Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Chen, H."
  1. Schatz, B.R.; Johnson, E.H.; Cochrane, P.A.; Chen, H.: Interactive term suggestion for users of digital libraries : using thesauri and co-occurrence lists for information retrieval (1996) 0.35
    0.34913033 = product of:
      0.4189564 = sum of:
        0.16631734 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16631734 = score(doc=6417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.6208447 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
        0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097459 = score(doc=6417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
        0.15233864 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15233864 = score(doc=6417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.5941817 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
        0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056475073 = score(doc=6417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
        0.034079477 = product of:
          0.068158954 = sum of:
            0.068158954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068158954 = score(doc=6417,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.21
    0.21250707 = product of:
      0.2550085 = sum of:
        0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09979041 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
        0.015471136 = weight(_text_:in in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015471136 = score(doc=5202,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
        0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09140319 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
        0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033885043 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
        0.014458697 = product of:
          0.028917395 = sum of:
            0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028917395 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  3. Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Houston, A.L.: Semantic indexing and searching using a Hopfield net (1998) 0.21
    0.20936035 = product of:
      0.25123242 = sum of:
        0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09979041 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=5704,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
        0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09140319 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
        0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033885043 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
        0.014458697 = product of:
          0.028917395 = sum of:
            0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028917395 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a neural network approach to document semantic indexing. Reports results of a study to apply a Hopfield net algorithm to simulate human associative memory for concept exploration in the domain of computer science and engineering. The INSPEC database, consisting of 320.000 abstracts from leading periodical articles was used as the document test bed. Benchmark tests conformed that 3 parameters: maximum number of activated nodes; maximum allowable error; and maximum number of iterations; were useful in positively influencing network convergence behaviour without negatively impacting central processing unit performance. Another series of benchmark tests was performed to determine the effectiveness of various filtering techniques in reducing the negative impact of noisy input terms. Preliminary user tests conformed expectations that the Hopfield net is potentially useful as an associative memory technique to improve document recall and precision by solving discrepancies between indexer vocabularies and end user vocabularies
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Chen, H.; Lally, A.M.; Zhu, B.; Chau, M.: HelpfulMed : Intelligent searching for medical information over the Internet (2003) 0.18
    0.17943853 = product of:
      0.21532625 = sum of:
        0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08315867 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.0068913912 = weight(_text_:in in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068913912 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07616932 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028237537 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.020869333 = product of:
          0.041738667 = sum of:
            0.041738667 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041738667 = score(doc=1615,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Medical professionals and researchers need information from reputable sources to accomplish their work. Unfortunately, the Web has a large number of documents that are irrelevant to their work, even those documents that purport to be "medically-related." This paper describes an architecture designed to integrate advanced searching and indexing algorithms, an automatic thesaurus, or "concept space," and Kohonen-based Self-Organizing Map (SOM) technologies to provide searchers with finegrained results. Initial results indicate that these systems provide complementary retrieval functionalities. HelpfulMed not only allows users to search Web pages and other online databases, but also allows them to build searches through the use of an automatic thesaurus and browse a graphical display of medical-related topics. Evaluation results for each of the different components are included. Our spidering algorithm outperformed both breadth-first search and PageRank spiders an a test collection of 100,000 Web pages. The automatically generated thesaurus performed as well as both MeSH and UMLS-systems which require human mediation for currency. Lastly, a variant of the Kohonen SOM was comparable to MeSH terms in perceived cluster precision and significantly better at perceived cluster recall.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: "Web retrieval and mining: A machine learning perspective"
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Dumais, S.; Chen, H.: Hierarchical classification of Web content (2000) 0.06
    0.06018027 = product of:
      0.12036054 = sum of:
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067770086 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.040895373 = product of:
          0.081790745 = sum of:
            0.081790745 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081790745 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 23rd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed. by N.J. Belkin, P. Ingwersen u. M.K. Leong
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Chen, H.; Dhar, V.: Cognitive process as a basis for intelligent retrieval system design (1991) 0.02
    0.016968077 = product of:
      0.05090423 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
        0.04310751 = product of:
          0.08621502 = sum of:
            0.08621502 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08621502 = score(doc=3845,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    2 studies were conducted to investigate the cognitive processes involved in online document-based information retrieval. These studies led to the development of 5 computerised models of online document retrieval. These models were incorporated into a design of an 'intelligent' document-based retrieval system. Following a discussion of this system, discusses the broader implications of the research for the design of information retrieval sysems
  7. Chen, H.; Shankaranarayanan, G.; She, L.: ¬A machine learning approach to inductive query by examples : an experiment using relevance feedback, ID3, genetic algorithms, and simulated annealing (1998) 0.02
    0.015933923 = product of:
      0.04780177 = sum of:
        0.015471136 = weight(_text_:in in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015471136 = score(doc=1148,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
        0.032330632 = product of:
          0.064661264 = sum of:
            0.064661264 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064661264 = score(doc=1148,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval using probabilistic techniques has attracted significant attention on the part of researchers in information and computer science over the past few decades. In the 1980s, knowledge-based techniques also made an impressive contribution to 'intelligent' information retrieval and indexing. More recently, information science researchers have tfurned to other newer inductive learning techniques including symbolic learning, genetic algorithms, and simulated annealing. These newer techniques, which are grounded in diverse paradigms, have provided great opportunities for researchers to enhance the information processing and retrieval capabilities of current information systems. In this article, we first provide an overview of these newer techniques and their use in information retrieval research. In order to femiliarize readers with the techniques, we present 3 promising methods: the symbolic ID3 algorithm, evolution-based genetic algorithms, and simulated annealing. We discuss their knowledge representations and algorithms in the unique context of information retrieval
  8. Chen, H.: Machine learning for information retrieval : neural networks, symbolic learning, and genetic algorithms (1994) 0.02
    0.015184413 = product of:
      0.045553237 = sum of:
        0.011816275 = weight(_text_:in in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011816275 = score(doc=2657,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
        0.033736963 = product of:
          0.067473926 = sum of:
            0.067473926 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067473926 = score(doc=2657,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In the 1980s, knowledge-based techniques also made an impressive contribution to 'intelligent' information retrieval and indexing. More recently, researchers have turned to newer artificial intelligence based inductive learning techniques including neural networks, symbolic learning, and genetic algorithms grounded on diverse paradigms. These have provided great opportunities to enhance the capabilities of current information storage and retrieval systems. Provides an overview of these techniques and presents 3 popular methods: the connectionist Hopfield network; the symbolic ID3/ID5R; and evaluation based genetic algorithms in the context of information retrieval. The techniques are promising in their ability to analyze user queries, identify users' information needs, and suggest alternatives for search and can greatly complement the prevailing full text, keyword based, probabilistic, and knowledge based techniques
  9. Zhu, B.; Chen, H.: Validating a geographical image retrieval system (2000) 0.02
    0.015181556 = product of:
      0.04554467 = sum of:
        0.010128236 = weight(_text_:in in 4769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010128236 = score(doc=4769,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4769, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4769)
        0.03541643 = product of:
          0.07083286 = sum of:
            0.07083286 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07083286 = score(doc=4769,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4769, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper summarizes a prototype geographical image retrieval system that demonstrates how to integrate image processing and information analysis techniques to support large-scale content-based image retrieval. By using an image as its interface, the prototype system addresses a troublesome aspect of traditional retrieval models, which require users to have complete knowledge of the low-level features of an image. In addition we describe an experiment to validate against that of human subjects in an effort to address the scarcity of research evaluating performance of an algorithm against that of human beings. The results of the experiment indicate that the system could do as well as human subjects in accomplishing the tasks of similarity analysis and image categorization. We also found that under some circumstances texture features of an image are insufficient to represent an geographic image. We believe, however, that our image retrieval system provides a promising approach to integrating image processing techniques and information retrieval algorithms
  10. Qin, J.; Zhou, Y.; Chau, M.; Chen, H.: Multilingual Web retrieval : an experiment in English-Chinese business intelligence (2006) 0.01
    0.013659408 = product of:
      0.040978223 = sum of:
        0.016880395 = weight(_text_:in in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016880395 = score(doc=5054,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
        0.02409783 = product of:
          0.04819566 = sum of:
            0.04819566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04819566 = score(doc=5054,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    As increasing numbers of non-English resources have become available on the Web, the interesting and important issue of how Web users can retrieve documents in different languages has arisen. Cross-language information retrieval (CLIP), the study of retrieving information in one language by queries expressed in another language, is a promising approach to the problem. Cross-language information retrieval has attracted much attention in recent years. Most research systems have achieved satisfactory performance on standard Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) collections such as news articles, but CLIR techniques have not been widely studied and evaluated for applications such as Web portals. In this article, the authors present their research in developing and evaluating a multilingual English-Chinese Web portal that incorporates various CLIP techniques for use in the business domain. A dictionary-based approach was adopted and combines phrasal translation, co-occurrence analysis, and pre- and posttranslation query expansion. The portal was evaluated by domain experts, using a set of queries in both English and Chinese. The experimental results showed that co-occurrence-based phrasal translation achieved a 74.6% improvement in precision over simple word-byword translation. When used together, pre- and posttranslation query expansion improved the performance slightly, achieving a 78.0% improvement over the baseline word-by-word translation approach. In general, applying CLIR techniques in Web applications shows promise.
  11. Chen, H.: Introduction to the JASIST special topic section on Web retrieval and mining : A machine learning perspective (2003) 0.01
    0.013504779 = product of:
      0.040514335 = sum of:
        0.015471136 = weight(_text_:in in 1610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015471136 = score(doc=1610,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1610, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1610)
        0.0250432 = product of:
          0.0500864 = sum of:
            0.0500864 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0500864 = score(doc=1610,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 1610, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Research in information retrieval (IR) has advanced significantly in the past few decades. Many tasks, such as indexing and text categorization, can be performed automatically with minimal human effort. Machine learning has played an important role in such automation by learning various patterns such as document topics, text structures, and user interests from examples. In recent years, it has become increasingly difficult to search for useful information an the World Wide Web because of its large size and unstructured nature. Useful information and resources are often hidden in the Web. While machine learning has been successfully applied to traditional IR systems, it poses some new challenges to apply these algorithms to the Web due to its large size, link structure, diversity in content and languages, and dynamic nature. On the other hand, such characteristics of the Web also provide interesting patterns and knowledge that do not present in traditional information retrieval systems.
  12. Huang, Z.; Chung, Z.W.; Chen, H.: ¬A graph model for e-commerce recommender systems (2004) 0.01
    0.012395689 = product of:
      0.037187066 = sum of:
        0.00826967 = weight(_text_:in in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00826967 = score(doc=501,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
        0.028917395 = product of:
          0.05783479 = sum of:
            0.05783479 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05783479 = score(doc=501,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information overload on the Web has created enormous challenges to customers selecting products for online purchases and to online businesses attempting to identify customers' preferences efficiently. Various recommender systems employing different data representations and recommendation methods are currently used to address these challenges. In this research, we developed a graph model that provides a generic data representation and can support different recommendation methods. To demonstrate its usefulness and flexibility, we developed three recommendation methods: direct retrieval, association mining, and high-degree association retrieval. We used a data set from an online bookstore as our research test-bed. Evaluation results showed that combining product content information and historical customer transaction information achieved more accurate predictions and relevant recommendations than using only collaborative information. However, comparisons among different methods showed that high-degree association retrieval did not perform significantly better than the association mining method or the direct retrieval method in our test-bed.
  13. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.01
    0.011616139 = product of:
      0.034848414 = sum of:
        0.015471136 = weight(_text_:in in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015471136 = score(doc=2733,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
        0.01937728 = product of:
          0.03875456 = sum of:
            0.03875456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03875456 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    While the Web has grown significantly in recent years, some portions of the Web remain largely underdeveloped, as shown in a lack of high-quality content and functionality. An example is the Arabic Web, in which a lack of well-structured Web directories limits users' ability to browse for Arabic resources. In this research, we proposed an approach to building Web directories for the underdeveloped Web and developed a proof-of-concept prototype called the Arabic Medical Web Directory (AMedDir) that supports browsing of over 5,000 Arabic medical Web sites and pages organized in a hierarchical structure. We conducted an experiment involving Arab participants and found that the AMedDir significantly outperformed two benchmark Arabic Web directories in terms of browsing effectiveness, efficiency, information quality, and user satisfaction. Participants expressed strong preference for the AMedDir and provided many positive comments. This research thus contributes to developing a useful Web directory for organizing the information in the Arabic medical domain and to a better understanding of how to support browsing on the underdeveloped Web.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
  14. Chen, H.; Ng, T.D.; Martinez, J.; Schatz, B.R.: ¬A concept space approach to addressing the vocabulary problem in scientific information retrieval : an experiment on the Worm Community System (1997) 0.01
    0.011253983 = product of:
      0.03376195 = sum of:
        0.012892614 = weight(_text_:in in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012892614 = score(doc=6492,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
        0.020869333 = product of:
          0.041738667 = sum of:
            0.041738667 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041738667 = score(doc=6492,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This research presents an algorithmic approach to addressing the vocabulary problem in scientific information retrieval and information sharing, using the molecular biology domain as an example. We first present a literature review of cognitive studies related to the vocabulary problem and vocabulary-based search aids (thesauri) and then discuss techniques for building robust and domain-specific thesauri to assist in cross-domain scientific information retrieval. Using a variation of the automatic thesaurus generation techniques, which we refer to as the concept space approach, we recently conducted an experiment in the molecular biology domain in which we created a C. elegans worm thesaurus of 7.657 worm-specific terms and a Drosophila fly thesaurus of 15.626 terms. About 30% of these terms overlapped, which created vocabulary paths from one subject domain to the other. Based on a cognitve study of term association involving 4 biologists, we found that a large percentage (59,6-85,6%) of the terms suggested by the subjects were identified in the cojoined fly-worm thesaurus. However, we found only a small percentage (8,4-18,1%) of the associations suggested by the subjects in the thesaurus
  15. Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009) 0.01
    0.00997684 = product of:
      0.029930517 = sum of:
        0.0137827825 = weight(_text_:in in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0137827825 = score(doc=2753,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
        0.016147735 = product of:
          0.03229547 = sum of:
            0.03229547 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03229547 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:50:30
  16. Ramsey, M.C.; Chen, H.; Zhu, B.; Schatz, B.R.: ¬A collection of visual thesauri for browsing large collections of geographic images (1999) 0.01
    0.009561586 = product of:
      0.028684758 = sum of:
        0.011816275 = weight(_text_:in in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011816275 = score(doc=3922,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
        0.016868481 = product of:
          0.033736963 = sum of:
            0.033736963 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033736963 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Digital libraries of geo-spatial multimedia content are currently deficient in providing fuzzy, concept-based retrieval mechanisms to users. The main challenge is that indexing and thesaurus creation are extremely labor-intensive processes for text documents and especially for images. Recently, 800.000 declassified staellite photographs were made available by the US Geological Survey. Additionally, millions of satellite and aerial photographs are archived in national and local map libraries. Such enormous collections make human indexing and thesaurus generation methods impossible to utilize. In this article we propose a scalable method to automatically generate visual thesauri of large collections of geo-spatial media using fuzzy, unsupervised machine-learning techniques
  17. Leroy, G.; Chen, H.: Genescene: an ontology-enhanced integration of linguistic and co-occurrence based relations in biomedical texts (2005) 0.01
    0.0090146605 = product of:
      0.027043981 = sum of:
        0.010896247 = weight(_text_:in in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010896247 = score(doc=5259,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
        0.016147735 = product of:
          0.03229547 = sum of:
            0.03229547 = weight(_text_:22 in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03229547 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The increasing amount of publicly available literature and experimental data in biomedicine makes it hard for biomedical researchers to stay up-to-date. Genescene is a toolkit that will help alleviate this problem by providing an overview of published literature content. We combined a linguistic parser with Concept Space, a co-occurrence based semantic net. Both techniques extract complementary biomedical relations between noun phrases from MEDLINE abstracts. The parser extracts precise and semantically rich relations from individual abstracts. Concept Space extracts relations that hold true for the collection of abstracts. The Gene Ontology, the Human Genome Nomenclature, and the Unified Medical Language System, are also integrated in Genescene. Currently, they are used to facilitate the integration of the two relation types, and to select the more interesting and high-quality relations for presentation. A user study focusing on p53 literature is discussed. All MEDLINE abstracts discussing p53 were processed in Genescene. Two researchers evaluated the terms and relations from several abstracts of interest to them. The results show that the terms were precise (precision 93%) and relevant, as were the parser relations (precision 95%). The Concept Space relations were more precise when selected with ontological knowledge (precision 78%) than without (60%).
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:26:01
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue on bioinformatics
  18. Chen, H.: Semantic research for digital libraries (1999) 0.01
    0.008717926 = product of:
      0.026153777 = sum of:
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=1247,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
        0.014458697 = product of:
          0.028917395 = sum of:
            0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028917395 = score(doc=1247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this era of the Internet and distributed, multimedia computing, new and emerging classes of information systems applications have swept into the lives of office workers and people in general. From digital libraries, multimedia systems, geographic information systems, and collaborative computing to electronic commerce, virtual reality, and electronic video arts and games, these applications have created tremendous opportunities for information and computer science researchers and practitioners. As applications become more pervasive, pressing, and diverse, several well-known information retrieval (IR) problems have become even more urgent. Information overload, a result of the ease of information creation and transmission via the Internet and WWW, has become more troublesome (e.g., even stockbrokers and elementary school students, heavily exposed to various WWW search engines, are versed in such IR terminology as recall and precision). Significant variations in database formats and structures, the richness of information media (text, audio, and video), and an abundance of multilingual information content also have created severe information interoperability problems -- structural interoperability, media interoperability, and multilingual interoperability.
  19. Carmel, E.; Crawford, S.; Chen, H.: Browsing in hypertext : a cognitive study (1992) 0.01
    0.008631212 = product of:
      0.025893634 = sum of:
        0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 7469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097459 = score(doc=7469,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 7469, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7469)
        0.016147735 = product of:
          0.03229547 = sum of:
            0.03229547 = weight(_text_:22 in 7469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03229547 = score(doc=7469,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7469, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7469)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    With the growth of hypertext and multimedia applications that support and encourage browsing it is time to take a penetrating look at browsing behaviour. Several dimensions of browsing are exemined, to find out: first, what is browsing and what cognitive processes are associated with it: second, is there a browsing strategy, and if so, are there any differences between how subject-area experts and novices browse; and finally, how can this knowledge be applied to improve the design of hypertext systems. Two groups of students, subject-area experts and novices, were studied while browsing a Macintosh HyperCard application on the subject The Vietnam War. A protocol analysis technique was used to gather and analyze data. Components of the GOMS model were used to describe the goals, operators, methods, and selection rules observed: Three browsing strategies were identified: (1) search-oriented browse, scanning and and reviewing information relevant to a fixed task; (2) review-browse, scanning and reviewing intersting information in the presence of transient browse goals that represent changing tasks, and (3) scan-browse, scanning for interesting information (without review). Most subjects primarily used review-browse interspersed with search-oriented browse. Within this strategy, comparisons between subject-area experts and novices revealed differences in tactics: experts browsed in more depth, seldom used referential links, selected different kinds of topics, and viewed information differently thatn did novices. Based on these findings, suggestions are made to hypertext developers
    Source
    IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics. 22(1992) no.5, S.865-884
  20. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.01
    0.008195978 = product of:
      0.024587933 = sum of:
        0.008440197 = weight(_text_:in in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008440197 = score(doc=5276,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
        0.016147735 = product of:
          0.03229547 = sum of:
            0.03229547 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03229547 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapid proliferation of Internet technologies and applications, misuse of online messages for inappropriate or illegal purposes has become a major concern for society. The anonymous nature of online-message distribution makes identity tracing a critical problem. We developed a framework for authorship identification of online messages to address the identity-tracing problem. In this framework, four types of writing-style features (lexical, syntactic, structural, and content-specific features) are extracted and inductive learning algorithms are used to build feature-based classification models to identify authorship of online messages. To examine this framework, we conducted experiments on English and Chinese online-newsgroup messages. We compared the discriminating power of the four types of features and of three classification techniques: decision trees, backpropagation neural networks, and support vector machines. The experimental results showed that the proposed approach was able to identify authors of online messages with satisfactory accuracy of 70 to 95%. All four types of message features contributed to discriminating authors of online messages. Support vector machines outperformed the other two classification techniques in our experiments. The high performance we achieved for both the English and Chinese datasets showed the potential of this approach in a multiple-language context.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37

Types

  • a 61
  • el 1
  • More… Less…