Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  1. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.02 
    0.017547676 = product of:
  0.035095353 = sum of:
    0.035095353 = product of:
      0.070190705 = sum of:
        0.070190705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070190705 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  2. Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996) 0.01 
    0.014180663 = product of:
  0.028361326 = sum of:
    0.028361326 = product of:
      0.056722652 = sum of:
        0.056722652 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056722652 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 4.1997 20:22:55
  3. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.01 
    0.010635497 = product of:
  0.021270994 = sum of:
    0.021270994 = product of:
      0.04254199 = sum of:
        0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04254199 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
  4. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.01 
    0.0105378665 = product of:
  0.021075733 = sum of:
    0.021075733 = product of:
      0.042151466 = sum of:
        0.042151466 = weight(_text_:4 in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042151466 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.29681075 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
  5. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.01 
    0.0105378665 = product of:
  0.021075733 = sum of:
    0.021075733 = product of:
      0.042151466 = sum of:
        0.042151466 = weight(_text_:4 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042151466 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.29681075 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
  6. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.01 
    0.0088629145 = product of:
  0.017725829 = sum of:
    0.017725829 = product of:
      0.035451658 = sum of:
        0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035451658 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  7. Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars : the Getty Online Searching Project report no.4 (1994) 0.01 
    0.008515882 = product of:
  0.017031765 = sum of:
    0.017031765 = product of:
      0.03406353 = sum of:
        0.03406353 = weight(_text_:4 in 6989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03406353 = score(doc=6989,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 6989, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6989)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Bates, M.J.: Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s : a memoir of student days (2004) 0.01 
    0.008515882 = product of:
  0.017031765 = sum of:
    0.017031765 = product of:
      0.03406353 = sum of:
        0.03406353 = weight(_text_:4 in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03406353 = score(doc=7246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library trends. 52(2004) no.4, S.683-701
  9. Bates, M.J.: Information search tactics (1979) 0.01 
    0.008515882 = product of:
  0.017031765 = sum of:
    0.017031765 = product of:
      0.03406353 = sum of:
        0.03406353 = weight(_text_:4 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03406353 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems
  10. Bates, M.J.: Defining the information disciplines in encyclopedia development (2007) 0.01 
    0.007527048 = product of:
  0.015054096 = sum of:
    0.015054096 = product of:
      0.030108191 = sum of:
        0.030108191 = weight(_text_:4 in 3400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030108191 = score(doc=3400,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.21200769 = fieldWeight in 3400, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis29.html.
    Source
    Information Research. 12(2007) no.4, paper colis29
  11. Bates, M.J.: Information and knowledge : an evolutionary framework for information science (2005) 0.01 
    0.0052689333 = product of:
  0.0105378665 = sum of:
    0.0105378665 = product of:
      0.021075733 = sum of:
        0.021075733 = weight(_text_:4 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021075733 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.14840537 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Auch unter: http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. - Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
    Source
    Information research. 10(2005) no.4, paper 239

Years

Types

Themes