Search (271 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.09 
    0.08879648 = product of:
  0.26638943 = sum of:
    0.06659736 = product of:
      0.19979207 = sum of:
        0.19979207 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19979207 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3554905 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19979207 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19979207 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3554905 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.07 
    0.07399707 = product of:
  0.22199121 = sum of:
    0.055497803 = product of:
      0.1664934 = sum of:
        0.1664934 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1664934 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3554905 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1664934 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1664934 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3554905 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.04 
    0.040119126 = product of:
  0.12035737 = sum of:
    0.10615473 = weight(_text_:168 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10615473 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28385672 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.37397295 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
  4. Toegel, J.: Kognitive Kriegsführung : neueste Manipulationstechniken als Waffengattung der NATO (2023) 0.04 
    0.03525711 = product of:
  0.21154264 = sum of:
    0.21154264 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 1028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21154264 = score(doc=1028,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.74283266 = fieldWeight in 1028, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1028)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Wie die psychologische Kriegsführung unseren Verstand ins Visier nimmt. Seit 2020 treibt die NATO eine neue Form der psychologischen Kriegsführung voran: die sogenannte "Kognitive Kriegsführung", die von der NATO selbst als "fortschrittlichste Form der Manipulation" bezeichnet wird. Diese nimmt die Psyche jedes Menschen direkt ins Visier, mit dem Ziel, unseren Verstand wie einen Computer zu 'hacken'. Der Propagandaforscher Jonas Tögel erläutert die Hintergründe und Entstehungsgeschichte der Kognitiven Kriegsführung; vom Beginn moderner Kriegspropaganda vor 100 Jahren, über die Militarisierung der Neurowissenschaften bis hin zu Zukunftstechnologien wie Nano-Robotern oder Neurowaffen. Und er zeigt, dass der Gedankenkrieg oft unbemerkt über sogenannte "Soft Power-Techniken" bereits heute stattfindet.
  5. DeSilva, J.M.; Traniello, J.F.A.; Claxton, A.G.; Fannin, L.D.: When and why did human brains decrease in size? : a new change-point analysis and insights from brain evolution in ants (2021) 0.03 
    0.033060905 = product of:
  0.09918271 = sum of:
    0.09066113 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09066113 = score(doc=405,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31835684 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
    0.008521583 = product of:
      0.017043166 = sum of:
        0.017043166 = weight(_text_:22 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017043166 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Rötzer, F.: Warum schrumpft das Gehirn des Menschen seit ein paar Tausend Jahren? Unter: https://krass-und-konkret.de/wissenschaft-technik/warum-schrumpft-das-gehirn-des-menschen-seit-ein-paar-tausend-jahren/. "... seit einigen tausend Jahren - manche sagen seit 10.000 Jahren -, also nach dem Beginn der Landwirtschaft, der Sesshaftigkeit und der Stadtgründungen sowie der Erfindung der Schrift schrumpfte das menschliche Gehirn überraschenderweise wieder. ... Allgemein wird davon ausgegangen, dass mit den ersten Werkzeugen und vor allem beginnend mit der Erfindung der Schrift kognitive Funktionen, vor allem das Gedächtnis externalisiert wurden, allerdings um den Preis, neue Kapazitäten entwickeln zu müssen, beispielsweise Lesen und Schreiben. Gedächtnis beinhaltet individuelle Erfahrungen, aber auch kollektives Wissen, an dem alle Mitglieder einer Gemeinschaft mitwirken und in das das Wissen sowie die Erfahrungen der Vorfahren eingeschrieben sind. Im digitalen Zeitalter ist die Externalisierung und Entlastung der Gehirne noch sehr viel weitgehender, weil etwa mit KI nicht nur Wissensinhalte, sondern auch kognitive Fähigkeiten wie das Suchen, Sammeln, Analysieren und Auswerten von Informationen zur Entscheidungsfindung externalisiert werden, während die externalisierten Gehirne wie das Internet kollektiv in Echtzeit lernen und sich erweitern. Über Neuimplantate könnten schließlich Menschen direkt an die externalisierten Gehirne angeschlossen werden, aber auch direkt ihre kognitiven Kapazitäten erweitern, indem Prothesen, neue Sensoren oder Maschinen/Roboter auch in der Ferne in den ergänzten Körper der Gehirne aufgenommen werden.
    Source
    Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 22 October 2021 [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.742639/full]
  6. Engel, B.: Corona-Gesundheitszertifikat als Exitstrategie (2020) 0.03 
    0.028852757 = product of:
  0.08655827 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
    0.028405279 = product of:
      0.056810558 = sum of:
        0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056810558 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:28
  7. Adeyemi, I.O.; Omopupa, K.T.: Moving from OPAC to discovery systems : Nigerian librarians' perceived knowledge and readiness (2020) 0.02 
    0.024769438 = product of:
  0.14861663 = sum of:
    0.14861663 = weight(_text_:168 in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14861663 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28385672 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.52356213 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.2, S.149-168
  8. Spannagel, C.: Hat ChatGPT eine Zukunft in der Mathematik? (2023) 0.02 
    0.024769438 = product of:
  0.14861663 = sum of:
    0.14861663 = weight(_text_:168 in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14861663 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28385672 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.52356213 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.3, S.168-172
  9. Provost, A. Le; Nicolas, .: IdRef, Paprika and Qualinka : atoolbox for authority data quality and interoperability (2020) 0.02 
    0.024769438 = product of:
  0.14861663 = sum of:
    0.14861663 = weight(_text_:168 in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14861663 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28385672 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.52356213 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 40(2020) H.2, S.158-168
  10. Schleim, S.: Warum die Hirnforschung die Psychologie braucht (2022) 0.02 
    0.0231409 = product of:
  0.1388454 = sum of:
    0.1388454 = product of:
      0.2776908 = sum of:
        0.2776908 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2776908 = score(doc=221,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            1.125762 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Rätsel Bewusstsein, Gedankenlesen, Gehirnschreibmaschine - was kann die Hirnforschung hier leisten? Kommt sie ohne Psychologie und Philosophie aus oder setzt sie sie umgekehrt zwingend voraus?
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Warum-die-Hirnforschung-die-Psychologie-braucht-6444377.html?view=print
  11. Irrgang, B.: Roboterbewusstsein, automatisiertes Entscheiden und Transhumanismus : Anthropomorphisierungen von KI im Licht evolutionär-phänomenologischer Leib-Anthropologie (2020) 0.02 
    0.02305257 = product of:
  0.069157705 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 5999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=5999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5999)
    0.04008121 = product of:
      0.08016242 = sum of:
        0.08016242 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 5999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08016242 = score(doc=5999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.32497945 = fieldWeight in 5999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5999)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    KI und Robotik werfen neue Fragen epistemologischer Art auf, die im Kontext einer Philosophie des Geistes wie der Ethik diskutiert werden müssen. Im Hinblick auf eine erste Skizze epistemologischer Art zu möglichen Formen von Intelligenz und Bewusstsein bei KI und Robotern wird aufgezeigt, dass von ihrer Genese und ihrer Struktur, also ihrer Phänomenologie, drei Arten von Intelligenz unterschieden werden müssen, nämlich evolutionär generierte, kulturell-sprachlich eingebettete und technologische, die nicht miteinander identifiziert werden können. Um Intelligenz und Bewusstsein von KI und Robotik im Unterschied zu biologischer und menschlicher Intelligenz verstehen zu können, muss die algorithmische Struktur von KI unter Berücksichtigung der Philosophie des Geistes und des wissenschaftlich-technologischen Forschens im Bereich der Evolution kognitiven und kommunikativen Verhaltens, der Neurowissenschaften und Psychologie und der Menschheitsgeschichte wie der Kulturanthropologie bestimmt werden.
  12. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.02 
    0.018441003 = product of:
  0.05532301 = sum of:
    0.04112037 = weight(_text_:b in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04112037 = score(doc=884,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  13. Griesbaum, J.; März, S.; Woltermann, T.: Wie man Fake News und eigene Vorurteile überwindet : Die Pandemie trifft die Armen, die Bildungswilligen und die ländlichen Räume am Schlimmsten. "Intercultural Perspectives on Information Literacy": Ein deutsch-indischer Vergleich (2021) 0.02 
    0.017807528 = product of:
  0.10684516 = sum of:
    0.10684516 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10684516 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.37518713 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Im Rahmen des Projektkurses erarbeiteten die Teilnehmenden Vorträge zu folgenden Themen: - Informationsverhalten in Corona-Zeiten - Der Bestätigungsfehler (confirmation bias): "Was ich glaube, ist sicher wahr." Wie man kognitive Fehler korrigiert, um einen offenen Geist zu fördern. - Auswirkungen der Pandemie auf den Bildungssektor - Kultivierung von Informationskompetenz in ländlichen Umgebungen. Die Vorträge wurden auf der Tagung von den Studierenden präsentiert und im Plenum diskutiert. Ergänzend wurden mit Dr. Thomas P. Mackey und Trudi E. Jacobson renommierte ExpertInnen für eine Keynote zum Thema "Metaliteracy und offene Lernumgebungen" gewonnen. Schließlich wurde ein Workshop zu kulturellen Aspekten von Informationskompetenz durchgeführt, in dem auch Möglichkeiten zur Weiterentwicklung des Projekts diskutiert wurden. Nachfolgend werden die einzelnen Sessions der Tagung vorgestellt.
  14. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.02 
    0.017311653 = product of:
  0.051934958 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
    0.017043166 = product of:
      0.03408633 = sum of:
        0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03408633 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
  15. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.02 
    0.017311653 = product of:
  0.051934958 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.017043166 = product of:
      0.03408633 = sum of:
        0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03408633 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
  16. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.01 
    0.0144263785 = product of:
  0.043279134 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
  17. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.01 
    0.0144263785 = product of:
  0.043279134 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
  18. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.01 
    0.0144263785 = product of:
  0.043279134 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  19. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.01 
    0.0144263785 = product of:
  0.043279134 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01 
    0.0144263785 = product of:
  0.043279134 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 173
  • d 97

Types

  • a 252
  • el 63
  • m 9
  • p 4
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications