Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Kognitive Modellierung des Abstracting (1991) 0.03
    0.028385146 = product of:
      0.14192572 = sum of:
        0.14192572 = weight(_text_:91 in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14192572 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19210906 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.7387768 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Series
    DGD-Schrift (DOK-3); 1/91
  2. Nomoto, T.: Discriminative sentence compression with conditional random fields (2007) 0.01
    0.014192573 = product of:
      0.07096286 = sum of:
        0.07096286 = weight(_text_:91 in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07096286 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19210906 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.3693884 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper focuses on a particular approach to automatic sentence compression which makes use of a discriminative sequence classifier known as Conditional Random Fields (CRF). We devise several features for CRF that allow it to incorporate information on nonlinear relations among words. Along with that, we address the issue of data paucity by collecting data from RSS feeds available on the Internet, and turning them into training data for use with CRF, drawing on techniques from biology and information retrieval. We also discuss a recursive application of CRF on the syntactic structure of a sentence as a way of improving the readability of the compression it generates. Experiments found that our approach works reasonably well compared to the state-of-the-art system [Knight, K., & Marcu, D. (2002). Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression. Artificial Intelligence 139, 91-107.].
  3. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994) 0.01
    0.0090645095 = product of:
      0.045322545 = sum of:
        0.045322545 = weight(_text_:c in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045322545 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.381109 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  4. Chen, H.-H.; Kuo, J.-J.; Huang, S.-J.; Lin, C.-J.; Wung, H.-C.: ¬A summarization system for Chinese news from multiple sources (2003) 0.01
    0.007691491 = product of:
      0.038457453 = sum of:
        0.038457453 = weight(_text_:c in 2115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038457453 = score(doc=2115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 2115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2115)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  5. Saggion, H.; Lapalme, G.: Selective analysis for the automatic generation of summaries (2000) 0.01
    0.006345156 = product of:
      0.03172578 = sum of:
        0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172578 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  6. Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998) 0.01
    0.006345156 = product of:
      0.03172578 = sum of:
        0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172578 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. Lee, J.-H.; Park, S.; Ahn, C.-M.; Kim, D.: Automatic generic document summarization based on non-negative matrix factorization (2009) 0.01
    0.006345156 = product of:
      0.03172578 = sum of:
        0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 2448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172578 = score(doc=2448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2448)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  8. Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.: Automatic text structuring and categorization as a first step in summarizing legal cases (1997) 0.01
    0.0054387054 = product of:
      0.027193528 = sum of:
        0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027193528 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999) 0.01
    0.0054387054 = product of:
      0.027193528 = sum of:
        0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027193528 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Dammeyer, A.; Jürgensen, W.; Krüwel, C.; Poliak, E.; Ruttkowski, S.; Schäfer, Th.; Sirava, M.; Hermes, T.: Videoanalyse mit DiVA (1998) 0.01
    0.0054387054 = product of:
      0.027193528 = sum of:
        0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027193528 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Hobson, S.P.; Dorr, B.J.; Monz, C.; Schwartz, R.: Task-based evaluation of text summarization using Relevance Prediction (2007) 0.01
    0.0054387054 = product of:
      0.027193528 = sum of:
        0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027193528 = score(doc=938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=938)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Ling, X.; Jiang, J.; He, X.; Mei, Q.; Zhai, C.; Schatz, B.: Generating gene summaries from biomedical literature : a study of semi-structured summarization (2007) 0.00
    0.0045322548 = product of:
      0.022661272 = sum of:
        0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022661272 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  13. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Ziegert, C.: SummIt-BMT : (Summarize It in BMT) in Diagnose und Therapie, Abschlussbericht (2002) 0.00
    0.0045322548 = product of:
      0.022661272 = sum of:
        0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022661272 = score(doc=4497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Finegan-Dollak, C.; Radev, D.R.: Sentence simplification, compression, and disaggregation for summarization of sophisticated documents (2016) 0.00
    0.0045322548 = product of:
      0.022661272 = sum of:
        0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022661272 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.00
    0.0018684261 = product of:
      0.00934213 = sum of:
        0.00934213 = product of:
          0.03736852 = sum of:
            0.03736852 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736852 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476317 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
  16. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.00
    0.0018684261 = product of:
      0.00934213 = sum of:
        0.00934213 = product of:
          0.03736852 = sum of:
            0.03736852 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736852 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476317 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  17. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.00
    0.0018684261 = product of:
      0.00934213 = sum of:
        0.00934213 = product of:
          0.03736852 = sum of:
            0.03736852 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03736852 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476317 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  18. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.00
    0.0014013195 = product of:
      0.0070065977 = sum of:
        0.0070065977 = product of:
          0.02802639 = sum of:
            0.02802639 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02802639 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476317 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
  19. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.00
    0.0011677663 = product of:
      0.0058388314 = sum of:
        0.0058388314 = product of:
          0.023355326 = sum of:
            0.023355326 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023355326 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476317 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
  20. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.00
    0.0011677663 = product of:
      0.0058388314 = sum of:
        0.0058388314 = product of:
          0.023355326 = sum of:
            0.023355326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023355326 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476317 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41