Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

0.061103076 = product of:
  0.09165461 = sum of:
    0.07207332 = weight(_text_:im in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07207332 = score(doc=4726,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.49970993 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
    0.0195813 = product of:
      0.058743894 = sum of:
        0.058743894 = weight(_text_:online in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058743894 = score(doc=4726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

"Wissen ist ... gleich unternehmerischer Erfolg." Diese abgewandelte Weisheit hat im Informationszeitalter an Aktualität noch gewonnen. Insbesondere trifft dies auf Patente und Patentinformationen zu. Wissen transparent zugänglich zu machen ist eine immer mehr an Bedeutung gewinnende Aufgabe im Unternehmen. Die beschriebene 'Lean-online-Patentinformation' zeigt eine realisierte Möglichkeit auf, aktuelle Schutzrechtsinformationen im Unternehmen im direkten Zugriff zu halten

0.043145757 = product of:
  0.064718634 = sum of:
    0.050963532 = weight(_text_:im in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050963532 = score(doc=742,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.35334828 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
    0.013755098 = product of:
      0.041265294 = sum of:
        0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041265294 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Im Projekt Virtuelle Informationsräume soll das Suchen in elektronischen Marktplätzen verbessert werden. Dabei soll die Informationsquellenauswahl optimiert, die eigentliche Suche unterstützt und die Präsentation der Ergebnisse verbessert werden. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird eine Verfahren zur Visualisierung von Suchergebnissen vorgestellt, welches die Suchergebnisse eingebettet in die Struktur des elektronischen Marktplatzes zeigt

Source

Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a

0.03220136 = product of:
  0.09660408 = sum of:
    0.09660408 = product of:
      0.14490612 = sum of:
        0.07269186 = weight(_text_:online in 7604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07269186 = score(doc=7604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 7604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7604)
        0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07221426 = score(doc=7604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7604)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.015015274 = product of:
  0.045045823 = sum of:
    0.045045823 = weight(_text_:im in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045045823 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.015015274 = product of:
  0.045045823 = sum of:
    0.045045823 = weight(_text_:im in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045045823 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0141388085 = product of:
  0.042416424 = sum of:
    0.042416424 = product of:
      0.063624635 = sum of:
        0.035973143 = weight(_text_:online in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035973143 = score(doc=4440,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.23231125 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
        0.027651496 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027651496 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to get a first approximation of the usefulness of online forums with regard to information seeking and knowledge generation. Design/methodology/approach - This study captures the characteristics of knowledge generation by examining the pragmatics and types of information needs of posted questions and by investigating knowledge related characteristics of discussion posts as well as the success of communication. Three online forums were examined. The data set consists of 55 threads, containing 533 posts which were categorized manually by two researchers. Findings - Results show that questioners often ask for personal estimations. Information needs often aim for actionable insights or uncertainty reduction. With regard to answers, factual information is the dominant content type and has the highest knowledge value as it is the strongest predictor with regard to the generation of new knowledge. Opinions are also relevant, but in a rather subsequent and complementary way. Emotional aspects are scarcely observed. Overall, results indicate that knowledge creation predominantly follows a socio-cultural paradigm of knowledge exchange. Research limitations/implications - Although the investigation captures important aspects of knowledge building processes, the measurement of the forums' knowledge value is still rather limited. Success is only partly measurable with the current scheme. The central coding category "new topical knowledge" is only of nominal value and therefore not able to compare different kinds of knowledge gains in the course of discussion. Originality/value - The investigation reaches out beyond studies that do not consider that the role and relevance of posts is dependent on the state of the discussion. Furthermore, the paper integrates two perspectives of knowledge value: the success of the questioner with regard to the expressed information need and the knowledge building value for communicants and readers.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.01201222 = product of:
  0.03603666 = sum of:
    0.03603666 = weight(_text_:im in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03603666 = score(doc=5493,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Regionale und lokale Zeitungen sind durch besondere Qualitätsmerkmale gekennzeichnet, die im vorliegenden Beitrag diskutiert werden. Ausgehend von dem Konstanzer Ansatz zur Bewertung von Informationsdienstleistungen werden zeitungsspezifische Kriterien eingearbeitet und den fünf Hauptkennzahlen Information, Präsentation, Interaktion und Kommunikation, Technik und Methodik sowie Organisatorisches und Soziales zugeordnet. In einer ersten Untersuchung wurde die Tauglichkeit des Ansatzes anhand der regionalen Tageszeitungen Südkurier und Schwäbische Zeitung, die beide ihr Verbreitungsgebiet am Bodensee haben, untersucht

0.011991048 = product of:
  0.035973143 = sum of:
    0.035973143 = product of:
      0.107919425 = sum of:
        0.107919425 = weight(_text_:online in 7122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107919425 = score(doc=7122,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.69693375 = fieldWeight in 7122, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7122)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al

0.010510692 = product of:
  0.031532075 = sum of:
    0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031532075 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Das Projekt DECIDoc hat die Zertifizierung von Informationspezialisten in einem europaweiten Rahmen zum Ziel. In Deutschland hat die DGI die Projektleitung und -kooridination für DECIDoc. Nach der Diskussion der Argumente für eine Zertifizierung wird das Zertifizierungshandbuch vorgestellt und die Überarbeitungsschritte, die in Deutschland vorgenommen wurden, dargestellt. Dabei wird im einzelnen auf die Änderungen der Kompetenzniveaus, der Kompetenzbereiche und der Kompetenzgruppen eingegangen. Zur Validierung der Veränderungen wurde ein Zertifizierungsverfahren erarbeitet und anhand zweier Testzertifizierungen überprüft. Das Zulassungs- und Bewerbungsverfahren, die Zusammensetzung der zertifizierungskommission, das Fachgespräch, die Bewertung sowie die Erfahrungen aus den Testzertifizierungen werden detailliert besprochen

0.009892109 = product of:
  0.029676326 = sum of:
    0.029676326 = product of:
      0.08902898 = sum of:
        0.08902898 = weight(_text_:online in 8577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08902898 = score(doc=8577,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.574941 = fieldWeight in 8577, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8577)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The Konstanz-Hypertext-System (KHS) is an open hypertext system which employs internal and external information sources to satisfy the user's need for information when navigating through a hypertext. E-mail, Gopher and online databases are available in KHS as external information sources. The main tasks which must be carried out during an online search are analysis of the question, selection of the databases, formulation of a search strategy, online search, feedback and the presentation of the results. All of these tasks are supported within KHS, but special emphasis is given to database selection. Introduces a new method for selecting relevant online databases with KHS using the database descriptions from several hosts

Source

Proceedings of the 15th National Online Meeting 1994, New York, 10-12 May 1994. Ed. by M.E. Williams

0.008076874 = product of:
  0.02423062 = sum of:
    0.02423062 = product of:
      0.07269186 = sum of:
        0.07269186 = weight(_text_:online in 7739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07269186 = score(doc=7739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 7739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7739)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Quality, quality control, quality assurance and quality management are becoming increasingly important in using online services and online databases. Focuses on the production of online bibliographic databases and discusses possible attributes responsible for the quality of this type of online database. Considers different stages in the production of the databases: acquisition of the original documents; quality of document analysis in the selection of the documents; and subject and bibliographic analysis. Shows how the quality attributes of the different production steps may be measured. Describes, as an example, a database production system with its testing routines and reference data

0.007680971 = product of:
  0.023042914 = sum of:
    0.023042914 = product of:
      0.06912874 = sum of:
        0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06912874 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.007507637 = product of:
  0.022522911 = sum of:
    0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022522911 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Qualität (vom lateinischen qualis = wie beschaffen) beschreibt die Güte, den Wert bzw die Beschaffenheit oder auch die Gesamtheit der charakteristischen Eigenschaften einer Sache oder Person. Die Beschaffenheit und die Unterscheidungsmerkmale einer Ware oder einer Dienstleistung in bezug auf ihre Vorzüge oder Mängel gegenüber anderen Waren oder Dienstleistungen sind dabei von besonderer Bedeutung. Diesem allgemeinsprachlichen Verständnis steht eine Definition der DIN ISO Norm 8402 gegenüber, die Qualität als "die Gesamtheit von Eigenschaften und Merkmalen eines Produktes oder einer Dienstleistung, die sich auf deren Eignung zur Erfüllung festgelegter oder vorausgesetzter Erfordernisse beziehen" beschreibt. Qualität ist also nicht ein abstraktes Gut, welches Dienstleistungen oder Produkten anhaftet. Vielmehr bezieht sich die Qualität eines Produktes oder einer Dienstleistung auf eine konkrete Situation oder Problemstellung, in deren Kontext die Qualität bestimmt wird. Diese Sichtweise auf Qualität, die zweckorientiert im Hinblick auf bestimmte, festgelegte Bedürfnisse ist, nennt man teleologisch. Qualität wird in beiden Definitionen als eine Größe formuliert, die sich aus bestimmten Kriterien zusammensetzt (Gesamtheit der charakteristischen Eigenschaften, Gesamtheit von Eigenschaften und Merkmalen) und für das entsprechende Produkt oder die Dienstleistung typisch sind. Es gibt also nicht die absolute Qualität, sondern immer nur eine zusammengesetzte Größe. Das bedeutet auch, dass Qualität keine binäre Größe ist, sondern dass zur Bewertung von Qualität eine kontinuierliche Skala notwendig ist. Möchte man die Qualität messen, so benötigt man also zumindest Ordinalskalen oder auch Intervallskalen.

0.006877549 = product of:
  0.020632647 = sum of:
    0.020632647 = product of:
      0.06189794 = sum of:
        0.06189794 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06189794 = score(doc=8430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 8430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8430)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.004038437 = product of:
  0.01211531 = sum of:
    0.01211531 = product of:
      0.03634593 = sum of:
        0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 3239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03634593 = score(doc=3239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 3239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3239)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Um die Nutzung ihrer Informationsdienste und -angebote beurteilen zu können, setzen Informationsinfrastruktureinrichtungen der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft die Webanalyse ein. Sieben Leibniz-Informationsinfrastruktureinrichtungen wurden mit einem Online-Fragebogen und einem teilstandardisierten Interview zur Nutzung der Webanalyse befragt. Es werden die verwendeten Methoden, Werkzeuge und Metriken sowie die verfügbaren Ressourcen als auch die Zukunftsperspektive der Webanalyse an den Einrichtungen beschrieben. Insgesamt wird der Stellenwert der Webanalyse an den Instituten als hoch angesehen. Die bisher wenig ausgeprägte Standardisierung und die fehlende Einheitlichkeit der Metriken und Erhebungsmethoden erschweren einen möglichen Vergleich von Nutzungsdaten allerdings erheblich.

0.003970755 = product of:
  0.011912264 = sum of:
    0.011912264 = product of:
      0.03573679 = sum of:
        0.03573679 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03573679 = score(doc=4356,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

K3 helps organizing a course with constructivist and instructional elements. It is used to run complex discussions and group work as presenting knowledge in a controlled environment. Besides basic functionalities like acting as a file server to exchange teaching materials and providing asynchronous communication, K3 offers: 1. A sophisticated system of intellectual, semi-automatic and automatic performance parameters as a means of permanent feedback and transparent gratification. 2. A MyK3 version to personalize the system for each user, be it a student or a lecturer. 3. Extended retrieval facilities. 4. A report generator to assemble a single student's or a group's contributions. 5. An elaborated administrator sub-system to enable the lecturers to organize their courses. 6. A visualization component, K3VIS to get a graphical, semistructured overview about a discourse. 7. A role system (moderator, presenter, researcher, and summarizer) to classify the responsibilities of students during a group work. 8. Typed discourse objects to organize and structure a discourse and allow ease of proximate actions, like retrieval and navigation.

0.0030723885 = product of:
  0.009217165 = sum of:
    0.009217165 = product of:
      0.027651496 = sum of:
        0.027651496 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027651496 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22