Search (218 results, page 1 of 11)

0.1267128 = product of:
  0.1900692 = sum of:
    0.08633958 = weight(_text_:based in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08633958 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.56493634 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
    0.10372963 = product of:
      0.20745926 = sum of:
        0.20745926 = weight(_text_:training in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20745926 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.8757113 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Theme

Computer Based Training

0.064081475 = product of:
  0.09612221 = sum of:
    0.03561326 = weight(_text_:based in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03561326 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
    0.06050895 = product of:
      0.1210179 = sum of:
        0.1210179 = weight(_text_:training in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1210179 = score(doc=4858,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.5108316 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Illustrates how a public library reference service that aims to utilise all types of information resources, both traditional and electronic, increases the options available to users but at the same time risks the emergence of 'Chaotic' situations, arising from inadequate training of the librarian; damage to or misuse of equipment by users; breaches of copyright; or the unforeseen hidden costs involved in Internet based resources. Discusses the 2 levels of training needed by electronic reference librarians; the essential knowledge they require; the pros and cons of reference service fee charging; and the problem of finding the right balance between CD-ROM and Internet resources

0.05637486 = product of:
  0.16912457 = sum of:
    0.16912457 = sum of:
      0.1210179 = weight(_text_:training in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1210179 = score(doc=3587,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050723847 = queryNorm
          0.5108316 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
      0.048106667 = weight(_text_:22 in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048106667 = score(doc=3587,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050723847 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Contribution to an issue devoted on the weeding and maintenance of reference collections. CD-ROM has become part of the library universe and increasing numbers of libraries are considering the acquisition of reference tools in the new format. Issues of evaluation and selection, hardware purchase, and budget are primary concerns in this decision. Many aspects of day-to-day maintenance and access to CD-ROM sources must also be considered in the evaluation process. These issue-space, security, the care and feeding of hardware and software, reference assistance, staffing and staff training, and user instruction are vital to the success of CD-ROM in the library. Focuses particularly on literature about training for staff and users.

Date

14. 1.1996 4:22:54

0.053229168 = product of:
  0.07984375 = sum of:
    0.04316979 = weight(_text_:based in 1610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04316979 = score(doc=1610,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.28246817 = fieldWeight in 1610, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1610)
    0.036673963 = product of:
      0.073347926 = sum of:
        0.073347926 = weight(_text_:training in 1610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073347926 = score(doc=1610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.3096107 = fieldWeight in 1610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, includes biographies of notable people. However, because it is jointly written by many contributors, it is subject to constant manipulation by contributors attempting to add biographies of non-notable people. Over time, Wikipedia has developed inclusion criteria for notable people (e.g., receiving a significant award) based on which newly contributed biographies are evaluated. In this paper we present and analyze a set of simple indicators that can be used to predict which article will eventually be accepted. These indicators do not refer to the content itself, but to meta-content features (such as the number of categories that the biography is associated with) and to author-based features (such as if it is a first-time author). By training a classifier on these features, we successfully reached a high predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve [AUC] of 0.97) even though we overlooked the actual biography text.

0.05226637 = product of:
  0.078399554 = sum of:
    0.03561326 = weight(_text_:based in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03561326 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
    0.04278629 = product of:
      0.08557258 = sum of:
        0.08557258 = weight(_text_:training in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08557258 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.3612125 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Theme

Computer Based Training

0.04961206 = product of:
  0.07441809 = sum of:
    0.050364755 = weight(_text_:based in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050364755 = score(doc=631,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.3295462 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
    0.024053333 = product of:
      0.048106667 = sum of:
        0.048106667 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048106667 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways

Date

22. 6.2002 19:37:55

0.045460265 = product of:
  0.068190396 = sum of:
    0.040700868 = weight(_text_:based in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040700868 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
    0.027489524 = product of:
      0.05497905 = sum of:
        0.05497905 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05497905 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:36:13

0.040827293 = product of:
  0.061240938 = sum of:
    0.044059984 = weight(_text_:based in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044059984 = score(doc=2352,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.28829288 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
    0.017180953 = product of:
      0.034361906 = sum of:
        0.034361906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034361906 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.

0.040307738 = product of:
  0.060461607 = sum of:
    0.012719021 = weight(_text_:based in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012719021 = score(doc=1219,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.083222985 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
    0.047742587 = sum of:
      0.030561633 = weight(_text_:training in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030561633 = score(doc=1219,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050723847 = queryNorm
          0.12900445 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
      0.017180953 = weight(_text_:22 in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017180953 = score(doc=1219,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050723847 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Ähnlich spektakulär und informativ präsentieren sich auch die Astronomen: Ihr schier unerschöpflicher Fundus von Bildern und Filmen macht das "elektronische Universum" auf http://zebu.uoregon.edu ebenso einen Klick wert wie die Geschichte von "Geburt und Tod der Sterne" auf demselben Server (http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~js/astl22). Schnell gerät der Wissensdurstige auf reizvolle Seitenpfade, denn viele Vorlesungen glänzen mit sorgfältig zusammengestellten Linklisten. Die führen zum Beispiel zu den "Chemischen Briefen" Justus von Liebigs, wie sie im 19. Jahrhundert zunächst als Wissenschaftskolumne in der Augsburger Allgemeinen Zeitung erschienen (www.liebig-museum.de/chbriefe/homepage.htm). Selbst die Alchemie - neunzig ansprechend präsentierte Megabyte auf www.alchemywebsite. com - verleitet zum Verweilen. Historisches ist, weil nicht stets aktualisierungsbedürftig, ohnehin beliebt im Netz. So wartet etwa die Universität Groningen (Niederlande) mit einem voluminösen Hypertext auf, praktisch ein komplettes Lehrbuch der amerikanischen Geschichte mit Texten, Essays und Präsidentenbiografien (http://odur.let.rug.nl/usanew). Noch weiter zurück in die Vergangenheit reicht eine Anthropologen-Website über den Ursprung des Menschen (www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/5579/TA.html). Verspieltere Naturen werden dort zuerst fossile Schädel zuzuordnen versuchen ("Name That Skull") oder einem Anthropologiestudenten beim Wurf des Atlatl zusehen. Dieser frühe Wurfspeer machte schon den Mammuts zu schaffen und drang noch vor wenigen hundert Jahren durch die eiserne Rüstung spanischer Konquistadoren. Selbst Angewandtes bietet die World Lecture Hall. Etwa die "Geschichte der ökonomischen Denkweise" einschließlich eines 22-Minuten-"Interviews" mit Karl Marx auf www.boisestate.edu/econ/lreynol/web/het.htm. Oder Online-Sprachkurse: Wollof und Xhosa, Suaheli und Sanskrit lehrt http://www.word2word.vorn/courscad.html. Surfen allein fördert die akademische Karriere allerdings nicht unbedingt. Wer of fizielle Online-Zertifikate in Deutschland anstrebt, findet in dem Beitrag "Virtuelle Universität im Selbstversuch" (Spektrum der Wissenschaft 11/ 2001, S. 109) gute Startpunkte für das Studieren im Netz, angefangen bei - na wo wohl? - www.studieren-irre-netz.de."

Theme

Computer Based Training

0.039777733 = product of:
  0.059666596 = sum of:
    0.03561326 = weight(_text_:based in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03561326 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
    0.024053333 = product of:
      0.048106667 = sum of:
        0.048106667 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048106667 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

NOVAGate is a subject-based information gateway covering electronic resources in the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service, which opened in July 1998, is produced by the veterinary and agricultural libraries of the 5 Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - which serve the NOVA University. The gateway covers Nordic and European resources as well as the resources of international organizations, but being planned is a network of subject gateways which will give access to a wide range of international quality resources within the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service uses the ROADS software

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:00

0.034095198 = product of:
  0.051142793 = sum of:
    0.03052565 = weight(_text_:based in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03052565 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
    0.020617142 = product of:
      0.041234285 = sum of:
        0.041234285 = weight(_text_:22 in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234285 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Reviews the current market for CD-ROM databases with particular reference to the online versus CD-ROM versus print debate. Concludes that the most likely scenario is a steady convergence of technologies, at least until the end of the century. Review the current and the most likely future developments in the area of CD-ROM database contents, software, hardware, and marketing. Concludes that users will choose databases on the basis of such factors as: ease of use; power of use; storage and delivery capacity; quality; functionaliy; timeliness; overall appeal; and real cost, not just price. Lists the most likely candidates for successful CD-ROM database development; not yet available. Concludes that Windows user faces will steadily replace DOS based systems, but not unless the Windows replacements are truly better and not just different. Recommends that both Windows and DOS interfaces be loaded onto the same CD-ROM with each database allowing the user to choose which to use. Reviews likely developments in CD-ROM hardware and marketing strategies

Date

22. 2.1996 9:35:26

0.034095198 = product of:
  0.051142793 = sum of:
    0.03052565 = weight(_text_:based in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03052565 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
    0.020617142 = product of:
      0.041234285 = sum of:
        0.041234285 = weight(_text_:22 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234285 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Describes a WWW based system which allows users to view, search and post geographically indexed information of the Earth. 2 geographic browsers have been developed: a 2D map browser capable of continuous scroll and zoom of an arbitrarily large sheet and a 3D flight-simulator browser capable of continuous flight around the Earth. On the server side, a geographical and geometrical server has been developed which contains large databases of images, elevations, lines, points and polygons stored in tiles structured into hierarchical pyramids or quadtrees. A metadata server has also been developed which contains URL pointers and geographical coordinates of various WWW documents, geographical information and geometrical models

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.034095198 = product of:
  0.051142793 = sum of:
    0.03052565 = weight(_text_:based in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03052565 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
    0.020617142 = product of:
      0.041234285 = sum of:
        0.041234285 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234285 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This study explores how and why people participate in collaborative knowledge-building practices in the context of Wikipedia. Based on a survey of 223 Wikipedians, this study examines the relationship between motivations, internal cognitive beliefs, social-relational factors, and knowledge-sharing intentions. Results from structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis reveal that attitudes, knowledge self-efficacy, and a basic norm of generalized reciprocity have significant and direct relationships with knowledge-sharing intentions. Altruism (an intrinsic motivator) is positively related to attitudes toward knowledge sharing, whereas reputation (an extrinsic motivator) is not a significant predictor of attitude. The study also reveals that a social-relational factor, namely, a sense of belonging, is related to knowledge-sharing intentions indirectly through different motivational and social factors such as altruism, subjective norms, knowledge self-efficacy, and generalized reciprocity. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Date

1. 6.2010 10:13:22

0.024702676 = product of:
  0.07410803 = sum of:
    0.07410803 = product of:
      0.14821605 = sum of:
        0.14821605 = weight(_text_:training in 7792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14821605 = score(doc=7792,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23690371 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.62563837 = fieldWeight in 7792, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.67046 = idf(docFreq=1125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Considers the issue of point of use user training for users of CD-ROM databases including consideration of whether any such instruction should be provided; whether only minimal instruction should be provided; how library or user type may influence levels of service; and how to balance the reference desk demands in the age of proliferating CD-ROM databases. Concludes that it is unrealistic to expect to place a definite time limit on point of use user training for CD-ROMs, apart from eliminating it altogether. Recognition of the need to balance CD-ROM point of use training with other reference services should help libraries to come closer to the ideal of a prioritized library service

0.022677701 = product of:
  0.0680331 = sum of:
    0.0680331 = product of:
      0.1360662 = sum of:
        0.1360662 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1360662 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17762627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22
22. 9.2003 10:02:00

0.02237859 = product of:
  0.067135766 = sum of:
    0.067135766 = product of:
      0.2014073 = sum of:
        0.2014073 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2014073 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43003735 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050723847 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.020350434 = product of:
  0.0610513 = sum of:
    0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0610513 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.020350434 = product of:
  0.0610513 = sum of:
    0.0610513 = weight(_text_:based in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0610513 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The increasing importance of patent information for companies has been matched by the growth in Internet and WWW based patent information services

0.019186573 = product of:
  0.057559717 = sum of:
    0.057559717 = weight(_text_:based in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057559717 = score(doc=1227,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.37662423 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Encarta represents the latest addition to the assortment of CD-ROM based encyclopedias now available; based on this review, it will be a worthy competitor to the popular Compton's and Grolier products. Microsoft is rumored to have spent over $500.000 in the development of Encarta, and it is only one of over 20 titles they are currently working on. Microsoft's electronic publishing strategy appears to have very substantial resources allocated for new CD-ROM title development, and it will be interesting to follow the success of these titles as they are released

0.019186573 = product of:
  0.057559717 = sum of:
    0.057559717 = weight(_text_:based in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057559717 = score(doc=3893,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15283063 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050723847 = queryNorm
        0.37662423 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Presents a study of 'channel repertoire' to information sources. Interviews 251 residents of Pullman, Washington and Moscow, Idaho to assess their interest in sport and community activities and whether the source of such information was traditional such as television or radio, or technology based (VCR, PC). Allowing for demographic influences the study finds separate repertoires for each topic. Sports had only a traditional media repertoire that consisted of television and newspapers, while community events has a combination of traditional and technology based channels consisting of newspapers, radios, personal computers, and cellular telephones