Search (58 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Nahl, D.; Tenopir, C.: Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database (1996) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=4213,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=4213,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Novice end users were given 2 hours of training in searching a full-text magazine database (Magazine ASAP(TM)) on DIALOG. Subjects searched during 3 to 4 sessions in the presence of a trained monitor who prompted them to think aloud throughout the sessions. qualitative analysis of the transcripts and transaction logs yielded empirical information on user variables (purpose, motivation, satisfaction), uses of the database, move types, and every question users asked during the searches. The spontaneous, naturalistic questions were categorized according to affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor speech acts. Results show that most of the searches were performed for the self and were work related. The most common use of the database was to retrieve full-text articles online and to download and print them out rather than read them on screen. The majority of searches were judged satisfactory. Innovative uses included browsing for background information and obtaining contextualized sentences for language teaching. Searchers made twice as many moves to limit sets as moves to expand sets. Affective questions outnumbered cognitive and sensorimotor questions by two to one. This preponderance of affective micro-information needs during searching might be addressed by new system functions
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.276-286
    Type
    a
  2. Tenopir, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Simmons, B.; Pollard, R.: Academic users' interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks : affective and cognitive behaviors (2008) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=2027,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=2027,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents part of phase 2 of a research project funded by the NSF-National Science Digital Library Project, which observed how academic users interact with the ScienceDirect information retrieval system for simulated class-related assignments. The ultimate goal of the project is twofold: (1) to find ways to improve science and engineering students' use of science e-journal systems; (2) to develop methods to measure user interaction behaviors. Process-tracing technique recorded participants' processes and interaction behaviors that are measurable; think-aloud protocol captured participants' affective and cognitive verbalizations; pre- and post-search questionnaires solicited demographic information, prior experience with the system, and comments. We explored possible relationships between affective feelings and cognitive behaviors. During search interactions both feelings and thoughts occurred frequently. Positive feelings were more common and were associated more often with thoughts about results. Negative feelings were associated more often with thoughts related to the system, search strategy, and task. Learning styles are also examined as a factor influencing behavior. Engineering graduate students with an assimilating learning style searched longer and paused less than those with a converging learning style. Further exploration of learning styles is suggested.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenbereichs: Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.105-121
    Type
    a
  3. Tenopir, C.: Online databases : taking online interaction for granted (1997) 0.01
    0.005751905 = product of:
      0.014379762 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
        0.0089308405 = product of:
          0.017861681 = sum of:
            0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017861681 = score(doc=1675,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers some of the human factors in online interaction and Internet use. Discusses the following: users' need for help from libraries and librarians, given the difficulties people continue to have in accessing and using networked information; the challenge of user demands for speedy delivery of information and documents; the trend towards 'humanizing the net' through chat rooms and social agent interfaces (such as Microsoft's Bob); and the problems for libraries of users using the Internet for trivial or pornographic purposes
    Type
    a
  4. Nahl-Jakobovits, D.; Tenopir, C.: Databases online and on CD-ROM : how they differ, let us count the ways (1992) 0.01
    0.0056083994 = product of:
      0.014020998 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 4851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=4851,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4851, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4851)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 4851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=4851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The study investigated the factors of response time, coverage, content and cost in CD-ROM and online versions of 2 popular databases: SilverPlatter Information Ins.'s and DIALOG's version of Psychological Abstracts (PsycINFO and PsycLIT) and Sociological Abstracts (Sociofile and Sociological Abstracts). Results confirm that, though the databases may be similar, significant differences do exist. Specifically, online searching gives a more consistent or predictable response time and yields greater currency, consistency and coverage
    Type
    a
  5. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.01
    0.0055105956 = product of:
      0.013776489 = sum of:
        0.007078358 = weight(_text_:a in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007078358 = score(doc=3113,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.0066981306 = product of:
          0.013396261 = sum of:
            0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013396261 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.10, S.2344-2361
    Type
    a
  6. Tenopir, C.; Nahl-Jakobovits, D.; Howard, D.L.: Strategies and assessments online : novices' experience (1991) 0.00
    0.0047055925 = product of:
      0.011763981 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 13(1991) no.3, S.237-266
    Type
    a
  7. Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994) 0.00
    0.0047055925 = product of:
      0.011763981 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the development of full text databases, encompassing: types of commercially available full text databases; online systems for full text databases; CD-ROM databases for full text databases; full text databases on magnetic discs or tapes; creation of full text databases; searching and display requirements for full text searching and software. Concludes that bibliographic information services without full text support solve only half of the retrieval problems
    Type
    a
  8. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.00
    0.004624805 = product of:
      0.011562012 = sum of:
        0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076151006 = score(doc=214,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.003946911 = product of:
          0.007893822 = sum of:
            0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007893822 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1840-1851
    Type
    a
  9. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Edwards, S.; Wu, L.: Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns : the paradox of control (2009) 0.00
    0.004624805 = product of:
      0.011562012 = sum of:
        0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076151006 = score(doc=2960,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
        0.003946911 = product of:
          0.007893822 = sum of:
            0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007893822 = score(doc=2960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - By tracking the information-seeking and reading patterns of science, technology, medical and social science faculty members from 1977 to the present, this paper seeks to examine how faculty members locate, obtain, read, and use scholarly articles and how this has changed with the widespread availability of electronic journals and journal alternatives. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered using questionnaire surveys of university faculty and other researchers periodically since 1977. Many questions used the critical incident of the last article reading to allow analysis of the characteristics of readings in addition to characteristics of readers. Findings - The paper finds that the average number of readings per year per science faculty member continues to increase, while the average time spent per reading is decreasing. Electronic articles now account for the majority of readings, though most readings are still printed on paper for final reading. Scientists report reading a higher proportion of older articles from a wider range of journal titles and more articles from library e-collections. Articles are read for many purposes and readings are valuable to those purposes. Originality/value - The paper draws on data collected in a consistent way over 30 years. It provides a unique look at how electronic journals and other developments have influenced changes in reading behavior over three decades. The use of critical incidence provides evidence of the value of reading in addition to reading patterns.
    Type
    a
  10. Douglass, K.; Allard, S.; Tenopir, C.; Wu, L.W.; Frame, M.: Managing scientific data as public assets : data sharing practices and policies among full-time government employees (2014) 0.00
    0.004303226 = product of:
      0.010758064 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=1195,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.003946911 = product of:
          0.007893822 = sum of:
            0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007893822 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines how scientists working in government agencies in the U.S. are reacting to the "ethos of sharing" government-generated data. For scientists to leverage the value of existing government data sets, critical data sets must be identified and made as widely available as possible. However, government data sets can only be leveraged when policy makers first assess the value of data, in much the same way they decide the value of grants for research outside government. We argue that legislators should also remove structural barriers to interoperability by funding technical infrastructure according to issue clusters rather than administrative programs. As developers attempt to make government data more accessible through portals, they should consider a range of other nontechnical constraints attached to the data. We find that agencies react to the large number of constraints by mostly posting their data on their own websites only rather than in data portals that can facilitate sharing. Despite the nontechnical constraints, we find that scientists working in government agencies exercise some autonomy in data decisions, such as data documentation, which determine whether or not the data can be widely shared. Fortunately, scientists indicate a willingness to share the data they collect or maintain. However, we argue further that a complete measure of access should also consider the normative decisions to collect (or not) particular data.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.251-262
    Type
    a
  11. Tenopir, C.: Electronic publishing : research issues for academic librarians and users (2003) 0.00
    0.0042062993 = product of:
      0.0105157485 = sum of:
        0.005779455 = weight(_text_:a in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005779455 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.0047362936 = product of:
          0.009472587 = sum of:
            0.009472587 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009472587 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Increased reliance on electronic resources requires examination of the roles of librarians in several key ways. This paper addresses the need for further research into three important areas of electronic publishing. How is the change to digital information sources affecting the scholarly work of college and university students? Previous research shows that students rely on Web and online resources and ask for less help from librarians. We do not know, however, how these changes will affect the learning and scholarly work of college and university students. Research is also needed to determine how the differences between separate article and full journal databases affect the way research is done. What are the implications for scholarship of decisions being made about what publishers publish and what librarians purchase? Finally, are librarians--as intermediaries to the search process--still necessary in a digital age? Online systems are designed to be used independently but that may not always yield the best results.
    Type
    a
  12. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.00
    0.0031257942 = product of:
      0.015628971 = sum of:
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
    Series
    New directions in information management; 21
  13. Lundeen, G.; Tenopir, C.: Text retrieval software for microcomputers and beyond : an overview and a review of four packages (1992) 0.00
    0.003082376 = product of:
      0.01541188 = sum of:
        0.01541188 = weight(_text_:a in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01541188 = score(doc=3223,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  14. Tenopir, C.: Choices for electronic reference (1993) 0.00
    0.0030460402 = product of:
      0.015230201 = sum of:
        0.015230201 = weight(_text_:a in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015230201 = score(doc=6569,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.28486365 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Gives a brief account of the various kinds of reference sources available to libraries, from remote online sources to locally mountes databases to printed reference works. Also provides a short historical account of electronic reference sources. Sees a role for each medium in the library and gives broad guidelines for choosing to provide a variety of these media
    Type
    a
  15. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.00
    0.002940995 = product of:
      0.007352487 = sum of:
        0.0034055763 = weight(_text_:a in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034055763 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
        0.003946911 = product of:
          0.007893822 = sum of:
            0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007893822 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1393-1408
    Type
    a
  16. Tenopir, C.: Full text database retrieval performance (1985) 0.00
    0.002724461 = product of:
      0.013622305 = sum of:
        0.013622305 = weight(_text_:a in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013622305 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Tenopir, C.: Target, Freestyle, WIN ... : searching takes a new look (1994) 0.00
    0.0026970792 = product of:
      0.013485395 = sum of:
        0.013485395 = weight(_text_:a in 6565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013485395 = score(doc=6565,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6565, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6565)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Tenopir, C.: Electronic reference options : tracking the changes (1995) 0.00
    0.002359453 = product of:
      0.011797264 = sum of:
        0.011797264 = weight(_text_:a in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011797264 = score(doc=2609,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a 1994 survey of the academic library memebers of the Association of Research Libraries, USA, to discover what types of electronic reference services they offer and how these services affect reference librarians' jobs and user and staff training. This survey was a follow up to an earlier survey in 1991
    Type
    a
  19. Tenopir, C.: ¬The user-system interface (1989) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Tenopir, C.: Searching by controlled vocabulary or free text (1987) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a