildert den Einsatz der Wissensnetz-Visualisierung in Lektorat und Recherche. Abschnitt 4 fasst die Ergebnisse der Projekte 1 und 2 zusammen und gibt einen Ausblick auf die Ziele der Projekte 3 und 4.
- Date
- 27. 1.2006 13:23:26
-
Savic, D.: Automatic classification of office documents : review of available methods and techniques (1995)
0.02
0.016689532 = product of:
0.08344766 = sum of:
0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027815886 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027815886 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027815886 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 23. 7.1996 10:28:09
-
Mukhopadhyay, S.; Peng, S.; Raje, R.; Palakal, M.; Mostafa, J.: Multi-agent information classification using dynamic acquaintance lists (2003)
0.01
0.014305313 = product of:
0.071526565 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 17. 8.2003 14:17:23
-
Sun, A.; Lim, E.-P.; Ng, W.-K.: Performance measurement framework for hierarchical text classification (2003)
0.01
0.014305313 = product of:
0.071526565 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 20. 8.2003 20:23:39
-
Gauch, S.; Chandramouli, A.; Ranganathan, S.: Training a hierarchical classifier using inter document relationships (2009)
0.01
0.014305313 = product of:
0.071526565 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 18:34:38
-
Ko, Y.: ¬A new term-weighting scheme for text classification using the odds of positive and negative class probabilities (2015)
0.01
0.014305313 = product of:
0.071526565 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 24.11.2015 14:23:26
-
Teich, E.; Degaetano-Ortlieb, S.; Fankhauser, P.; Kermes, H.; Lapshinova-Koltunski, E.: ¬The linguistic construal of disciplinarity : a data-mining approach using register features (2016)
0.01
0.014305313 = product of:
0.071526565 = sum of:
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=3015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=3015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023842188 = score(doc=3015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 12. 6.2016 20:23:08
-
HaCohen-Kerner, Y.; Beck, H.; Yehudai, E.; Rosenstein, M.; Mughaz, D.: Cuisine : classification using stylistic feature sets and/or name-based feature sets (2010)
0.01
0.011921095 = product of:
0.05960547 = sum of:
0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019868491 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019868491 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019868491 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 23. 7.2010 13:16:35
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.01
0.0069408542 = product of:
0.052056406 = sum of:
0.044469506 = product of:
0.13340852 = sum of:
0.13340852 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13340852 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2373741 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0075869 = product of:
0.0227607 = sum of:
0.0227607 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0227607 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.027998796 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
