Search (2047 results, page 1 of 103)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.15
    0.1534976 = product of:
      0.3069952 = sum of:
        0.3069952 = sum of:
          0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22480638 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.082188815 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082188815 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 57(2005) no.3, S.200-
  2. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.10
    0.10233173 = product of:
      0.20466346 = sum of:
        0.20466346 = sum of:
          0.14987092 = weight(_text_:200 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14987092 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.51190335 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054792542 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
    Source
    FID news bulletin. 45(1995) no.6, S.196-200
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10083683 = sum of:
      0.080289625 = product of:
        0.24086887 = sum of:
          0.24086887 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24086887 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.42857853 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020547204 = product of:
        0.041094407 = sum of:
          0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041094407 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Lee, D.: Webs of "Wirkung" : modelling the interconnectedness of classification schemes (2014) 0.09
    0.089540266 = product of:
      0.17908053 = sum of:
        0.17908053 = sum of:
          0.13113706 = weight(_text_:200 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13113706 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.44791543 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
          0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047943473 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.200-207
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Lazinger, S.S.; Peritz, B.C.: Reader use of a nationwide research library network : local OPAC vs. remote files (1991) 0.08
    0.0767488 = product of:
      0.1534976 = sum of:
        0.1534976 = sum of:
          0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11240319 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
          0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041094407 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:06:18
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 10(1991), S.192-200
  6. Teper, J.H.; Erekson, S.M.: ¬The condition of our "hidden" rare book collections : a conservation survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2006) 0.08
    0.0767488 = product of:
      0.1534976 = sum of:
        0.1534976 = sum of:
          0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11240319 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
          0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041094407 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.3, S.200-213
  7. Perry, J.W.: Mechanized searching and subject headings (1953) 0.07
    0.07493546 = product of:
      0.14987092 = sum of:
        0.14987092 = product of:
          0.29974183 = sum of:
            0.29974183 = weight(_text_:200 in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29974183 = score(doc=3891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                1.0238067 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.200
  8. Salton, G.; Fox, E.A.; Voorhees, E.: Advanced feedback methods in information retrieval (1985) 0.07
    0.07493546 = product of:
      0.14987092 = sum of:
        0.14987092 = product of:
          0.29974183 = sum of:
            0.29974183 = weight(_text_:200 in 5445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29974183 = score(doc=5445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                1.0238067 = fieldWeight in 5445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36(1985), S.200-210
  9. Peck, T.P.: Ladsirlac, Sinto, Herties and all that (1974) 0.07
    0.07493546 = product of:
      0.14987092 = sum of:
        0.14987092 = product of:
          0.29974183 = sum of:
            0.29974183 = weight(_text_:200 in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29974183 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                1.0238067 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Special libraries. 65(1974), S.196-200
  10. Immroth, J. P.: Library of Congress Classification (19??) 0.07
    0.07493546 = product of:
      0.14987092 = sum of:
        0.14987092 = product of:
          0.29974183 = sum of:
            0.29974183 = weight(_text_:200 in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29974183 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                1.0238067 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.93-200
  11. Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002) 0.07
    0.07104977 = product of:
      0.14209954 = sum of:
        0.14209954 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.048430223 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048430223 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
  12. Ekmekcioglu, F.C.; Willett, P.: Effectiveness of stemming for Turkish text retrieval (2000) 0.07
    0.06556853 = product of:
      0.13113706 = sum of:
        0.13113706 = product of:
          0.26227412 = sum of:
            0.26227412 = weight(_text_:200 in 5423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26227412 = score(doc=5423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.89583087 = fieldWeight in 5423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 34(2000) no.2, S.195-200
  13. Chen, Y.-S.; Chong, P.P.: Information productivity modeling : the Simon-Yule approach (1998) 0.07
    0.06556853 = product of:
      0.13113706 = sum of:
        0.13113706 = product of:
          0.26227412 = sum of:
            0.26227412 = weight(_text_:200 in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26227412 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.89583087 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.170-200
  14. Furner, J.: Philosophy and information studies (2010) 0.07
    0.06556853 = product of:
      0.13113706 = sum of:
        0.13113706 = product of:
          0.26227412 = sum of:
            0.26227412 = weight(_text_:200 in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26227412 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.89583087 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.159-200
  15. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.06
    0.06395733 = product of:
      0.12791467 = sum of:
        0.12791467 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.03424534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03424534 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined Library of Congress Classification (LCC)-based class numbers assigned to a representative sample of 200 titles in 52 American library systems to determine the level of consistency within and across those systems. The results showed that under the condition that a library system has a title, the probability of that title having the same LCC-based class number across library systems is greater than 85 percent. An examination of 121 titles displaying variations in class numbers among library systems showed certain titles (for example, multi-foci titles, titles in series, bibliographies, and fiction) lend themselves to alternate class numbers. Others were assigned variant numbers either due to latitude in the schedules or for reasons that cannot be pinpointed. With increasing dependence on copy cataloging, the size of such variations may continue to decrease. As the preferred class number with its alternates represents a title more fully than just the preferred class number, this paper argues for continued use of alternates by library systems and for finding a method to link alternate class numbers to preferred class numbers for enriched subject access through local and union catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.06
    0.06395733 = product of:
      0.12791467 = sum of:
        0.12791467 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.03424534 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03424534 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A new collaborative approach in information organization and sharing has recently arisen, known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. A key element of collaborative tagging is the concept of collective intelligence (CI), which is a shared intelligence among all participants. This research investigates the phenomenon of social tagging in the context of CI with the aim to serve as a stepping-stone towards the mining of truly valuable social tags for web resources. This study focuses on assessing and evaluating the degree of CI embedded in social tagging over time in terms of two-parameter values, number of participants, and top frequency ranking window. Five different metrics were adopted and utilized for assessing the similarity between ranking lists: overlapList, overlapRank, Footrule, Fagin's measure, and the Inverse Rank measure. The result of this study demonstrates that a substantial degree of CI is most likely to be achieved when somewhere between the first 200 and 400 people have participated in tagging, and that a target degree of CI can be projected by controlling the two factors along with the selection of a similarity metric. The study also tests some experimental conditions for detecting social tags with high CI degree. The results of this study can be applicable to the study of filtering social tags based on CI; filtered social tags may be utilized for the metadata creation of tagged resources and possibly for the retrieval of tagged resources.
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  17. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.06
    0.06395733 = product of:
      0.12791467 = sum of:
        0.12791467 = sum of:
          0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093669325 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.03424534 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03424534 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2, S.180-200
  18. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.06
    0.056839816 = product of:
      0.11367963 = sum of:
        0.11367963 = sum of:
          0.07493546 = weight(_text_:200 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07493546 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.25595167 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.038744178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038744178 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Pages
    S.200-201
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  19. Kashyap, M.M.: Ranganathan's postulational approach to classification : its development and impact (1986) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.200-215
  20. Ferretti, M.: 'Documentics' : the electronic management of technical documents (1994) 0.06
    0.056201596 = product of:
      0.11240319 = sum of:
        0.11240319 = product of:
          0.22480638 = sum of:
            0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 6310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22480638 = score(doc=6310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 6310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Electronic library. 12(1994) no.3, S.197-200

Types

  • b 31
  • el 31
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes