Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.20648976 = product of:
  0.24778771 = sum of:
    0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012822312 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
    0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061184157 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
    0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020018218 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
    0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08549531 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
    0.06826771 = product of:
      0.13653542 = sum of:
        0.13653542 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13653542 = score(doc=7410,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.62530804 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.8333333 = coord(5/6)

Abstract

Once the library has been through a process of transition from traditional library procedures to automated ones, natural language searching became a necessity for both indexers and searchers. Therefore, aside from the precoordinated classified catalogue we started to build a dictionary of terms in order to make postcoordinate search possible in keeping with the UDC notations assigned to each bibliographic record. After a while we came to the conclusion that the dictionary needed a control of its terms so that synonymous concepts and semantic ambuguities be avoided. The project presented in this paper shows how reality imposed the improvement of the quality of indexing and hence of the searching possibilities. Is also shows the reasons why we consider a multilingual thesaurus based on UDC an ideal indexing and searching device. The experiment applied on class 8 of UDC illustrates the way the UDC tables can be quite successfully used in building a thesaurus due to their qulities and how their limitations can be overcome by a thesaurus. An appendix to the paper contains a sample of the multilingual thesaurus given in both alphabetical and systematic layouts

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.035354 = product of:
  0.106061995 = sum of:
    0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 3221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028025504 = score(doc=3221,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 3221, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3221)
    0.07803649 = product of:
      0.15607297 = sum of:
        0.15607297 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15607297 = score(doc=3221,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 3221, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3221)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The automation of Bucharest University Central Library involved the compilation of a dictionary of terms to facilitate postcoordinated searching in accordance with the UDC notation attached to every bibliographic record. Describes the project and demonstrates why a multilingual UDC based thesaurus is considered as ideal indexing and searching tool. The experiment, which applied to Class 8 of UDC (Linguisitcs and Literature), illustrates how all UDC tables can be successfully used to build a thesaurus and the ways in which their limitations can be overcome by a thesaurus

Footnote

Übers. des Titels: Building a multilingual thesaurus based on UDC

0.031329658 = product of:
  0.18797794 = sum of:
    0.18797794 = sum of:
      0.14956705 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14956705 = score(doc=3697,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.68499064 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03841088 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04725067 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users

Date

22. 7.2010 20:40:56