Search (272 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. White, R.W.; Roth, R.A.: Exploratory search : beyond the query-response paradigm (2009) 0.01 
    0.013136493 = product of:
  0.07225071 = sum of:
    0.047574617 = weight(_text_:lecture in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047574617 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13308205 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.35748336 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
    0.005561643 = weight(_text_:in in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005561643 = score(doc=0,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
    0.015173013 = weight(_text_:computer in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015173013 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.20188503 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
    0.0039414368 = product of:
      0.0078828735 = sum of:
        0.0078828735 = weight(_text_:science in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078828735 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    As information becomes more ubiquitous and the demands that searchers have on search systems grow, there is a need to support search behaviors beyond simple lookup. Information seeking is the process or activity of attempting to obtain information in both human and technological contexts. Exploratory search describes an information-seeking problem context that is open-ended, persistent, and multifaceted, and information-seeking processes that are opportunistic, iterative, and multitactical. Exploratory searchers aim to solve complex problems and develop enhanced mental capacities. Exploratory search systems support this through symbiotic human-machine relationships that provide guidance in exploring unfamiliar information landscapes. Exploratory search has gained prominence in recent years. There is an increased interest from the information retrieval, information science, and human-computer interaction communities in moving beyond the traditional turn-taking interaction model supported by major Web search engines, and toward support for human intelligence amplification and information use. In this lecture, we introduce exploratory search, relate it to relevant extant research, outline the features of exploratory search systems, discuss the evaluation of these systems, and suggest some future directions for supporting exploratory search. Exploratory search is a new frontier in the search domain and is becoming increasingly important in shaping our future world.
  2. Marchionini, G.: Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia (1989) 0.01 
    0.012039777 = product of:
  0.06621877 = sum of:
    0.038912293 = weight(_text_:notes in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038912293 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
    0.0043691397 = weight(_text_:in in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043691397 = score(doc=2589,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
    0.018207615 = weight(_text_:computer in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018207615 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
    0.0047297236 = product of:
      0.009459447 = sum of:
        0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009459447 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    An exploratory study was conducted of elementary school children searching a full-text electronic encyclopedia on CD-ROM. 28 third and forth graders and 24 sixth graders conducted 2 assigned searches, one open-ended, the other one closed, after 2 demonstration sessions. Keystrokes captured by the computer and observer notes were used to examine user information-seeking strategies from a mental model perspective. Older searchers were more successful in finding required information, and took less time than younger searchers. No differences in total number of moves were found. Analysis of search patterns showed that novices used a heuristic, highly interactive search strategy. Searchers used sentence and phrase queries, indicating unique mental models for this search system. Most searchers accepted system defaults and used the AND connective in formulating queries. Transition matrix analysis showed that younger searchers generally favoured query refining moves and older searchers fovoured examining title and text moves. Suggestions for system designers were made and future research questions were identified
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989) no.1, S.54-66
  3. Steinhaus, I.: Online recherchieren : Ökonomische Wege zu Informationen (1997) 0.01 
    0.010750282 = product of:
  0.05912655 = sum of:
    0.017470691 = weight(_text_:und in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017470691 = score(doc=2672,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.017470691 = weight(_text_:und in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017470691 = score(doc=2672,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.0029429442 = weight(_text_:in in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029429442 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.021242218 = weight(_text_:computer in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021242218 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    'Information at your fingertip' ist einer der großen Versprechen der Computerindustrie. Tatsächlich wächst das Angebot online verfügbarer Datenbanken und Informationsnetze mit geradezu atemberaubender Geschwindigkeit. Waren Online-Recherchen noch vorwenigen Jahren eine teure Spielerei für Experten, so kann sich heute jeder in den Netzen auf die Suche begeben. Doch ohne Know-how werden die Ergebnisse kaum befriedigen. Dieses Buch hilft Ihnen, die Recherchekosten und den Arbeitsaufwand so niedrig wie möglich zu halten. Es vermittelt die notwendigen Kenntnisse im Umgang mit Online-Diensten und dem Internet und erläutert die Besonderheiten der unterschiedlichen Datenbanken. Vor allem aber erklärt es anhand praxisnaher Beispiele, wie man Suchanfragen konzipiert und erfolgversprechende Suchstrategien entwickelt
    Series
    rororo Computer
  4. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.01 
    0.007288664 = product of:
  0.0534502 = sum of:
    0.038912293 = weight(_text_:notes in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038912293 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
    0.0061788964 = weight(_text_:in in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061788964 = score(doc=2404,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
    0.008359012 = product of:
      0.016718024 = sum of:
        0.016718024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016718024 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Reports on a study of the search tactics used in searching the WWW and in dealing with difficulties such as too many postings and no relevant postings. Describes how the study was carried out, the analytical techniques used in it, and the results. Notes that with regard to tactics used to address search difficulties, no differences were found between searchers for texts and those for graphic information, and between those for known items and subject searches. Comments on the similarities and differences between the tactics used and and those used in online searching, including online catalogue searching
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
  5. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010) 0.01 
    0.0068250312 = product of:
  0.03753767 = sum of:
    0.012627926 = weight(_text_:und in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012627926 = score(doc=4663,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
    0.012627926 = weight(_text_:und in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012627926 = score(doc=4663,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
    0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003363365 = score(doc=4663,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
    0.008918453 = product of:
      0.017836906 = sum of:
        0.017836906 = weight(_text_:science in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017836906 = score(doc=4663,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    The paper proposes three different kinds of science models as value-added services that are integrated in the retrieval process to enhance retrieval quailty. The paper discusses the approaches Search Term Recommendation, Bradfordizing and Author Centrality on a general level and addresses implementation issues of the models within a real-life retrieval environment.
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  6. Shaw, D.: Bibliographic database searching by graduate students in language and literature : search strategies, system interfaces, and relevance judgements (1995) 0.01 
    0.0064984304 = product of:
  0.035741366 = sum of:
    0.008434889 = product of:
      0.016869778 = sum of:
        0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869778 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0043691397 = weight(_text_:in in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043691397 = score(doc=5651,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
    0.018207615 = weight(_text_:computer in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018207615 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
    0.0047297236 = product of:
      0.009459447 = sum of:
        0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009459447 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    Reports on a study conducted at Indiana University in the summer of 1993 which observed 10 advanced graduate students in language and literature studies as they conducted literature searches using databases on CD-ROM. Presents a brief review of related literature on relevance judgements, human-computer interaction (HCI) and information seeking behaviour of humanities students. The search strategies of the graduate students under study were found to be typical of humanities scholars, who create large sets and review records quickly to select relevant items. Factors influencing relevance assessments included language, source of publication, author, and length of work. Participants especially appreciated electronic access to the Modern Language Association (MLA) International Bibliography but encountered problems with the controlled vocabulary and analytic entries for books and proceedings. The study has identified problems with database content, presentation and search interfaces which should be considered by system designers
    Date
    8.11.1996 19:42:29
    Source
    Library and information science research. 17(1995) no.4, S.327-345
  7. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.01 
    0.006146135 = product of:
  0.045071654 = sum of:
    0.019681407 = product of:
      0.039362814 = sum of:
        0.039362814 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039362814 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058858884 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
    0.01950436 = product of:
      0.03900872 = sum of:
        0.03900872 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03900872 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
    Source
    Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski
  8. Lempert, Y.: Suchstrategien in Kinder-OPACs : Vorstellung ausgewählter Beispiele und Anforderungen an Dokumentationssprachen (1998) 0.01 
    0.005853931 = product of:
  0.042928826 = sum of:
    0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018941889 = score(doc=3402,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
    0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018941889 = score(doc=3402,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
    0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050450475 = score(doc=3402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
  9. Mattmann, B.; Regenass, N.: ¬Eine neue Form der Recherche in Bibliotheken : "Suchschlitz" contra Exploration - Reduktion statt Orientierung? (2021) 0.01 
    0.005787044 = product of:
  0.04243832 = sum of:
    0.019138183 = weight(_text_:und in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019138183 = score(doc=432,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
    0.019138183 = weight(_text_:und in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019138183 = score(doc=432,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
    0.004161952 = weight(_text_:in in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004161952 = score(doc=432,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Suchportale von Bibliotheken haben im Laufe der Zeit immer stärker eine Reduktion auf einfachste Suchmöglichkeiten im Stile von Google erfahren. Das kommt zwar den Gewohnheiten der Nutzer:innen entgegen, schränkt aber die Möglichkeiten einer fundierten Recherche ein. Abhilfe schaffen explorative Suchinstrumente. Damit diese ökonomisch und bedarfsgerecht realisiert werden können, braucht es eine hohe Datenqualität und einen standardisierten Werkzeugkasten zur Umsetzung von Rechercheoberflächen. Anstelle eines Ausbaus der Funktionen von Suchportalen empfiehlt sich daher eine Ausrichtung und Individualisierung zusätzlicher Recherchetools auf konkrete Anwendungskontexte und Nutzertypen.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Schwerpunktheft: Transfer und Transformation - Bibliotheken als Vermittler im globalen Kontext. Kolloquium anlässlich des 80. Geburtstages von Elmar Mittler.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 45(2021) H.2, S.304-316
  10. Cooper, L.Z.: ¬A case study of information-seeking behavior in 7-year-old children in a semistructured situation (2002) 0.01 
    0.00577009 = product of:
  0.042313993 = sum of:
    0.032426912 = weight(_text_:notes in 5235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032426912 = score(doc=5235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29513517 = fieldWeight in 5235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5235)
    0.0059456457 = weight(_text_:in in 5235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059456457 = score(doc=5235,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 5235, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5235)
    0.0039414368 = product of:
      0.0078828735 = sum of:
        0.0078828735 = weight(_text_:science in 5235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078828735 = score(doc=5235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5235)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Cooper identifies search strategies in 21 seven year old children (entering Piaget's concrete operational stage), and compares these to those characterized by a model of adult search strategies with a particular interest on the impact of visual information. Videotapes were made of behavior at a bookshelf of the children in their regularly scheduled media center class and in visits outside the class time. Children largely ignored the camera and commented on the videotapes in a debriefing session. Field notes were also kept. The analysis produced counts of strategy types using the Belkin model. Thirty-three books on spiders were added to the collection and filed normally in Dewey 595.4. A CD-ROM encyclopedia was also made available and both were utilized. Nine search sessions on the CD-ROM encyclopedia were recorded and a Scan/Learn/Recognize strategy was favored. At the shelf a Scan/Select/Recognize strategy was common with only a few looking beyond the cover to make a selection. Metadata use was discussed and the children agreed it should be used. It was used in the CD-ROM search but not at the shelves. There is a tendency to rely on visual information if available, and it appears the Belkin model can be used to characterize children's search behavior.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.11, S.904-923
  11. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01 
    0.0052063293 = product of:
  0.038179748 = sum of:
    0.008434889 = product of:
      0.016869778 = sum of:
        0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869778 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0035673876 = weight(_text_:in in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0035673876 = score(doc=3612,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.026177472 = sum of:
      0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009459447 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.016718024 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016718024 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  12. Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive engineering in information retrieval domains : merging paradigms? (1995) 0.01 
    0.0050643287 = product of:
  0.03713841 = sum of:
    0.015626261 = weight(_text_:und in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015626261 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
    0.015626261 = weight(_text_:und in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015626261 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
    0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058858884 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 19(1995) H.1, 64-77
  13. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.00 
    0.0049982793 = product of:
  0.027490534 = sum of:
    0.009470944 = weight(_text_:und in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009470944 = score(doc=3206,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.009470944 = weight(_text_:und in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009470944 = score(doc=3206,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.0043691397 = weight(_text_:in in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043691397 = score(doc=3206,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.004179506 = product of:
      0.008359012 = sum of:
        0.008359012 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008359012 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Content
    "In einer öffentlichen Bücherei ist die Suche nach einem Werk recht einfach: Man geht einfach die Regale ab, bis man beim richtigen Buchstaben oder Thema angekommen ist. In vielen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken ist das komplizierter. Denn dort müssen sich Studenten durch Datenbanken und Zettelkataloge wühlen. "Eine Ausnahme ist der Lesesaal, erklärt Marlene Grau, Sprecherin der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek in Hamburg. Im Lesesaal stehen die Bücher wie in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek in Reih und Glied nach Fachgebieten wie Jura, Biologie oder Medizin sortiert. So können Studenten ein wenig schmökern und querbeet lesen. Wer jedoch ein bestimmtes Werk sucht, nutzt besser gleich den Katalog der Bibliothek. Darin lässt sich zum einen nach dem Autor oder einem Titelstichwort suchen - in der Biologie etwa "Fliege" oder "Insekt". "Dann kann man hoffen, dass Bücher zum Thema das Stichwort im Titel enthalten", sagt Grau. Die andere Variante ist, nach einem Schlagwort zu suchen. Um das passende zu finden, kann man im Schlagwort-Index blättern. Oder man sucht nach einem bekannten Buch, das zum Thema passt. Dann kann man mit dessen Schlagwörtern weitersuchen. Der Vorteil: Bücher müssen dieses Schlagwort nicht im Titel enthalten. Buchtitel wie 'Keine Angst vor Zahlen' oder 'Grundkurs Rechnen' findet man über die Schlagworte 'Mathematik' und 'Einführung', aber mit Stichworten eher nicht", erklärt Ulrich Hohoff. Er leitet die Universitätsbibliothek in Augsburg.
    Im Online-Katalog erfahren Studenten auch, ob das Buch verfügbar oder verliehen ist. Ist es gerade vergriffen, kann man es vormerken lassen, er- klärt Monika Ziller, Vorsitzen- de des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbands in Berlin. Dann werden die Studenten entsprechend benachrichtigt, wenn es zurückgegeben wurde. Außerdem könnten Studenten virtuelle Fachbibliotheken nutzen, erklärt Grau. Um das Thema Slavistik kümmert sich etwa die Staatsbibliothek in Berlin. Auf der Internetseite kann man über Suchbegriffe alle elektronischen Slavistik-Angebote wie Zeitschriften, E-Books oder Bibliografien durchforsten. Die virtuelle Fachbibliothek spuckt dann eine Titelliste aus. Bestenfalls können Studenten gleich auf einzelne Volltexte der Liste zugreifen. Oder sie müssen schauen, ob die eigene Bibliothek das gesuchte Werk hat. Vor allem Zeitschriften sind oft online im Volltext abrufbar, aber auch Enzyklopädien. "Die sind auch aktueller als der Brockhaus von 1990, der zu Hause im Regal steht" sagt Grau. Manchmal ließen sich die Texte aus Gründen des Urheberrechts aber nur auf den Rechnern auf dem Unicampus lesen, ergänzt Hohoff. Findet man ein Buch nicht, ist der Grund dafür oft ein Fehler, der sich bei der Suche eingeschlichen hat. Das fängt bei der Rechtschreibung an: "Bibliothekskataloge verfügen über keine fehlertolerante Suche wie Google", erklärt Ziller.
    "Ein häufiger Fehler ist auch, bei Google nach Büchern zu suchen", sagt Grau. Die Suchmaschine enthält keine Bibliotheksdaten. Außerdem sollten Studenten darauf achten, ob sie nach einem Zeitschriften-Artikel oder einer Monografie suchen. Benötigt man einen Aufsatz, muss man nach dem Titel der Zeitschrift und nicht nach dem Titel des Artikels suchen. Wichtig ist auch, den Suchschlüssel zu beachten. Wer nach dem Autor Johann Wolfgang von Goethe sucht, aber das Wort in der Titelsuche eingibt, bekommt andere Treffermengen. Studenten sollten die Suche auch nicht zu sehr eingrenzen. "Dann findet man nichts", warnt Grau. Andererseits darf man auch nicht zu allgemein suchen. Wer nach einem Buch zur deutschen Geschichte sucht, bekommt bei der Eingabe von "deutsche Geschichte" Tausende Treffer. "Da muss man den richtigen Suchschlüssel auswählen", erklärt Grau. Wer im Feld "Titelanfänge" etwa "deutsche Geschichte" eingibt, finde alle Titel mit diesen Wörtern in genau dieser Reihenfolge. Er lande also nicht beim Buch "Deutsche Naturlyrik: ihre Geschichte in Einzelanalysen". Das ist bei weit gefassten Begriffen sehr wichtig und hilfreich."
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Series
    Magazin: Beruf und Bildung
  14. Einsporn, N.: Fachinformationen im WWW (2006) 0.00 
    0.004945944 = product of:
  0.036270257 = sum of:
    0.015784906 = weight(_text_:und in 6044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015784906 = score(doc=6044,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 6044, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6044)
    0.015784906 = weight(_text_:und in 6044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015784906 = score(doc=6044,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 6044, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6044)
    0.004700446 = weight(_text_:in in 6044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004700446 = score(doc=6044,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 6044, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6044)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Mittels professioneller Suchtechniken lässt sich die Recherche im WWW wesentlich schneller und zuverlässiger gestalten. Selbst eine universelle Suchmaschine, wie Google, erlaubt mittels spezieller Suchfunktionen qualifizierte Recherchen über den Freitext hinaus. Von besonderer Bedeutung sind hier die Selektion nach Domainnamen und die Einbeziehung der URL. In Kombination mit dem Verständnis der Ranking-Techniken, z. B. der Prioritäten der im HTML-Quelltext verankerten inhaltlichen Meta-Informationen (Title-Tag, Meta-Tags Keywords, Description) gegenüber dem Standardverfahren (Google PageRank) lässt sich die Recherche auf professionelle Informationsangebote ausrichten. Eine weitere Qualifizierung lässt sich durch geschickten Einsatz der Phrasensuche erreichen. In jedem Fall setzt eine erfolgreiche Recherche, auch bei scheinbar einfachen Benennungen und Zusammenhängen eine intellektuelle Recherchevorbereitung voraus - bei der zunächst das Thema strukturiert und dann eine Vorstellung über die möglichen Zusammenhänge entwickelt wird, in der die Zielinformation im WWW zu finden sein könnte. Soweit die Möglichkeit besteht, sollte bei anspruchsvollen technischwissenschaftlichen Themen der WWW-Suche eine Recherche in professionellen Literaturdatenbanken vorausgehen. Diese haben den Vorzug, dass eine transparente und sorgfältig selektierte Quellenbasis vorliegt und durch Suche mit kontrolliertem Wortschatz die typischen Unschärfen einer Freitextrecherche (unerwünschte Zusammenhänge, Synonyme, Homonyme, Schreibvarianten usw.) umgangen werden können. Die FIZ-Technik-Inform GmbH bietet kostenpflichtige Weiterbildungsveranstaltungen auch zur WWW-Recherche an.
    Source
    Spezialbibliotheken zwischen Auftrag und Ressourcen: 6.-9. September 2005 in München, 30. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e.V. / Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband. Red.: M. Brauer
  15. Bense, H.: Finden ohne Suchen : automatische Benachrichtigungen über relevante wissenschaftliche Publikationen mit regelbasierter KI (2021) 0.00 
    0.0046766372 = product of:
  0.03429534 = sum of:
    0.015465987 = weight(_text_:und in 693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015465987 = score(doc=693,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 693, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=693)
    0.015465987 = weight(_text_:und in 693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015465987 = score(doc=693,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 693, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=693)
    0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003363365 = score(doc=693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=693)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Jeden Tag erscheint eine Flut neuer wissenschaftlichen Publikationen. Für Forscher ist es schwierig, dabei den Überblick zu behalten. Aktualität und Relevanz der Ergebnislisten von Suchmaschinen wie Google, scholar.google.com und wissenschaftlichen Suchportalen entsprechen oft nicht den Erwartungen der Forscher. Vorgestellt wird eine Methode, die als Finden ohne Suchen (FwS = finding without searching) bezeichnet wird. Diese Methode nutzt künstliche Intelligenz in Kombination mit ausdrucksstarken benutzerdefinierten Regeln für Benachrichtigungen über neue Publikationen über eine App.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.5/6, S.265-270
  16. Kosmin, L.J.: Teaching Internet end-users effective search strategies across diversified databases (1992) 0.00 
    0.004629066 = product of:
  0.033946484 = sum of:
    0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003363365 = score(doc=4520,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
    0.024276821 = weight(_text_:computer in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024276821 = score(doc=4520,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
    0.0063062985 = product of:
      0.012612597 = sum of:
        0.012612597 = weight(_text_:science in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012612597 = score(doc=4520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Numerous computer networks worldwide implement the same suite of Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) communications rules. These facilitate electronic interactions among remotely situated users. presents a model curriculum designed to introduce newcomers to the Internet in science and technlogy oriented organizations
  17. Loosen, D.: Suchstrategien im bibliothekarischen Informationsdienst : Definitionen und Probleme sowie Entwicklung allgemeiner und beispielhafter Handlungsweisen (1988) 0.00 
    0.004591973 = product of:
  0.050511703 = sum of:
    0.025255851 = weight(_text_:und in 7619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025255851 = score(doc=7619,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 7619, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7619)
    0.025255851 = weight(_text_:und in 7619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025255851 = score(doc=7619,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 7619, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7619)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
  18. Cole, C.: ¬A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge (2011) 0.00 
    0.0044145416 = product of:
  0.032373305 = sum of:
    0.0021021033 = weight(_text_:in in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0021021033 = score(doc=4474,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
    0.02145788 = weight(_text_:computer in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02145788 = score(doc=4474,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.28550854 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
    0.008813321 = product of:
      0.017626641 = sum of:
        0.017626641 = weight(_text_:science in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017626641 = score(doc=4474,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.32538348 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a theory of information need for information retrieval (IR). Information need traditionally denotes the start state for someone seeking information, which includes information search using an IR system. There are two perspectives on information need. The dominant, computer science perspective is that the user needs to find an answer to a well-defined question which is easy for the user to formulate into a query to the system. Ironically, information science's best known model of information need (Taylor, 1968) deems it to be a "black box"-unknowable and nonspecifiable by the user in a query to the information system. Information science has instead devoted itself to studying eight adjacent or surrogate concepts (information seeking, search and use; problem, problematic situation and task; sense making and evolutionary adaptation/information foraging). Based on an analysis of these eight adjacent/surrogate concepts, we create six testable propositions for a theory of information need. The central assumption of the theory is that while computer science sees IR as an information- or answer-finding system, focused on the user finding an answer, an information science or user-oriented theory of information need envisages a knowledge formulation/acquisition system.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1216-1231
  19. DiMartino, D.; Zoe, L.R.: End-user full-text searching : access or excess? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0040504327 = product of:
  0.029703174 = sum of:
    0.0029429442 = weight(_text_:in in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029429442 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.021242218 = weight(_text_:computer in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021242218 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.0055180113 = product of:
      0.011036023 = sum of:
        0.011036023 = weight(_text_:science in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011036023 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Reports a study which examined and assessed the search techniques of trained end-users to determine whether or not they were searching the system affectively. 131 multilingual graduate students at Baruch College, City University of New York searched a full-text system and completed a survey that asked them to evaluate the system and describe their search strategy and techniques. 55% indicated dissatisfaction with their searches. Correlations between native language and searching results and satisfaction are shown. Findings suggest that computer-literate end users with prior experience searching other databases and formal training experience more difficulties than in commonly realized. Discusses the implications for training
    Source
    Library and information science research. 18(1996) no.2, S.133-149
  20. Foss, E.; Druin, A.; Yip, J.; Ford, W.; Golub, E.; Hutchinson, H.: Adolescent search roles (2013) 0.00 
    0.0038969829 = product of:
  0.028577873 = sum of:
    0.005640535 = weight(_text_:in in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005640535 = score(doc=536,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
    0.018207615 = weight(_text_:computer in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018207615 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
    0.0047297236 = product of:
      0.009459447 = sum of:
        0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009459447 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present an in-home observation and in-context research study investigating how 38 adolescents aged 14-17 search on the Internet. We present the search trends adolescents display and develop a framework of search roles that these trends help define. We compare these trends and roles to similar trends and roles found in prior work with children ages 7, 9, and 11. We use these comparisons to make recommendations to adult stakeholders such as researchers, designers, and information literacy educators about the best ways to design search tools for children and adolescents, as well as how to use the framework of searching roles to find better methods of educating youth searchers. Major findings include the seven roles of adolescent searchers, and evidence that adolescents are social in their computer use, have a greater knowledge of sources than younger children, and that adolescents are less frustrated by searching tasks than younger children.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.173-189

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 259
  • d 11
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 255
  • m 11
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications