Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.08 
    0.07506215 = product of:
  0.1501243 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
    0.10684516 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10684516 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.37518713 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Es ist ein semantisches Netz für den Gegenstandsbereich Luftfahrt modelliert worden, welches Unternehmensinformationen, Organisationen, Fluglinien, Flughäfen, etc. enthält, Diese sind 10 Hauptkategorien zugeordnet worden, die untergliedert nach Facetten sind. Die Begriffe des Gegenstandsbereiches sind mit 23 unterschiedlichen Relationen verknüpft worden (Z. B.: 'hat Standort in', bietet an, 'ist Homebase von', etc). Der Schwerpunkt der Betrachtung liegt auf dem Unterschied zwischen den drei klassischen Standardrelationen und den zusätzlich eingerichteten Relationen, bezüglich ihrem Nutzen für ein effizientes Retrieval. Die angelegten Kategorien und Relationen sind sowohl für eine kognitive als auch für eine maschinelle Verarbeitung geeignet.
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Neue Anwendungsgebiete für Thesauri : Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie (1992) 0.04 
    0.035615057 = product of:
  0.21369033 = sum of:
    0.21369033 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 1366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21369033 = score(doc=1366,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.75037426 = fieldWeight in 1366, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1366)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  3. Zimmermann, H.H.: Anmerkungen zur Neugestaltung der DIN 1463 (Thesauri) (1992) 0.04 
    0.035615057 = product of:
  0.21369033 = sum of:
    0.21369033 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 1373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21369033 = score(doc=1373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.75037426 = fieldWeight in 1373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1373)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  4. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.02 
    0.023082202 = product of:
  0.069246605 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.022724222 = product of:
      0.045448445 = sum of:
        0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045448445 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
  5. Sarre, F.; Güntzer, U.; Myka, A.; Jüttner, G.: Maschinelles Lernen von Relationen für Thesauri und Hypertext (1992) 0.02 
    0.017807528 = product of:
  0.10684516 = sum of:
    0.10684516 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10684516 = score(doc=1368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.37518713 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  6. Maille, B.: ¬Les relations sémantiques des thésaurus (1991) 0.02 
    0.015507462 = product of:
  0.09304477 = sum of:
    0.09304477 = weight(_text_:b in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09304477 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  7. Köper, B.: Vergleich von ausgewählten Thesaurus-Begriffsfeldern hinsichtlich ihrer linguistischen Relation (1990) 0.01 
    0.01356903 = product of:
  0.08141418 = sum of:
    0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08141418 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  8. Will, L.D.: Publications on thesaurus construction and use : including some references to facet analysis, taxonomies, ontologies, topic maps and related issues (2005) 0.01 
    0.01356903 = product of:
  0.08141418 = sum of:
    0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 3192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08141418 = score(doc=3192,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3192, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3192)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Type
    b
  9. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Nax, K.; Storp, M.: Ideenskizze eines dynamisch konfigurierbaren elektronischen Thesaurus am Beispiel der Sozialwissenschaften (1994) 0.01 
    0.0116305975 = product of:
  0.06978358 = sum of:
    0.06978358 = weight(_text_:b in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06978358 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  10. Burkart, M.: Thesaurus (2004) 0.01 
    0.011541101 = product of:
  0.034623303 = sum of:
    0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023261193 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
    0.011362111 = product of:
      0.022724222 = sum of:
        0.022724222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022724222 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus als Dokumentationssprache wird in der DIN 1463-1in seinen wesentlichen Merkmalen beschrieben. Dort wird der Thesaurus im informationswissenschaftlichen Sinne so definiert: "Ein Thesaurus im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation ist eine geordnete Zusammenstellung von Begriffen und ihren (vorwiegend natürlichsprachigen) Bezeichnungen, die in einem Dokumentationsgebiet zum Indexieren, Speichern und Wiederauffinden dient. Er ist durch folgende Merkmale gekennzeichnet: a) Begriffe und Bezeichnungen werden eindeutig aufeinander bezogen ("terminologische Kontrolle"), indem - Synonyme möglichst vollständig erfasst werden, - Homonyme und Polyseme besonders gekennzeichnet werden, - für jeden Begriff eine Bezeichnung (Vorzugsbenennung, Begriffsnummer oder Notation) festgelegt wird, die den Begriff eindeutig vertritt, b) Beziehungen zwischen Begriffen (repräsentiert durch ihre Bezeichnungen) werden dargestellt." Diese Definition wäre zu ergänzen um folgende: c) Der Thesaurus ist präskriptiv, indem er für seinen Geltungsbereich festlegt, welche begrifflichen Einheiten zur Verfügung gestellt werden und durch welche Bezeichnungen diese repräsentiert werden. Im Folgenden sollen die wichtigsten Elemente und Prinzipien von Thesauri und die Thesaurusmethodik vorgestellt werden. Dies kann in diesem Rahmen nur auf eine sehr kursorische und allgemeine Art und Weise geschehen. Außerdem beschränkt sich die Darstellung auf den Thesauruseinsatz im klassischen Bereich von Information und Dokumentation. Auf die Behandlung von Spezialproblemen oder auf besondere Thesaurusformen (z.B. mehrsprachige Thesauri) kann hier nicht eingegangen werden, ebenso auf die erweiterten Anforderungen, die an Thesauri im Kontext von Wissensrepräsentation oder Hypertext zu stellen sind. Allerdings überschneidet sich der klassische IuD-Bereich zunehmend mit erweiterten Formen (etwa im Rahmen von Internetanwendungen). Da der Thesaurus im dokumentarischen Sinn alle Grundelemente des Thesaurusprinzips in klarer Form aufweist, wird dieser Bereich für eine Einführung gewählt. Für eine intensivere Auseinandersetzung mit der Thematik wird die Lektüre von Wersig empfohlen, auf den sich auch die folgenden Ausführungen in weiten Teilen stützen. Eine weitere grundsätzliche Einführung in diesen Bereich, allerdings eher ausgerichtet auf die Spezifika des englischen Sprachraums, findet sich bei Lancaster.
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:18:22
  11. Brühl, B.: Thesauri und Klassifikationen : Naturwissenschaften - Technik - Wirtschaft (2005) 0.01 
    0.011541101 = product of:
  0.034623303 = sum of:
    0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023261193 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
    0.011362111 = product of:
      0.022724222 = sum of:
        0.022724222 = weight(_text_:22 in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022724222 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Series
    Materialien zur Information und Dokumentation; Bd.22
  12. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01 
    0.010098464 = product of:
  0.03029539 = sum of:
    0.020353545 = weight(_text_:b in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020353545 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
    0.009941847 = product of:
      0.019883694 = sum of:
        0.019883694 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019883694 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  13. Thönssen, B.: Automatische Indexierung und Schnittstellen zu Thesauri (1988) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=30,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  14. Pott, B.: ¬Das Thesaurus Maintenance System (TMS) : Erfahrungen mit einer Dienstleistung des Berliner Arbeitskreises Information für die Fachinformation (1988) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=519,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  15. ¬Le thésaurus aujourd'hui : Paris, 10 Janvier 1994 (1994) 0.01 
    0.007753731 = product of:
  0.046522386 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 8670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=8670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 8670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8670)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DEGEZ, D.: Le thésaurus dans la réalité de son utilisation: les maux des mots; JULIEN, S.: Les problèmes de fusion de thésaurus: example de RESAGRI; KRUMEICH, C.: Qu'est-ce que qu'un thésaurus?; MASSE, C.: Une vision critique de L'offre logicelle pour gérer thes thésaurus; MENILLET, D.: Le thésaurus et les modes d'indexation; NORMIER, B.: Outils linguistiques et thésaurus: construction, evaluation, évolution, utilisation; REYNAUD, F.: Les problèmes de fusion de thésaurus: example d'URBANET; ROULIN, Au-delà d'un seule langue et d'un seul thésaurus: approche méthodologique
  16. García Marco, F.J. et al: Proyectos internacionales de reforma y ampliación de las normas sobre tesauros para su adaptación a los nuevos contextos de integración e interoperabilidad en el entorno digital (2007) 0.01 
    0.007753731 = product of:
  0.046522386 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 1099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=1099,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1099, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1099)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  17. Ferrer Morillo, L.M.; Portillo de Hernández, R.: Tesauros transdisciplinarios : del reduccionismo científico a la unidad del conocimiento (2007) 0.01 
    0.007753731 = product of:
  0.046522386 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  18. Nkwenti-Azeh, B.: ¬The use of thesaural facets and definitions for the representation of knowledge structures (1994) 0.01 
    0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 7735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=7735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 7735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7735)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  19. Retti, G.; Stehno, B.: ¬The Laurin thesaurus : a large, multilingual, electronic thesaurus for newspaper clipping archives (2004) 0.01 
    0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  20. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.01 
    0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 16
  • f 6
  • es 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 48
  • el 5
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications