Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.07
    0.06778233 = product of:
      0.13556466 = sum of:
        0.13556466 = sum of:
          0.093502276 = weight(_text_:software in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093502276 = score(doc=4820,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042062387 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  2. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.06
    0.056026805 = product of:
      0.11205361 = sum of:
        0.11205361 = sum of:
          0.06298082 = weight(_text_:software in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06298082 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.049072787 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049072787 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  3. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.06
    0.056026805 = product of:
      0.11205361 = sum of:
        0.11205361 = sum of:
          0.06298082 = weight(_text_:software in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06298082 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.049072787 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049072787 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04
    0.04109043 = product of:
      0.08218086 = sum of:
        0.08218086 = product of:
          0.24654256 = sum of:
            0.24654256 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24654256 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43867373 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  5. Marcondes, C.H.; Costa, L.C da.: ¬A model to represent and process scientific knowledge in biomedical articles with semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.04
    0.040019147 = product of:
      0.080038294 = sum of:
        0.080038294 = sum of:
          0.044986304 = weight(_text_:software in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044986304 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
          0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03505199 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051742528 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization faces the challenge of managing the amount of knowledge available on the Web. Published literature in biomedical sciences is a huge source of knowledge, which can only efficiently be managed through automatic methods. The conventional channel for reporting scientific results is Web electronic publishing. Despite its advances, scientific articles are still published in print formats such as portable document format (PDF). Semantic Web and Linked Data technologies provides new opportunities for communicating, sharing, and integrating scientific knowledge that can overcome the limitations of the current print format. Here is proposed a semantic model of scholarly electronic articles in biomedical sciences that can overcome the limitations of traditional flat records formats. Scientific knowledge consists of claims made throughout article texts, especially when semantic elements such as questions, hypotheses and conclusions are stated. These elements, although having different roles, express relationships between phenomena. Once such knowledge units are extracted and represented with technologies such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) and linked data, they may be integrated in reasoning chains. Thereby, the results of scientific research can be published and shared in structured formats, enabling crawling by software agents, semantic retrieval, knowledge reuse, validation of scientific results, and identification of traces of scientific discoveries.
    Date
    12. 3.2016 13:17:22
  6. Innovations and advanced techniques in systems, computing sciences and software engineering (2008) 0.04
    0.038959283 = product of:
      0.07791857 = sum of:
        0.07791857 = product of:
          0.15583713 = sum of:
            0.15583713 = weight(_text_:software in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15583713 = score(doc=4319,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering includes a set of rigorously reviewed world-class manuscripts addressing and detailing state-of-the-art research projects in the areas of Computer Science, Software Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Systems Engineering and Sciences. Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering includes selected papers form the conference proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering (SCSS 2007) which was part of the International Joint Conferences on Computer, Information and Systems Sciences and Engineering (CISSE 2007).
    Content
    Inhalt: Image and Pattern Recognition: Compression, Image processing, Signal Processing Architectures, Signal Processing for Communication, Signal Processing Implementation, Speech Compression, and Video Coding Architectures. Languages and Systems: Algorithms, Databases, Embedded Systems and Applications, File Systems and I/O, Geographical Information Systems, Kernel and OS Structures, Knowledge Based Systems, Modeling and Simulation, Object Based Software Engineering, Programming Languages, and Programming Models and tools. Parallel Processing: Distributed Scheduling, Multiprocessing, Real-time Systems, Simulation Modeling and Development, and Web Applications. New trends in computing: Computers for People of Special Needs, Fuzzy Inference, Human Computer Interaction, Incremental Learning, Internet-based Computing Models, Machine Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Neural Networks, and Online Decision Support System
    LCSH
    Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
    Software engineering
    RSWK
    Computerarchitektur / Software Engineering / Telekommunikation / Online-Publikation
    Subject
    Computerarchitektur / Software Engineering / Telekommunikation / Online-Publikation
    Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
    Software engineering
  7. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03
    0.027393617 = product of:
      0.054787233 = sum of:
        0.054787233 = product of:
          0.1643617 = sum of:
            0.1643617 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1643617 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43867373 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.027393617 = product of:
      0.054787233 = sum of:
        0.054787233 = product of:
          0.1643617 = sum of:
            0.1643617 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1643617 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43867373 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  9. Reimer, U.: Einführung in die Wissensrepräsentation : netzartige und schema-basierte Repräsentationsformate (1991) 0.02
    0.022267086 = product of:
      0.044534173 = sum of:
        0.044534173 = product of:
          0.089068346 = sum of:
            0.089068346 = weight(_text_:software in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089068346 = score(doc=1566,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 285 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), Groupware
    RVK
    ST 285 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), Groupware
  10. Information and communication technologies : international conference; proceedings / ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7 - 9, 2010 (2010) 0.02
    0.022267086 = product of:
      0.044534173 = sum of:
        0.044534173 = product of:
          0.089068346 = sum of:
            0.089068346 = weight(_text_:software in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089068346 = score(doc=4784,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Computer software
    Subject
    Computer software
  11. Fagundes, P.B.; Freund, G.P.; Vital, L.P.; Monteiro de Barros, C.; Macedo, D.D.J.de: Taxonomias, ontologias e tesauros : possibilidades de contribuição para o processo de Engenharia de Requisitos (2020) 0.02
    0.019479642 = product of:
      0.038959283 = sum of:
        0.038959283 = product of:
          0.07791857 = sum of:
            0.07791857 = weight(_text_:software in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07791857 = score(doc=5828,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.37958977 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Some of the fundamental activities of the software development process are related to the discipline of Requirements Engineering, whose objective is the discovery, analysis, documentation and verification of the requirements that will be part of the system. Requirements are the conditions or capabilities that software must have or perform to meet the users needs. The present study is being developed to propose a model of cooperation between Information Science and Requirements Engineering. Aims to present the analysis results on the possibilities of using the knowledge organization systems: taxonomies, thesauri and ontologies during the activities of Requirements Engineering: design, survey, elaboration, negotiation, specification, validation and requirements management. From the results obtained it was possible to identify in which stage of the Requirements Engineering process, each type of knowledge organization system could be used. We expect that this study put in evidence the need for new researchs and proposals to strengt the exchange between Information Science, as a science that has information as object of study, and the Requirements Engineering which has in the information the raw material to identify the informational needs of software users.
  12. Beßler, S.: Wissensrepräsentation musealer Bestände mittels semantischer Netze : Analyse und Annotation eines Teilbestands des Haus der Geschichte der BRD in Bonn (2010) 0.02
    0.019086074 = product of:
      0.03817215 = sum of:
        0.03817215 = product of:
          0.0763443 = sum of:
            0.0763443 = weight(_text_:software in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763443 = score(doc=4024,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Semantische Netze unterstützen den Suchvorgang im Information Retrieval. Über ihre vielfältigen Relationen und Inferenzen unterstützen sie den Anwender und helfen Daten im Kontext zu präsentieren und zu erfassen. Die Relationen ermöglichen Suchanfragen die große Treffermengen produzieren zu verfeinern und so Treffermengen zu erreichen die möglichst genau das enthalten was gesucht wurde. Es wird, anhand eines Ausschnitts des Datenbestands des Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in Bonn, aufgezeigt wie bestehende Datenbestände in semantische Netze überführt werden können und wie diese anschließend für das Retrieval eingesetzt werden können. Für die Modellierung des semantischen Netz wird die Open Source Software Protégé in den Versionen 3.4.4. und 4.1_beta eingesetzt, die Möglichkeiten des Retrieval werden anhand der Abfragesprachen DL Query und SPARQL sowie anhand der Software Ontology Browser und OntoGraf erläutert.
  13. Schreiber, G.; Amin, A.; Assem, M. van; Boer, V. de; Hardman, L.; Hildebrand, M.; Omelayenko, B.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.; Tordai, A.; Aroyoa, L.: Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections : the MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator (2008) 0.02
    0.019086074 = product of:
      0.03817215 = sum of:
        0.03817215 = product of:
          0.0763443 = sum of:
            0.0763443 = weight(_text_:software in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763443 = score(doc=4646,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we describe a SemanticWeb application for semantic annotation and search in large virtual collections of cultural-heritage objects, indexed with multiple vocabularies. During the annotation phase we harvest, enrich and align collection metadata and vocabularies. The semantic-search facilities support keyword-based queries of the graph (currently 20M triples), resulting in semantically grouped result clusters, all representing potential semantic matches of the original query. We show two sample search scenario's. The annotation and search software is open source and is already being used by third parties. All software is based on establishedWeb standards, in particular HTML/XML, CSS, RDF/OWL, SPARQL and JavaScript.
  14. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.02
    0.019086074 = product of:
      0.03817215 = sum of:
        0.03817215 = product of:
          0.0763443 = sum of:
            0.0763443 = weight(_text_:software in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763443 = score(doc=439,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Software engineering
    Subject
    Software engineering
  15. Helbig, H.: ¬Die semantische Struktur natürlicher Sprache : Wissensrepräsentation mit MultiNet (2001) 0.02
    0.017994521 = product of:
      0.035989042 = sum of:
        0.035989042 = product of:
          0.071978085 = sum of:
            0.071978085 = weight(_text_:software in 7072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071978085 = score(doc=7072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 7072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Methodik der 'Mehrschichtigen Erweiterung Semantischer Netze' (MultiNet) ist sowohl für theoretische Untersuchungen als auch für die automatische Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache auf dem Rechner geeignet. Die vorgestellten Ergebnisse sind eingebettet in ein System von Software-Werkzeugen, die eine praktische Nutzung der MultiNet-Darstellungsmittel als Formalismus zur Bedeutungsrepräsentation sichern
  16. Reif, G.: Semantische Annotation (2006) 0.02
    0.017994521 = product of:
      0.035989042 = sum of:
        0.035989042 = product of:
          0.071978085 = sum of:
            0.071978085 = weight(_text_:software in 5807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071978085 = score(doc=5807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 5807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Kapitel wird zuerst der Begriff Semantische Annotation eingeführt und es werden Techniken besprochen um die Annotationen mit dem ursprünglichen Dokument zu verknüpfen. Weiters wird auf Probleme eingegangen, die sich beim Erstellen der Annotationen ergeben. Im Anschluss daran werden Software Tools vorgestellt, die einen Benutzer beim Annotierungsprozess unterstützen. Zum Abschluss werden Methoden diskutiert, die den Annotierungsvorgang in den Entwicklungsprozess einer Web Applikation integrieren.
  17. Resource Description Framework (RDF) (2004) 0.02
    0.017994521 = product of:
      0.035989042 = sum of:
        0.035989042 = product of:
          0.071978085 = sum of:
            0.071978085 = weight(_text_:software in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071978085 = score(doc=3063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Resource Description Framework (RDF) integrates a variety of applications from library catalogs and world-wide directories to syndication and aggregation of news, software, and content to personal collections of music, photos, and events using XML as an interchange syntax. The RDF specifications provide a lightweight ontology system to support the exchange of knowledge on the Web. The W3C Semantic Web Activity Statement explains W3C's plans for RDF, including the RDF Core WG, Web Ontology and the RDF Interest Group.
  18. OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2004) 0.02
    0.017994521 = product of:
      0.035989042 = sum of:
        0.035989042 = product of:
          0.071978085 = sum of:
            0.071978085 = weight(_text_:software in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071978085 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.
  19. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02
    0.017525995 = product of:
      0.03505199 = sum of:
        0.03505199 = product of:
          0.07010398 = sum of:
            0.07010398 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010398 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  20. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.017525995 = product of:
      0.03505199 = sum of:
        0.03505199 = product of:
          0.07010398 = sum of:
            0.07010398 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010398 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051742528 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 75
  • d 22
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 66
  • el 22
  • m 12
  • x 8
  • s 4
  • n 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects