Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"n"
  1. OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2004) 0.00
    0.003730403 = product of:
      0.044764835 = sum of:
        0.044764835 = weight(_text_:software in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044764835 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12766245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032179873 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.
  2. Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997) 0.00
    0.0016320513 = product of:
      0.019584615 = sum of:
        0.019584615 = weight(_text_:software in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019584615 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12766245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032179873 = queryNorm
            0.15340936 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.
  3. Köstlbacher, A. (Übers.): OWL Web Ontology Language Überblick (2004) 0.00
    0.0012349738 = product of:
      0.014819685 = sum of:
        0.014819685 = weight(_text_:und in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014819685 = score(doc=4681,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032179873 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Die OWL Web Ontology Language wurde entwickelt, um es Anwendungen zu ermöglichen den Inhalt von Informationen zu verarbeiten anstatt die Informationen dem Anwender nur zu präsentieren. OWL erleichtert durch zusätzliches Vokabular in Verbindung mit formaler Semantik stärkere Interpretationsmöglichkeiten von Web Inhalten als dies XML, RDF und RDFS ermöglichen. OWL besteht aus drei Untersprachen mit steigender Ausdrucksmächtigkeit: OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full. Dieses Dokument wurde für Leser erstellt, die einen ersten Eindruck von den Möglichkeiten bekommen möchten, die OWL bietet. Es stellt eine Einführung in OWL anhand der Beschreibung der Merkmale der drei Untersprachen von OWL dar. Kenntnisse von RDF Schema sind hilfreich für das Verständnis, aber nicht unbedingt erforderlich. Nach der Lektüre dieses Dokuments können sich interessierte Leser für detailliertere Beschreibungen und ausführliche Beispiele der Merkmale von OWL dem OWL Guide zuwenden. Die normative formale Definition von OWL findet sich unter OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
  4. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.00
    9.6887315E-4 = product of:
      0.011626477 = sum of:
        0.011626477 = product of:
          0.03487943 = sum of:
            0.03487943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03487943 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032179873 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22