Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.01744775 = product of:
      0.052343246 = sum of:
        0.052343246 = product of:
          0.10468649 = sum of:
            0.10468649 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10468649 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  2. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.01526678 = product of:
      0.04580034 = sum of:
        0.04580034 = product of:
          0.09160068 = sum of:
            0.09160068 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09160068 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  3. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.01526678 = product of:
      0.04580034 = sum of:
        0.04580034 = product of:
          0.09160068 = sum of:
            0.09160068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09160068 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  4. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.01
    0.013085811 = product of:
      0.039257433 = sum of:
        0.039257433 = product of:
          0.07851487 = sum of:
            0.07851487 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851487 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  5. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.01
    0.013085811 = product of:
      0.039257433 = sum of:
        0.039257433 = product of:
          0.07851487 = sum of:
            0.07851487 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851487 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  6. Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018) 0.01
    0.008838471 = product of:
      0.026515411 = sum of:
        0.026515411 = product of:
          0.053030822 = sum of:
            0.053030822 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053030822 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discovery-Systeme bieten meist als Standardeinstellung eine Sortierung nach Relevanz an. Wie die Relevanz ermittelt wird, ist häufig intransparent. Dabei wären Kenntnisse darüber aus Nutzersicht ein wichtiger Faktor in der Informationskompetenz, während Bibliotheken sicherstellen sollten, dass das Ranking zum eigenen Bestand und Publikum passt. In diesem Aufsatz wird dargestellt, wie Discovery-Systeme Treffer auswählen und bewerten. Dazu gehören Indexierung, Prozessierung, Text-Matching und weitere Relevanzkriterien, z. B. Popularität oder Verfügbarkeit. Schließlich müssen alle betrachteten Kriterien zu einem zentralen Score zusammengefasst werden. Ein besonderer Fokus wird auf das Ranking von EBSCO Discovery Service, Primo und Summon gelegt.
  7. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.008723875 = product of:
      0.026171623 = sum of:
        0.026171623 = product of:
          0.052343246 = sum of:
            0.052343246 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052343246 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  8. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.008723875 = product of:
      0.026171623 = sum of:
        0.026171623 = product of:
          0.052343246 = sum of:
            0.052343246 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052343246 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  9. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.008723875 = product of:
      0.026171623 = sum of:
        0.026171623 = product of:
          0.052343246 = sum of:
            0.052343246 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052343246 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  10. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.008723875 = product of:
      0.026171623 = sum of:
        0.026171623 = product of:
          0.052343246 = sum of:
            0.052343246 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052343246 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  11. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.008723875 = product of:
      0.026171623 = sum of:
        0.026171623 = product of:
          0.052343246 = sum of:
            0.052343246 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052343246 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  12. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01
    0.0077108885 = product of:
      0.023132665 = sum of:
        0.023132665 = product of:
          0.04626533 = sum of:
            0.04626533 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04626533 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  13. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.00763339 = product of:
      0.02290017 = sum of:
        0.02290017 = product of:
          0.04580034 = sum of:
            0.04580034 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04580034 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  14. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01
    0.00763339 = product of:
      0.02290017 = sum of:
        0.02290017 = product of:
          0.04580034 = sum of:
            0.04580034 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04580034 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  15. Wilhelmy, A.: Phonetische Ähnlichkeitssuche in Datenbanken (1991) 0.01
    0.007575832 = product of:
      0.022727495 = sum of:
        0.022727495 = product of:
          0.04545499 = sum of:
            0.04545499 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04545499 = score(doc=5684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 5684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheken mit und ohne Grenzen: Informationsgesellschaft und Bibliothek. Der österreichische Bibliothekartag 1990, Bregenz, 4.-8.9.1990, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen
  16. Mutschke, P.: Autorennetzwerke : Verfahren zur Netzwerkanalyse als Mehrwertdienste für Informationssysteme (2004) 0.01
    0.007575832 = product of:
      0.022727495 = sum of:
        0.022727495 = product of:
          0.04545499 = sum of:
            0.04545499 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04545499 = score(doc=4050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Virtuelle Bibliotheken enthalten eine Fülle an Informationen, die in ihrer Vielfalt und Tiefe von Standardsuchmaschinen nicht erschöpfend erfasst wird. Der Arbeitsbericht informiert über Entwicklungen am IZ, die darauf abzielen, Wissen über das Interaktionsgeschehen in wissenschaftlichen Communities und den sozialen Status ihrer Akteure für das Retrieval auszunutzen. Grundlage hierfür sind soziale Netzwerke, die sich durch Kooperation der wissenschaftlichen Akteure konstituieren und in den Dokumenten der Datenbasis z.B. als Koautorbeziehungen repräsentiert sind (Autorennetzwerke). Die in dem Bericht beschriebenen Studien zur Small-World-Topologie von Autorennetzwerken zeigen, dass diese Netzwerke ein erhebliches Potential für Informationssysteme haben. Der Bericht diskutiert Szenarios, die beschreiben, wie Autorennetzwerke und hier insbesondere das Konzept der Akteurszentralität für die Informationssuche in Datenbanken sinnvoll genutzt werden können. Kernansatz dieser Retrievalmodelle ist die Suche nach Experten und das Ranking von Dokumenten auf der Basis der Zentralität von Autoren in Autorennetzwerken.
  17. Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing mit Katalogdaten : Alternative Sicht auf Suchergebnisse und Publikationsquellen durch Re-Ranking (2010) 0.01
    0.007575832 = product of:
      0.022727495 = sum of:
        0.022727495 = product of:
          0.04545499 = sum of:
            0.04545499 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04545499 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Nutzer erwarten für Literaturrecherchen in wissenschaftlichen Suchsystemen einen möglichst hohen Anteil an relevanten und qualitativen Dokumenten in den Trefferergebnissen. Insbesondere die Reihenfolge und Struktur der gelisteten Ergebnisse (Ranking) spielt, neben dem direkten Volltextzugriff auf die Dokumente, für viele Nutzer inzwischen eine entscheidende Rolle. Abgegrenzt wird Ranking oder Relevance Ranking von sogenannten Sortierungen zum Beispiel nach dem Erscheinungsjahr der Publikation, obwohl hier die Grenze zu »nach inhaltlicher Relevanz« gerankten Listen konzeptuell nicht sauber zu ziehen ist. Das Ranking von Dokumenten führt letztlich dazu, dass sich die Benutzer fokussiert mit den oberen Treffermengen eines Suchergebnisses beschäftigen. Der mittlere und untere Bereich eines Suchergebnisses wird häufig nicht mehr in Betracht gezogen. Aufgrund der Vielzahl an relevanten und verfügbaren Informationsquellen ist es daher notwendig, Kernbereiche in den Suchräumen zu identifizieren und diese anschließend dem Nutzer hervorgehoben zu präsentieren. Phillipp Mayr fasst hier die Ergebnisse seiner Dissertation zum Thema »Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing für die verteilte Suche in Digitalen Bibliotheken« zusammen.
  18. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01
    0.0065429057 = product of:
      0.019628717 = sum of:
        0.019628717 = product of:
          0.039257433 = sum of:
            0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039257433 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  19. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.01
    0.0065429057 = product of:
      0.019628717 = sum of:
        0.019628717 = product of:
          0.039257433 = sum of:
            0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039257433 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  20. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01
    0.0065429057 = product of:
      0.019628717 = sum of:
        0.019628717 = product of:
          0.039257433 = sum of:
            0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039257433 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04829205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36

Years

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 9
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 30
  • m 2
  • r 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…