Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Zimmermann, H.H.: Zur Struktur und Nutzung von Klassifikationen im Bibliothekswesen : Beispiel der Klassifikation der Deutschen Bibliothek und der sog. Niederländischen Basiskklassifikation (1994) 0.05
    0.046834663 = product of:
      0.093669325 = sum of:
        0.093669325 = product of:
          0.18733865 = sum of:
            0.18733865 = weight(_text_:200 in 6027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18733865 = score(doc=6027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.63987917 = fieldWeight in 6027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.187-200
  2. Liu, S.: Decomposing DDC synthesized numbers (1997) 0.03
    0.028100798 = product of:
      0.056201596 = sum of:
        0.056201596 = product of:
          0.11240319 = sum of:
            0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11240319 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Some empirical studies have explored the direct use of traditional classification schemes in the online environment; none has manipulated these manual classifications in such a way as to take full advantage of the power of both the classification and computer. It has been suggested that this power could be realized if the individual components of synthesized DDC numbers could be identified and indexed. Looks at the feasibility of automatically decomposing DDC synthesized numbers and the implications of such decompositions for informational retrieval. 1.701 sythesized numbers were decomposed by a computer system called DND (Dewey Number Decomposer). 600 were randomly selected for examination by 3 judges, each evaluating 200 numbers. The decomposition success rate was 100% and it was concluded that synthesized DDC numbers can be accurately decomposed automatically. The study has implications for information retrieval, expert systems for assigning DDC numbers, automatic indexing, switching language development and other important areas of cataloguing and classification
  3. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.027396271 = product of:
      0.054792542 = sum of:
        0.054792542 = product of:
          0.109585084 = sum of:
            0.109585084 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109585084 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  4. Liu, S.: Decomposing DDC synthesized numbers (1996) 0.02
    0.023417331 = product of:
      0.046834663 = sum of:
        0.046834663 = product of:
          0.093669325 = sum of:
            0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 5969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093669325 = score(doc=5969,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 5969, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5969)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Much literature has been written speculating upon how classification can be used in online catalogs to improve information retrieval. While some empirical studies have been done exploring whether the direct use of traditional classification schemes designed for a manual environment is effective and efficient in the online environment, none has manipulated these manual classifications in such a w ay as to take full advantage of the power of both the classification and computer. It has been suggested by some authors, such as Wajenberg and Drabenstott, that this power could be realized if the individual components of synthesized DDC numbers could be identified and indexed. This paper looks at the feasibility of automatically decomposing DDC synthesized numbers and the implications of such decomposition for information retrieval. Based on an analysis of the instructions for synthesizing numbers in the main class Arts (700) and all DDC Tables, 17 decomposition rules were defined, 13 covering the Add Notes and four the Standard Subdivisions. 1,701 DDC synthesized numbers were decomposed by a computer system called DND (Dewey Number Decomposer), developed by the author. From the 1,701 numbers, 600 were randomly selected fo r examination by three judges, each evaluating 200 numbers. The decomposition success rate was 100% and it was concluded that synthesized DDC numbers can be accurately decomposed automatically. The study has implications for information retrieval, expert systems for assigning DDC numbers, automatic indexing, switching language development, enhancing classifiers' work, teaching library school students, and providing quality control for DDC number assignments. These implications were explored using a prototype retrieval system.
  5. LaBarre, K.: ¬A multi faceted view : use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access (2006) 0.02
    0.023417331 = product of:
      0.046834663 = sum of:
        0.046834663 = product of:
          0.093669325 = sum of:
            0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093669325 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 2001, information architects and knowledge management specialists charged with designing websites and access to corporate knowledge bases seemingly re-discovered a legacy form of information organization and access: faceted analytico-synthetic theory (FAST). Instrumental in creating new and different ways for people to engage with the digital content of the Web, the members of this group have clearly recognized that faceted approaches have the potential to improve access to information on the web. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of FAST, while others seem to mimic the forms implicitly (Adkisson, 2003). The focus of this ongoing research study is two-fold. First, access and organizational structures in a stratified random sample of 200 DMOZ websites were examined for evidence of the use of FAST. Second, in the context of unstructured interviews, the understanding and use of FAST among a group of eighteen practitioners is uncovered. This is a preliminary report of the website component capture and interview phases of this research study. Future work will involve formalizing a set of feature guidelines drawn from the initial phases of this research study. Preliminary observations will be drawn from the first phase of this study.
  6. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.020547204 = product of:
      0.041094407 = sum of:
        0.041094407 = product of:
          0.082188815 = sum of:
            0.082188815 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082188815 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  7. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.01712267 = product of:
      0.03424534 = sum of:
        0.03424534 = product of:
          0.06849068 = sum of:
            0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06849068 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  8. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  9. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  10. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  11. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  12. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  13. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
  14. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  15. Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Melvil (2005) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ab Januar 2006 wird Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein neues Webangebot mit dem Namen Melvil starten, das ein Ergebnis ihres Engagements für die DDC und das Projekt DDC Deutsch ist. Der angebotene Webservice basiert auf der Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC, die im Oktober 2005 als Druckausgabe im K. G. Saur Verlag erscheint. Er bietet jedoch darüber hinausgehende Features, die den Klassifizierer bei seiner Arbeit unterstützen und erstmals eine verbale Recherche für Endnutzer über DDCerschlossene Titel ermöglichen. Der Webservice Melvil gliedert sich in drei Anwendungen: - MelvilClass, - MelvilSearch und - MelvilSoap.
  16. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.01
    0.010273602 = product of:
      0.020547204 = sum of:
        0.020547204 = product of:
          0.041094407 = sum of:
            0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041094407 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.010273602 = product of:
      0.020547204 = sum of:
        0.020547204 = product of:
          0.041094407 = sum of:
            0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041094407 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  19. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.01
    0.010273602 = product of:
      0.020547204 = sum of:
        0.020547204 = product of:
          0.041094407 = sum of:
            0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041094407 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.010273602 = product of:
      0.020547204 = sum of:
        0.020547204 = product of:
          0.041094407 = sum of:
            0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041094407 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31