Search (96 results, page 1 of 5)

0.042993616 = product of:
  0.107484035 = sum of:
    0.052035857 = weight(_text_:t in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052035857 = score(doc=3571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
    0.05544818 = product of:
      0.11089636 = sum of:
        0.11089636 = weight(_text_:index in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11089636 = score(doc=3571,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.5853582 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Object

Science Citation Index
Social Sciences Citation Index
Arts and Humanities Citation Index

0.0395898 = product of:
  0.19794899 = sum of:
    0.19794899 = sum of:
      0.15683112 = weight(_text_:index in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15683112 = score(doc=6920,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.82782143 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.041117873 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041117873 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,

Date

16.12.2001 14:01:22

Object

Science Citation Index
Social Sciences Citation Index
Arts and Humanities Citation Index

0.038944405 = product of:
  0.19472201 = sum of:
    0.19472201 = weight(_text_:1091 in 634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19472201 = score(doc=634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35686025 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.5456534 = fieldWeight in 634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=634)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.8, S.1079-1091

0.03685167 = product of:
  0.09212917 = sum of:
    0.044602163 = weight(_text_:t in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044602163 = score(doc=3467,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
    0.047527004 = product of:
      0.09505401 = sum of:
        0.09505401 = weight(_text_:index in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09505401 = score(doc=3467,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The journal impact factors, published by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI; Philadelphia, PA), are widely known and are used to evaluate overall journal quality and the quality of the papers published therein. However, when making comparisons between subject fields, the work of individual scientists and their research institutions as reflected in their articles' ISI impact factors can become meaningless. This inequality will remain as long as ISI impact factors are employed as an instrument to assess the quality of international research. Here we propose a new mathematical index entitled Impact Factor PointAverage (IFPA) for assessment of the quality of individual research work in different subject fields. The index is established based an a normalization of differences in impact factors, rankings, and number of journal titles in different subject fields. The proposed index is simple and enables the ISI impact factors to be used with equality, especially when evaluating the quality of research work in different subject fields.

0.035681732 = product of:
  0.17840865 = sum of:
    0.17840865 = weight(_text_:t in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17840865 = score(doc=1119,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        1.0445935 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.233-251(T.1); S.252-266(T.2)

0.033934113 = product of:
  0.16967055 = sum of:
    0.16967055 = sum of:
      0.13442667 = weight(_text_:index in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13442667 = score(doc=590,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.7095612 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.03524389 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03524389 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

"Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."

Date

6. 4.2008 19:04:22

Object

H-Index

0.028816758 = product of:
  0.07204189 = sum of:
    0.044602163 = weight(_text_:t in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044602163 = score(doc=943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
    0.027439727 = product of:
      0.054879453 = sum of:
        0.054879453 = weight(_text_:index in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054879453 = score(doc=943,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Citation analysis of documents retrieved from the Medline database (at the Web of Knowledge) has been possible only on a case-by-case basis. A technique is presented here for citation analysis in batch mode using both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) at the Web of Knowledge and the Science Citation Index at the Web of Science (WoS). This freeware routine is applied to the case of "Brugada Syndrome," a specific disease and field of research (since 1992). The journals containing these publications, for example, are attributed to WoS categories other than "cardiac and cardiovascular systems", perhaps because of the possibility of genetic testing for this syndrome in the clinic. With this routine, all the instruments available for citation analysis can now be used on the basis of MeSH terms. Other options for crossing between Medline, WoS, and Scopus are also reviewed.

0.024889644 = product of:
  0.06222411 = sum of:
    0.044602163 = weight(_text_:t in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044602163 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
    0.017621946 = product of:
      0.03524389 = sum of:
        0.03524389 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03524389 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

22. 8.2014 16:52:04

0.021028781 = product of:
  0.105143905 = sum of:
    0.105143905 = sum of:
      0.06402603 = weight(_text_:index in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06402603 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.041117873 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041117873 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.

Date

17.11.2020 12:22:59

0.02094437 = product of:
  0.104721844 = sum of:
    0.104721844 = sum of:
      0.054879453 = weight(_text_:index in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054879453 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.049842395 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049842395 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.

Date

22. 3.2009 19:22:35

0.020814342 = product of:
  0.104071714 = sum of:
    0.104071714 = weight(_text_:t in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.104071714 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.020814342 = product of:
  0.104071714 = sum of:
    0.104071714 = weight(_text_:t in 3836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.104071714 = score(doc=3836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 3836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3836)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Editor

Braun, T.

0.02069634 = product of:
  0.103481695 = sum of:
    0.103481695 = product of:
      0.20696339 = sum of:
        0.20696339 = weight(_text_:index in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20696339 = score(doc=5000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            1.092441 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object

Science Citation Index

0.018293152 = product of:
  0.09146576 = sum of:
    0.09146576 = product of:
      0.18293151 = sum of:
        0.18293151 = weight(_text_:index in 554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18293151 = score(doc=554,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.9655905 = fieldWeight in 554, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=554)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Announces the availability of the Web of Science, a proprietary Web browser providing intranet access to the Citation Index databases from ISI. The new browser interface will allow researcher to browse indexed information and perform further research. Describes search options

Object

Science citation index
Social sciences citation index

0.014634522 = product of:
  0.07317261 = sum of:
    0.07317261 = product of:
      0.14634521 = sum of:
        0.14634521 = weight(_text_:index in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14634521 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.014634522 = product of:
  0.07317261 = sum of:
    0.07317261 = product of:
      0.14634521 = sum of:
        0.14634521 = weight(_text_:index in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14634521 = score(doc=576,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The h-index (Hirsch, 2005) is robust, remaining relatively unaffected by errors in the long tails of the citations-rank distribution, such as typographic errors that short-change frequently cited articles and create bogus additional records. This robustness, and the ease with which h-indices can be verified, support the use of a Hirsch-type index over alternatives such as the journal impact factor. These merits of the h-index apply both to individuals and to journals.

0.013442667 = product of:
  0.067213334 = sum of:
    0.067213334 = product of:
      0.13442667 = sum of:
        0.13442667 = weight(_text_:index in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13442667 = score(doc=1341,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.7095612 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The debate about which similarity measure one should use for the normalization in the case of Author Co-citation Analysis (ACA) is further complicated when one distinguishes between the symmetrical co-citation - or, more generally, co-occurrence - matrix and the underlying asymmetrical citation - occurrence - matrix. In the Web environment, the approach of retrieving original citation data is often not feasible. In that case, one should use the Jaccard index, but preferentially after adding the number of total citations (i.e., occurrences) on the main diagonal. Unlike Salton's cosine and the Pearson correlation, the Jaccard index abstracts from the shape of the distributions and focuses only on the intersection and the sum of the two sets. Since the correlations in the co-occurrence matrix may be spurious, this property of the Jaccard index can be considered as an advantage in this case.

Object

Salton's Cosine index
Jaccard index

0.013442667 = product of:
  0.067213334 = sum of:
    0.067213334 = product of:
      0.13442667 = sum of:
        0.13442667 = weight(_text_:index in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13442667 = score(doc=3848,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.7095612 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The Web of Science, an online database of bibliographic information produced by Thomson Reuters- draws its real value from the scholarly citation index at its core. By indexing the cited references from each paper as a separate part of the bibliographic data, a citation index creates a pathway by which a paper can be linked backward in time to the body of work that preceded it, as well as linked forward in time to its scholarly descendants. This entry provides a brief history of the development of the citation index, its core functionalities, and the way these unique data are provided to users through the Web of Science.

Object

Science Citation Index
Social Sciences Citation Index
Arts and Humanities Citation Index

0.012935213 = product of:
  0.06467606 = sum of:
    0.06467606 = product of:
      0.12935212 = sum of:
        0.12935212 = weight(_text_:index in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12935212 = score(doc=376,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.6827756 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Ein Leserbrief zu Sinn und Nutzen des Science Citation Index als Erwiderung auf einen Beitrag von A. Octavio in Mathematical intelligencer 18(1996) no.4, S.9-11

0.012935213 = product of:
  0.06467606 = sum of:
    0.06467606 = product of:
      0.12935212 = sum of:
        0.12935212 = weight(_text_:index in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12935212 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.6827756 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object

Science citation index
Social sciences citation index