-
Bedford, D.: Knowledge architectures : structures and semantics (2021)
0.09
0.08702372 = product of:
0.13053557 = sum of:
0.057665598 = weight(_text_:management in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057665598 = score(doc=566,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.3330879 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.07286997 = sum of:
0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045034144 = score(doc=566,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.02783583 = weight(_text_:22 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783583 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge Architectures reviews traditional approaches to managing information and explains why they need to adapt to support 21st-century information management and discovery. Exploring the rapidly changing environment in which information is being managed and accessed, the book considers how to use knowledge architectures, the basic structures and designs that underlie all of the parts of an effective information system, to best advantage. Drawing on 40 years of work with a variety of organizations, Bedford explains that failure to understand the structure behind any given system can be the difference between an effective solution and a significant and costly failure. Demonstrating that the information user environment has shifted significantly in the past 20 years, the book explains that end users now expect designs and behaviors that are much closer to the way they think, work, and act. Acknowledging how important it is that those responsible for developing an information or knowledge management system understand knowledge structures, the book goes beyond a traditional library science perspective and uses case studies to help translate the abstract and theoretical to the practical and concrete. Explaining the structures in a simple and intuitive way and providing examples that clearly illustrate the challenges faced by a range of different organizations, Knowledge Architectures is essential reading for those studying and working in library and information science, data science, systems development, database design, and search system architecture and engineering.
- Content
- Section 1 Context and purpose of knowledge architecture -- 1 Making the case for knowledge architecture -- 2 The landscape of knowledge assets -- 3 Knowledge architecture and design -- 4 Knowledge architecture reference model -- 5 Knowledge architecture segments -- Section 2 Designing for availability -- 6 Knowledge object modeling -- 7 Knowledge structures for encoding, formatting, and packaging -- 8 Functional architecture for identification and distinction -- 9 Functional architectures for knowledge asset disposition and destruction -- 10 Functional architecture designs for knowledge preservation and conservation -- Section 3 Designing for accessibility -- 11 Functional architectures for knowledge seeking and discovery -- 12 Functional architecture for knowledge search -- 13 Functional architecture for knowledge categorization -- 14 Functional architectures for indexing and keywording -- 15 Functional architecture for knowledge semantics -- 16 Functional architecture for knowledge abstraction and surrogation -- Section 4 Functional architectures to support knowledge consumption -- 17 Functional architecture for knowledge augmentation, derivation, and synthesis -- 18 Functional architecture to manage risk and harm -- 19 Functional architectures for knowledge authentication and provenance -- 20 Functional architectures for securing knowledge assets -- 21 Functional architectures for authorization and asset management -- Section 5 Pulling it all together - the big picture knowledge architecture -- 22 Functional architecture for knowledge metadata and metainformation -- 23 The whole knowledge architecture - pulling it all together
- LCSH
- Information storage and retrieval systems / Management
- Subject
- Information storage and retrieval systems / Management
-
Palsdottir, A.: Data literacy and management of research data : a prerequisite for the sharing of research data (2021)
0.08
0.07586511 = product of:
0.113797665 = sum of:
0.09987975 = weight(_text_:management in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09987975 = score(doc=183,freq=30.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.57692516 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.013917915 = product of:
0.02783583 = sum of:
0.02783583 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783583 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the knowledge and attitude about research data management, the use of data management methods and the perceived need for support, in relation to participants' field of research. Design/methodology/approach This is a quantitative study. Data were collected by an email survey and sent to 792 academic researchers and doctoral students. Total response rate was 18% (N = 139). The measurement instrument consisted of six sets of questions: about data management plans, the assignment of additional information to research data, about metadata, standard file naming systems, training at data management methods and the storing of research data. Findings The main finding is that knowledge about the procedures of data management is limited, and data management is not a normal practice in the researcher's work. They were, however, in general, of the opinion that the university should take the lead by recommending and offering access to the necessary tools of data management. Taken together, the results indicate that there is an urgent need to increase the researcher's understanding of the importance of data management that is based on professional knowledge and to provide them with resources and training that enables them to make effective and productive use of data management methods. Research limitations/implications The survey was sent to all members of the population but not a sample of it. Because of the response rate, the results cannot be generalized to all researchers at the university. Nevertheless, the findings may provide an important understanding about their research data procedures, in particular what characterizes their knowledge about data management and attitude towards it. Practical implications Awareness of these issues is essential for information specialists at academic libraries, together with other units within the universities, to be able to design infrastructures and develop services that suit the needs of the research community. The findings can be used, to develop data policies and services, based on professional knowledge of best practices and recognized standards that assist the research community at data management. Originality/value The study contributes to the existing literature about research data management by examining the results by participants' field of research. Recognition of the issues is critical in order for information specialists in collaboration with universities to design relevant infrastructures and services for academics and doctoral students that can promote their research data management.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2, S.322-341
-
Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020)
0.08
0.0756816 = product of:
0.113522395 = sum of:
0.063169494 = weight(_text_:management in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063169494 = score(doc=181,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.0503529 = sum of:
0.022517072 = weight(_text_:system in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022517072 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.02783583 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783583 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper aims to explore the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. A survey study is used to approach what their information needs are, how these needs change during an engineering design project and how their information-seeking behaviours have been influenced by the newly developed information technologies (ITs). Through an in-depth analysis of the survey results, the key functions have been identified for the next-generation management systems. Design/methodology/approach The paper first proposed four hypotheses on the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of young engineers. Then, a survey study was undertaken to understand their information usage in terms of the information needs and information-seeking behaviours during a complete engineering design process. Through analysing the survey results, several findings were obtained and on this basis, further comparisons were made to discuss and evaluate the hypotheses. Findings The paper has revealed that the engineering designers' information needs will evolve throughout the engineering design project; thus, they should be assisted at several different levels. Although they intend to search information and knowledge on know-what and know-how, what they really require is the know-why knowledge in order to help them complete design tasks. Also, the paper has shown how the newly developed ITs and web-based applications have influenced the engineers' information-seeking practices. Research limitations/implications The research subjects chosen in this study are engineering students in universities who, although not as experienced as engineers in companies, do go through a complete design process with the tasks similar to industrial scenarios. In addition, the focus of this study is to understand the information-seeking behaviours of a new generation of design engineers, so that the development of next-generation information and knowledge management systems can be well informed. In this sense, the results obtained do reveal some new knowledge about the information-seeking behaviours during a general design process. Practical implications This paper first identifies the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. On this basis, the varied ways to meet these needs and behaviours are discussed and elaborated. This intends to provide the key characteristics for the development of the next-generation knowledge management system for engineering design projects. Originality/value This paper proposes a novel means of exploring the future engineers' information needs and information-seeking behaviours in a collaborative working environment. It also characterises the key features and functions for the next generation of knowledge management systems for engineering design.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.853-868
-
Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023)
0.07
0.07235319 = product of:
0.108529784 = sum of:
0.045588657 = weight(_text_:management in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045588657 = score(doc=884,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.06294113 = sum of:
0.02814634 = weight(_text_:system in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02814634 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:43:02
-
Dunn, H.; Bourcier, P.: Nomenclature for museum cataloging (2020)
0.05
0.047729462 = product of:
0.07159419 = sum of:
0.05470639 = weight(_text_:management in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05470639 = score(doc=5483,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
0.016887804 = product of:
0.03377561 = sum of:
0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03377561 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We present an overview of Nomenclature's history, characteristics, structure, use, management, development process, limitations, and future. Nomenclature for Museum Cataloging is a bilingual (English/French) structured and controlled list of object terms organized in a classification system to provide a basis for indexing and cataloging collections of human-made objects. It includes illustrations and bibliographic references as well as a user guide. It is used in the creation and management of object records in human history collections within museums and other organizations, and it focuses on objects relevant to North American history and culture. First published in 1978, Nomenclature is the most extensively used museum classification and controlled vocabulary for historical and ethnological collections in North America and represents thereby a de facto standard in the field. An online reference version of Nomenclature was made available in 2018, and it will be available under open license in 2020.
-
Farmer, L.S.J.: Cataloging children's materials : issues and solutions (2021)
0.04
0.043221936 = product of:
0.0648329 = sum of:
0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045130465 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.019702438 = product of:
0.039404877 = sum of:
0.039404877 = weight(_text_:system in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039404877 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Library catalogs remain challenging for children to use, especially because children have difficulty with multi-step processes, have less semantic and technical knowledge, and often search differently from adults. Child-friendly catalogs should have clear, simple protocols and visual guides that are standardized yet include flexible options for differentiated manipulation. Materials should be described accurately and in ways that connect meaningfully to children. More fundamentally, cataloging children's materials needs to be done in light of children as potential users and limitations of the integrated library management system itself. Getting children's feedback in the process can optimize the results.
-
Bergman, O.; Israeli, T.; Whittaker, S.: Factors hindering shared files retrieval (2020)
0.04
0.041990705 = product of:
0.06298605 = sum of:
0.045588657 = weight(_text_:management in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045588657 = score(doc=5843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.017397394 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose Personal information management (PIM) is an activity in which people store information items in order to retrieve them later. The purpose of this paper is to test and quantify the effect of factors related to collection size, file properties and workload on file retrieval success and efficiency. Design/methodology/approach In the study, 289 participants retrieved 1,557 of their shared files in a naturalistic setting. The study used specially developed software designed to collect shared files' names and present them as targets for the retrieval task. The dependent variables were retrieval success, retrieval time and misstep/s. Findings Various factors compromise shared files retrieval including: collection size (large number of files), file properties (multiple versions, size of team sharing the file, time since most recent retrieval and folder depth) and workload (daily e-mails sent and received). The authors discuss theoretical reasons for these negative effects and suggest possible ways to overcome them. Originality/value Retrieval is the main reason people manage personal information. It is essential for retrieval to be successful and efficient, as information cannot be used unless it can be re-accessed. Prior PIM research has assumed that factors related to collection size, file properties and workload affect file retrieval. However, this is the first study to systematically quantify the negative effects of these factors. As each of these factors is expected to be exacerbated in the future, this study is a necessary first step toward addressing these problems.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.1, S.130-147
-
Tran, Q.-T.: Standardization and the neglect of museum objects : an infrastructure-based approach for inclusive integration of cultural artifacts (2023)
0.04
0.039774552 = product of:
0.059661828 = sum of:
0.045588657 = weight(_text_:management in 1136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045588657 = score(doc=1136,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 1136, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1136)
0.01407317 = product of:
0.02814634 = sum of:
0.02814634 = weight(_text_:system in 1136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02814634 = score(doc=1136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the integration of born-digital and digitized content into an outdated classification system within the Museum of European Cultures in Berlin. It underscores the predicament encountered by smaller to medium-sized cultural institutions as they navigate between adhering to established knowledge management systems and preserving an expanding array of contemporary cultural artifacts. The perspective of infrastructure studies is employed to scrutinize the representation of diverse viewpoints and voices within the museum's collections. The study delves into museum personnel's challenges in cataloging and classifying ethnographic objects utilizing a numerical-alphabetical categorization scheme from the 1930s. It presents an analysis of the limitations inherent in this method, along with its implications for the assimilation of emerging forms of born-digital and digitized objects. Through an exploration of the case of category 74, as observed at the Museum of European Cultures, the study illustrates the complexities of replacing pre-existing systems due to their intricate integration into the socio-technical components of the museum's information infrastructure. The paper reflects on how resource-constrained cultural institutions can take a proactive and ethical approach to knowledge management, re-evaluating their knowledge infrastructure to promote inclusion and ensure adaptability.
-
Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021)
0.04
0.03970675 = product of:
0.059560128 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.020876871 = product of:
0.041753743 = sum of:
0.041753743 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041753743 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.1, S.129-143
-
Park, Y.J.: ¬A socio-technological model of search information divide in US cities (2021)
0.04
0.03970675 = product of:
0.059560128 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
0.020876871 = product of:
0.041753743 = sum of:
0.041753743 = weight(_text_:22 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041753743 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2 S.144-159
-
Cui, H.; Stacy, S.: Welcome to LAC/Bienvenue à BAC : a new bilingual NACO partner (2020)
0.04
0.03704738 = product of:
0.055571064 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 5803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=5803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5803)
0.016887804 = product of:
0.03377561 = sum of:
0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 5803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03377561 = score(doc=5803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5803)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In 2018, the national, bilingual authority file maintained by Library and Archives Canada (LAC), called Canadiana Authorities, underwent major changes when the internally-developed Integrated Library System (ILS) AMICUS was decommissioned and OCLC's WorldShare Management Services (WMS) was adopted as a replacement. As a part of the transition, LAC split its single, bilingual authority file Canadiana Authorities into separate English and French language files and joined Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) in order to manage its English-language authority records. This has been a significant change that has challenged the organization to rethink everyday practices while maintaining its commitments to the Canadian and global library community. This paper discusses this national library's history of bilingual cataloging, the reason for the changes, and the attempt to ensure that the two files "talk" to each other.
-
Dattolo, A.; Corbatto, M.: Assisting researchers in bibliographic tasks : a new usable, real-time tool for analyzing bibliographies (2022)
0.04
0.03704738 = product of:
0.055571064 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
0.016887804 = product of:
0.03377561 = sum of:
0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03377561 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The amount of scientific papers is growing together with the development of science itself; but, although there is an unprecedented availability of large citation indexes, some daily activities of researchers remain time-consuming and poorly supported. In this paper, we present Visual Bibliographies (VisualBib), a real-time visual platform, designed using a zz-structure-based model for linking metadata and a narrative, visual approach for showing bibliographies. VisualBib represents a usable, advanced, and visual tool, which simplifies the management of bibliographies, supports a core set of bibliographic tasks, and helps researchers during complex analyses on scientific bibliographies. We present the variety of metadata formats and visualization methods, proposing two use case scenarios. The maturity of the system implementation allowed us two studies, for evaluating both the effectiveness of VisualBib in providing answers to specific data analysis tasks and to support experienced users during real-life uses. The results of the evaluation are positive and describe an effective and usable platform.
-
Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020)
0.04
0.03643499 = product of:
0.109304965 = sum of:
0.109304965 = sum of:
0.06755122 = weight(_text_:system in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06755122 = score(doc=5996,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.041753743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041753743 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
- Date
- 6.10.2020 21:22:33
-
Fagundes, P.B.; Freund, G.P.; Vital, L.P.; Monteiro de Barros, C.; Macedo, D.D.J.de: Taxonomias, ontologias e tesauros : possibilidades de contribuição para o processo de Engenharia de Requisitos (2020)
0.03
0.03475901 = product of:
0.052138515 = sum of:
0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236047 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
0.01990247 = product of:
0.03980494 = sum of:
0.03980494 = weight(_text_:system in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03980494 = score(doc=5828,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Some of the fundamental activities of the software development process are related to the discipline of Requirements Engineering, whose objective is the discovery, analysis, documentation and verification of the requirements that will be part of the system. Requirements are the conditions or capabilities that software must have or perform to meet the users needs. The present study is being developed to propose a model of cooperation between Information Science and Requirements Engineering. Aims to present the analysis results on the possibilities of using the knowledge organization systems: taxonomies, thesauri and ontologies during the activities of Requirements Engineering: design, survey, elaboration, negotiation, specification, validation and requirements management. From the results obtained it was possible to identify in which stage of the Requirements Engineering process, each type of knowledge organization system could be used. We expect that this study put in evidence the need for new researchs and proposals to strengt the exchange between Information Science, as a science that has information as object of study, and the Requirements Engineering which has in the information the raw material to identify the informational needs of software users.
-
Dootson, P.; Tate, M.; Desouza, K.C.; Townson, P.: Transforming public records management : six key insights (2021)
0.03
0.03438512 = product of:
0.10315535 = sum of:
0.10315535 = weight(_text_:management in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10315535 = score(doc=214,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Records management in the public sector is integral for delivering public good. However, several institutional challenges inhibit the required implementation of innovative and information-centric tools to transform records management in response to the challenges of digitization and to capitalize on new opportunities in the digital economy. In this article, we make recommendations to overcome institutional and legislative barriers to transform records management in the public sector.
-
Ekstrand, M.D.; Wright, K.L.; Pera, M.S.: Enhancing classroom instruction with online news (2020)
0.03
0.033088963 = product of:
0.049633443 = sum of:
0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236047 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.017397394 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.5, S.725-744
-
Rha, E.Y.; Belkin, N.: Exploring social aspects of task perception using cognitive sociology : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.03
0.033088963 = product of:
0.049633443 = sum of:
0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236047 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.017397394 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.4, S.525-543
-
Kang, M.: Dual paths to continuous online knowledge sharing : a repetitive behavior perspective (2020)
0.03
0.033088963 = product of:
0.049633443 = sum of:
0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236047 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.017397394 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.2, S.159-178
-
Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.03
0.033088963 = product of:
0.049633443 = sum of:
0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236047 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.017397394 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.3, S.339-359
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.03
0.033088963 = product of:
0.049633443 = sum of:
0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236047 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.017397394 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479479 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
