Search (227 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Kozma, R.B.: Learning with media (1991) 0.12
    0.11946598 = product of:
      0.17919897 = sum of:
        0.081401736 = weight(_text_:based in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081401736 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.5326271 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.09779723 = product of:
          0.19559446 = sum of:
            0.19559446 = weight(_text_:training in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19559446 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.8256285 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  2. Hammond, N.: Tailoring hypertext for the learner (1991) 0.10
    0.10453274 = product of:
      0.15679911 = sum of:
        0.07122652 = weight(_text_:based in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07122652 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.46604872 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
        0.08557258 = product of:
          0.17114516 = sum of:
            0.17114516 = weight(_text_:training in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17114516 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.722425 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  3. Duffy, T.M.; Knuth, R.A.: Hypermedia and instruction : where is the match? (1990) 0.09
    0.08959949 = product of:
      0.13439924 = sum of:
        0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0610513 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.073347926 = product of:
          0.14669585 = sum of:
            0.14669585 = weight(_text_:training in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14669585 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.6192214 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  4. Leggett, J.J.; Schnase, J.L.; Kacmar, C.J.: Hypertext for learning (1990) 0.09
    0.08959949 = product of:
      0.13439924 = sum of:
        0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0610513 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
        0.073347926 = product of:
          0.14669585 = sum of:
            0.14669585 = weight(_text_:training in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14669585 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.6192214 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  5. Jonassen, D.H.; Grabinger, R.S.: Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning (1990) 0.09
    0.08959949 = product of:
      0.13439924 = sum of:
        0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0610513 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
        0.073347926 = product of:
          0.14669585 = sum of:
            0.14669585 = weight(_text_:training in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14669585 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.6192214 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  6. Thissen, F.: Merkmale effektiven Lernens : Virtuelle Lehrveranstaltungen - neue Formen des Lehrens und Lernens (2001) 0.09
    0.08959949 = product of:
      0.13439924 = sum of:
        0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 5847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0610513 = score(doc=5847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 5847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5847)
        0.073347926 = product of:
          0.14669585 = sum of:
            0.14669585 = weight(_text_:training in 5847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14669585 = score(doc=5847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.6192214 = fieldWeight in 5847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  7. Bussmann, I.: ¬Die Bibliothek als Atelier des innvoativen Lernens (2001) 0.09
    0.08959949 = product of:
      0.13439924 = sum of:
        0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0610513 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
        0.073347926 = product of:
          0.14669585 = sum of:
            0.14669585 = weight(_text_:training in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14669585 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.6192214 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  8. Thissen, F.: ¬Das Lernen neu erfinden : konstruktivistische Grundlagen einer Multimedia-Didaktik (1999) 0.07
    0.07466623 = product of:
      0.11199935 = sum of:
        0.050876085 = weight(_text_:based in 6361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050876085 = score(doc=6361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.33289194 = fieldWeight in 6361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6361)
        0.061123267 = product of:
          0.12224653 = sum of:
            0.12224653 = weight(_text_:training in 6361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12224653 = score(doc=6361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.5160178 = fieldWeight in 6361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  9. Fujiwara, Y.; Gotoda, H.: Representation model for relativity of concepts (1995) 0.05
    0.048992746 = product of:
      0.073489115 = sum of:
        0.052871976 = weight(_text_:based in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052871976 = score(doc=2994,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.34595144 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
        0.020617142 = product of:
          0.041234285 = sum of:
            0.041234285 = weight(_text_:22 in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041234285 = score(doc=2994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    When modelling pieces of unstructured information, such as full text forms, it is often necessary to recognize them based on a semantic principle, through which properties of information can be derived. Since there are several semantic principles that are related to each other, the resulting properties are also mutually relevant. This relevance is called 'relativity of concepts', whose modelling is indispensible to dealing exclusively with such properties of information that are invariant under the change of the underlying semantic principles. This paper uses the self-structured semantic relationship model to account for the relativity of concepts. More specifically, a set of local views rather than a single global view are introduced to the model, which greatly enhances the flexibility of the model's expressive power. Furthermore, semantic equivalence between the view-based information structures is also formalized in the proposed model. This truns out to be useful when integrating pieces of information that are structure based on different principles
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.1, S.22-30
  10. Oxbrow, N.: Information literacy : the final key to an information society (1998) 0.05
    0.045460265 = product of:
      0.068190396 = sum of:
        0.040700868 = weight(_text_:based in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040700868 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
        0.027489524 = product of:
          0.05497905 = sum of:
            0.05497905 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05497905 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The terms: information society, the information age, the knowledge based society and the knowledge driven economy are all now familiar terms. Governments have been promoting them, the media has been reporting on them and leaders use them to indicate progress and advancement. In light of all this exposure, considers just how far along the road are these societies from the industrial age towards the information age
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:55:13
  11. Crowe, M.; Beeby, R.; Gammack, J.: Constructing systems and information : a process view (1996) 0.04
    0.039777733 = product of:
      0.059666596 = sum of:
        0.03561326 = weight(_text_:based in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03561326 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
        0.024053333 = product of:
          0.048106667 = sum of:
            0.048106667 = weight(_text_:22 in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048106667 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Within dynamic organizations, information systems often fail to adapt to changing requirements and structures. The book presents a different view of IS provision, based on end-user information systems construction, as a means of avoiding many of the recognized problems. Adopting a philosophy of constructivism, emphasizing psychological and social factors in information construction, the authors examine different types of systems across natural and social sciences
    Date
    25.12.2001 13:22:30
  12. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.04
    0.035437185 = product of:
      0.053155776 = sum of:
        0.035974823 = weight(_text_:based in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035974823 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.23539014 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.017180953 = product of:
          0.034361906 = sum of:
            0.034361906 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034361906 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  13. Bruce, C.S.: ¬The relational approach : a new model for information literacy (1997) 0.03
    0.034095198 = product of:
      0.051142793 = sum of:
        0.03052565 = weight(_text_:based in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052565 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
        0.020617142 = product of:
          0.041234285 = sum of:
            0.041234285 = weight(_text_:22 in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041234285 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The dominant approaches in information literacy scholarship and research conflict with constructivist approaches to learning preferred by educators. Proposes an alternative, 'relational', model of information literacy which reveals a picture of information literacy that is constructed in terms of varying relations between people and information. These relations are captured in 7 categories, graphially conveyed through awareness structures, which together represent information literacy as it is experienced. Information literacy education may be interpreted as helping people to experience information use differently. This model demonstrates that: the meanings associated with information literacy by information professionals may not be shared by users; the experienced meaning of information literacy is fluid and contextually bound; and, understanding of information literacy and related concepts will deepen if the experience of information users is given priority in research. Proposes an agenda for information literacy research based upon the relational approach
    Source
    New review of information and library research. 3(1997), S.1-22
  14. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03
    0.031330027 = product of:
      0.09399008 = sum of:
        0.09399008 = product of:
          0.28197023 = sum of:
            0.28197023 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28197023 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43003735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  15. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.03
    0.028412666 = product of:
      0.042618997 = sum of:
        0.025438042 = weight(_text_:based in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025438042 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.16644597 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.017180953 = product of:
          0.034361906 = sum of:
            0.034361906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034361906 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This review introduces a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking to provide a theoretical basis for: - empirical studies that improve our understanding of the cognitive process and mechanisms of sensemaking and integration of results of such studies; - education in critical thinking and sensemaking skills; - the design of sensemaking assistant tools that support and guide users. The paper reviews and extends existing sensemaking models with ideas from learning and cognition. It reviews literature on sensemaking models in human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive system engineering, organizational communication, and library and information sciences (LIS), learning theories, cognitive psychology, and task-based information seeking. The model resulting from this synthesis moves to a stronger basis for explaining sensemaking behaviors and conceptual changes. The model illustrates the iterative processes of sensemaking, extends existing models that focus on activities by integrating cognitive mechanisms and the creation of instantiated structure elements of knowledge, and different types of conceptual change to show a complete picture of the cognitive processes of sensemaking. The processes and cognitive mechanisms identified provide better foundations for knowledge creation, organization, and sharing practices and a stronger basis for design of sensemaking assistant systems and tools.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  16. fwt: Wie das Gehirn Bilder 'liest' (1999) 0.03
    0.025917372 = product of:
      0.07775211 = sum of:
        0.07775211 = product of:
          0.15550423 = sum of:
            0.15550423 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15550423 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:01:22
  17. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.02
    0.022730133 = product of:
      0.034095198 = sum of:
        0.020350434 = weight(_text_:based in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020350434 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.13315678 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
        0.013744762 = product of:
          0.027489524 = sum of:
            0.027489524 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027489524 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  18. Benkowsky, J.; Bühring, B.; Georgy, U.; Linde, F.: Information pricing : the development of a product- and pricing concept for the research centre of the Public Library Cologne (2005) 0.02
    0.022730133 = product of:
      0.034095198 = sum of:
        0.020350434 = weight(_text_:based in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020350434 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.13315678 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
        0.013744762 = product of:
          0.027489524 = sum of:
            0.027489524 = weight(_text_:22 in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027489524 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The project Information Pricing was carried out during the summer semester 2004 by four students and two lecturers. Aim of the project was to develop a new product- and pricing concept for the research centre of the Public Library Cologne. The intention was to increase its competitiveness, especially in the business customer segment. The initiating factor for the project was the significant decrease in requests from 1997 to 2001. This paper describes the development of different attributes of information, analysing various pricing concepts of private and public information providers as well as the development of a pricing concept which is aligned to the requirements and performance of the research centre. The final result was an improved pricing system for an enhanced range of products. The first step was getting more familiar with the characteristics of information and the methods that can be used to measure the value of information. One of the key issues to consider is the value of information for a customer and the question how this value can be charged. In order to be capable of evaluating all issues of information pricing and to develop a solid pricing system, it was essential to analyse and assess pricing modules based on their intension of use. For example, the differentiation of the pricing concept with regard to certain user segments like business or private users as well as members and non-members. Another option is to define prices dependant on the requested response times for research tasks and thereby reflect the urgency of those tasks directly in the pricing concept. Furthermore, the qualitative and quantitative differentiation of information has to be taken into account. All described approaches - and also combinations of these - should be considered when developing a new pricing system. It is also important to recognize the special role of the research centre as a part of the public library. Libraries fulfil a public contract for their users. In this case it has to be ensured that people of all social backgrounds have the chance to gain access to all kind of information. While presenting results to the Public library Cologne some problems arose, mainly the gap between theoretical and practical feasibility. The final result was a practical pricing system, which is easy to implement for the research centre and which is described in the paper.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 9:24:59
  19. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.02
    0.022730133 = product of:
      0.034095198 = sum of:
        0.020350434 = weight(_text_:based in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020350434 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.13315678 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
        0.013744762 = product of:
          0.027489524 = sum of:
            0.027489524 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027489524 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.02
    0.022730133 = product of:
      0.034095198 = sum of:
        0.020350434 = weight(_text_:based in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020350434 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.13315678 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
        0.013744762 = product of:
          0.027489524 = sum of:
            0.027489524 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027489524 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050723847 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22

Languages

  • e 154
  • d 66
  • sp 3
  • da 1
  • de 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 189
  • m 31
  • s 8
  • el 5
  • ? 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects