Search (1369 results, page 1 of 69)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (2001) 0.11 
    0.11216178 = product of:
  0.22432356 = sum of:
    0.22432356 = product of:
      0.4486471 = sum of:
        0.4486471 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4486471 = score(doc=316,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.4830972 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    LCSH
    Abstracting
    RSWK
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Subject
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Abstracting
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10051675 = sum of:
  0.08003477 = product of:
    0.2401043 = sum of:
      0.2401043 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2401043 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020481981 = product of:
    0.040963963 = sum of:
      0.040963963 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040963963 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1764618 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Moens, M.F.: Automatic indexing and abstracting of document texts (2000) 0.10 
    0.10032054 = product of:
  0.20064108 = sum of:
    0.20064108 = product of:
      0.40128216 = sum of:
        0.40128216 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 6892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40128216 = score(doc=6892,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.3265224 = fieldWeight in 6892, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Need for indexing and abstracting texts; attributes of texts; text representations and their use; selection of natural language index terms; assignment of controlled language index texts; automatic abstracting; applications
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  4. Craven, T.C.: Presentation of repeated phrases in a computer-assisted abstracting tool kit (2001) 0.10 
    0.099312276 = product of:
  0.19862455 = sum of:
    0.19862455 = product of:
      0.3972491 = sum of:
        0.3972491 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3972491 = score(doc=3667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.3131902 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  5. Pinto, M.: Engineering the production of meta-information : the abstracting concern (2003) 0.10 
    0.099312276 = product of:
  0.19862455 = sum of:
    0.19862455 = product of:
      0.3972491 = sum of:
        0.3972491 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3972491 = score(doc=4667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.3131902 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  6. Yusuff, A.: Automatisches Indexing and Abstracting : Grundlagen und Beispiele (2002) 0.10 
    0.099312276 = product of:
  0.19862455 = sum of:
    0.19862455 = product of:
      0.3972491 = sum of:
        0.3972491 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3972491 = score(doc=1577,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.3131902 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  7. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.09 
    0.09028848 = product of:
  0.18057697 = sum of:
    0.18057697 = product of:
      0.36115393 = sum of:
        0.36115393 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36115393 = score(doc=4913,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.1938701 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
    LCSH
    Abstracting
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Abstracting
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
  8. Katzmayr, M.; Putz, M.; Fessler, G.: Evaluationsmethoden zur Bewertung von Aggregatordatenbanken am Beispiel von ProQuest ABI/Inform und EBSCO Business Source Premier (2005) 0.08 
    0.080674306 = product of:
  0.16134861 = sum of:
    0.16134861 = sum of:
      0.120384656 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.120384656 = score(doc=3420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 3420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3420)
      0.040963963 = weight(_text_:22 in 3420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040963963 = score(doc=3420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1764618 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3420)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An der Universitätsbibliothek der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien wurden im Rahmen einer Lizenzierungsentscheidung die Datenbanken ABI/Inform Proquest und EBSCO Business Source Premier verglichen. Neben den Ergebnissen wird ein Konzept vorgestellt, wie in der Praxis ein Vergleich zwischen Aggregatordatenbanken bezogen auf den eigenen Bibliotheksbestand durchgeführt werden kann. Ausgehend von einer Beschreibung der Besonderheiten von Aggregatordatenbanken (z.B. Embargos) werden sowohl quantitative (Vergleich der Titellisten, Volltextverfügbarkeit) als auch qualitative (peer-reviewed, Rankings, Indexierung und Abstracting) inhaltliche Kriterien für die Evaluation angeführt. Neben der inhaltlichen Bewertung wurden die Usability der Datenbankoberfläche (v a. Suchmöglichkeiten), das Nutzungsverhalten sowie die Bedürfnisse der Benutzer untersucht. Vor allem bei quantitativen Kriterien schneidet EBSCO Business Source Premier besser ab als ABI/Inform Pro0uest jedoch kann - die budgetären Möglichkeiten vorausgesetzt - aufgrund der mitunter geringen inhaltlichen Überschneidung für eine Lizenzierung beider Datenbanken argumentiert werden.
    Date
    22. 5.2005 12:27:18
  9. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.08 
    0.080674306 = product of:
  0.16134861 = sum of:
    0.16134861 = sum of:
      0.120384656 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.120384656 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
      0.040963963 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040963963 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1764618 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  10. Rabe, D.: Are abstracting and indexing databases still relevant? (2002) 0.08 
    0.08025643 = product of:
  0.16051286 = sum of:
    0.16051286 = product of:
      0.32102573 = sum of:
        0.32102573 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32102573 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.0612179 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Parekh, R.L.: Advanced indexing and abstracting practices (2000) 0.08 
    0.07962697 = product of:
  0.15925394 = sum of:
    0.15925394 = product of:
      0.31850788 = sum of:
        0.31850788 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31850788 = score(doc=119,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.0528946 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Indexing and abstracting are not activities that should be looked upon as ends in themselves. It is the results of these activities that should be evaluated and this can only be done within the context of a particular database, whether in printed or machine-readable form. In this context, the indexing can be judged successful if it allows searchers to locate items they want without having to look at many they do not want. This book intended primarily as a text to be used in teaching indexing and abstracting of Library and information science. It is an immense value to all individuals and institutions involved in information retrieval and related activities, including librarians, managers of information centres and database producers.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Indexing and Abstracting 2. Automatic Indexing and Automatic Abstracting 3. Principles of Indexing 4.Periodicals Listing and Accessioning 5. Online Computer Service 6. Dialog, Searching and Bibliographic Display 7. Books 8. Bibliographic Control 9. Abstracting Functions 10. Acquisition System 11. Future of Indexing and Abstracting Services
  12. Pinto, M.: Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments : research trends (2003) 0.07 
    0.07372025 = product of:
  0.1474405 = sum of:
    0.1474405 = product of:
      0.294881 = sum of:
        0.294881 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.294881 = score(doc=4446,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.97479093 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The technological revolution is affecting the structure, form and content of documents, reducing the effectiveness of traditional abstracts that, to some extent, are inadequate to the new documentary conditions. Aims to show the directions in which abstracting/abstracts can evolve to achieve the necessary adequacy in the new digital environments. Three researching trends are proposed: theoretical, methodological and pragmatic. Theoretically, there are some needs for expanding the document concept, reengineering abstracting and designing interdisciplinary models. Methodologically, the trend is toward the structuring, automating and qualifying of the abstracts. Pragmatically, abstracts networking, combined with alternative and complementary models, open a new and promising horizon. Automating, structuring and qualifying abstracting/abstract offer some short-term prospects for progress. Concludes that reengineering, networking and visualising would be middle-term fruitful areas of research toward the full adequacy of abstracting in the new electronic age.
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  13. Hahn, U.: ¬Die Verdichtung textuellen Wissens zu Information : vom Wandel methodischer Paradigmen beim automatischen Abstracting (2004) 0.07 
    0.070937335 = product of:
  0.14187467 = sum of:
    0.14187467 = product of:
      0.28374934 = sum of:
        0.28374934 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28374934 = score(doc=4667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.937993 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  14. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: SimSum : an empirically founded simulation of summarizing (2000) 0.07 
    0.07022438 = product of:
  0.14044876 = sum of:
    0.14044876 = product of:
      0.28089753 = sum of:
        0.28089753 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28089753 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.9285657 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  15. Mani, T.: Automatic summarization (2001) 0.07 
    0.07022438 = product of:
  0.14044876 = sum of:
    0.14044876 = product of:
      0.28089753 = sum of:
        0.28089753 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28089753 = score(doc=4076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.9285657 = fieldWeight in 4076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  16. Fourie, I.: How can we take a socio-cognitive approach in teaching indexing and abstracting? (2002) 0.07 
    0.07022438 = product of:
  0.14044876 = sum of:
    0.14044876 = product of:
      0.28089753 = sum of:
        0.28089753 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28089753 = score(doc=881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.9285657 = fieldWeight in 881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=881)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.07 
    0.067228585 = product of:
  0.13445717 = sum of:
    0.13445717 = sum of:
      0.10032054 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10032054 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.3316306 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
      0.034136638 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034136638 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1764618 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050391316 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  18. Koltay, T.: Abstracting: information literacy on a professional level (2009) 0.06 
    0.0608161 = product of:
  0.1216322 = sum of:
    0.1216322 = product of:
      0.2432644 = sum of:
        0.2432644 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2432644 = score(doc=3610,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.80416155 = fieldWeight in 3610, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to argue for a conception of information literacy (IL) that goes beyond the abilities of finding information as it includes communication skills. An important issue in this is that abstractors exercise IL on a professional level. Design/methodology/approach - By stressing the importance of the fact that information literacy extends towards verbal communication the paper takes an interdisciplinary approach, the main component of which is linguistics. Findings - It is found that verbal communication and especially analytic-synthetic writing activities play an important role in information literacy at the level of everyday language use, semi-professional and professional summarising of information. The latter level characterises abstracting. Originality/value - The paper adds to the body of knowledge about information literacy in general and in connection with communication and abstracting.
  19. Haag, M.: Automatic text summarization (2002) 0.06 
    0.060192328 = product of:
  0.120384656 = sum of:
    0.120384656 = product of:
      0.24076931 = sum of:
        0.24076931 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 5662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24076931 = score(doc=5662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.79591346 = fieldWeight in 5662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  20. Lancaster, F.W.: Do indexing and abstracting have a future? (2003) 0.06 
    0.060192328 = product of:
  0.120384656 = sum of:
    0.120384656 = product of:
      0.24076931 = sum of:
        0.24076931 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24076931 = score(doc=3761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.79591346 = fieldWeight in 3761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1149
  • m 153
  • el 64
  • s 52
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications