Search (72 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Fassbender, J.: ¬Die Register des Buchinhalts : Register oder Konkordanz (2011) 0.02 
    0.01751495 = product of:
  0.052544847 = sum of:
    0.0205157 = weight(_text_:und in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0205157 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
    0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03202915 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.6/7, S.322
  2. Fassbender, J.: Register / Indexe (2023) 0.02 
    0.016890846 = product of:
  0.05067254 = sum of:
    0.026650677 = weight(_text_:und in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026650677 = score(doc=785,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
    0.02402186 = weight(_text_:des in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02402186 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Der Fokus dieses Artikels liegt auf der Indexerstellung von Publikationen, d. h. der detaillierten Indexierung der Inhalte von Dokumenten statt der Indexierung auf Dokumentebene, welche sich auf das Gesamtthema von Dokumenten beschränkt. Zu letzterer zählen z. B. das Hauptthema von Artikeln, die Sachkatalogisierung von Büchern oder die Erschließung von Objekten in der Museumsdokumentation. Die Worte Index und Register werden synonym benutzt. Das Wort Index ist nicht nur ein Homonym aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen (z. B. Finanzwesen, Mathematik), sondern auch ein Polysem im Publikationswesen, da es in romanischen Sprachen sowohl Inhaltsverzeichnis als auch Register meinen kann. Während im Finanzwesen, Mathematik u. a. die Pluralform Indizes benutzt wird, ist im bibliographischen Sinn Indexe der korrekte Plural (engl.: indexes), es sei denn, es geht um Indices zu alten Werken in lateinischer Sprache (index rerum, index nominum, index verborum). Etymologie, Bedeutung und Plural des Wortes Index erläutert Wellisch ausführlich.
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  3. Fassbender, J.: ¬Das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer - professionelle Registererstellung irn Brennpunkt (2004) 0.02 
    0.016678672 = product of:
  0.050036013 = sum of:
    0.03402144 = weight(_text_:und in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03402144 = score(doc=3052,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.3248651 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
    0.016014574 = weight(_text_:des in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016014574 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Anlässlich der diesjährigen Buchmesse trafen sich auf Initiative von Jochen Fassbender zum ersten Mal die Mitglieder des im Sommer 2004 entstandenen Deutschen Netzwerks der Indexer. Das DNI versteht sich als Sammelbecken für alle an professioneller Registererstellung (Indexing) interessierten Personen und als Plattform für die damit verbundenen Themen im deutschsprachigen Raum. Im DNI sind sowohl Spezialisten aus dem Publikationswesen als auch aus dem informationswissenschaftlichen Bereich versammelt; beide Bereiche sollen dadurch auch enger zusammengeführt werden. Thematisch ist der gesamte Printund digitale Medienbereich, vom klassischen Buchregister über den Fachzeitschriften-Index bis hin zu Registern für elektronische Medien, abgedeckt. Das DNI möchte eine ähnliche Funktion wie die schon lange bestehenden, weltweit führenden anglo-amerikanischen Fachverbände, die Society of Indexers in Großbritannien und die American Society of Indexers, einnehmen. Denn trotz über 500-jähriger Buchtradition im deutschsprachigen Raum gibt es hierzulande keinen professionellen Rahmen für Registerersteller, und die Qualität der Register lässt oft zu wünschen übrig. Register, die ohne spezielle Indexing-Kenntnisse erstellt werden - und dazu zählen meist auch von Autoren erstellte Register - gehen oft an den Bedürfnissen der Leser und Nutzer vorbei. Das DNI möchte daher über notorisch weit verbreitete Fehleinschätzungen zum Indexing aufklären und kann sich dabei auf zum Teil jahrzehntelange Erfahrung und Kompetenz seiner Mitglieder stützen. Die meisten DNI-Mitglieder bieten zudem Registererstellung als Dienstleistung an. Moderne, professionelle Registererstellung, insbesondere die Erstellung von Sachregistern, ist ein Fachgebiet für sich und umfasst neben den technischen Aspekten auch die indexmethodischen Kompetenzen. Der Registererstellung kommt stets eine besondere Bedeutung zu, denn nur ein qualitativ hochwertiges Register bietet einen wirklichen Zugang zum Inhalt einer Publikation. Gute Register sind daher kein Selbstzweck, sondern stellen einen Mehrwert und damit auch einen hervorragenden, oft unterschätzten Marketing-Faktor dar. Verlage, Firmen und Autoren, die an den Serviceleistungen der DNI-Mitglieder interessiert sind, sowie Interessenten, die sich dem DNI anschließen möchten, finden weiterführende Informationen auf der DNI-Website www.d-indexer.org. Eine enge Zusammenarbeit mit der DGI ist gegeben."
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 55(2004) H.8, S.491
  4. Luhn, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature (1985) 0.01 
    0.011173959 = product of:
  0.033521876 = sum of:
    0.014012752 = weight(_text_:des in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014012752 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
    0.019509122 = product of:
      0.039018244 = sum of:
        0.039018244 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039018244 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.17869665 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In the optimistic 1960s the potential of the computer seemed limitless. The realization of this potential in the area of information retrieval and dissemination owes much to the creative mind of Hans Peter Luhn. A pioneer of information science, he had a mind and an imagination that could transcend the state of the art. Luhn was born in Germany, where he studied technology, physics, and accounting. He came to the United States in 1924 and in 1941, at the age of 45, he joined IBM. In the course of his twenty-year tenure at IBM, he was issued over eighty patents; at one time he held more than any other IBM employee. Luhn is credited with originating KWIC indexes, computer selective dissemination systems (SDI), computer coding schemes, and statistical techniques for automatic indexing and abstracting. Also attributed to him is the first modern use of the word "thesaurus." The selection that follows modestly presents the idea of a Keyword in Context (KWIC) index. This is the idea of automatically identifying significant or "key" words and highlighting them in context. The context in question was normally a title. Though title term or catchword indexing had been practiced for over one hundred years, the implementation of the idea in mechanized systems in the 1960s was not trivial. It required programming the computer to recognize word boundaries and then developing a means for automatically differentiating significant from nonsignificant words. Spaces were used to demarcate word boundaries and a stop list, consisting of articles, conjunctions, prepositions, auxiliary verbs, some adjectives, and some very common words, was used to differentiate significant from nonsignificant words. A difficulty with any automatic indexing limited to extracting single words from texts is the semantic indeterminancy of the extracted character strings. To disambiguate these, Luhn adopted the concordance idea, proposing to display them in the context of their titles. Specifying the meaning of an index term by couching it in "context," anticipated the later development of string index languages such as PRECIS (PREserved Context Index System). Although the selection that follows is quite short, it presents, in addition to the idea of KWIC, what at the time were two innovative ideas. One is the distinction between the dissemination and the retrieval of information, in regard to which Luhn makes a point sometimes overlooked by modern critics of KWIC. This is that different purposes require different kinds of indexes; an index that is used to disseminate information for current awareness need not be as "perfect" as one used for retrospective information retrieval. The need to alert researchers to current information quickly, and the somewhat transitory character of this information, make KWIC, albeit quick and dirty, a costeffective alternative for dissemination indexes. The second harbinger idea is a method of uniquely identifying documents for retrieval using an identification code comprising the initial characters from a document's author, title, and - interestingly - year of publication. Luhn's mind was fertile indeed and he is aptly called a pioneer of information science.
    Footnote
    Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
  5. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01 
    0.008535751 = product of:
  0.051214505 = sum of:
    0.051214505 = product of:
      0.10242901 = sum of:
        0.10242901 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10242901 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  6. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01 
    0.008535751 = product of:
  0.051214505 = sum of:
    0.051214505 = product of:
      0.10242901 = sum of:
        0.10242901 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10242901 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  7. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01 
    0.008535751 = product of:
  0.051214505 = sum of:
    0.051214505 = product of:
      0.10242901 = sum of:
        0.10242901 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10242901 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  8. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01 
    0.008535751 = product of:
  0.051214505 = sum of:
    0.051214505 = product of:
      0.10242901 = sum of:
        0.10242901 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10242901 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  9. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  10. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  11. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  13. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  14. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  15. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  16. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01 
    0.0074687824 = product of:
  0.044812694 = sum of:
    0.044812694 = product of:
      0.08962539 = sum of:
        0.08962539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08962539 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  18. Pfizer, Y.: Development of the 'Index of the Hebrew Daily Press` (1990) 0.01 
    0.0074320463 = product of:
  0.044592276 = sum of:
    0.044592276 = product of:
      0.08918455 = sum of:
        0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08918455 = score(doc=4053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The Index of the Hebrew Daily Press developed from the desire to meet reader's needs, in particular those of secondary school students and college students preparing term papers and small research projects. The Index began in the 1950s with the organisation of a card catalogue of selected articles from journals and newspapers. Discusses the problems in defining and establishing the thesaurus for such a catalogue, the growth, changes and development of the catalogue as a result of cooperative efforts at Tel-Hai Regional College Library and the University of Haifa Library.
  19. Browne, G.: Changes in website indexing (2007) 0.01 
    0.007328562 = product of:
  0.04397137 = sum of:
    0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04397137 = score(doc=747,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Website-Indexing wurde in den 1990er Jahren wichtig, als Indexierer, Bibliothekare und Web-Manager mit verschiedenen Ansätzen experimentierten, einen besseren Zugang zu Informationen zu schaffen, die sie über das Internet anboten. Die Tools, mit denen Register erstellt werden, reichten von simpler HTML-Codierung bis zu HTML Indexer und anderer spezieller Software. Neue Indexe und Software-Produkte entstanden, aber viele Website-Register sind auch wieder verschwunden. Es werden die Gründe für die Erstellung von Website-Indexen dargestellt und Beispiele von Website-Indexen und anderen Zugangsoptionen erläutert, die in den letzten 15 Jahren entstanden, die aber nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen. Es werden einige Vermutungen über die Gründe für diese Veränderungen angestellt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.437-440
  20. Diedrichs, R.: Arbeitsbericht AG Indexierung der Konferenz für Regelwerksfragen (2000) 0.01 
    0.0072533954 = product of:
  0.043520372 = sum of:
    0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 5526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043520372 = score(doc=5526,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04725067 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5526, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5526)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Vor dem Hintergrund der zunehmenden Verbreitung von Suchmaschinen für bibliothekarische Datenbanken - KvK, KOBV, etc. - ergeben sich aus der unterschiedlichen Konstruktion der angegangenen Indexsysteme einige Probleme: - inkonsistente Suchergebnisse bei scheinbar gleichen Suchschlüsseln Autor: Müller-Udenscheid -> müller, Udenscheid, mueller? - Titelstichworte: sind Zusätze zum Sachtitel indexiert oder nicht? - unterschiedliche Suchschlüssel: Beschränkung auf die kleinste gemeinsame Schnittmenge. Die Verwendung einer einheitlichen Oberfläche gaukelt an dieser Stelle aber konsistente Ergebnisse vor. Auf Grund dieser Ausgangslage hat die KM eine Arbeitsgruppe eingesetzt, die Empfehlungen für eine einheitliche Indexierung bibliothekarischer Datenbanken erarbeiten soll. Diese Arbeitsgruppe hat sich bisher dreimal getroffen und Entwürfe für erste Festlegungen erarbeitet.
    Series
    Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI); Bd.1)(Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V.; Bd.3
    Source
    Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 46
  • d 25
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 57
  • m 12
  • x 3
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications