Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"fi"
  1. Savolainen, R.: Tiedon kayton tutkimus informaatiotutkimuksessa (1994) 0.01 
    0.014616735 = product of:
  0.043850206 = sum of:
    0.03282144 = weight(_text_:r in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03282144 = score(doc=3670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03872851 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
    0.011028768 = product of:
      0.022057535 = sum of:
        0.022057535 = weight(_text_:4 in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022057535 = score(doc=3670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Kirjastotiede ja informatiika. 13(1994) no.4, S.101-109
  2. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.01 
    0.0052471785 = product of:
  0.03148307 = sum of:
    0.03148307 = product of:
      0.06296614 = sum of:
        0.06296614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296614 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
  3. Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996) 0.00 
    0.0022281478 = product of:
  0.013368886 = sum of:
    0.013368886 = product of:
      0.026737772 = sum of:
        0.026737772 = weight(_text_:4 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026737772 = score(doc=27,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system
    Source
    Informaatiotutkimus. 15(1996) no.4, S.133-144
  4. Kuronen, T.: Ranganathanin lait ja virtuaalikirjasto (1996) 0.00 
    0.0021007177 = product of:
  0.012604306 = sum of:
    0.012604306 = product of:
      0.025208613 = sum of:
        0.025208613 = weight(_text_:4 in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025208613 = score(doc=6704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    Finnish information studies; 4

Authors

Types

Themes