Search (34942 results, page 1 of 1748)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.16
    0.156567 = product of:
      0.2348505 = sum of:
        0.055152725 = product of:
          0.16545817 = sum of:
            0.16545817 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16545817 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006121026 = score(doc=306,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.008118565 = product of:
          0.03247426 = sum of:
            0.03247426 = weight(_text_:g in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03247426 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.16545817 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16545817 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
    Type
    a
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.13
    0.13493797 = product of:
      0.20240696 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0052465936 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052465936 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.14182128 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14182128 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.008065332 = product of:
          0.024195995 = sum of:
            0.024195995 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024195995 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Type
    a
  3. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.13
    0.12997395 = product of:
      0.2599479 = sum of:
        0.06303169 = product of:
          0.18909505 = sum of:
            0.18909505 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18909505 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.00782116 = weight(_text_:a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00782116 = score(doc=230,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.18909505 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18909505 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
    Type
    a
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.13
    0.12781224 = product of:
      0.25562447 = sum of:
        0.06303169 = product of:
          0.18909505 = sum of:
            0.18909505 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18909505 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.003497729 = weight(_text_:a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003497729 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.18909505 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18909505 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
    Type
    a
  5. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.13
    0.12654297 = product of:
      0.25308594 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0052465936 = weight(_text_:a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052465936 = score(doc=2514,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.20056558 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20056558 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
    Type
    a
  6. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.13
    0.12577462 = product of:
      0.25154924 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.003709902 = weight(_text_:a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003709902 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.20056558 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20056558 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  7. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.12
    0.12321998 = product of:
      0.24643996 = sum of:
        0.004328219 = weight(_text_:a in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004328219 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.008118565 = product of:
          0.03247426 = sum of:
            0.03247426 = weight(_text_:g in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03247426 = score(doc=4031,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.23399317 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23399317 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Als Erfinder des «Allgemeinen» gilt, gemäß dem Bericht des Aristoteles und seit diesem Bericht, Sokrates. Er ist es, der nicht mehr danach suchte, woraus ein Ding zu dem geworden ist, was es ist, oder wie es entstanden ist, sondern danach, «was [ein Ding] ist», und somit ist Sokrates der erste gewesen, der die Herausarbeitung des Allgemeinen (?a?????) forderte und mit seinen Fragen seine Gesprächspartner zu dieser Herausarbeitung trieb bzw. lockte; die Definition (???sµ??) war das Ziel des sokratischen Gesprächs, und die sokratische Aporie war das Vehikel.
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
    Source
    Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hrsg.: J. Ritter, K. Gründer u. G. Gabriel
    Type
    a
  8. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.11
    0.11329096 = product of:
      0.16993643 = sum of:
        0.039394803 = product of:
          0.11818441 = sum of:
            0.11818441 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11818441 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0065582423 = weight(_text_:a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065582423 = score(doc=76,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.005798975 = product of:
          0.0231959 = sum of:
            0.0231959 = weight(_text_:g in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0231959 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.11818441 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11818441 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Content
    Originally published July 1981 as Internal Report 81-2, Dept. of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 3400 Gottingen, W.-Germany.
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
    Type
    a
  9. Dawson, J.W.: Kurt Gödel und die Grenzen der Logik (1999) 0.10
    0.103503935 = product of:
      0.3105118 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
        0.30613965 = weight(_text_:kurt in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30613965 = score(doc=4503,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            1.2677138 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit einem einzigen Aufsatz erschütterte Kurt Gödel das Fundament der modernen Mathematik. Sein Genie strapazierte den Verstand bis an die äußersten Grenzen - nicht nur den der Mathematiker, sondern auch seinen eigenen
    Type
    a
  10. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.10
    0.09927674 = product of:
      0.19855347 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009458431 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009458431 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14182128 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14182128 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Type
    a
  11. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.10
    0.09825742 = product of:
      0.19651484 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007419804 = weight(_text_:a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007419804 = score(doc=2918,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14182128 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14182128 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Type
    a
  12. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.10
    0.09748046 = product of:
      0.19496092 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0058658705 = weight(_text_:a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058658705 = score(doc=862,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.14182128 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14182128 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
    Type
    a
  13. Kelm, B.: ¬Die Inhaltserschließung der Deutschen Bibliothek. Im Spannungsfeld zwischen nationalen und internationalen Erfordernissen (1988) 0.09
    0.088338226 = product of:
      0.26501468 = sum of:
        0.0052465936 = weight(_text_:a in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052465936 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.2597681 = weight(_text_:kurt in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2597681 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            1.0756907 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Nationalbibliotheken im Jahr 2000. Festgabe für Günther Pflug zum 65. Geb. Hrsg. von Sieghardt von Köcknitz u. Kurt Nowak
    Type
    a
  14. Otto, F.: ¬Das Katalogsystem der Bibliothek des Instituts für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel) und seine Wirkung nach außen (1974) 0.09
    0.088338226 = product of:
      0.26501468 = sum of:
        0.0052465936 = weight(_text_:a in 4810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052465936 = score(doc=4810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4810)
        0.2597681 = weight(_text_:kurt in 4810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2597681 = score(doc=4810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            1.0756907 = fieldWeight in 4810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4810)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation im behördlichen Bereich. Kurt Georf Wernicke zum 65. Geburtstag. Hrsg. von Hildebert Kirchner u.a
    Type
    a
  15. Kuessner, T.: Logbuch Mathematik (2020) 0.09
    0.087463796 = product of:
      0.2623914 = sum of:
        0.0026232968 = weight(_text_:a in 5956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026232968 = score(doc=5956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5956)
        0.2597681 = weight(_text_:kurt in 5956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2597681 = score(doc=5956,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            1.0756907 = fieldWeight in 5956, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5956)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ein Beitrag zum Einbürgerschaftsgespräch mit Kurt Gödel und der Verarbeitung in Daniel Kehlmann: Geister in Princeton.
    Biographed
    Gödel, Kurt
    Content
    Kurt Gödels Staatsbürgerschaftstest "Nun, Mister Gödel, wo kommen Sie her?" "Wo ich herkomme? Österreich." "Was für eine Regierung hatten sie in Österreich?" "Es war eine Republik, doch die Verfassung war so, dass sie in eine Diktatur verwandelt wurde." "Oh, das ist schlecht. Das kann in diesem Land nicht passieren." "Aber ja. Ich kann es beweisen." "Oh Gott. Lassen wir uns da nicht ins Detail gehen." Dieses Gespräch führte Kurt Gödel 1947 bei seinem Einbürgerungstest. Zur Vorbereitung auf die Prüfung hatte er in den Monaten zuvor die Verfassung der USA gelesen. Dem Spieltheoretiker Oskar Morgenstern hatte er danach aufgeregt von inneren Widersprüchen in der Verfassung erzählt und dass es auf völlig legale Weise möglich sei, "ein Diktator zu werden und ein faschistisches Regime zu installieren". Um Probleme beim Einbürgerungsgespräch zu vermeiden, begleiteten ihn deshalb Morgenstern und Albert Einstein, die als Bürgen - anders als sonst üblich - mit ihm gemeinsam befragt wurden..
    Type
    a
  16. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.08
    0.07988265 = product of:
      0.1597653 = sum of:
        0.039394803 = product of:
          0.11818441 = sum of:
            0.11818441 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11818441 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0021860807 = weight(_text_:a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0021860807 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.11818441 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11818441 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
    Type
    a
  17. Springer, M.: Was hier steht, ist nicht wahr (2006) 0.06
    0.06479081 = product of:
      0.12958162 = sum of:
        0.0017488645 = weight(_text_:a in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017488645 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
        0.122455865 = weight(_text_:kurt in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122455865 = score(doc=5309,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.5070855 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
        0.005376888 = product of:
          0.016130663 = sum of:
            0.016130663 = weight(_text_:22 in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016130663 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    "Was halten Sie von diesem Satz, der von sich aussagt, dass er falsch sei? Wenn er, wie behauptet, nicht wahr ist, stimmt nicht, was er aussagt, und das bedeutet, dass er wahr ist - im Widerspruch zu dem, was er behauptet. Als Urform solcher sich selbst torpedierenden Aussagen gilt die Paradoxie des kretischen Priesters Epimenides, der alle Kreter als Lügner bezeichnete. Auch dies führt zu einer Antinomie: einem unauflöslichen Selbstwiderspruch. Vor hundert Jahren, am 28. April 1906, wurde im heutigen Tschechien, damals Teil der österreichischen Monarchie, Kurt Gödel geboren, den die Fachwelt zu diesem Jubiläum als den größten Logiker seit Aristoteles feiert. Sein Ruhm beruht im Wesentlichen auf einem einzigen Theorem, dem Gödel'schen Unvollständigkeitssatz, der auf raffinierte Weise die Antinomie des Lügners nutzt. Damit zeigte Gödel 1931, dass die damalige Erwartung, die gesamte Mathematik lasse sich nach dem Vorbild der Euklidischen Geometrie aus einigen Axiomen und Ableitungsregeln entwickeln, trügerisch war. In jedem formalen System, das es erlaubt, die Theoreme der Arithmetik herzuleiten, können systemsprengende Sätze von der Art des Lügnerparadoxons konstruiert werden, die sich weder beweisen noch widerlegen lassen. Gödel selbst sah in seiner - für die Zeitgenossen völlig überraschenden - Entdeckung nichts Negatives, obwohl sie die Hoffnung, die Mathematik könne letztlich komplett auf Logik zurückgeführt werden, gründlich zerstörte. Hätte jene Hoffnung sich bewahrheitet, so gäbe es zumindest theoretisch ein Computerprogramm, das automatisch sämtliche Sätze der Mathematik zu produzieren vermöchte. Gödel hingegen meinte als überzeugter Anhänger der Platon'schen Ideenlehre, die Tätigkeit der Mathematiker gleiche der Entdeckungsreise in eine unbekannte Welt geistiger Objekte und nicht der freien Erfindung von Spielregeln, Formalismen und Rechenprogrammen. Dafür schien ihm sein Unvollständigkeitssatz ein klares Indiz (siehe »Kurt Gödel«, Spektrum-Biografie 1/2002). Wie groß der denkerische Ehrgeiz des großen Logikers war, offenbaren erst Gödels postum edierte Notizen. Schon der Halbwüchsige betitelte ein Schulheft mit »Fehler der Bibel« - nicht einmal das Buch der Bücher war vor seinem kritischen Misstrauen sicher. In reifen Jahren arbeitete er an einem Beweis für die Existenz Gottes auf rein logischer Basis - nach dem Vorbild des mittelalterlichen Scholastikers Anselm von Canterbury. Gödels ontologischer Gottesbeweis geht kurz gesagt so: Gott ist nur denkbar als Wesen, das alle positiven Eigenschaften in sich vereint, und da Existenz eine solche positive Eigenschaft ist, muss Gott existieren. Was zu beweisen war. In gewisser Weise erscheint mir dieses Argument als logische Umkehrung der Antinomie des Lügners. Der Satz »Ich bin falsch« sprengt die Konsistenz des Systems, in dem er formuliert wird; die Behauptung »Ich bin wahr« macht das Gegenteil: Eigenmächtig, kühn und herausfordernd stellt sie sich selbst im logischen Raum auf. Um dieser Behauptung blindlings zu vertrauen, ja sie als Selbstaussage des höchsten Wesens zu verstehen - etwa im Sinne des Jesu-Worts »Ich bin die Wahrheit und das Leben« -, dazu muss man freilich wie Gödel bedingungslos an die reale Existenz logisch-mathematischer Objekte glauben."
    Date
    22. 7.2006 19:56:41
    Type
    a
  18. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.06
    0.0641976 = product of:
      0.19259278 = sum of:
        0.003497729 = weight(_text_:a in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003497729 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.18909505 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18909505 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
    Type
    a
  19. Bauhuis, W.: Warnung vor Publikumskatalogen (1959) 0.06
    0.05889216 = product of:
      0.17667648 = sum of:
        0.003497729 = weight(_text_:a in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003497729 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
        0.17317875 = weight(_text_:kurt in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17317875 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7171272 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Aus der Welt des Bibliothekars. Festschrift für Rudolf Juchhoff zum 65. Geburtstag. Hrsg.: Kurt Ohly u. Werner Krieg
    Type
    a
  20. Biedenkopf, K.: Zwischen rasantem technischem Fortschritt und Machtkontrolle (1998) 0.06
    0.05889216 = product of:
      0.17667648 = sum of:
        0.003497729 = weight(_text_:a in 1964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003497729 = score(doc=1964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1964)
        0.17317875 = weight(_text_:kurt in 1964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17317875 = score(doc=1964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24148957 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.7171272 = fieldWeight in 1964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1964)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit einem Plädoyer zugunsten der Wirtschaftsfreiheit hat sich Sachsens Ministerpräsident Kurt Biedenkopf in die Debatte um die Ausgestaltung der Kommunikationsgesellschaft eingeschaltet und eine neue Medienpolitik gefordert. Biedenkopf sprach am 9.9.98 in Gütersloh bei einem Symposium der Bertelsmann Stiftung mit dem Thema 'Kommunikationsordnung 2000 - Innovation und Verantwdortung in der Informationsgesellschaft'
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 1003
  • b 69
  • p 3
  • i 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes