Search (2370 results, page 2 of 119)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Chen, Y.-S.; Chong, P.P.: Information productivity modeling : the Simon-Yule approach (1998) 0.07
    0.06556853 = product of:
      0.13113706 = sum of:
        0.13113706 = product of:
          0.26227412 = sum of:
            0.26227412 = weight(_text_:200 in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26227412 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.89583087 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.170-200
  2. Furner, J.: Philosophy and information studies (2010) 0.07
    0.06556853 = product of:
      0.13113706 = sum of:
        0.13113706 = product of:
          0.26227412 = sum of:
            0.26227412 = weight(_text_:200 in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26227412 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.89583087 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.159-200
  3. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.06
    0.06395733 = product of:
      0.12791467 = sum of:
        0.12791467 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.03424534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03424534 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined Library of Congress Classification (LCC)-based class numbers assigned to a representative sample of 200 titles in 52 American library systems to determine the level of consistency within and across those systems. The results showed that under the condition that a library system has a title, the probability of that title having the same LCC-based class number across library systems is greater than 85 percent. An examination of 121 titles displaying variations in class numbers among library systems showed certain titles (for example, multi-foci titles, titles in series, bibliographies, and fiction) lend themselves to alternate class numbers. Others were assigned variant numbers either due to latitude in the schedules or for reasons that cannot be pinpointed. With increasing dependence on copy cataloging, the size of such variations may continue to decrease. As the preferred class number with its alternates represents a title more fully than just the preferred class number, this paper argues for continued use of alternates by library systems and for finding a method to link alternate class numbers to preferred class numbers for enriched subject access through local and union catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.06
    0.06395733 = product of:
      0.12791467 = sum of:
        0.12791467 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.03424534 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03424534 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A new collaborative approach in information organization and sharing has recently arisen, known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. A key element of collaborative tagging is the concept of collective intelligence (CI), which is a shared intelligence among all participants. This research investigates the phenomenon of social tagging in the context of CI with the aim to serve as a stepping-stone towards the mining of truly valuable social tags for web resources. This study focuses on assessing and evaluating the degree of CI embedded in social tagging over time in terms of two-parameter values, number of participants, and top frequency ranking window. Five different metrics were adopted and utilized for assessing the similarity between ranking lists: overlapList, overlapRank, Footrule, Fagin's measure, and the Inverse Rank measure. The result of this study demonstrates that a substantial degree of CI is most likely to be achieved when somewhere between the first 200 and 400 people have participated in tagging, and that a target degree of CI can be projected by controlling the two factors along with the selection of a similarity metric. The study also tests some experimental conditions for detecting social tags with high CI degree. The results of this study can be applicable to the study of filtering social tags based on CI; filtered social tags may be utilized for the metadata creation of tagged resources and possibly for the retrieval of tagged resources.
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  5. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.06
    0.06395733 = product of:
      0.12791467 = sum of:
        0.12791467 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.03424534 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03424534 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2, S.180-200
  6. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.06
    0.056839816 = product of:
      0.11367963 = sum of:
        0.11367963 = sum of:
          0.07493546 = weight(_text_:200 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07493546 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.25595167 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.038744178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038744178 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Pages
    S.200-201
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Kashyap, M.M.: Ranganathan's postulational approach to classification : its development and impact (1986) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.200-215
  8. Ferretti, M.: 'Documentics' : the electronic management of technical documents (1994) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 6310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=6310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 6310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Electronic library. 12(1994) no.3, S.197-200
  9. Videoconferencing and document sharing system (1995) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 1989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=1989,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 1989, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1989)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews current developments in teleconferencing (videoconferencing) through some of the recent products of: Apple (Quick time Conferencing); Creative Labs (Share Vision PC3000) IBM (Picture Tel) and INTEL (ProShare PC Personal Conferencing Video System 200)
  10. ¬The year in reference (1994) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Inhaltsverzeichnis in: IfB 4(1996) H.1, S.200-207.
  11. Guttenberg, A.Z.: Toward a conceptual framework for an international classification of land use planning information (1978) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.190-200
  12. Jascó, P.: Mapping algorithms to translate natural language questions into search queries for Web databases (1997) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.189-200
  13. Ellis, D.: Information retrieval research (1997) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Inform (London). 1997, no.200, S.3-4
  14. Hauptman, R.; Anderson, C.L.: ¬The people speak : the dispersion and impact of technology in American libraries (1994) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=5382,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews selected surveys of the status of technological applications in librarires and reports results of a survey, of 200 public libraries, 200 school libraries, 200 special libraries, and 200 college libraries and university libraries, randomly selected from the American Library Directory, to investigate the current attitudes towards technological applications and implementations. Results indicate that very few professional information professionals believe that their facilities contain state of the art equipment: a conclusion strengthened by the fact that only one third of the respondents have OPACs or use electronic mail, and less than 50% have access to CD-ROMs. In the case of the more esoteric applications, only 2% make use of expert systems, only 4% have hypertext, and 8% have voice mail. Concludes that, as money tightens throughout the 90s, libraries will have to seek out new technologies as a means of delivering quality information services at a reasonable cost
  15. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05
    0.053526416 = product of:
      0.10705283 = sum of:
        0.10705283 = product of:
          0.3211585 = sum of:
            0.3211585 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3211585 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42857853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  16. Tennant, R.; Lipow, A.; Ober, J.: Crossing the Internet threshold : an instructional handbook (1993) 0.05
    0.05298737 = product of:
      0.10597474 = sum of:
        0.10597474 = product of:
          0.21194948 = sum of:
            0.21194948 = weight(_text_:200 in 4930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21194948 = score(doc=4930,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.7239407 = fieldWeight in 4930, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 200
    RVK
    ST 200
  17. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Packer, J.G.: ¬An analysis of Internet search engines : assessment of over 200 search queries (1996) 0.05
    0.05298737 = product of:
      0.10597474 = sum of:
        0.10597474 = product of:
          0.21194948 = sum of:
            0.21194948 = weight(_text_:200 in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21194948 = score(doc=5816,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.7239407 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of searches on 200 topics carried out on 5 Internet search engines (Magellan, Point, Lycos, InfoSeek and AltaVista). Describes the methodology followed and the results of the study. Gives a chart showing 30 of the search queries, with the performance of each search engine. Indicates some of the limitations of the search engines
  18. Bates, C.: Web programming : building Internet applications (2000) 0.05
    0.05298737 = product of:
      0.10597474 = sum of:
        0.10597474 = product of:
          0.21194948 = sum of:
            0.21194948 = weight(_text_:200 in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21194948 = score(doc=5,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.7239407 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 200
    RVK
    ST 200
  19. Braun, E.: ¬The Internet directory : [the guide with the most complete listings for: 1500+ Internet and Bitnet mailing lists, 2700+ Usenet newsgroups, 1000+ On-line library catalogs (OPACs) ...] (1994) 0.05
    0.05298737 = product of:
      0.10597474 = sum of:
        0.10597474 = product of:
          0.21194948 = sum of:
            0.21194948 = weight(_text_:200 in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21194948 = score(doc=1549,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.7239407 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 200 Informatik / Monographien / Vernetzung, verteilte Systeme / Allgemeines, Netzmanagement
    RVK
    ST 200 Informatik / Monographien / Vernetzung, verteilte Systeme / Allgemeines, Netzmanagement
  20. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.05
    0.051165864 = product of:
      0.10233173 = sum of:
        0.10233173 = sum of:
          0.07493546 = weight(_text_:200 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07493546 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.25595167 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.027396271 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027396271 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22

Types

  • a 2047
  • m 194
  • s 105
  • el 77
  • b 32
  • r 13
  • x 8
  • i 6
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications