-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.07
0.074054174 = product of:
0.14810835 = sum of:
0.14810835 = sum of:
0.10692415 = weight(_text_:mining in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10692415 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28585905 = queryWeight, product of:
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.37404498 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.0411842 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0411842 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Mohr, J.W.; Bogdanov, P.: Topic models : what they are and why they matter (2013)
0.04
0.037803393 = product of:
0.075606786 = sum of:
0.075606786 = product of:
0.15121357 = sum of:
0.15121357 = weight(_text_:mining in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15121357 = score(doc=1142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28585905 = queryWeight, product of:
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.5289795 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We provide a brief, non-technical introduction to the text mining methodology known as "topic modeling." We summarize the theory and background of the method and discuss what kinds of things are found by topic models. Using a text corpus comprised of the eight articles from the special issue of Poetics on the subject of topic models, we run a topic model on these articles, both as a way to introduce the methodology and also to help summarize some of the ways in which social and cultural scientists are using topic models. We review some of the critiques and debates over the use of the method and finally, we link these developments back to some of the original innovations in the field of content analysis that were pioneered by Harold D. Lasswell and colleagues during and just after World War II.
- Theme
- Data Mining
-
Bauckhage, C.: Moderne Textanalyse : neues Wissen für intelligente Lösungen (2016)
0.04
0.03564138 = product of:
0.07128276 = sum of:
0.07128276 = product of:
0.14256552 = sum of:
0.14256552 = weight(_text_:mining in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14256552 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28585905 = queryWeight, product of:
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.49872664 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Data Mining
-
Shen, M.; Liu, D.-R.; Huang, Y.-S.: Extracting semantic relations to enrich domain ontologies (2012)
0.03
0.031186208 = product of:
0.062372416 = sum of:
0.062372416 = product of:
0.12474483 = sum of:
0.12474483 = weight(_text_:mining in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12474483 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28585905 = queryWeight, product of:
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.4363858 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Domain ontologies facilitate the organization, sharing and reuse of domain knowledge, and enable various vertical domain applications to operate successfully. Most methods for automatically constructing ontologies focus on taxonomic relations, such as is-kind-of and is- part-of relations. However, much of the domain-specific semantics is ignored. This work proposes a semi-unsupervised approach for extracting semantic relations from domain-specific text documents. The approach effectively utilizes text mining and existing taxonomic relations in domain ontologies to discover candidate keywords that can represent semantic relations. A preliminary experiment on the natural science domain (Taiwan K9 education) indicates that the proposed method yields valuable recommendations. This work enriches domain ontologies by adding distilled semantics.
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.02
0.017160086 = product of:
0.034320172 = sum of:
0.034320172 = product of:
0.068640344 = sum of:
0.068640344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068640344 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.017160086 = product of:
0.034320172 = sum of:
0.034320172 = product of:
0.068640344 = sum of:
0.068640344 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068640344 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.013728068 = product of:
0.027456136 = sum of:
0.027456136 = product of:
0.054912273 = sum of:
0.054912273 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054912273 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.01
0.013728068 = product of:
0.027456136 = sum of:
0.027456136 = product of:
0.054912273 = sum of:
0.054912273 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054912273 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.01
0.012012059 = product of:
0.024024118 = sum of:
0.024024118 = product of:
0.048048235 = sum of:
0.048048235 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048048235 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.012012059 = product of:
0.024024118 = sum of:
0.024024118 = product of:
0.048048235 = sum of:
0.048048235 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048048235 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.012012059 = product of:
0.024024118 = sum of:
0.024024118 = product of:
0.048048235 = sum of:
0.048048235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048048235 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.01
0.01029605 = product of:
0.0205921 = sum of:
0.0205921 = product of:
0.0411842 = sum of:
0.0411842 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0411842 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.01
0.01029605 = product of:
0.0205921 = sum of:
0.0205921 = product of:
0.0411842 = sum of:
0.0411842 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0411842 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.01029605 = product of:
0.0205921 = sum of:
0.0205921 = product of:
0.0411842 = sum of:
0.0411842 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0411842 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.01029605 = product of:
0.0205921 = sum of:
0.0205921 = product of:
0.0411842 = sum of:
0.0411842 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0411842 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.008580043 = product of:
0.017160086 = sum of:
0.017160086 = product of:
0.034320172 = sum of:
0.034320172 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034320172 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
