-
Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005)
0.06
0.064313166 = product of:
0.16078292 = sum of:
0.0067407903 = weight(_text_:a in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067407903 = score(doc=4729,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.15404212 = weight(_text_:391 in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15404212 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32032555 = queryWeight, product of:
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.
- Source
- Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.4, S.378-391
- Type
- a
-
Howarth, L.C.: Designing a "Human Understandable" metalevel ontology for enhancing resource discovery in knowledge bases (2000)
0.06
0.05544969 = product of:
0.13862422 = sum of:
0.010255786 = weight(_text_:a in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010255786 = score(doc=114,freq=20.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.12836844 = weight(_text_:391 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12836844 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32032555 = queryWeight, product of:
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.40074366 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- With the explosion of digitized resources accessible via networked information systems, and the corresponding proliferation of general purpose and domain-specific schemes, metadata have assumed a special prominence. While recent work emanating from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has focused on the Resource Description Framework (RDF) to support the interoperability of metadata standards - thus converting metatags from diverse domains from merely "machine-readable" to "machine-understandable" - the next iteration, to "human-understandable," remains a challenge. This apparent gap provides a framework for three-phase research (Howarth, 1999) to develop a tool which will provide a "human-understandable" front-end search assist to any XML-compliant metadata scheme. Findings from phase one, the analyses and mapping of seven metadata schemes, identify the particular challenges of designing a common "namespace", populated with element tags which are appropriately descriptive, yet readily understood by a lay searcher, when there is little congruence within, and a high degree of variability across, the metadata schemes under study. Implications for the subsequent design and testing of both the proposed "metalevel ontology" (phase two), and the prototype search assist tool (phase three) are examined
- Pages
- S.391-397
- Type
- a
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.02
0.02341929 = product of:
0.058548227 = sum of:
0.007783594 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007783594 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.05076463 = product of:
0.10152926 = sum of:
0.10152926 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10152926 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
- Type
- a
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.02
0.023295792 = product of:
0.05823948 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.047861353 = product of:
0.095722705 = sum of:
0.095722705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095722705 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
- Type
- a
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.020383818 = product of:
0.050959542 = sum of:
0.00908086 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00908086 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.04187868 = product of:
0.08375736 = sum of:
0.08375736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08375736 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
- Type
- a
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.018621458 = product of:
0.046553645 = sum of:
0.012710555 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012710555 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.03384309 = product of:
0.06768618 = sum of:
0.06768618 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768618 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
- Type
- a
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.016459199 = product of:
0.041147996 = sum of:
0.011234651 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011234651 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.029913345 = product of:
0.05982669 = sum of:
0.05982669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05982669 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.02
0.015634561 = product of:
0.0390864 = sum of:
0.009173054 = weight(_text_:a in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009173054 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.029913345 = product of:
0.05982669 = sum of:
0.05982669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05982669 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.01561286 = product of:
0.03903215 = sum of:
0.0051890626 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051890626 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.03384309 = product of:
0.06768618 = sum of:
0.06768618 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768618 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
- Type
- a
-
Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998)
0.01
0.01455987 = product of:
0.036399674 = sum of:
0.006486328 = weight(_text_:a in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006486328 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.029913345 = product of:
0.05982669 = sum of:
0.05982669 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05982669 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 18:45:36
- Type
- a
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.01
0.01455987 = product of:
0.036399674 = sum of:
0.006486328 = weight(_text_:a in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006486328 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.029913345 = product of:
0.05982669 = sum of:
0.05982669 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05982669 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
- Type
- a
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.01
0.01455987 = product of:
0.036399674 = sum of:
0.006486328 = weight(_text_:a in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006486328 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.029913345 = product of:
0.05982669 = sum of:
0.05982669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05982669 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.01421351 = product of:
0.035533775 = sum of:
0.011603097 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011603097 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Type
- a
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.0137235215 = product of:
0.034308802 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
- Type
- a
-
Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998)
0.01
0.0137235215 = product of:
0.034308802 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.01
0.0137235215 = product of:
0.034308802 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
- Type
- a
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.01
0.0137235215 = product of:
0.034308802 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
- Type
- a
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.01
0.013180876 = product of:
0.03295219 = sum of:
0.012012849 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012012849 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.02093934 = product of:
0.04187868 = sum of:
0.04187868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04187868 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
- Type
- a
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.013167359 = product of:
0.032918397 = sum of:
0.008987721 = weight(_text_:a in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008987721 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
- Type
- a
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.013167359 = product of:
0.032918397 = sum of:
0.008987721 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008987721 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
- Type
- a
