Search (638 results, page 1 of 32)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Koch, C.: Can a photodiode be conscious? (2013) 0.10
    0.09684664 = product of:
      0.29053992 = sum of:
        0.15333863 = product of:
          0.30667725 = sum of:
            0.30667725 = weight(_text_:searle in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30667725 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30824864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.9949022 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.1372013 = weight(_text_:john in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1372013 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.5595788 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Erwiderung auf die Rezension von John Searle zu: Koch, C.: Consciousness: confessions of a romantic reductionist. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 2012 in:The New York Review of Books, 10.01.2013 [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/?pagination=false&printpage=true]
    Issue
    Mit einer weiteren Erwiderung von J. Searle
  2. Löhrer, G.: Der Anti-Dualismus, sein Vokabular und dessen Ambiguität : eine methodische Bemerkung zu Searles monistischen Auffassungen in der Philosophie des Geistes (2005) 0.07
    0.07263499 = product of:
      0.21790496 = sum of:
        0.11500397 = product of:
          0.23000795 = sum of:
            0.23000795 = weight(_text_:searle in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23000795 = score(doc=4505,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30824864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.74617666 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.102900974 = weight(_text_:john in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102900974 = score(doc=4505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.41968408 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Wie passen mentale Phänomene wie Bewusstsein, Intentionalität und mentale Verursachung zum "Rest des Universums" und wie bringen wir unsere Theorien dieser Phänomene im Gebäude unserer übrigen Welterklärungen unter? Wie muss eine Theorie aussehen, die wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen und neurowissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen gerecht wird, ohne grundlegende Intuitionen und bewusste, subjektive wie qualitative Erfahrungen des Mentalen zu unterdrücken oder zu marginalisieren? - John Rogers Searle vertritt in seinem Buch Mind eine in Teilen verfeinerte Version jenes geschmeidigen Monismus, der auch seine früheren Arbeiten zur Philosophie des Geistes kennzeichnet. Ziel seiner Überlegungen ist eine, "biological naturalism" genannte, umfassende und einheitliche Theorie des Mentalen, die er für die Philosophie als das Projekt menschlicher Selbstverständigung für vordringlich hält. In ihrem Zentrum wiederum steht eine Theorie des Bewusstseins.
    Content
    Besprechung zu: Searle, J.R.: Geist. Beim hier vorliegenden Text handelt es sich um die vorletzte Fassung. (Vgl.: https://www.uni-erfurt.de/fileadmin/user-docs/Philosophie/praktphil/Online-Texte/Der_Antidualismus_sein_Vokabular_und_dessen_Ambiguitaet.pdf.)
  3. Albinus, L.: Can science cope with more than one world? : a cross-reading of Habermas, Popper, and Searle (2013) 0.05
    0.05117252 = product of:
      0.15351756 = sum of:
        0.06776674 = product of:
          0.13553348 = sum of:
            0.13553348 = weight(_text_:searle in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13553348 = score(doc=4520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30824864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.4396888 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08575082 = weight(_text_:john in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08575082 = score(doc=4520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.34973675 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to critically assess the 'three-world theory' as it is presented-with some slight but decisive differences-by Ju¨rgen Habermas and Karl Popper. This theory presents the philosophy of science with a conceptual and material problem, insofar as it claims that science has no single access to all aspects of the world. Although I will try to demonstrate advantages of Popper's idea of 'the third world' of ideas, the shortcomings of his ontological stance become visible from the pragmatic point of view in Habermas's theory of communicative acts. With regard to the critique that the three-world theory has met in both its pragmatic and ontological versions, I will take a closer look at John Searle's naturalistic counter-position. By teasing out some problematic implications in his theory of causation, I aim to show that Searle's approach is, in fact, much closer to Popper's than he might think. Finally, while condoning Habermas's distinction between the natural world and the lifeworld, I will opt for a pragmatically differentiated view of 'the real', rather than speaking of different worlds.
  4. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 1: Das Dilemma mit der inkompetenten Informationskompetenz. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021). (2021) 0.04
    0.037372507 = product of:
      0.22423504 = sum of:
        0.22423504 = weight(_text_:960 in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22423504 = score(doc=345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3350932 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.66917217 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Open Password. 2021, Nr.960 vom 13. August 2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzMzMiwiYjI1NGVjNmJhNzhhIiwwLDAsMzAwLDFd]
  5. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.03
    0.034124374 = product of:
      0.10237312 = sum of:
        0.06564288 = weight(_text_:r in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06564288 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
        0.03673025 = product of:
          0.0734605 = sum of:
            0.0734605 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0734605 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  6. Atzbach, R.: ¬Der Rechtschreibtrainer : Rechtschreibübungen und -spiele für die 5. bis 9. Klasse (1996) 0.03
    0.02923347 = product of:
      0.08770041 = sum of:
        0.06564288 = weight(_text_:r in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06564288 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
        0.022057535 = product of:
          0.04411507 = sum of:
            0.04411507 = weight(_text_:4 in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04411507 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.4197538 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Pages
    26 S. (Begleitheft) + 4 Disketten
  7. LexiROM (1999) 0.03
    0.02923347 = product of:
      0.08770041 = sum of:
        0.06564288 = weight(_text_:r in 5025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06564288 = score(doc=5025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5025)
        0.022057535 = product of:
          0.04411507 = sum of:
            0.04411507 = weight(_text_:4 in 5025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04411507 = score(doc=5025,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.4197538 = fieldWeight in 5025, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5025)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: B.I.T.online 2(1999) H.4, S.505-507 (R. Fuhlrott)
  8. San Segundo, R.: Existing and planned UDC products in Spain (2007) 0.03
    0.025057262 = product of:
      0.07517178 = sum of:
        0.056265324 = weight(_text_:r in 6467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056265324 = score(doc=6467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 6467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6467)
        0.01890646 = product of:
          0.03781292 = sum of:
            0.03781292 = weight(_text_:4 in 6467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03781292 = score(doc=6467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 6467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich des 'UDC Seminar: Information Access for the Global Community, The Hague, 4-5 June 2007'
  9. ¬Der Brockhaus in Text und Bild (1999) 0.03
    0.025057262 = product of:
      0.07517178 = sum of:
        0.056265324 = weight(_text_:r in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056265324 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
        0.01890646 = product of:
          0.03781292 = sum of:
            0.03781292 = weight(_text_:4 in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03781292 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: B.I.T.online 2(1999) H.4, S.505-507 (R. Fuhlrott)
  10. ¬Der Brockhaus multimedial (1998) 0.03
    0.025057262 = product of:
      0.07517178 = sum of:
        0.056265324 = weight(_text_:r in 5024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056265324 = score(doc=5024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 5024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5024)
        0.01890646 = product of:
          0.03781292 = sum of:
            0.03781292 = weight(_text_:4 in 5024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03781292 = score(doc=5024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 5024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: B.I.T.online 2(1999) H.4, S.505-507 (R. Fuhlrott)
  11. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.024374552 = product of:
      0.073123656 = sum of:
        0.046887767 = weight(_text_:r in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046887767 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
        0.026235892 = product of:
          0.052471783 = sum of:
            0.052471783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052471783 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
    Type
    r
  12. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Reception of externalized knowledge : a constructivistic model based on Popper's Three Worlds and Searle's Collective Intentionality (2019) 0.02
    0.022866882 = product of:
      0.1372013 = sum of:
        0.1372013 = weight(_text_:john in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1372013 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.5595788 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    We provide a model for the reception of knowledge from externalized information sources. The model is based on a cognitive understanding of information processing and draws up ideas of an exchange of information in communication processes. Karl Popper's three-world theory with its orientation on falsifiable scientific knowledge is extended by John Searle's concept of collective intentionality. This allows a consistent description of externalization and reception of knowledge including scientific knowledge as well as everyday knowledge.
  13. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.02
    0.022395348 = product of:
      0.13437209 = sum of:
        0.13437209 = sum of:
          0.050417226 = weight(_text_:4 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050417226 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03872851 = queryNorm
              0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
          0.083954856 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083954856 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03872851 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
    Pages
    4 CDs
  14. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz ist auf domänenspezifisches Vorwissen angewiesen und kann immer nur vorläufig sein : eine Antwort auf Steve Patriarca (2021) 0.02
    0.021355718 = product of:
      0.12813431 = sum of:
        0.12813431 = weight(_text_:960 in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12813431 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3350932 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.3823841 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Schon die Überschrift des Statements von Steve Patriarca belegt, dass die Anhänger der "Informationskompetenz" (Information Literacy) nach wie vor von der einfachen und naiven Annahme ausgehen, dass die reine Verfügbarkeit von "Informationskompetenz" ausreicht, um "uns die Werkzeuge" zu geben, "Quellen zu prüfen und Tatsachenbehauptungen zu verifizieren". Ohne nochmals gebetsmühlenartig die Argumente gegen eine "allgemeingültige Informationskompetenz" zu wiederholen, die es als eigenständige "Kompetenz" nicht geben kann (siehe die letzten Stellungnahmen zu diesem Unbegriff in Open Password Nr. 682, 691, 759, 960, 963, 965, 971, 979 usw.), und zudem auf die dort eingebundenen Sichten der Nachbarwissenschaften (Neurowissenschaften, Kommunikationswissenschaft usw.) zu diesem unguten Terminus der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft zu verweisen, sei hier lediglich kurz klargestellt:
  15. Großmann. R.; Heinz, M.: RAK-WB als Hypertext (1995) 0.02
    0.02088105 = product of:
      0.06264315 = sum of:
        0.046887767 = weight(_text_:r in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046887767 = score(doc=5332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
        0.015755383 = product of:
          0.031510767 = sum of:
            0.031510767 = weight(_text_:4 in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031510767 = score(doc=5332,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.29982415 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 4(1996) H.2/3, S.273-275 (H. Gerstberger)
  16. Doc-Thèses : Le catalogue des thèses soutenues dans les universités françaises sur CD-ROM (1997) 0.02
    0.02088105 = product of:
      0.06264315 = sum of:
        0.046887767 = weight(_text_:r in 1819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046887767 = score(doc=1819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1819)
        0.015755383 = product of:
          0.031510767 = sum of:
            0.031510767 = weight(_text_:4 in 1819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031510767 = score(doc=1819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.29982415 = fieldWeight in 1819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 45(1998) H.4, S.437-447 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger u. R. Volk-Thoma)
  17. Jungen, O.: Grenzen der Technik : das letzte Refugium menschlicher Intelligenz (2018) 0.02
    0.02088105 = product of:
      0.06264315 = sum of:
        0.046887767 = weight(_text_:r in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046887767 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
        0.015755383 = product of:
          0.031510767 = sum of:
            0.031510767 = weight(_text_:4 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031510767 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03872851 = queryNorm
                0.29982415 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Computer können längst nicht alles. Online-Übersetzer zum Beispiel stoßen schnell an ihre Grenzen. Für den Kognitionswissenschaftler Douglas R. Hofstadter herrscht in vielen Maschinen effiziente Scheinintelligenz.
    Date
    4. 7.2018 18:57:50
  18. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02
    0.019595928 = product of:
      0.11757557 = sum of:
        0.11757557 = sum of:
          0.04411507 = weight(_text_:4 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04411507 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03872851 = queryNorm
              0.4197538 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.0734605 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0734605 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03872851 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Beitrag anläßlich des Seminars "Tools for knowledge organization - ISKO UK Seminar", 4. September 2007
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  19. Wikipedia : das Buch : aus der freien Enzyklopädie Wikipedia ; [mit der DVD-ROM Wikipedia 2005/2006] (2005) 0.02
    0.01929518 = product of:
      0.05788554 = sum of:
        0.048507985 = weight(_text_:john in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048507985 = score(doc=118,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.19784097 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
        0.009377554 = weight(_text_:r in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009377554 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.073147066 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 53(2006) H.6, S.319-321 (R. Strzolka): "Bespricht man ein Buch, welches der Wikipedia - vorsichtig ausgedrückt, nahe steht -, so ist es sinnvoll, dies im Bewusstsein einer Öffentlichkeit zu tun, die zwischen berechtigter Kritik und kritikloser Sektenhaftigkeit der Wikipedianer oszilliert. Wirklich gleichgültig ist die Wikipedia kaum jemandem, der sich mit Informationsvermittlung beschäftigt. Einer der Vorzüge ist zugleich die Achillesferse des Projektes: der offene Zugang ermöglicht zum einen für jedermann die Mitarbeit, öffnet andererseits aber auch Tür und Tor für Manipulationen. Dass die Offenheit des WikipediaKonzeptes als Gefahr empfunden wird, zeigt die Tatsache, dass Chinas größte Suchmaschine Baidu im Mai 2006 eine eigene Alternative zur Wikipedia ins Netz stellte und der Zugang zur allgemeinen Wikipedia gesperrt wurde. Die an sich reizvolle Grundidee, dass ein offenes Projekt sich von selbst justiert und Fehler auf diese Weise binnen kurzer Zeit korrigiert werden, scheint sich nicht so selbstverständlich zu verwirklichen wie die Initiatoren der Wikipedia 200s dachten, als das Projekt online ging. Während die Kritik in den populären Massenmedien wie dem SPIEGEL sich vor allem um spektakuläre Manipulationen von Biographien Prominenter dreht, kritisiert die wissenschaftliche Diskussion eher Fragen kultureller Gleichschaltung durch einen globalen Diskurs. Die Diskussion um Fälschungen zur Biographie eines führenden Siemens-Mitarbeiters schlug Mitte 2006 hohe Wogen, doch wurden auch Angaben zu Bill Gates oder Jane Fonda gefälscht oder der Journalist John Seigentler verdächtigt, in die Ermordung von John und Robert Kennedy verwickelt gewesen zu sein (Wikipedia in der Kritik www.heute.de/ZDFheute/inhalt/14/0,3672,3022414.htm). Der Journalist Nicholas Carr hatte ein Jahr zuvor schon in einem Blog die Qualität der Wikipedia drastisch kritisiert und der WikipediaMitbegründer Jimmy Wales hatte ihm in einem Kommentar dazu in weiten Teilen Recht gegeben (www.roughtype.com/ archives/2005/10/the_amorality_0.php). Allerdings verblüfft die Art Qualitätsstandard, die Wales anstrebt, weil er zugab, dass die Artikel über Fonda und Gates schlecht seien - dies wäre schlimmer als handelte es sich um Einträge zu einem Dichter des 13. Jahrhunderts. Gerade bei solchen Randthemen aber ist eine Enzyklopädie interessant, nicht bei Klatsch über Prominente, für die es genügend andere Quellen gibt.
  20. Markoff, J.: Researchers announce advance in image-recognition software (2014) 0.02
    0.018199118 = product of:
      0.05459735 = sum of:
        0.04287541 = weight(_text_:john in 1875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04287541 = score(doc=1875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.17486838 = fieldWeight in 1875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1875)
        0.011721942 = weight(_text_:r in 1875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011721942 = score(doc=1875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03872851 = queryNorm
            0.09143383 = fieldWeight in 1875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1875)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Computer vision specialists said that despite the improvements, these software systems had made only limited progress toward the goal of digitally duplicating human vision and, even more elusive, understanding. "I don't know that I would say this is 'understanding' in the sense we want," said John R. Smith, a senior manager at I.B.M.'s T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, N.Y. "I think even the ability to generate language here is very limited." But the Google and Stanford teams said that they expect to see significant increases in accuracy as they improve their software and train these programs with larger sets of annotated images. A research group led by Tamara L. Berg, a computer scientist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, is training a neural network with one million images annotated by humans. "You're trying to tell the story behind the image," she said. "A natural scene will be very complex, and you want to pick out the most important objects in the image.""

Languages

  • d 313
  • e 305
  • m 6
  • a 3
  • el 2
  • es 1
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 300
  • i 53
  • r 35
  • m 17
  • b 16
  • s 9
  • n 8
  • x 7
  • p 3
  • l 2
  • More… Less…

Themes