Search (108 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  1. Auer, T.; Ruohonen, M.: Analyzing the quality of information system use and management in the organizational context : experiences from 2 cases (1997) 0.04
    0.04073471 = product of:
      0.10183677 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  2. Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996) 0.04
    0.03995956 = product of:
      0.099898905 = sum of:
        0.080696784 = weight(_text_:context in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080696784 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.45792344 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
        0.019202124 = product of:
          0.057606373 = sum of:
            0.057606373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057606373 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses information in the context of information resources management arguing that it is an essential resource for every organization but one that needs to be managed better. Examines information as a resource, as an asset, as a commodity, as a rubbish
    Source
    Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
  3. Kocamustafaogullari, K.: Computer aided management for information processing projects (1995) 0.03
    0.03197257 = product of:
      0.07993142 = sum of:
        0.06456973 = weight(_text_:system in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06456973 = score(doc=4546,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study of the nature of information processing projects and some of the project management programming packages used. Also describes an in house interface program developed to utilize a selected project management package, TIMELINE, by using ORACLE Data Base Management System tools and the Pascal programming language for the management of information system projects. Studies a sample application by using the developed system
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:40:59
  4. Ballay, J.-F.; Poitou, J.-P.: Diademe : a collective knowledge management system (CKMS) (1996) 0.02
    0.02397943 = product of:
      0.05994857 = sum of:
        0.048427295 = weight(_text_:system in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048427295 = score(doc=916,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
        0.011521274 = product of:
          0.03456382 = sum of:
            0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456382 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The rationale and the general outline of a system for the management of collective knowledge (CKMS) has been presented by Poitou at ISMICK 95. The features of a CKMS are quite closely implemented in DIADEME, a computer assisted system for the capitalization and the management of research engineers' knowledge, which has been designed, developed and is currently being implemented at Electricité de France (EDF) by Ballay. During Spring 1995, Poitou has conducted at EDF a survey of the engineers' knowledge management behavior, of their attitudes toward a prospective CKMS. During Spring 1996, Poitou conducted a survey among the same engineers about their users' reactions to the implementation of DIADEME. The present paper briefly sums up the main features of a CKMS, (Section 1) describes the aims and the general architecture of DIADEME (Section 4), and gives some insight into the results of the 1995 users' expectation survey (Section 3) and of the 1996 users' satisfaction survey (Section 5).
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  5. DeRoure, D.: ¬An open framework for collaborative distributed information management (1998) 0.02
    0.023828931 = product of:
      0.059572328 = sum of:
        0.04613084 = weight(_text_:system in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04613084 = score(doc=3557,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The MEMOIR project supports researchers working with a vast quantity of distributed information, by assisting them in finding both relevant documents and researchers with related interests. It is an open architecture based on the existing Web infrastructure. Key to the architecture is the use of proxies: to support message routing for dynamic reconfiguration and extension of the system, to collect information about the trail of documents that a user visits, and to insert links on the fly. Presents the MEMOIR framework and its rationale, and discusses early experiences with the system
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  6. Tsuchiya, T.; Tsuchiya, S.: Interorganizational knowledge creation and policy exercise (1996) 0.02
    0.023828931 = product of:
      0.059572328 = sum of:
        0.04613084 = weight(_text_:system in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04613084 = score(doc=913,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Interorganizational knowledge creation has become a crucial factor for successful management of corporations in the environment surrounding them today. Collaboration with other organizations is indispensable for a corporation to resolve complex and Jong range issues such as customer satisfaction and sustainable development. One of the most fundamental obstacles in creating knowledge among organizations is partial or incomplete communication due to incommensurable point of view. Policy exercises can improve commensurability and facilitate inter-organizational knowledge creation by providing a shared model of the system under investigation. This paper will discuss it taking Intelligent Transportation System (TTS) Deployment Exercises as an example.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  7. Beulens, A.; Zuurbier, P.: Inter-firm competence management (1996) 0.02
    0.023601629 = product of:
      0.059004072 = sum of:
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
        0.021724723 = product of:
          0.06517417 = sum of:
            0.06517417 = weight(_text_:22 in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06517417 = score(doc=2805,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a framework for analyzing management processes of inter-firm competence. Effective and efficient management of inter-firm competence is suggested to depend an a balance between knowledge systems and enabling information technologies. Knowledge processes comprise processes to collect, generate, diffuse, utilize and dispose knowledge. Managing these processes in an inter-firm environment poses some new challenges both to knowledge and information system development as well.
    Date
    12. 8.2002 13:22:13
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  8. Lissack, M.R.: Chaos and complexity : what does that have to do with knowledge management? (1996) 0.02
    0.021331938 = product of:
      0.053329844 = sum of:
        0.045648996 = weight(_text_:context in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045648996 = score(doc=908,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.25904062 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
        0.0076808496 = product of:
          0.023042548 = sum of:
            0.023042548 = weight(_text_:22 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023042548 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    As interest in the study of complex systems has grown, a new vocabulary is emerging to describe discoveries about wide-ranging and fundamental phenomena. Complexity theory research has allowed for new insights into many phenomena and for the development of a new language. 'his paper argues that a shared language based an the vocabulary of complexity can have an important role in a management context. The use of complexity theory metaphors can change the way managers think about the problems they face. Instead of competing in a game or a war, they are trying to find their way an an ever changing, ever turbulent landscape. Such a conception of their organizations' basic task can, in cum, change the day-to-day decisions made by management. If part of the problem of knowledge management is the need to identify value added knowledge, language and metaphor play a key role - for they are the very tools of the identification [what is knowledge] and ascription [what makes it value-added] process. Complexity theory metaphors, it is argued, are not panaceas. There are limits to the types of organizations where the notion of a "fitness landscape" and "degree of coupling" can make a positive contribution to managements understanding of the world. The author argues that one potential distinction - between worlds where complexity metaphors can contribute and those where they cannot - can be drawn by measuring the degree to which an organization perceives that value-added investments are to be made in a) the development of new knowledge or b) infrastructure. In this context, infrastructure is defined as those items to which an economist might (once such investment is made) ascribe the label "sunk costs", but which management would not willingly walk away from. For this purpose then, emotional investments, legacy systems, existing bureaucracy, and material goods could all constitute "infrastructure". Infrastructure investments it is argued are pari of what Brian Arthur of the Sante Fe Institute defines as the world of diminishing retums. Investments in knowledge are different. While the ability of an organization to effectively deal wich new knowledge is limited by a variety of constraints, the leverage which can be obtained from such knowledge gives rise to the potential for increasing retums. As organizations leam to remove some of the constraints an their ability to absorb and lever new information, they force themselves down to the increasing retums part of the "S" curve. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the potency of complexity metaphors in driving managerial perceptions of knowledge management businesses.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  9. Holsapple, C.W.: Knowledge management in decision making and decision support (1995) 0.02
    0.02105642 = product of:
      0.05264105 = sum of:
        0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03727935 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces a knowledge management oriented view of decisions and decisioning as a complement to classical perspectives and as a contribution to understanding computer based possibilities for relaxing strains on decision makers. The perspective includes a model of knowledge management activities performed by a decision maker and a taxonomy of knowledge types. This leads to a characterization of decision support system purposes, traits and potentials that offer a basis for new research into computerized possibilities for knowledge management
    Source
    Knowledge and policy. 8(1995) no.1, S.5-22
  10. Engers, T.M. van; Steenhuis, M.: Knowledge management in the Dutch tax and customs administration : quantifying knowledge in an operational context (1996) 0.02
    0.01997978 = product of:
      0.049949452 = sum of:
        0.040348392 = weight(_text_:context in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040348392 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.22896172 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
        0.009601062 = product of:
          0.028803186 = sum of:
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  11. Wijnhoven. F.; Wognum, P.M.; Weg, R.L.W. van de: Knowledge ontology development (1996) 0.02
    0.01997978 = product of:
      0.049949452 = sum of:
        0.040348392 = weight(_text_:context in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040348392 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.22896172 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.009601062 = product of:
          0.028803186 = sum of:
            0.028803186 = weight(_text_:22 in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028803186 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge-containing documents and data about knowledge have been handled in stable environments by bureaucratic systems using very stable knowledge ontologies. These systems, though not always very effective in such environments, will become highly ineffective in environments where knowledge has to be updated and replaced frequently. Moreover, organizations in such dynamic environments also use knowledge from extemal resources extensively. This makes the development of a stable ontology for knowledge storage and retrieval particularly complicated. This paper describes eight context classes of knowledge ontology development and explores elements of a method for ontology development. These classes are based an the differences in contexts defined along three dimensions: knowledge dynamics, complexity and social dispersion. Ontology development matches these contexts and ontology needs defined by (logical and social) structure and ontology maturity. The classification framework and methodology are applied to two cases. The first case illustrates a descriptive use of our framework to characterize ontology development in an academic environment. The second case illustrates a normative use of our framework. The method proposed seemed to be empirically valid and rich and be useful for detecting options for ontology improvement.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  12. Krebs, R.: ¬Die Rolle von Informationssystemen im Konzern : Verflechtung, Kooperation, Koordination (1993) 0.02
    0.018517707 = product of:
      0.09258853 = sum of:
        0.09258853 = product of:
          0.13888279 = sum of:
            0.069755144 = weight(_text_:29 in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069755144 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
            0.06912764 = weight(_text_:22 in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912764 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.29-56
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  13. Pemberton, J.M.: ¬The information economy : a context for records and information management (1995) 0.02
    0.016139356 = product of:
      0.080696784 = sum of:
        0.080696784 = weight(_text_:context in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080696784 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.45792344 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Grupp, H.; Schmoch, U.; Koschatzky, K.: Science and technology infrastructure in Baden-Wuertemberg and its orientation towards future regional development (1998) 0.02
    0.015834149 = product of:
      0.03958537 = sum of:
        0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027959513 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
        0.011625858 = product of:
          0.034877572 = sum of:
            0.034877572 = weight(_text_:29 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034877572 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article deals with technological and innovation processes, and the economic benefits in a region with open borderlines as part of a national innovation and economic system. Innovations and technologies compete for resources in an environment characterized by economic scarcity. Ultimately, the technology most suited to the times and the regional conditions triumphs. The article focuses the (present) innovative structures in industry in a selected region of Germany (i.e., the federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg) and provides new scientometric data on the (present) contribution of public institutions to technological development in the region under scutiny. This article concludes with a synopsis of present structures and a new information database on future technologies, thereby pointing out the regional challenges originating from structural change
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.1, S.18-29
  15. Kessels, J.: Knowledge productivity and the corporate curriculum (1996) 0.02
    0.015431422 = product of:
      0.07715711 = sum of:
        0.07715711 = product of:
          0.115735665 = sum of:
            0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05812929 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
            0.057606373 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057606373 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2002 17:06:29
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  16. Lewin, K.; Sprehe, J.T.: Information management in federal agencies : the neglected piece of the IRM puzzle (1996) 0.01
    0.01491174 = product of:
      0.0745587 = sum of:
        0.0745587 = weight(_text_:system in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0745587 = score(doc=4406,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents several examples of US federal agencies' attempts to cope with information management issues to highlight the importance of managing information as a corporate resource. These include: the Dept. of Defense's Corporate Information Management Programme; the Federal Aviation Administration's Operational Data Management System; and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Earth Observing System Data and Information System. Highlights aspects of these information management activities that demonstrate differential agency responses to system development needs and requirements
  17. Workflow management systems and interoperability (1998) 0.01
    0.01491174 = product of:
      0.0745587 = sum of:
        0.0745587 = weight(_text_:system in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0745587 = score(doc=817,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This book addresses recent advances in workflow management systems. Based on a NATO workshop held in 1997, it is an integrated collection of papers by leading international researchers. Topics emphasized include interoperability, Internet technologies to improve system capabilities, scalable and dynamic cooperation technologies, and workflow system prototypes
    RSWK
    Prozessmanagement / Anwendungssystem / Verteiltes System / Kongress / Istanbul <1997> (23145) (32145)
    Subject
    Prozessmanagement / Anwendungssystem / Verteiltes System / Kongress / Istanbul <1997> (23145) (32145)
  18. McPherson, P.K.: Information mastery (1995) 0.01
    0.012913945 = product of:
      0.06456973 = sum of:
        0.06456973 = weight(_text_:system in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06456973 = score(doc=2606,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the relationship between information management and information mastery. Defines the informatic system as that which is made up of all the processes of information handling and knowledge work within an organization. Information mastery involves more than good information management: it also encompasses human networking and thoughts. Examines the domain for information mastery and sets out the requirements for an informatic system that will deliver information mastery. It is the quality of the informatic system that gives the value added and determines the business's competitiveness and long term survival
  19. Bauwens, M.: Knowledge transfer in cyberspace : a model for future business practices (1996) 0.01
    0.0129114855 = product of:
      0.064557426 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes the different knowledge transfer practices that will dominate besiness and organizations in the next few years. Discusses cyberspace and the trend towards virtualization and sets out the differences between data, information, knowledge, intelligence, and wisdom. Describes the context of external cyberspace and the Internet, and dealing with a surplus of information. Discusses internal cyberspace and the use of forums, and addresses the question of the virtualization of paper based information centres
  20. King, L.A.: Records management as a strategic business function (1997) 0.01
    0.0129114855 = product of:
      0.064557426 = sum of:
        0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064557426 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses whether records management should be considered a strategic business function. Drawing on considerable experience in large chemical company, attempts to analyse why the records management function did not appear to be valued in the same way as other resource based functions in that context. Explains why records management should be treated as a strategic function and suggests ways of achieving this

Languages

  • e 82
  • d 23
  • nl 1
  • s 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 92
  • s 13
  • m 6
  • el 1
  • More… Less…